Do you want mages to try assassinating us? Because that's how you get Magnostadt's ruling class to attack. They're already backstabbing each other:
Claiming to be immortal and invincible is
also a way to invite Magnostadt's ruling class to attack, from that kind of paranoid point of view. Because a person who walks their streets claiming to be an invincible immortal is
exactly the kind of person they should all gang up on and try to take down right away. You don't say shit like that if you don't plan to start throwing your weight around.
Both are perks of divinity. Sigurd explicitly stated that with more worship, Jade will be able to exist without a mortal vessel and gain abilities according to her domain. If you consider it wrong to set them in context to worship (although my argument only implies and never explicitly states that she got them through worship), I don't mind if Jade uses a different wording.
My concern in this matter is solely restricted to wanting Jade to not tell lies about things like this.
You completely ignore that he already accepts Magi as "more than powerful mages." Ergo, an analogue difference for gods deserves the same recognition.
I'm not so clear that Terry does feel that way. Then again, I may just be a bit hazy about how this plane works, and making mistakes accordingly.
I thought you didn't want to lie? That's a planeswalker ability, mere gods can't do that.
Fair enough; I got slack here and you are right to call me out on this. On the other hand, we know that on at least SOME of the planes, gods DO have access to alternate dimensions within their own planes of existence. The fact that our own abilities are of a rather higher order, given that Jade's divinity and her planeswalker spark are tied together
anyway, is a bit... well, it's complicated, but in the name of not misrepresenting anything maybe it had better be dropped.
3 is a lie, 4 implies a lie since the avatar creation is far more limited than "granting life." So do you think implied lies are acceptable or not? You both use and condemn them.
As noted, while gods generally can't planeswalk, they
do tend to have interdimensional ability within a given plane.
More to the point, what I'm getting at is that a reasonable definition of "god" would contain a big list of traits and say "a god must have the majority of these." Like, if a being was literally omniscient and omnipotent, as opposed to merely very powerful, it might be reasonable to call them a god even if they
can't grant their followers an afterlife or hear prayers. But the converse is also true; a being that can hear prayers and grant an afterlife might reasonably be called a god even if their power is 'merely' on par with that of the greatest mortal magicians to ever live.
"Ability to travel to other dimensions within this plane of existence, and/or to other planes of existence" is a trait we might reasonably add to the list of "things gods can do, that set them above mortals, because while a mortal MIGHT be able to do one of these if they really tried, it takes a god to be able to do a whole bunch of them."
It wasn't a lie, I just listed abilities we would have received through worship but already have through other means in the context of worship. Again, I don't mind at all if you want a wording that doesn't imply a falsehood.
Well, we could simply note that we
have these abilities. Conceptual immunity to fire being an obvious example; taking the Daenerys approach to demonstrating our special standing has its merits.