- Location
- Spain
I have to admit it still feels a bit disjointed to me, in the sense that it seemingly leads to anchors/authority springing from nowhere.
Like, we have two Solars.
On their own they can't cast spell X because they have no free anchors. Thus they forge an alliance with each other. They sign contracts, swear oaths and hold a feast.
Now suddenly for some reason one or even two anchors were created and can be used to cast sorcery. So, uh, what really changed? You can apparently "borrow" the authority of your ally to cast sorcery, but it is quite obvious that this authority never existed in the first place. Your ally could not in fact cast that sorcery/call upon that authority to that extent before your alliance, yet suddenly it springs from nowhere, having been artificially stretched.
Sure, you say that it is the connection that carries the metaphysical weight, but it just does not feel that way to me.
It feels just as weird with gods and demons:
You can, by invoking the name of your drinking buddy Takehaya-Susano'o-Totally-not-the-Japanese-one call forth storms, but he can not use that particular bit of authority (because it did not exist) and has to anchor his own spell to something else?
If Susano'o has ten drinking buddies who are sorcerers, can his authority be stretched so far as to support 11 storm-sorceries? What about 50, 100 or even, in some mad, eternal Revel, 1000 [1]?
You can use Ligier's tutelage to call upon infernal sorcery, and yet to do the same, he himself must call upon something else, even though he himself is really the source of that power, because even so he can only use his nature to anchor one singular sorcery. [2]
Uh, they can use their core nature as an anchor, right? There is no way Ligier could not use himself as an anchor for Nuclear Hellfire based spells in my eyes.
Due to the rather nebulous nature of connections it seems as if the perceived authority of the benefactor is artificially inflated or shrunk, depending on ones perspective.
The anchor system in it's current form is basically a hack. It takes a it of mechanics (Background dots) and uses in a way that was never intended. So, honestly, it doesn't make much sense.
Backgrounds are a PC thing meant to balance their starting resources. The moment you start treating them like real things, weird thing happens. Like, the king of a country can anchor a spell in it's authority (Backing). Which, ok, i get that. He can also name a first minister, that then can anchor a spell as well. (Status). Etc etc.
The whole system generalizes too much for my taste. You can use basically anything as an anchor, even things that you can really spent nor suspend (Your army won't stop existing if you use them as an anchor, duh, nor your allies will).