Jon Chung
=][=
I don't think I understand what you are saying here. If the tight-coupling you are talking about is how spending WP to resist social makes you weaker in combat, then sorta?
Yes, precisely that. In 2E, spending WP to resist social makes you weaker in combat (to the point of dead-man-walking at 0), and you therefore react to situations where you're being forced to spend WP differently to what you would otherwise do. The incentive structure the game is giving you is encouraging you to do things that don't make narrative or real-life sense.
Like, let's take your example about being pitched at to invest into things, being run out of WP then promptly being killed in battle. You assume this won't happen, but think about this from a perspective where the GM isn't going to proactively ensure that it doesn't, and that issue can and will happen - we are letting whatever is system-legal happen. Do you treat the badgering about investment into people's trading caravans differently given this knowledge? That coupling makes "Situation in which I am being convinced but resisting with my willpower" logically equivalent to "Situation in which I am being drained of my combat lifebar".
There's also "Situation in which I am being drained of the ability to resist any social orders at all from anyone telling me to do anything", which is related. Eg, you get drained to zero in the investor meeting, walk out, and until you get your WP back, anyone can talk you into doing almost anything.
Last edited: