If you're going to make calls about how everyone feels about a thing it's not outrageous to mention someone who really does not. You're opening the topic to discussion, yeah?

I really do not have the energy or patience to listen to a cis dude talk about they think their trans friend feels.

If you go back and read my post...

Trans people are also often fans of works, worlds, and settings where it is possible to alter yourself in order to become the person you want to be. It's a running theme in our lives.

I never say all trans people feel the way I do about cyberpunk or that all of them even like cyberpunk. It's about settings that allow or self-alteration and self-actualization, something that shows up in some cyberpunk works. And explains why I like cyberpunk despite it being a dystopian capitalist hellscape.

So no, I didn't open that door.
 
I really do not have the energy or patience to listen to a cis dude talk about they think their trans friend feels.

It's hardly what I think, thank you very much. We've been close friends for over twenty years. I don't expect you to know that, but friends talk. Regardless I apologise for suggesting you were attempting to speak for everyone, that was my bad. But my overall point remains.
 








Edit: Ah nevermind I see someone already beat me to it.
 
Last edited:
Hope balance wouldn't be too balanced, going completely cyber to surpass other people and limit was what draw me to tech punk. Or mod support, either or.
 
How does Humanity wok on tabletop and how did players balance that with bionics? Is it possible for a late game player not to have any bionics at all and still be viable?

Basically you had the Humanity stat, which was your Empathy (social stat for dealing with individual people rather than crowds and media) times 10. Getting augmented (generally) subtracted from this, and if you hit 0 Humanity you went loco. Costs generally increased based on how drastic and traumatic the modifications were. Something that was done gradually and had minor effects, like a treatment regimen and genetic tweaks to become swole, could have humanity costs of 1 or even 0. On the flipside becoming a bulletproof war cyborg capable of benchpressing a car, running at highway speeds, and dodging bullets might cost you 42d6 Humanity, easily taking you from zero to psycho in no time flat.

There are, however, various ways to avoid this sort of thing. If you had the money to burn, you could go to specialized European clinics to halve the humanity loss. You could then have intensive psychological therapy to halve the humanity loss again. That would take a passes-for-human full body conversion cyborg, who would normally eat a hefty 16d6 humanity cost, to a pretty trivial 4d6. The book gave options for gradually gaining humanity via monitoring and outpatient psychotherapy in the core, which I assume most people just forgot about and/or assumed required the removal of all cybernetics (but note that only the full mental restructuring requires that).

As to being viable without cybernetics? The 'framework' combat augs like boosterware, smartgun links, skinweave, and muscle lace are just way too powerful for way too little a cost. Going minimalist is pretty viable-the main thing is getting the most reflex possible so you can avoid being shot (both by avoiding bullets and by shooting people flinging bullets your way first), and survive being shot (which can be done by being swole and having implant armor). So no, I'd say not really.
 
And importantly in CP2020, armor is important as fuck.

You can take 12 points of damage without risking death saves (and risking failing death saves), and headshots deal double damage after armor.

A very basic 9mm pistol, dealing 2d6+1 damage, has a decent chance of exceeding that number on a single shot on a body or limb hit, and are very likely to exceed that on a headshot.

Basic skinweave is SP12-that reduces incoming damage by 12. Now instead of having to worry about instantly dying from a pistol bullet to the head if you don't go outside with some sort of head protection (which is either obvious or relatively ineffectual), you're basically immune to that kind of thing. This also means that even relatively light body armor will make you effectively immune to most handguns and SMGs, with only heavy SMGs and assault rifles being an actual threat. Unless you're a full cyborg, you're not going to tank your way through a dozen guys shooting at you with AP rifles (but note that a combat full conversion is absolutely capable of eating an entire magazine of 20mm AP rifle fire and not giving a single fuck) but it lets you survive a lot more pain than someone who is solely relying on body armor, particularly if you get ambushed.
 
Let's put it this way: One of the most cyberpunk-characters I can imagine is a non-straight non-binary catgirl who shares their brain with several personalities, and who had their body appropriately modified to look like a catgirl, but also be able to present different faces on demand for the other personalities, and change other gendered aspects of it as any of them please.

I know someone like that in real life. Except they don't have any of the body mods, obviously, because the technology for them doesn't exist yet.
In a transhumanist story, they could just exist with the bodymods, and without any problems at all.
In a cyberpunk story, they'd have to struggle with being an outsider, with paying for all those mods, with some of those mods using proprietary software (so they better be or know a hacker), and all the soul-crushing corporate jobs instead demanding that they look like a white normative binary gendered supermodel. Oh and they'd fight the fucking system that does all that crap to them.

And yes, you should have people like that in cyberpunk stories. Because people like that exist in real life. So you can only do three things with them in your cyberpunk story:
- pretend they don't exist. But that's just straight-up erasure of people who actually exist, and obviously shitty.
- they exist, but society fully accepts them. But then you're more of a transhumanist story, aren't you?
- they exist, and they're outcasts, and thus at least adjacent to your protagonist. In other words, cyberpunk.

Why does it matter? Why do I want non-normative people in a cyberpunk game?
Well first of all because we exist. But also, because Cyberpunk is about outcasts fighting against the system - and guess who is least likely to be an outcast? Straight people, cisgendered people, neurotypical people, normative people. They still can be, but if they're the only people you're presenting in the role of societal outcast you're actively erasing the non-normative people who should also be there.


As for why I am making such a big fuzz about this:
Once you're saying that changing your body is inherently "profane", you're automatically alienating trans people. Who're actually doing that right now, in real life. So if that is actually what they're going with, in the game, as a central theme - without all the nuance talked about here already, which might simply be missing from current releases - then there's very little chance the game is actually going to contain trans people in any relevant way.
And I'm also quite aware that way too much cyberpunk is using "changing your body is profane" as a central theme, and is also only using straight cisgendered protagonists, and just does a ton of other things that the genre just shouldn't do if it were actually Punk - and because Cyberpunk 2077 so far hasn't given any indication that it isn't doing all of these things.

Wow just wow. For starters yes you are correct if Cyberpunk was interested in honestly being what it pretends to be then sure there should be trans-people and other non-conforming to the mainstream standards outcasts. Just one problem: Cyberpunk has always been about White Men and their own anxieties/awe about future technologies.

As such you are not talking about Cybepunk in general you are talking about Cypherpunk Cyberpunk. There's an indie game called Dex that pretends to be the regular Noir Cyberpunk and then switches gears ever so slowly to end as a Cypherpunk Cyberpunk.

And yes Cypherpunk as a genre is a deconstruction of both Noir and it's need to center White Men in it's stories. If you want broader Cypherpunk works in other genres try the Provost's Dog trilogy and the Circle of Magic books by Tamora Pierce and Death Parade an anime by Madhouse from a few years back. Of the four works I've recommended here only Death Parade doesn't have non-straight and non-binary characters in it and Dex has a trans character as one of the main characters and yes it is spelled out in the main plot of the story that the character is trans without anyone having to say it by basically having in the game a skill set that is only usable by one gender because the technology that is being used for said skill is being tested on only one gender. Of course the parameters of the test mean that the gender in question is assigned at birth and not the actual gender of the test subjects so one of them is trans and is one of the main characters of the story.

Cyberpunk is very much about dystopia through technology as a means; that's the whole portmanteau. You can entirely reasonably have a cyberpunk setting which is a terrible anarchist mess just as much as one that's corporate controlled. Capitalism is just an easy way to do this but it's not the core of the idea.

In cases where it is anarchy that is causing the dystopia there is always anarchist capitalism in the setting and it is what keeps the dystopia dystopian.

Transgender people are literal transhumanism and cyberpunk made flesh. We use technology to alter our bodies in order to become closer to the selves we want to express to the world. Just because a lot of cyberpunk fans ignore our existence doesn't make us any less of a real presence in the fandom.

Trans people are also often fans of works, worlds, and settings where it is possible to alter yourself in order to become the person you want to be. It's a running theme in our lives.

Again you are talking about Cypherpunk and not Cyberpunk with it's it's Noir firmly centered on White Men most of the time.

hot take cyberpunk (any punk really) that ignores transgender folk is made by cowards

Accurate. More accurate would be to say that any punk made that ignores transgender folk (and their history in the movement) is made by overly anxious people who just want to explore their own sense of control and not any real world issues. After all anxiety is a paranoia of the different and the strange.

Ok. So back then, humanity/soul/whatever for that specific Cyberpunk game was meant to be a game-balance thing, as well as a theatrical thing. (If you watched Robocop, the other cyborgs that all went mad? That was a good part of what people believed in media of the time.) It was designed so that if you tried to push your luck, then you went mad/thought everyone else wasn't worth the same as you/lost your soul/etc, again depending on the game.

Honestly it was just stupidly done in many cases. I mean, you lost 'humanity' for replacing a toe or a finger. Having a medical implant that injected drugs, stuff that we have in real life right now. All of that counted against you.

It's clearly not needed, but you have to remember that back in the late 80's we had a strong swing in tabletop RPG's to limit player's abilities to derail games. White Wolf's d10 system was designed to make combat as hard as it could be, Call of Cthulhu was specifically designed to punish the players. (Sadly not even a joke) So I'm guessing that influenced the Humanity cost thing.

It was also before we started seeing anime and other media influences showing cybernetics as something that heroes and good guys used. I have to be honest, I'm glad that the general feel towards cybernetics became more positive.

Actually from my understanding the whole cybernetics eats your soul is a trope created by people bitter about Necromancy (the study of the dead and their deaths specifically to gain knowledge) being the one divination that has done genuine good in the world in the long term. There are plenty of various divinations in the world, but of the ones that purport to heal people only Necromancy has brought in any scientifically viable results. Or did you miss the part where our modern medicine is descended from what could be called a School of Necromancy?

It is historically more complicated than that of course as the scientific method and it's philosophical precursors have a long and storied history connected to the various concepts of divination, but in the modern day the societal consensus among most popular writers is that the modern day medicine is a type of Necromancy even if most of them never come out and fully say it.

I have a very close friend who is trans and I don't know that she feels any particular kinship with even Gunther Herman. I also think that framing cyberpunk as being a genre about altering yourself to become who you want to be somewhat presents a different picture than that painted by the works that exist in the genre. Adam Jensen's iconic line is I didn't ask for this and that's not some outlier. When we look at cyborgs in fiction they are typically either repairing a damaged body ala the Six Million Dollar Man or doing so in order to maintain competitive advantage in an employment environment made hellish by out of control capitalism. Not always, but it's one of the recurring features of cyberpunk stories.

That you identify with the promise posed by the technology is not outrageous, obviously. But the genre is not, and should not, be by nature positive. It's a critique of all too real shifts in the social landscape due to the growing power of corporations and the distorting effect of money on communities.

Also, this is somewhat more abstract, but I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the notion of voluntary cybernetics as being a source of personal disassociation. I am a transhumanist so I'm hardly opposed to self-modification and I personally really hope to see a day where the technology exists to repair sickness or bodily damage or whatever, but we're not talking about gradual means to achieve change. We're talking getting perfectly functionally limbs getting chopped off or internal organs getting pulled out in favour of industrial hardware. Hardware that is, in the end, just like any other piece of consumer electronics. We already live in world where planned obsolesence is rife. Your phone goes out of date a year after it's released. What if that was your heart? Part of your brain? Part of what makes cyberpunk so engaging is that knowledge, watching characters stuck in a loop of needing cutting edge cybernetics they can't afford just to stay relevant in the job market so they can afford more cutting edge cybernetics so they can continue to be relevant in the job market. The harrowing world of corporate extravagance. Of capitalism out of control.

By that definition Cyberpunk as a genre is going to be deconstructed in the next 20 years into either a new genre or a new version of itself. Also you missed the point on the trans issue brought up: It's about the genre not having any trans characters even though in real life it is some trans-people that are already living in a form of Cyberpunk.

i mean i know cyberpunk is awful i'm fucking living it my dude. i live paycheck to paycheck and my complicated electronic devices are slowly moving towards their planned obsolescence. corporations are destroying the world, my state is constantly on fire, and there's not a lot of hope for the future. shit sucks. Capitalism is already of control. in fact trans people ar emore likely to be economically disadvantaged, unemployed, or underemployed.

also like, that doesn't mean i can't wish for technologies that would let me be happy and identify with the positive implications of such technology and dream of being a neon-haired hacker girl fighting the good fight against capitalism.

also 'i have a trans friend' is just as facile and flaccid as 'i have a black friend' maybe don't do that.

EDIT: honestly the more I think about it, the more angry I get about this post.

Well actually corporations aren't destroying the world nearly as much as they used to. This is a combination of reaching Late Stage Capitalism as a Global Society and activist actions that have forced corporations to curb some of their worst impulses. Of course the corporations won't go down without a fight and at this point it is clear that a lot of the really big ones need to be wiped of the face of Humanity as a whole to make this existence any kind of long term better.

If you're going to make calls about how everyone feels about a thing it's not outrageous to mention someone who really does not. You're opening the topic to discussion, yeah?

You are made a really bad argument with this post. Like racist grandpa levels of bad. Also missing the point of what is being talked about.

I really do not have the energy or patience to listen to a cis dude talk about they think their trans friend feels.

If you go back and read my post...



I never say all trans people feel the way I do about cyberpunk or that all of them even like cyberpunk. It's about settings that allow or self-alteration and self-actualization, something that shows up in some cyberpunk works. And explains why I like cyberpunk despite it being a dystopian capitalist hellscape.

So no, I didn't open that door.

It's hardly what I think, thank you very much. We've been close friends for over twenty years. I don't expect you to know that, but friends talk. Regardless I apologise for suggesting you were attempting to speak for everyone, that was my bad. But my overall point remains.

Just because you are friends with someone for twenty years doesn't mean that you know them inside and out. Like for fucks sake I'm 31 at this point and have lived with my sibling my whole life and the bastard still doesn't get most of what goes on inside my head. Also you only apologized for misunderstanding the original point, not for sticking your foot up your mouth.
 
