Why not? I'd already claimed Pawn. And frankly, I'm increasingly suspicious that no one else seems to want to join in on this case. The evidence against me is already arrayed, as is the argument. Why hasn't anyone else spoken up against me?
I haven't suggested we speculate on whether the Queen is town or scum. In fact I was criticizing premature speculation on that topic. Let me reread Day 1, but my impression was that -Rosen pushed hugh over yourself.
Having reread, Rosen voted you as a joke. Rosen started pushing hugh when there was some ambiguity about whether the thread was going to go after you or them.
As the rules do not explicitly ban it, it would be allowed.
Rosen did basically nothing with that vote, pursued Hugh much more consistently. When Shadell asked Nictis to sell her on you versus Hugh, Rosen said nothing.
I think it might be premature to discuss that.
It risks revealing info to scum. If the Queen kill wasn't the scum kill, scum don't know how their target survived. Leaving them in the dark on that is preferable to the alternative.
Yeah, it could definitely have been a bit Rosen was doing, expecting Zaealix to flip sooner rather than later and thus reflect well on Rosen for defending them. It could also have been Rosen trying to save a team mate and counting on his rep as a solid player who follows his hunches to make people doubt it was just one scum defending another. Rosen is very good at generating ambiguity.
Yes, I would like to confirm that I am Rosen's other Pawn, but I also killed Rosen last night for missing multiple Monty Python skits in our QT.
If that's what you think needs to be done, you're the one putting in the most work.
I think we should play as of it is going to continue until we hear otherwise.
There aren't too many options.
