In America it is unlikely to be government agencies that get snoopy. More reporters running the story and spys of various types wanting to steal or buy our secret. In other words we will get used to people constantly following us who have a fairly clear idea what they can legally get away with the open artificial diamonds option.[X] Plan Magical Diamond in the Rough
Alright, fine. I didn't like the plan diamond mine in Africa but I liked the thought of snoopy government agencies meddling even less. And this one is solid anyway, so it gets my vote.
I think you're reaching. I appreciate that you try to pack as much as you can into your plans, but we don't want additional complications in our first attempt to set up some basic legal fictions to cover our operations.I am stealing most of it, and adding checking for magical properties of the land he'll be buying via the crown. Even if you don't want to combine diamonds and, say, mining Black Jade, we'd still be wise to check which property has some ancient burial ground or something, if only to avoid buying it.
[X] Plan Magical Diamond in the Rough
-[X] Ask Thomas to set up the diamond mining company as an entity in his name, to be used to sell our highest quality diamonds.
--[X] Have Thomas gather the list of properties for sale, then use the Crown on the list to arrange them starting from the one that has the most unclaimed and undiscovered supernatural power within its borders, including buried underneath it. Use the sales announcements of the properties to check what kind of magical power each one has.
—[X] Any diamond that isn't up to snuff should be stockpiled in Molly's room.
-[X] Ask Thomas to begin looking into the process of setting up a pair of jewelry supply companies, one somewhere outside the country that isn't interested in looking into foreign business and one in the US. The former of which at least should be as difficult as possible to trace to either of them.
—[X] Long term the goal is to launder the artificial diamonds through the overseas supply company to the local one, while very carefully paying all relevant taxes and avoiding lies on any part of the operation past the necessary deceptions on ownership and gem source. No need to invite trouble.
Yeah, but the thing is no one believes that unless they can see it. If we set up a company claiming to do something in a new non-dangerous way they're going to want to inspect the premises.Zoning regulations do not require you to reveal trade secrets. They just make sure you arent breaking any environmental rules.
You arent dumping stuff in the water, no emissions, arent drawing industrial amounts of power, no people harmed? Sure it might look strange, but noone actually has any grounds for complaint
I was addressing flat votes to put Molly in charge of such a company in her own name.Thats kinda why Thomas is the front person. And Whites do that kind of thing very well.
As for the rest, well:
Uh, no. You cannot bar regulators from the premises of a manufacturing concern.Yeah, but the thing is no one believes that unless they can see it. If we set up a company claiming to do something in a new non-dangerous way they're going to want to inspect the premises.
NDAs would be involved, but you can't just say you've invented something new and refuse entry when regulators ask if your enormous industrial presses or 3000 degree carbon plasma are a fire hazard.
Such a loophole makes it way too easy to tell regulators to screw off.
If we don't want to mess with a fake mine then I think we should just go with importing mixed gems from a wholesaler that we create abroad.
Oh, my bad.I was addressing flat votes to put Molly in charge of such a company in her own name.
There's also employee related issues (taxes and benefits) that could get the hairy eye of the government turned towards us.one is simply to claim some new process that makes artificial diamonds on the cheap, if not quite admitting how cheap or that the production line is the CEO. As long as you pay your taxes on what you sell the IRS isn't going to give a damn how you make the stones
You can't just say you don't if all prior industrial standards say you probably are. The EPA isn't going to take your word for it.Uh, no. You cannot bar regulators from the premises of a manufacturing concern.
However, if you do not claim that your manufacturing process involves industrial processes, high temperature plasmas or hazardous chemicals? Regulators can walk into a clean room and look all they want, certify you as compliant and walk away.
Probably has nothing to do with this.You can't just say you don't if all prior industrial standards say you probably are. The EPA isn't going to take your word for it.
State and federal regulators will rapidly lose patience with a company claiming to manufacture things that provides no address for their facilities. Especially if they clearly have products manufactured somewhere and refuse to give a plausible explanation for how they're doing it in defiance of how everyone else understands the process.
You can't just lie on a couple of registration forms and expect everyone to shrug it off once you've caught their attention.
That's basically the regulatory version of telling a cop "you can't do this to me". They can, and now that you're being annoying they're going to make a point about it.
Edit:
On the last bit; I'm not sure either, but a significant number of people are voting for it.
You're not wrong on aspects of this, where disagree is on the level of interest. If you're a decades old compost heap then no one cares, a brand new interesting thing won't get passed over the same way. Especially if someone decides to play games with us.Probably has nothing to do with this.
State or federal regulators cannot demand that your operation resemble those of other entities. They can demand inspection of your alleged place of manufacture, or take sensings from outside it. If they find nothing, they cant do nothing.
You have not imported any heavy industrial equipment.
You are not consuming industrial amounts of energy or water. There are no industrial emissions of chemicals, heat or noise. There is nothing to infract, and regulators have much bigger fish to fry.
The only reason they would go over and beyond would be if someone with influence was pushing them to, and we have (a) bureaucracy charm for that.
Seriously, I wish regulators were anywhere as rigorous or well-resourced as you think IRL.
I mean, look at this from 2013
Company put a freaking fertilizer storage facility with several hundred tons of ammonium nitrate in a town.West Fertilizer Company explosion - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
This place was last inspected in 1985.
12 people died when it blew up.
It STILL took 2 years after that for the Texas legislature to mandate that fire marshalls could demand to inspect such sites.
There's a reason why I said we could always rent or buy a property in Texas as a dodge.
I dont really agree.You're not wrong on aspects of this, where disagree is on the level of interest. If you're a decades old compost heap then no one cares, a brand new interesting thing won't get passed over the same way. Especially if someone decides to play games with us.
On the regulators specifically you're also right that they can't demand we do everything the way everyone else does, but real world physics is the lens they're going to operate through.
We can't demand that they do their inspections from the property line; they'll be able to demand entry to certain areas even if they can't mess with equipment. If someone pops in and thinks our facility looks fake then the response will be based on the assumption that we're lying and evading oversight. Which they hate and tend to try making examples off when it gets really blatant.
From 1967, an estimated two million carats of tanzanite were mined in Tanzania before the mines were nationalized by the Tanzanian government in 1971.
In 1990, the Tanzanian government split the tanzanite mines into four sections: Blocks A, B, C and D. Blocks A and C were awarded to large operators, while Blocks B and D were reserved for the local miners. In 2005 the government renewed the lease of Block C mine to TanzaniteOne, who paid US$40 million for their lease and mining license.[citation needed]
In June 2003, the Tanzanian government introduced legislation banning the export of unprocessed tanzanite to India. (Like many gemstones, most tanzanite is cut in Jaipur.) The reason for the ban is to attempt to spur development of local processing facilities, thereby boosting the economy and recouping profits. This ban was phased in over a two-year period, until which time only stones over 0.5 grams were affected.[citation needed] In 2010, the government of Tanzania banned the export of rough stones weighing more than one gram.[16]
TanzaniteOne Mining Ltd is owned by Richland Resources, but a 2010 law in Tanzania required them to cede 50% ownership of their mining license to the Tanzanian State Mining Company (Stamico). Production in 2011 amounted to 2,400,000 carats (480 kg; 1,100 lb), earning them $24 million.[17]
Following the construction of a 24 km (15 mi) perimeter wall around the mines, to improve security and prevent smuggling,[18] production rose from 147.7 kg (325.6 lb) in 2018 to a record 781.2 kg (1,722 lb) in 2019.[19]
Another selling point to this route is that it should be easy to dismantle when it's usefulness has run its course. The mine route puts us on so many different radars, we could be dealing with consequences from it for years to come.And frankly, on consideration, Im a little surprised at the idea that owning a foreign diamond mine is supposed to draw less attention than selling low numbers of artificial diamonds quietly wholesale and paying your taxes.
