Now there is another idea for taylor and this time she could even use her native brocktonian experience…as a minor aside, some potions are addicting too, so you can't just go ham on them
I think list needs to be moderated from general list, to applicable for Taylor and co.
I recently went through that too, and i started low key shipping her with Sirius almost as soon as they started actually working together.So I've just finished reading intercession (post-GM Taylor ends up in HP, given baby Harry to watch over) and I'm starting to regret there was no Moody shipping considering she's like 30 by the time the plot starts...
edit: Yay bonding!
If canon didn't want me to rewrite it, it should have made coherent sense to begin with.
It was good to see Taylor and Hermione getting along. I was a little worried after the mess with Ginny and Molly, but if Taylor could get along with Ron and Hermione… well that would be one less thing to worry about this year.
I think list needs to be moderated from general list, to applicable for Taylor and co.
Number of potions have strongly overlapping effect of "heals minor wounds\abrasions", so in category "wat is obtainable in the moment".
- Anapneo Potion [SP] - potion against chocking seems of questionable utility, it's not like you can splash it on the victim.
- Burning Bitterroot Balm - no concrete info about what it does, besides being in healing category.
- Lung Clearing Potion - no source at all
- Replenishing Potion - no info on what it does
- Restoration Potion - technically not a healing potion, but counter-spell.
- Antidotes - usually taken after poison has effect, etc. Questionable if it's practical have it everlasting
- Baruffio's Brain Elixir - " that's a potion which doesn't work at the best of times"
- Bravery Charm Potion - seems to be game-mechanics element, not real lore potion
- Calming Draught - making mind-affecting stuff Everlasting seems unwise. Also more fits with Healing category.
- Confidence Boosting Brew - also questionable if making it Everlasting is safe.
- Dai Ryusaki's Mind-Enhancing Potion - not safe, not really accessible, unclear what it does besides enhancing Legimency.
- Draught of Peace - overlaps with Calming Draught
- Exstimulo Potion - designed to work on single spell. Amazingly broken if Everlasting it works.
- Focus Potion - pure game mechanics element
- Homenum Revelio Potion - When this spell was cast on a person it created an odd sensation. According to Harry Potter, it felt like "something was swooping low over him, immersing his body in its shadow". Probably of questionable use if you make it Everlasting
- Homonculous Charm - it's a spell that cast on the map, i don't see how you making it a potion
- Invigoration Draught - lots of conflicting lore and no clear info about what it specifically does
- Maxima Potion - pure game mechanics element
- Mopsus Potion - name and the art only from card game, any effect is speculation
- Potion of All Potential - not invented yet, also implied to be permanent effect, no need to be Everlasting
- Stealth Sensoring Spell - cast on an area, can't be made into potion
- Surgito (Disenchantment Charm) is a counterspell, belongs more in healing category, and can't be really made Everlasting
- Wisdom Potion - "it is unclear if a potion like this truly exists."
- Bundimun Pomade - way Taylor treats her hair is pretty opposite to using pomade
- Protego options - as spell creates forcefield, it's unclear if you can make potion that enhances clothing. On the other hand, twins made Shield Hat, so it's applicable in different way.
- Scourgify - when used on humans fill their mouth with soap, unclear why you want that in potion
- Sleekeazy's Hair Potion and Scalp Treatment - makes hair slick, also opposite of what Taylor prefers
"Dexterity draught" If you're using an American spelling checker, I can see where it would trip over that word. Americans spell it "draft" and it has nothing to do with a lack of rain.
"Dexterity draught" If you're using an American spelling checker I can see where it would trip over that word. Americans spell it "draft" and it has nothing to do with a lack of rain.
So 'droggit,' then?
...actually... There is such a thing as "drowning the opposition in too much data".Something like Hominem Revelio would either not be able to be made into a potion, as it is an AOE spell, or the potion would reveal the drinker to everyone around them, which is counterproductive.
I think she has a good knowledge of human depravity already doesn't need anymore.Wouldn't taylor be more the kind to keep the evils book ?at least to have an idea of what triks the other side can use and how defend against it ?,know your enemy and all that ?
...actually... There is such a thing as "drowning the opposition in too much data".
This would probably only be useful if Skitter is alone on the battlefield, but as we all know, that happens all the time.
Step one: Hominum Revelio potions a few places.
Step two: Let a hundred bugs (or more) drink as much potion as they can, then start chaotic evasive maneuvers. Repeat for each potion on the battlefield.
Step three: Everyone on the battlefield are now intimately aware of EXACTLY where those hundreds of dancing bugs (per potion) are. And are therefore also insanely distracted.
Step four: Abuse said distraction.