Last edited:
I don't think any definition of Cyberpunk but your own has it being explicitly only about white dudes.

Maybe a lot of works in the genre have been about white guys, but that doesn't mean it definitionally has to be. That doesn't seem controversial, but maybe it is.
 
There's an argument, I think a good one, that cyberpunk is mainly rooted in noir cinema, and that being the case Humphrey Bogart is probably the archetypal cyberpunk protagonist. Not even a particular role he played, just literally Humphrey Bogart, in much the same way John Wayne is the archetypal western protagonist. But just as you didn't need to cast John Wayne to have a western, you don't need to cast Humphrey Bogart* and can instead expand the horizons of the genre.

*that said i would be up for a cyberpunk story where the protagonist is literally humphrey bogart, like he got frozen accidentally during filming for the big sleep and then gets defrosted a hundred years later, like that sherlock holmes cartoon
 
In cases where it is anarchy that is causing the dystopia there is always anarchist capitalism in the setting and it is what keeps the dystopia dystopian.
That's not the kind of anarchy being referred to (nobody calls ancaps anarchists, least of all anarchists!), but this need to push all of cyberpunk into a rage against capitalist is just boring. Capitalism is a great tool to use to talk about alienation, but the idea that it's the be all and end all is silly. The way technology enables our worst impulses, creates prisoner's dilemmas we constantly defect in, and end up showing the worst parts of our soul is the core of cyberpunk. Black Mirror's Nosedive is an excellent example of this; rip out our capitalism system, replace it with Likes and Welcome to Hell.

There's an argument, I think a good one, that cyberpunk is mainly rooted in noir cinema, and that being the case Humphrey Bogart is probably the archetypal cyberpunk protagonist. Not even a particular role he played, just literally Humphrey Bogart, in much the same way John Wayne is the archetypal western protagonist. But just as you didn't need to cast John Wayne to have a western, you don't need to cast Humphrey Bogart* and can instead expand the horizons of the genre.

*that said i would be up for a cyberpunk story where the protagonist is literally humphrey bogart, like he got frozen accidentally during filming for the big sleep and then gets defrosted a hundred years later, like that sherlock holmes cartoon
Now I'm imagining Humphrey Bogart starring in Sleeper and choking on my coffee
 
Black Mirror's Nosedive is an excellent example of this; rip out our capitalism system, replace it with Likes and Welcome to Hell.

Changing to a different currency does not actually mean you've changed the system, though. Like, I've googled it, and it looks like a pretty thinly veiled point about capitalism in and of itself. Maybe it's different in the actual show, but from what I've seen from Black Mirror? It probably isn't.
 
Changing to a different currency does not actually mean you've changed the system, though. Like, I've googled it, and it looks like a pretty thinly veiled point about capitalism in and of itself. Maybe it's different in the actual show, but from what I've seen from Black Mirror? It probably isn't.
It's pretty blatantly about how the status rat race is its own thing; nobody worries about money so instead you just move to the next way of hating each other and trying oneupmanship.

Black Mirror has some great "use capitalism to talk about horrors" episodes, but Nosedive is a great example of flipping the script and going "even without the private ownership of property social media technology is basically evil." Definitely go watch the episode, it's great.
 
*that said i would be up for a cyberpunk story where the protagonist is literally humphrey bogart, like he got frozen accidentally during filming for the big sleep and then gets defrosted a hundred years later, like that sherlock holmes cartoon

Now I'm thinking of that one movie where people would use time travel to steal healthy bodies from 'accident' victims in the past as replacement parts, with Humphrey Bogart as the target instead...




So yea, thinking of the whole 'humanity' trait being related to how many cybernetics you have, the only actual setting that I can justify it in now would be Shadowrun, since that's less about you being a person, and more about how magic views you, if you're alive or an object in it's view.

Plus, there's a point I've seen made in the past. Cyberpsychosis, as described in the game, is LITERALLY how some people play video games like GTA. Instead of having it be connected to the amount of cybernetics a player has, it can instead just be like the Star system in GTA, a hidden value judging you on how 'humane' you're acting in verse and the NPC's reacting to it in response.
 
Last edited:
It's a very 80s genre, it's arguably been really out of date for years :V
I mean, arguably, it has already heavily changed in response to the stuff that has been written in the genre? People don't talk about "post-cyberpunk" being a thing for no reason.

Also, like, on the topic of portraying body modification in terms of positivity, I've been (re-)reading Gibson's Sprawl trilogy, and it's actually kinda interesting to see that body modification in these works (written by one of the earliest representatives of cyberpunk) is treated as just... this background thing, in many ways? And it's not always portrayed in a positive light.

