- Location
- Elsewhere
"And will you, to the best of your ability, protect him from harm?"
I have this hilarious image of Snape trying to protect Draco from Emotional Harm.
"And will you, to the best of your ability, protect him from harm?"
I will note that we only see two people explictly get love potioned in canon - Ron and Tom Riddle Senior.
Of those two, we only know about Ron's behavior while on the potion.
Considering how obviously monofocused he was, i don't think that could be called "subtle."
There's also the implied evidence leaning this way of Fred &George selling love potions. If love potions are loud and obvious that fits their style, they aren't really a subtle pair.
That could just be a sampling bias. As in no one found out about the subtle love potions. Perhaps all you need is a weaker one that encourages things without making you obsessive.I will note that we only see two people explictly get love potioned in canon - Ron and Tom Riddle Senior.
Of those two, we only know about Ron's behavior while on the potion.
Considering how obviously monofocused he was, i don't think that could be called "subtle."
There's also the implied evidence leaning this way of Fred &George selling love potions. If love potions are loud and obvious that fits their style, they aren't really a subtle pair.
There's also the implied evidence leaning this way of Fred &George selling love potions. If love potions are loud and obvious that fits their style, they aren't really a subtle pair.
Hmm, this wording I think is the only way out and depends on Voldemort's exact wording in his order to Draco, if there's any other orders he gave to Draco that could be interpreted this order in the vow instead, what the expiration date/deadline on the vow is (if there even is one), and if the magic of the Vow allows for technical loopholes like these or if the intent is more important than the wording."will you carry out the deed that the Dark Lord has ordered Draco to perform?"
Consider that Hogwarts puts 16-17-18 year olds of both genders in proximity for extended period of time.
The only real questions are how the vow and snape will react to various degrees of force directed at Draco and how he and Dumbledore will react to having their truly idiotic plot derailed.
Honestly, I'm surprised that Fred and George even put those up for sale. After all, I can think of a fair few ways that Love Potion could be used to steal a Family's wealth/Inheritance, and logically that sort of thing would be heavily controlled, if not outright illegal.I've always figured that it was either teenage stupidity and lack of consideration of the true consequences of their actions (because teenagers), or the 'love potions' just made people act as if there was a veela around -- AKA like Ron and Fleur in 4th year (my preferred interpretation).
I find this kind of 'logic' exasperating. "Let's assemble elaborate models of the world based on fractions of the text, and when they conflict with the rest of the text conclude that the problem is the text, not the model."Honestly, I'm surprised that Fred and George even put those up for sale. After all, I can think of a fair few ways that Love Potion could be used to steal a Family's wealth/Inheritance, and logically that sort of thing would be heavily controlled, if not outright illegal.
Honestly, I'm surprised that Fred and George even put those up for sale. After all, I can think of a fair few ways that Love Potion could be used to steal a Family's wealth/Inheritance, and logically that sort of thing would be heavily controlled, if not outright illegal.
I mean, it's definitely both. We have plenty of evidence of both the former (why didn't the time turners ever come up again besides "neville knocked all of time travel off a shelf") and the later, (just for starters, the house elf thing, but if you need more, the casual vacancy is pretty vile, ideologically speaking)Likely J K Rowling not thinking things through I am guessing or she just has a very weird sense of ethics.
Similar things to legal entailments like that? Probably, yeah, though one could question whether Sirius Black would even have inherited in that case.Inheritance has nothing to do with purebloods; it has to do with something important to the family in question, lands or money being the most common.
If X family has substantial holding of any kind, they take precautions to insure that those holdings stay in the family. My own Great grandfather made it a requirement in his will that whoever got the family ranch A. Could only sell it to a non family member after every member of the family had refused it and B. Whomever had the ranch had to have the same two clauses in their will.
In the wizard world, I'd assume they have similar things, and have to take precautions against inheritance theft.
I'd like to point out Love Potions get stronger if left to mature, and this is one Harry decided to go, "No, fuck that shit," and being dosed with it and then forgot about it. So it could have been more subtle if it hadn't strengthened with age.Of those two, we only know about Ron's behavior while on the potion.
@mp3.1415player has a few of these as one or two chapter crack-fics and they are hilarious. Like Harry being a parcelmouth so they use his ability to deliver nail bombs to all the known death eaters.Like in general, I'm wary of "I spent 10 seconds thinking and found an obvious hack that lets me TAKE OVER THE WORLD," being played straight since that way lies really shitty Isekai protags with their braindead cheats that apparently no one ever in existence ever came up with.
"Will you, Severus, watch over my son, Draco, as he attempts to fulfill the Dark Lord's wishes?"
"I will," said Snape. A thin tongue of brilliant flame issued from the wand and wound its way around their hands like a red-hot wire.
"And will you, to the best of your ability, protect him from harm?"
"I will," said Snape. A second tongue of flame shot from the wand and interlinked with the first, making a fine, glowing chain.
"And, should it prove necessary . . . if it seems Draco will fail . . ." whispered Narcissa (Snape's hand twitched within hers, but he did not draw away), "will you carry out the deed that the Dark Lord has ordered Draco to perform?"
Quoted direct from the book. Snape is bound by the vow to do what he can for Draco and kill Dumbles should it seem Draco is not up to the task.
The only real questions are how the vow and snape will react to various degrees of force directed at Draco and how he and Dumbledore will react to having their truly idiotic plot derailed.
That of course, is offset by people actually accepting (coughFudgecough) that Lucius was under it for years without anyone knowing.
Insufficient data that is Canon to determine the truth.
Question 1 | Question 2 | Question 3 | Result |
Yes | Yes | Not asked, given that they already answered they did so while not under the Imperius | Chuck 'em through the Veil for being lying liars who lie |
Yes | No | No | Same questions about the specific crimes they were accused off |
Yes | No | Yes | Chuck 'em in Azkaban for life |
No | Not asked, given that obviously this is also a no | Not asked in this case | Same questions about the specific crimes they were accused off |
"And, should it prove necessary . . . if it seems Draco will fail . . ." whispered Narcissa (Snape's hand twitched within hers, but he did not draw away), "will you carry out the deed that the Dark Lord has ordered Draco to perform?"