"Another one for the fire?" Ron asked scowling as he flipped pages through his own dusty tome.
"It's an in depth study on various ways to mentally break non magicals down into obedient slaves without resorting to the imperious curse." I answered flatly making my way to the shelves in search of something less likely to inspire me to commit murder.
Hermione muttered dire curses under her breath and Harry briefly closed his eyes before trying to focus on his own reading. Ron made a strangled sort of noise in the back of his throat before slamming his own book shut.
While I'd like to agree with you, odds are Malfoy and crew are not people you'd want to get to those books. So, would a mundane bank be a good place to cache them?I don't know if anyone in the scene would realistically have this perspective, but they shouldn't burn those books. Someday, if they succeed at changing the world, people may deny the reality of the past and the reasons for whatever changes and protections were put in place. Keeping proof of how bad things can get, no matter how gruesome and terrible, is important, IMO.
Why would a history denier be impressed by an alleged primary source like that?I don't know if anyone in the scene would realistically have this perspective, but they shouldn't burn those books. Someday, if they succeed at changing the world, people may deny the reality of the past and the reasons for whatever changes and protections were put in place. Keeping proof of how bad things can get, no matter how gruesome and terrible, is important, IMO.
It's the difference between the Age of Enlightenment and the Craft Guild Secrets views of the world? In the first, shared knowledge benefits everyone, in the second (craft) secrets (or family lore resources) are protected, hidden, hoarded?Why would a history denier be impressed by an alleged primary source like that?
I think they're pointing out that someone who denies history that happened in the first place won't care about the source you use
Yes, I don't understand how that would even be related considering the subject is destroying books, not hoarding them, and the other subject is people rejecting knowledge, not using it.I think they're pointing out that someone who denies history that happened in the first place won't care about the source you use
It's not a problem of Guilds versus Freely Shared Information
I'll take the argument no further than this, because it's literally just a real world holocaust argument we're reframing into this story, but I strongly disagree with this reasoning. I agree we shouldn't let ourselves get trapped in the weeds arguing with deniers about every minor detail of history that wasn't filmed simultaneously from six different angles by people who mutually hated each other. And that you can't really evidence someone out of a hardline denier position, because as you imply, they'll just claim every record is a lie - they don't have some rational analysis of the trustworthyness of each piece of evidence. But whether they matter to deniers or not, records like these matter. They help complete the narrative, painting a fuller picture with all the details. Deniers don't just claim "nothing happened", they minimize things, they claim certain people had no knowledge, they try to chip away anything they possibly can. And evidence can and does make a difference there. Unless it was an immediate choice between denying tools for harm to an enemy and keeping records around, any piece of the truth that they can protect from being clawed away by deniers and minimizers is worth it, and you can't possibly know which pieces of evidence will matter to history. If I'm being honest, though, I think truth is an end in and of itself for me, even if I'm not rationally analyzing the impact of keeping gruesome documents around. Humanity should face the truth of everything it is and does, good and bad.Why would a history denier be impressed by an alleged primary source like that?
Actually Rowling wrote Quidditch Through the Ages as an in-universe book for Comic Relief in 2001. To quote it on fouls:I bet the boy's favorite book 'Quidetch Through the Ages' would have a list of the ban ed drugs and the examples of their uses and why each was banned.
Rules are of course "made to be broken." Seven hundred Quidditch fouls are listed in the Department of Magical Games and Sports records, and all of them are known to have occurred during the final of the first ever World Cup in 1473. The full list of these fouls, however, has never been made available to the wizarding public. It is the Department's view that witches and wizards who see the list "might get ideas."
I was fortunate enough to gain access to the documents relating to these fouls while researching this book and can confirm that no public good can come of their publication. Ninety percent of the fouls listed are, in any case, impossible as long as the ban on using wands against
the opposing team is upheld (this ban was imposed in 1538). Of the remaining ten percent, it is safe to say that most would not occur to even the dirtiest player; for example, "setting fire to an opponent's broom tail," "attacking an opponent's broom with a club," "attacking an opponent with an axe."
The final between Transylvania and Flanders has gone down in history as the most violent of all time and many of the fouls then recorded had never been seen before – for instance, the transfiguration of a Chaser into a polecat, the attempted decapitation of a Keeper with a broadsword, and the release, from under the robes of the Transylvanian Captain, of a hundred blood-sucking vampire bats.
The first Bludgers (or "Blooders") were, as we have seen, flying rocks, and in Mumps's time they had merely progressed to rocks carved into the shape of balls. These had one important disadvantage, however: They could be cracked by the magically reinforced Beaters' bats of the fifteenth century, in which case all players would be pursued by flying gravel for the remainder of the game.