Like, Mona Lisa Overdrive, as an example, features a teenage prostitute born off the grid being sold/kidnapped by a bunch of amoral corporate bastards and then being given involuntary cosmetic surgery in order to become a body double to a famous actress. It's creepy and weird and gross. The other most prominent example of body modification, "Sally Shears", has quite a few body modifications that make her a more effective killer, but the hints made at her past don't seem to imply that it was done because she really liked those modifications, but because they would give her an edge. It has also a minor character who has undergone a "chemo-penal" sentence, which basically means he was drugged against his will and cannot remember his time in jail, has constant memory problems, and is tortured by psychoneurological issues. On the other hand, the setting also shows that it's actually possible to decisively cure drug addiction, so there's that silver lining?

Like, there's a lot of stories about cyberpunk where the main topic isn't necessarily the positive portrayal of body modification, but to also show how a society that uses this technology can abuse it to get power over others. They don't necessarily need to be corporations, sure, but they will quite likely be corporations involved.

Mind, Gibson's work doesn't really focus on body modification as much as it does on the creation of AIs surpassing human intelligence and how they interact with ordinary humans connected to the internet, but there's room in cyberpunk for stories with a greater focus on body modification, and it'd be nice to get stories in the genres that embrace it in order to speak to those who think it would help them become who they want to be, so like, at the end of the day I can completely understand why people might be aggrieved at the possibility that there will be no modification-positive messages in this game at all.
 
Last edited:
It's not like the idea that cybernetics may have inherent problems is inherently wrongheaded and shouldn't be explored. Even without extrapolating from cartoonish shitty tech industry practices there are a lot of problems.

For example, unless it's being developed literally by the military computer software kinda sucks ass. It can glitch out, slow down, crash for no obvious reason, and even if your on top of updates a mishandled one can fuck everything up. There's a reason why there's so many jokes about how stupid and dumb software development can be. So if you want to replace part of your brain with a computer then yeah maybe it's better and more effecient but it's also more fuckup prone.

Or howabout parts and repair? Say what you will about the human body, atleast I don't need to come in to the shop every two years to get my hamstrings replaced so I can keep walking. Atleast my lungs don't have filters that need to be changed so I can breathe. Atleast I can't be stopped by a cop and given a ticket because one of the lightbulbs embedded in my ass cheeks went out. And that's just with cars, you're getting into a whole other world of costs and points of failure with super advanced prothesis. It's not even a capitalism driving up costs thing, because the people who can repair your cyber-arm probably deserve to get paid that much.

Of course this isn't a problem in transhuman fiction, because that assumes that we've solved the problems with technology so it can solve our actual problems. But cyberpunk is supposed to be somewhat grounded in shitty reality. And shitty reality is that our most advanced consumer-tier technology is kind of shit and will probably get us killed if we put our lives in it's hands. There's a reason why currently existing prosthetic body parts aren't "cyber".

You don't need to get into "essence loss" or some other floofy woofy new age bullshit to say "maybe cybernetics aren't the best idea in the universe". You just need to hit CTRL-ALT-DEL to exit a program from the task manager because it locked up for no fucking reason for the millionth time, then extrapolate that concept to your brain.
 
Last edited:
Remember that traditionally Deckers and Riggers would do their own software on hardware boards they built themselves.

But otherwise yea I can TOTALLY believe that. :) Plus, like the example in Deus Ex, you could always have hacks installed from official firmware updates.

I sure would worry about that happening all the time, and end up screwing my own implants up with my own shoddy maintenance.
 
If you want broader Cypherpunk works in other genres try the Provost's Dog trilogy and the Circle of Magic books by Tamora Pierce a.

Tamora Pierce is about as cypherpunk as my pale white 'insert slang for bodypart here, adjust for rudeness', and I say this as someone who grew up reading her books and who wants her to hurry up and finish the Trish storyline already. Tamora Pierce write progressive, novels. Tamora Pierce writes heavily 'you go girl' novels that almost all not only assume a balance of gender equality that we lack it today, but wouldn't work without it (well except the Provosts dog books, and we really don't talk about how shitty the third book of them was). Tamora pierce is a militant feminist who deliberately makes sure that everyone knows her blog is a strong opinion zone, and doesn't write stories about breaking boundries as much as she does writing stories after the boundary was broken, and why it was such a stupid boundry in the first place that she barely pays it any attention in the first place.

(Well except how Thom and Roger were meant to be more clearly lovers in the original drafts of lioness rampant, but she was still building her career then).

She is not a Cypherpunk writer, because she has nothing to do with telling stories that mix more traditional cyberpunk with a study of strong cryptography. She would almost never write a story about reclaiming ones privacy in a cyberpunk dystopia, because she'd write a more traditional science fiction story in the first place, which would have the privacy as a given.
 
