Arizona: *sighs contentedly*
Pennsylvania: *grumbles contentedly*
Mutsu: M-my... I didn't think it would be this effective.
 
They're not modern ships built deliberately primitive with World War Two technology in order to make them cheaper. They're actual World War Two warships. They can play by the same rules they would have played by if the Abyssals had appeared in 1945, with the leveling effect rendered irrelevant. And by those rules, they are extremely effective- just as they were in 1945.

The leveling effect hurts modern ships, neutralizing the advantages conferred by modern weaponry. 1945-vintage period pieces are by all appearances exempt.

B-52s are 1950s-vintage aircraft. The bombs are first-rate... but each B-52 only carried a few of them. The proper analogy is World War Two strategic bombers dropping really good armor piercing bombs in level flight at high altitude. Such attacks were sometimes successful against anchored targets (e.g. Pearl Harbor, or the progressive wrecking of the Tirpitz by the RAF and Fleet Air Arm). But they were not reliably effective against moving targets or on anything other than a preplanned raid. The GPS systems of the bombs are completely irrelevant, because they level out to irrelevancy.

By launching a glide-bombing, low-altitude attack, the B-1s may have accidentally (or not so accidentally) made themselves more effective. That's an attack profile that works under World War Two rules, whereas level bombing from thirty thousand feet generally doesn't. This enabled the B-1s to score at least some hits with their bombs. The same carpet-bombing attack, dropped from a higher altitude, might well have failed or been less effective.

Here's where the research fails on the non-ship side for BelBat annoy me.

The B-52H is not 1960s vintage. The *airframe* is 1960s, but they've regularly been gutted and upgraded from the ground up- most recently in 2013. They're specially-prepped advanced front line aircraft with very good bombs, attacking a *stationary* target the size of an Airfield.

The direct 1945 equivalent is Silverplate B-29s dropping pumpkin bombs at 30,000ft with Norden bombsights- very effective.

B-1s glide bombing shouldn't be effective because in 1945, a land based bomber glide-bombing a moving ship was asking to get chewed and generally not hit anything.

I know it serves the narrative, but it's anything but consistent.
 
B-1s glide bombing shouldn't be effective because in 1945, a land based bomber glide-bombing a moving ship was asking to get chewed and generally not hit anything.

The B-1s were not glide bombing; rather, they were skip bombing.
23E2. Glide bombing

Glide bombing is similar to dive bombing except that the attack angle is less than 60 degrees. This technique is better adapted to fighter-type aircraft which tend to develop excessive speeds in steep dives. Glide bombing is high-speed attack and bombs are released at an altitude of from 2,000 to 3,000 feet. Advantages over horizontal bombing include surprise and quick getaway. The disadvantages are that the bomb velocity is less than in dive bombing and AA vulnerability is greater than in dive bombing.

In the story, JM writes that the B-1s are, " All she knew was the sleek black bombers howling so low their engines seemed to kiss the surf were the most beautiful things she'd ever seen." This is not a bombing run at 2-3k feet, this is sticking-your-feet-out-the-side-and-getting-your-toes-wet skip bombing made famous in the Pacific by the b-25 and other fast medium bombers like it. This type of bombing played absolute hell with IJN convoys for example, during the Battle of the Bismark Sea

. In a single, daring, low-level attack, 12 B-25s and a sister squadron flying modified A-20s literally stopped a Japanese convoy in its tracks. A second attack later in the day wiped out the convoy. Not a single transport survived the battle.

While IJN transports are a far cry from an abyssal fleet, in the atomic prince incident in the Yellow Rose chapter, it was just Atomic Princess all by her lonesome. Furthermore, she was distracted, wounded, and based on a never completed BC designed back when planes were considered not to be a threat to ships, so in theory here AA capabilities should be lacking. All this made her easy-ish pray to B-1s employing a highly effective WW2 strategy.
 
Last edited:
I think it's because gun battles are more exciting to write, in many ways, than airstrikes.

So, in other words, Author Bias rearing its head.
Ahem...
"Well," Crowning leaned in, the flickering glee of a storyteller coming over his face. "Remember back when I talked about the Aeneid?"

Gale nodded. "Yeah, the first recorded appearance of shipgirls, right?"