Is the person who sold the land to you going to have seller's remorse and take you to court when he hears you're getting diamonds? Or get together some local toughs to apply extrajudicial pressure? Will international diamond companies perk up and take notice to buy up land in the area and launch prospecting expeditions, under the reasoning that similar geology will also yield gemstones?
Seriously. This is less lowprofile than a US-based company, because we will come to the attention of the State Department and CIA, because resource geopolitics is very much in their wheelhouse. Not to mention every other major intelligence service and foreign ministry that tracks that sort of thing, in addition to international press and press in the country of operation.
Yeah, that makes up my mind.
I think I'd much rather deal with local regulators.
VOTE
[X] An innovative diamond creating start up, make high quality but obviously artificial diamonds
Imagine if we were making high-grade steel instead of diamonds. You could not just put scrap iron and steel plates into an empty warehouse and declare the smelting process to be proprietary.
Personally eventually I want to find a fire aspected node. And build a waste processing facility that turn trash into oil. It can be done just not in anyway at all economically.Imagine if we were making high-grade steel instead of diamonds. You could not just put scrap iron and steel plates into an empty warehouse and declare the smelting process to be proprietary.
That said post 2000 diamond trade regulation in real world are non-trivial as well.
We're talking about an incredibly small throughput that only needs to last until we get another source of income to use in our own name.And frankly, on consideration, Im a little surprised at the idea that owning a foreign diamond mine is supposed to draw less attention than selling low numbers of artificial diamonds quietly wholesale and paying your taxes.
Is the person who sold the land to you going to have seller's remorse and take you to court when he hears you're getting diamonds? Or get together some local toughs to apply extrajudicial pressure? Will international diamond companies perk up and take notice to buy up land in the area and launch prospecting expeditions, under the reasoning that similar geology will also yield gemstones?
Seriously. This is less lowprofile than a US-based company, because we will come to the attention of the State Department and CIA, because resource geopolitics is very much in their wheelhouse. Not to mention every other major intelligence service and foreign ministry that tracks that sort of thing, in addition to international press and press in the country of operation.
Yeah, that makes up my mind.
I think I'd much rather deal with local regulators.
VOTE
[X] An innovative diamond creating start up, make high quality but obviously artificial diamonds
They're not comparable. Forget the regulators.Imagine if we were making high-grade steel instead of diamonds. You could not just put scrap iron and steel plates into an empty warehouse and declare the smelting process to be proprietary.
That said post 2000 diamond trade regulation in real world are non-trivial as well.
Not possible in this cosmology.Personally eventually I want to find a fire aspected node. And build a waste processing facility that turn trash into oil. It can be done just not in anyway at all economically.
I am reasonably comfortable with our ability to avoid the overburdened regulatory apparatus of the US and domestic journalistic scrutiny. I am not at all comfortable with our current ability to elude the diplomatic corps and natsec apparatus of every G20 nationstate out there if we draw their attention by getting involved in alleged diamond mines in the Third World.We're talking about an incredibly small throughput that only needs to last until we get another source of income to use in our own name. Molly would attract way too much attention doing either of these things, but Thomas Raith is the sort of person who it makes sense to have tried this sort of stuff from an outside perspective.
If he thinks he can work the legal aspects of it for at least a few months then that's all we need. In a way all that meddling is a good thing for us, since none of our diamonds are actually in the ground and we need an excuse to shut things down at some point.
Once we've laundered enough gems to get to our next proper income stream we can just shut down because the mine played out/the political situation grew too volatile.
The problem with the artificial stuff is the highly significant claim we'll be setting up and backing that leads right back to us.
People in and out of government would give a shit about a process that can grow diamonds in a suburban garage without 3000 degree carbon plasma or vats of variably unhealthy materials.
So Google earth sees a hole. Holes are not hard to make or find.Plus, Google Earth has been a thing at this point since 2001.
Dont even need to buy dedicated satellite imagery to check out a sight on the ground, though you can if you want.