That's not the kind of anarchy being referred to (nobody calls ancaps anarchists, least of all anarchists!), but this need to push all of cyberpunk into a rage against capitalist is just boring. Capitalism is a great tool to use to talk about alienation, but the idea that it's the be all and end all is silly. The way technology enables our worst impulses, creates prisoner's dilemmas we constantly defect in, and end up showing the worst parts of our soul is the core of cyberpunk. Black Mirror's Nosedive is an excellent example of this; rip out our capitalism system, replace it with Likes and Welcome to Hell.

Anarchist Capitalists are still Anarchists and Capitalists even if most Anarchist like to stick their fingers in their ears and go lalallalalalallalala and ignore what that says about human nature. Also listing Social Capitalism as an example of a system without Capitalism just shows that you don't understand what Capitalism is.

It's pretty blatantly about how the status rat race is its own thing; nobody worries about money so instead you just move to the next way of hating each other and trying oneupmanship.

Black Mirror has some great "use capitalism to talk about horrors" episodes, but Nosedive is a great example of flipping the script and going "even without the private ownership of property social media technology is basically evil." Definitely go watch the episode, it's great.

Social media technology was built around the idea of quantifying and using Social Capital in our Capitalist Society so no it's still Capitalism just Late Stage Capitalism which is interested in extracting value from more abstract concepts present in society like say popularity, friendship or other types of social interactions. In case you didn't know in the Marketplace of Ideas Attention is Currency/Money and can be spent or squandered like any other currency.

I mean, arguably, it has already heavily changed in response to the stuff that has been written in the genre? People don't talk about "post-cyberpunk" being a thing for no reason.

Also, like, on the topic of portraying body modification in terms of positivity, I've been (re-)reading Gibson's Sprawl trilogy, and it's actually kinda interesting to see that body modification in these works (written by one of the earliest representatives of cyberpunk) is treated as just... this background thing, in many ways? And it's not always portrayed in a positive light.

Like, Mona Lisa Overdrive, as an example, features a teenage prostitute born off the grid being sold/kidnapped by a bunch of amoral corporate bastards and then being given involuntary cosmetic surgery in order to become a body double to a famous actress. It's creepy and weird and gross. The other most prominent example of body modification, "Sally Shears", has quite a few body modifications that make her a more effective killer, but the hints made at her past don't seem to imply that it was done because she really liked those modifications, but because they would give her an edge. It has also a minor character who has undergone a "chemo-penal" sentence, which basically means he was drugged against his will and cannot remember his time in jail, has constant memory problems, and is tortured by psychoneurological issues. On the other hand, the setting also shows that it's actually possible to decisively cure drug addiction, so there's that silver lining?

Like, there's a lot of stories about cyberpunk where the main topic isn't necessarily the positive portrayal of body modification, but to also show how a society that uses this technology can abuse it to get power over others. They don't necessarily need to be corporations, sure, but they will quite likely be corporations involved.

Mind, Gibson's work doesn't really focus on body modification as much as it does on the creation of AIs surpassing human intelligence and how they interact with ordinary humans connected to the internet, but there's room in cyberpunk for stories with a greater focus on body modification, and it'd be nice to get stories in the genres that embrace it in order to speak to those who think it would help them become who they want to be, so like, at the end of the day I can completely understand why people might be aggrieved at the possibility that there will be no modification-positive messages in this game at all.

First of all Mona? That prostitute that gets kidnapped and cosmetically altered? Would not come from the place Gibson had her come. Then there is the whole Sally Shears/Molly Millions issue of her being fap material. No literally Sally/Molly is there for the fanservice like a big breasted anime girl in an Isekai. Some people think that is all she is and some people think that she is also a complex character on top of that. As for the guy who was abused by the state? Nobody remembers him or what he did in the last book of the Sprawl trilogy unless they are big Gibson geeks or have re-read the trilogy recently is my impression and since I haven't re-read the trilogy recently I got nothing.

o_O That is not how drug addiction works and also that was done so that Case would have a leash on him that would make him behave for a given value of behaving. So no that is no silver lining since it was a corporate underworld asshole taking away someone's method of self-medication and giving them a replacement that also acted as a leash to keep them compliant.

Third the Tessier-Ashpool family that builds the AIs in the trilogy is an expy of the Rothschild family so turn on your antisemitism detectors to subtle bullshit levels.

Gibson, like a lot of authors from his generation, wrote his anxieties and fetishes into his works and it shows.

It's not like the idea that cybernetics may have inherent problems is inherently wrongheaded and shouldn't be explored. Even without extrapolating from cartoonish lyrics shitty tech industry practices there are a lot of expected problems.

