- Location
- Mid-Atlantic
[nods sagely]
Missile submarines are worst submarines.
Well, that's what the DEs think, anyway.
Missile submarines are worst submarines.
Well, that's what the DEs think, anyway.
Ironically, W23s would be far better used in an anti-sub role. Just.....not as depth charges, as you'd probably snap your own keel from the enormous pressure wave going off so close to you.Will W23s be authorized? Probably not, but I'd like to see it happen. Preferably without the presence of anyone who was at Crossroads, but Prinz Eugen is in Lou's CruDiv, so there's a fat chance.
Well... they only got three Fleet Carriers..honestly, and not trying to devalue Shinano, but I think they'd need more than 1 carrier this. On the plus side outside air combat the 262's aren't much of a threat, those things were absolute shit as bombers.
Nuclear antisubmarine torpedoes are actually a thing, and many Cold War torpedoes were designed to take nuclear warheads.Ironically, W23s would be far better used in an anti-sub role. Just.....not as depth charges, as you'd probably snap your own keel from the enormous pressure wave going off so close to you.
A preset timed detonator inside a torpedo on the other hand.....
what about the truly flat top and miss drinks a lotWell... they only got three Fleet Carriers..
Total.
So they kind of need to use only one Carrier here...
Well aware of that fact. Was more thinking about seeing if some of the shipgirls could use them in 'blindfire' salvos, using torpedo casings they already have, but with the warhead swapped out. So no sonar guidance, not even wire-guidance, but straight ahead dumbfire shots.Having Akagi or Kaga along would really help and I am rather surprised Japan isn't committing a bit more to this operation. But I can think of a lot of reasons for it.
Nuclear antisubmarine torpedoes are actually a thing, and many Cold War torpedoes were designed to take nuclear warheads.
They are CVLs—light aircraft carriers. American CVLs would be the Independence class—built from the hulls of Cleveland-class light cruisers—or the Saipan class—built from the hulls of Baltimore-class heavy cruisers. But the Saipans were a postwar design, so they can't show up. The Independences, however, can. If only with CVEs showing up also to take the load off of convoys, thus freeing up more tonnage for important operations.
They are CVLs—light aircraft carriers. American CVLs would be the Independence class—built from the hulls of Cleveland-class light cruisers—or the Saipan class—built from the hulls of Baltimore-class heavy cruisers. But the Saipans were a postwar design, so they can't show up. The Independences, however, can. If only with CVEs showing up also to take the load off of convoys, thus freeing up more tonnage for important operations.
aircraft in the air is still aircraft in the air...I never said fleet carriers in my original post.They are CVLs—light aircraft carriers. American CVLs would be the Independence class—built from the hulls of Cleveland-class light cruisers—or the Saipan class—built from the hulls of Baltimore-class heavy cruisers. But the Saipans were a postwar design, so they can't show up. The Independences, however, can. If only with CVEs showing up also to take the load off of convoys, thus freeing up more tonnage for important operations.
And this is a problem I have with this story—the lack of balance between carriers and battleships. Yes, I have heard both the Watsonian and Doylist reasons. Yes, I love the surface combat. No, I still don't like the reasoning. This imbalance can lead to Abyssal carrier spam, in which no matter what, the shipgirls WILL lose when they either sink or run out of ammo. Not even subs are safe—the Abyssals would likely bring destroyers an light carriers for ASW, and they would drown the subs in ash cans. Unless, there are enough carriers to balance out the battleships.It's been stated that no more carriers, except for maybe a CVE or two, will be showing up.
Shipgirls show no signs of being able to "swap out" their munitions for steel-hulled ship munitions or modified versions of same.Well aware of that fact. Was more thinking about seeing if some of the shipgirls could use them in 'blindfire' salvos, using torpedo casings they already have, but with the warhead swapped out. So no sonar guidance, not even wire-guidance, but straight ahead dumbfire shots.
Except it doesn't, because for some reason, the Abyssals don't actually have carriers to spam, any more than the Forces of Good (TM) do.And this is a problem I have with this story—the lack of balance between carriers and battleships. Yes, I have heard both the Watsonian and Doylist reasons. Yes, I love the surface combat. No, I still don't like the reasoning. This imbalance can lead to Abyssal carrier spam...