"Yes, but that wasn't always the explanation," said Crowning. "Before academia was confronted with the reality of ship spirits, we always assumed the ships rose again because…" The professor paused, taking a moment to gather his words while Gale leaned in even closer. "Because it wasn't worthy of them. They'd gone though so many trials, only to die without dignity… it wasn't fitting."

"Doc," said Gale in a voice halfway to a wispier. "Get to the point."

"Now we know that that's not the case." Crowning happily ignored Gale's eagerness. This was his story, and he was going to take his time spelling it out for her. "But I think the logic's still sound."

Gale blinked.

"Battleships were supposed to be the queens of the sea," said the professor. "When their guns speak, history listens. Only that never happened. Not once. Jutland was the closest we ever got, and even that was a pale shadow of the deceive brawl these girls were built for."

"Yeah," Gale nodded. "Yeah, but the decisive battle got thrown out when planes and subs became a thing. A battle line's just a magnet for bombs and torpedoes."

"I know." Crowning held up a finger. "But that leaves us with a whole generation of girls who've never once done what they were born to do. Only now they're back, and the old gods of the sea have taken planes and submarines out of the equation."

"So…" Gale shook her head. "So where does that leave us? Some random omniscient being has a hard-on for battleships?"

"Yes," Crowning shrugged. "But I think it means there's more going on here than we think."

One wonders how Archie feels. Is she a big seafood lover because fishie, or does she not like eating seafood because fishie?
Archie: There are eating fishies, and then there are looking fishies!
Why everyone insist on calling Project 1144 Orlan Heavy Cruiser, a battlecruiser with NATO classification -_- ?
Because it is. It's a capital ship armed with capital-ship grade weapons that can reliably murderize anything else afloat, but it lacks the armor to resist a through pounding by its own weapons. It's a battlecruiser.
Here's where the research fails on the non-ship side for BelBat annoy me.

The B-52H is not 1960s vintage. The *airframe* is 1960s, but they've regularly been gutted and upgraded from the ground up- most recently in 2013. They're specially-prepped advanced front line aircraft with very good bombs, attacking a *stationary* target the size of an Airfield.

The direct 1945 equivalent is Silverplate B-29s dropping pumpkin bombs at 30,000ft with Norden bombsights- very effective.

B-1s glide bombing shouldn't be effective because in 1945, a land based bomber glide-bombing a moving ship was asking to get chewed and generally not hit anything.

I know it serves the narrative, but it's anything but consistent.
They B-52s did get quite good accuracy... By WWII standards when "Inside the same zip-code" was considered accurate. The Norden Bombsight only guaranteed pinpoint hints if there was good wind conditions (which given the choppy, stormy weather off the Bering sea, wasn't gonna happen.) Getting just one bomb on target from that altitude was better than could be expected.

And the B-1's, as stated elsewhere, were skip-bombing. They're also low-altitude high-speed penetration bombers, so they map to something closer to a Mosquito or B-25 than a lumbering B-52.
 
The Norden Bombsight only guaranteed pinpoint hints if there was good wind conditions (which given the choppy, stormy weather off the Bering sea, wasn't gonna happen.) Getting just one bomb on target from that altitude was better than could be expected.
Hey, when they tested the Norden, it could hit the bottom of the pickle barrel. In Arizona. Where there's nothing in the sky 340 days a year.
 
And the rest of the year, we have monsoons that tear roofs off of houses.
Hey, when I was living in Phoenix last year, there was about a week of actual winter temperatures. You could even see the snowline. Then it cleared off, and stayed that way until April, when I moved back to NM.
 
Anyway, the Norden was 'accurate enough to hit a pickle barrel from 25,000 feet.' Unfortunately, there's clouds in Europe. Now 'you cloud hit within a square mile of the barrel.'
 
Because it is. It's a capital ship armed with capital-ship grade weapons that can reliably murderize anything else afloat, but it lacks the armor to resist a through pounding by its own weapons. It's a battlecruiser.

*an Anglo-American battlecruiser

*pouting Seydlitz intensifies*

:V

For actual content, and crossposting from SB:



Evidently her sea trials.

Do we even have a picture of either of the sisters shooting other than this?
 