For example, unless it's being developed literally by the military computer software kinda sucks ass. It can glitch out, slow down, crash for no obvious reason, and even if your on top of updates a mishandled one can fuck everything up. There's a reason why there's so many jokes about how stupid and dumb software development can be. So if you want to replace part of your brain with a computer then yeah maybe it's better and more effecient but it's also more fuckup prone.

Or howabout parts and repair? Say what you will about the human body, atleast I don't need to come in to the shop every two years to get my hamstrings replaced so I can keep walking. Atleast my lungs don't have filters that need to be changed so I can breathe. Atleast I can't be stopped by a cop and given a ticket because one of the lightbulbs embedded in my ass cheeks went out. And that's just with cars, you're getting into a whole other world of costs and points of failure with super advanced prothesis. It's not even a capitalism driving up costs thing, because the people who can repair your cyber-arm probably deserve to get paid that much.

Of course this isn't a problem in transhuman fiction, because that assumes that we've solved the problems with technology so it can solve our actual problems. But cyberpunk is supposed to be somewhat grounded in shitty reality. And shitty reality is that our most advanced consumer-tier technology is kind of shit and will probably get us killed if we put our lives in it's hands. There's a reason why currently existing prosthetic body parts aren't "cyber".

You don't need to get into "essence loss" or some other floofy woofy new age bullshit to say "maybe cybernetics aren't the best idea in the universe". You just need to hit CTRL-ALT-DEL to exit a program from the task manager because it locked up for no fucking reason for the millionth time, then extrapolate that concept to your brain.

o_O Military software is of high quality and doesn't have shitty failures? The fuck? No, just no. Military hardware and software is known to be more error prone than the civilian stuff because the military only has it tested for bugs and crashes if it will affect their bottom line. Like I don't know why Cyberpunk is so obsessed with military grade hardware when it real life unless it was made by a genius or a professional military personnel not looking to cheat a buck out of the system or by a politician with an interest in making sure that soldiers on the ground using the hardware are getting the good stuff (or any and all combination of the three) military hardware and software is shit that will get outplayed by a competent guerilla tactician.

Another reason why cybernetics are not being used in prosthetic body parts is that the current cutting edge models are being made by 3d-printing them as the main goal right now is to make prosthetics affordable for everyone who needs them to be able to use them so cybernetics are out of the question outside of someone with the knowledge, skill and resources deciding to make them a thing right now.

Tamora Pierce is about as cypherpunk as my pale white 'insert slang for bodypart here, adjust for rudeness', and I say this as someone who grew up reading her books and who wants her to hurry up and finish the Trish storyline already. Tamora Pierce write progressive, novels. Tamora Pierce writes heavily 'you go girl' novels that almost all not only assume a balance of gender equality that we lack it today, but wouldn't work without it (well except the Provosts dog books, and we really don't talk about how shitty the third book of them was). Tamora pierce is a militant feminist who deliberately makes sure that everyone knows her blog is a strong opinion zone, and doesn't write stories about breaking boundries as much as she does writing stories after the boundary was broken, and why it was such a stupid boundry in the first place that she barely pays it any attention in the first place.

(Well except how Thom and Roger were meant to be more clearly lovers in the original drafts of lioness rampant, but she was still building her career then).

She is not a Cypherpunk writer, because she has nothing to do with telling stories that mix more traditional cyberpunk with a study of strong cryptography. She would almost never write a story about reclaiming ones privacy in a cyberpunk dystopia, because she'd write a more traditional science fiction story in the first place, which would have the privacy as a given.

o_O You intentionally miss what I wrote?:

And yes Cypherpunk as a genre is a deconstruction of both Noir and it's need to center White Men in it's stories.

I was talking about Cypherpunk the literary genre that is concerned with the Cypher (as in the uncritically accepted part of Noir that assumes that everywhere and everytime you set a story among societal outcasts of a society they will look suspiciously like members of an US Roaring 20s gang and/or cast members of a Detectives Drama from the 50s and 60s and/or characters from trashy spy thrillers from the same eras) of the Genre of Noir and going Punk on it's bullshit.

I was not talking about the movement in Informatics Industries' circles that concerns itself with improving overall cryptography in the industries and stories about the industries which includes Cyberpunk stories.

OK so yes Pierce writes progressive in all of her work and also writes White Savior narratives like Alan Moore writes rape, violation and psychological scarring for his female characters' narratives: Often enough you are uncomfortable with recommending their work as a whole and so do it on a case by case basis. What do you mean her work isn't about breaking boundaries?:

The Song of the Lioness is about a woman breaking into a fully male dominated field as a pioneer (Also White Savior bullshit, Feminist wank that hasn't been seen since the 80s in the mainstream and homophobia against male on male action that would make Go Nagai stand up and take notice
Thom and Roger aren't meant to be a positive portrayal of homosexuality what with poor Thom being seduced and then killed by Roger
) and all the problems that she encounters as a woman in a male dominated field of being a knight and serving/saving the Kingdom and the King.