They are CVLs—light aircraft carriers. American CVLs would be the Independence class—built from the hulls of Cleveland-class light cruisers—or the Saipan class—built from the hulls of Baltimore-class heavy cruisers. But the Saipans were a postwar design, so they can't show up. The Independences, however, can. If only with CVEs showing up also to take the load off of convoys, thus freeing up more tonnage for important operations.
honestly, and not trying to devalue Shinano, but I think they'd need more than 1 carrier this. On the plus side outside air combat the 262's aren't much of a threat, those things were absolute shit as bombers.
They already have ASROCs.
Audio is gammy, but the film is 52 years old.
There's 2 big deck carriers on this- Shinano and Bonnie Dick- plus a bunch of ship AA, including the long range punch of the Burkes.
Bonhomme Richard's a Wasp-class amphib. While she can carry about 20-odd Harriers (actually @theJMPer shouldn't she have F-35s by now?), that's in pure Sea Control Ship configuration. In present amphibious assault config she'd be carrying much less, maybe around 4-6 Harriers at best, in order to have more space dedicated to MV-22s and CH-53Es to deploy Marines to the beach and Cobras to cover those Marines. And that's a problem, because while the Harrier is a great aircraft and all, levelling effect is going to work against it. It's basically got a similar kinematic profile to the old A-4 Skyhawk, except the A-4 is faster, has better range, and a ridiculously higher roll rate. This is why the F-35B was such a big deal for the USMC and everyone who wanted to upgrade from Harriers.
In a perfect world, I'd agree with you, but I'm being conservative in my expectations because of the leveling effect. Which compares aircraft as they are today vs abyssal equivalents as they were then. F-22s would curbstomp abyssal air. F-35s likewise, because these aircraft are the tops today. The Harrier has never been tops even when it first came out - it was already badly outclassed kinematically by the Teen Fighters and the Fulcrums and Flankers back in the Cold War, and that's just gotten worse in the decades after.Except neither the 262 nor 234 was ever that manueverable. Fast yes, but turned like a pig. And AMRAAMs and Sidewinder-Xs don't care what platform is shooting them.
As I recall the A-4 had two 20mm Colt Mk 12 cannons. Israeli Skyhawks IIRC were upgunned with 30mm DEFA guns.Ah the Scooter. Probably the most damn useful and nimble little jet fighter bomber we ever came up with. And it didn't require a supercarrier to operate from, an Essex platform was just fine thank you very much.
Up in the Boeing Museum of Flight they have one of the A-4s the Blue Angels used to fly. It still has all four 20mm cannons too.
Bonhomme Richard is the steel-hulled amphibious assault ship, there to provide a Marine contingent for seizing the island. Not one of the carriers of that name. Not going to be contributing much to the air defenses.There's 2 big deck carriers on this- Shinano and Bonnie Dick- plus a bunch of ship AA, including the long range punch of the Burkes.
If something gets through that, another deck is the least of their concerns.
Levelling. Effect.Except neither the 262 nor 234 was ever that manueverable. Fast yes, but turned like a pig. And AMRAAMs and Sidewinder-Xs don't care what platform is shooting them.
The Burkes on the other hand are AA machines. Or will leveling effect nerf them too?Bonhomme Richard is the steel-hulled amphibious assault ship, there to provide a Marine contingent for seizing the island. Not one of the carriers of that name. Not going to be contributing much to the air defenses.
Levelling. Effect.
[sighs]
An Abyssal jet fighter from 1945 is competitive with the best modern fighter aircraft. It just is. Deal with it.
A Harrier, even armed with high-end air to air missiles, is not.
Do not expect the very small number of Harriers Bonhomme Richard could realistically be carrying to play much of a role in this action.
The way the leveling effect works, more or less, is that stuff from 1945 is competitive with present day stuff. So how badly the leveling effect works on something depends on how competitive it is with present day stuff.The Burkes on the other hand are AA machines. Or will leveling effect nerf them too?