Obtaining the plutonium from the seabed would be a major project for any human group, because you'd have to hover around the areas where the carriers were sunk, and search the ocean floor laboriously to find the wreckage and extract what you were looking for. For Abyssals, it's not clear whether they even CAN use Earthly weapons; they seem to have some kind of logistics but it may have more to do with metaphysics than with physical goods.
To give an idea of just HOW major a project it would be, consider that Project AZORIAN was a CIA operation in the mid-70s to recover, primarily, the nuclear weapons aboard the sunken Soviet missile submarine K-129. It cost billions of dollars, required a year of searching with a special-missions submarine modified specifically for seabed search, construction of two special ships and a specialized piece of recovery equipment under the cover story of being a Howard Hughes project to mine manganese nodules from the ocean floor, and took two or three years to complete... and, at least according to the official story, it was largely a failure when the recovery claw broke and most of the submarine, including the missile compartment, fell back to the bottom. (The veracity of that part of the story is questionable, but irrelevant to what a massive project it was.) Any project to recover nuclear weapons from other sunken sites would be similarly difficult; as proven in the 1966 crash of a nuclear-armed B-52G off Palomares, Spain, nuclear-armed nations would go to great lengths to recover any lost nuclear weapon that seemed to have even a slight chance of being feasible to recover, so the "easy" ones have already been recovered. The remaining ones are all either under at least 9800 feet of water or even deeper than that; buried so deep in mud that we haven't been able to precisely locate them, much less recover them; or completely bloody missing to the point where nobody knows where they went. (There have been some other such incidents that I didn't link, but again, if the weapons were at all retrievable, they were retrieved by one side or another.)

Plus, they're fighting according to World War Two rules, which lends itself admirably to their gun armament. Do their Harpoons perform according to spec, or do they experience the same level of epic fail everyone else's missiles do?
I would expect they would have similar performance to the ASM-N-2 Bat or LBD Gargoyle anti-ship missiles; both are rough equivalents (albeit air-launched) that were in service or live-fire testing by the end of WW2.

The Iowas get to cheat, by virtue of being the sole surviving real battleships.
Well, not the SOLE remaining ones. If the industrial effort to reactivate Showboat, Mamie, and Bama ever bears fruit, they'd also get to cheat; Salem, Little Rock, and all the surviving Fletchers would presumably also get to cheat if reactivated. (Yes, the Des Moines class didn't enter service until after the war, but they would have been in service in time for the Invasion of Japan, had the war not ended when it did, so I figure that they get to count as "1945" ships.) Also, Mikasa and Texas would like to have a word with you... :lol

By launching a glide-bombing, low-altitude attack, the B-1s may have accidentally (or not so accidentally) made themselves more effective. That's an attack profile that works under World War Two rules, whereas level bombing from thirty thousand feet generally doesn't. This enabled the B-1s to score at least some hits with their bombs. The same carpet-bombing attack, dropped from a higher altitude, might well have failed or been less effective.
Not so accidentally--JMPer said that part of the reason Bones were used for the attack on Atomic Princess was that their crews were about the only four-engined bomber crews crazy enough to try supersonic dive bombing in such a big bird.


Incidentally, this is why fears about nuclear reactors becoming nuclear bombs are utterly baseless. Reactor-grade uranium doesn't have enough U235 to go kaboom.
When Chernobyl's Reactor #4 suffered its catastrophic accident in 1986, it's now known that there was a prompt criticality runaway reaction in part of the core, similar to a fizzled nuclear weapon, with an explosive yield of about ten tons (no, not kilotons); given the design of the RBMK reactor in the accident (as compared to other nuclear reactors), this is a close upper bound on the maximum nuclear yield possible from a worst-case scenario with a nuclear reactor.

Photos of Yamato's magazine cooking off are DISTRESSINGLY mushroom shaped in that way only truly awful explosions can be.
Mushroom clouds are not limited to large explosions. Any explosion that results in a bubble of hot gas rising and cooling will form a fine mushroom cloud. I've seen a fire department demonstration of extinguishing a diesel fuel fire where the ignition of about a gallon of diesel generated a mushroom cloud about fifty feet high. I've also accidentally caused a quite lovely three-foot-high mushroom cloud when I spilled some alcohol into a bunsen burner in a chemistry lab.

Why everyone insist on calling Project 1144 Orlan Heavy Cruiser, a battlecruiser with NATO classification -_- ?
Because 24,000 tons displacement and 2x the armaments of the three next largest surface combatants.
As for the NATO classification, not only is "Kirov" the familiar name for the class in Western circles, wasn't it also the original name of the first ship of the class? By US Navy standards, that would mean that the class would be referred to as the "Kirov class," even if the ship was renamed later.
 
Back
Top