The Immortals is about a young Prince who is a Demigod and must master the power such existence brings with the help of a sorceress teacher that will later become a lover to learn to live in the world and of course to save the world from a Mad Emperor who seeks to use the resurging magic and the returning magical beasts as a means of conquest and who's actions bring the world closer and closer to ruin by slowly unsealing darker forces in the shadows. Of course the Demigod Prince is a woman and the older sorceress is a man (if you think that Numair isn't just a skillfully written older sorceress that teaches and then falls in love with the hero mixed in with Tamora's own fetishes I have to ask did the question ever enter your mind of what kind of a mage archetype Numair is?) and Tamora goes into some squick territory in this gender-bender of an old old tale, but the things people consider squicky in the tale are squicky in the original configuration as well (husband wifery anyone?).

The Protector of the Small is about a young woman walking in the path of her idol who in the previous generation was the first woman to break into a male dominated field as a pioneer and following in her footsteps to fully break open the field for women behind her while also dealing with sexism and discrimination in her occupation.

Tricksters is a cocktail of White Savior, power fantasy worthy of any modern overpowered Isekai protagonist and fucking your bird boyfriend after he has had a journey to become a man that involved sex with other women. It's better than it sounds, but not good enough to recommend to anyone other than completionists of the Tortal universe.

Provost's Dog is a cypherpunk story about a pre-modern detective that plays with both Noir tropes and the idea of what and who a Noir detective can be and can face. I'm really curious to know what in the third book makes it so shitty? Breaking old patriarchal taboos that I have yet to see any other work break? Being bad at writing a type of relationship that the author herself and her circle of friends have no experience with? Having the main character be a Necromancer and be rewarded for it? The whole this is why slavery is bad okay anvil? Or something else?

The Circle of Magic books follow 4 kids (3 girls and 1 boy) as they grow up and grow into their powers and their place in the world. Each of the kids is from a different culture and part of their world. The books are Cypherpunk trough and trough it's just that the deconstruction of Noir starts with having the protagonists be a Corporate Princess (Duke Verdis is in character closer to a workaholic CEO than an actual Duke), an abandoned child of rich merchants, an exile from a conservative society of Romani-expys and a street rat from fantasy Singapore. Then it goes into story after story that I have yet to see in another Cyberpunk or Dungeonpunk that take you for a spin in choices of plot and main character action. Some of the stories are better than others with Battle Magic being the most egregious for being set in a war between Fantasy China and Fantasy Tibet with all the tact and consideration for the complexities of politics when translating them into fantasy settings of Black and White Insanity (Tibet good, China bad).
 
Last edited:
If you want to define capitalism as the things we do together then you do you, but I don't think that exactly undermines my core point.

Also how is cyberpunk a deconstruction of noir? It's very much a literal outgrowth; a member of the genre and not a reflection of it. I might be reading you wrong here but I just don't get this claim
 
If you want to define capitalism as the things we do together then you do you, but I don't think that exactly undermines my core point.

Also how is cyberpunk a deconstruction of noir? It's very much a literal outgrowth; a member of the genre and not a reflection of it. I might be reading you wrong here but I just don't get this claim

My point is that at this late stage of development Capitalism has seeped into everything and in everything we do in our lives there is value extrection happening unless we take the time and effort to try not to do that.

Cypherpunk not Cyberpunk is a deconstruction of Noir.
CYPHERPUNK NOT CYBERPUNK IS A DECONSTRUCTION OF NOIR.

Edit: :facepalm: The spacings don't work in quantity of more than one.
 
Last edited:
My point is that at this late stage of development Capitalism has seeped into everything and in everything we do in our lives there is value extrection happening unless we take the time and effort to try not to do that.

Cypherpunk not Cyberpunk is a deconstruction of Noir.
CYPHERPUNK NOT CYBERPUNK IS A DECONSTRUCTION OF NOIR.

Edit: :facepalm: The spacings don't work in quantity of more than one.
Okay, was just me reading poorly then, no problem!


And that's really just ceding all ground to capitalism which kind of undermines any critique of it; people have been horrible and wonderful to each other since long before capitalism existed and will continue to be wonderful and horrible to each other for long into the future. Tying yourself into s framework of this being capitalism is a straightjacket for your imagination.

Like you can do a cyberpunk story about an ancom hacker commune which is ripped apart by murder (after it turned out one of the members tried to upload their bodiless wife into another person from the cloud for a threesome gone wrong). The technology is enabling us to do wrong, but it's a human story at heart
 
Back
Top