Take a chill pill. Take several. Did I do anything to justify you cursing at me?
Also, did it occur to you to look up the answer to that question? Google 'warship uss camp'
It was a largely joking suggestion, as Camp has appeared only in my little side-adventure in Norfolk. But she
did serve in the Philippine Navy (and the Vietnamese Navy). It affects her.
USS Texas is no match for Sara. This is the Saratoga that would have been
launched and updated from the 20's, if not the 30's. USS Texas is a WWI Dreadnaught. Sara outclasses her in armor and weaponry.
Nitpick: Abyssatoga does
not outclass Texas in armor, but she does have roughly twice the gun range and half again the speed. Both ships will be able to score penetrating hits on the other if they can hit at all; Texas isn't armored against 16" gunfire except under very favorable circumstances, and Atomic Battlecruiser Princess is effectively not armored at all as far as battleship-caliber shells are concerned. But unless conditions are very favorable, Texas cannot force the 16"-armed battlecruiser to fight within her own gun range.
With all due respect Breakaway, I find that to be bullshit on two levels.
Firstly, If that would actually work for this story, then why the hell did the Air Force modify those B-52s to act as overgrown B-17s during the Habbuk?
Because Northern Princess is so massive that it takes a very, very heavy bomb to even damage her. Antiship missiles hitting her sides would very likely not penetrate, especially since the USN doesn't use superheavy antiship missiles like, say, Russia does. Meanwhile, the B-52 could be modified to carry that class of bomb and modifications for visual bomb-sighting so that the bomb could hopefully hit Abyssal targets that normally laugh at other forms of guidance.
Secondly, that still doesn't answer why more aircraft are not being scrambled to attack Saratoga.
In addition to what TheJMPer said... We know that National Guard (and I think Navy) aircraft have already launched attacks against Atomic Battlecruiser Princess, but were shot down by her escorting AA cruisers.
Also, it is possible that the US strategic bomber force has suffered heavy attrition in the opening phase of the war, repelling attacks against the coast.
Irrelevant. The '42 refit only dealt with anti-aircraft armament, not her armor or main battery.
Well, Texas also has some of the other advantages of her refits- but sadly, her being in "Texas Kai Ni" form doesn't do much for her surface combat abilities, you're not entirely wrong about that.
The B-1B is also a Stealth Bomber I think. I would have personally sent in the F-117s, they have been mothballed and are being stored god knows were. But the B-1B will get the job done as well.
Uh... no. The B-1 is not a stealth bomber in any normal sense. That is a B-2. Also, stealth probably does not work well against Abyssals because of the leveling effect. It could
work; there were planes that were relatively hard to spot on radar in that era... but it would merely decrease maximum detection range a bit.
STRONG SUGGESTION: Thor, before you say ANYTHING on this thread involving a fact about military technology, specifically spend two minutes on Google and Wikipedia trying to determine whether that fact is actually true. If you can't find the relevant facts immediately, use
five minutes. This will make you look much smarter and more respectable.
Quick question. Since we have seen carriers launch planes in other ways then bow and arrows, White just chucking toys into the air, Jun'you using the magic scroll (can't think of actual term right now) and then Shinano throwing her arrows, can anyone eventually throw knives? We just saw how only Shimano and, I'm guessing, White could still operate losing an arm, so I guess I'm asking if they can prepare for his. Or is it a case of, if it gets this bad it's all over?
Damage to an arm for a carrier-girl is equivalent to losing the ability to launch planes at full effect (that is, damage to the carrier deck). Shinano may have been able to launch lightly loaded interceptor aircraft, but could she have handled heavier torpedo bombers and so on?
Personally I'd like to see a US carrier with a satchel full of baseballs to throw... because seriously that would be as American as momboat and apple pie.
So any stealth aircraft would be roughly as good as a Ho-229 then? And yes, before anyone says it, I know that it wasn't actually "Stealth", just a highly reduced radar signature. From memory, it was good enough that if it had been used in time, the land based radar stations in Britain could only give a fifteen minute window of warning of them coming in. Don't know how that would translate to Abyssal ship radars, but...
About a 40% drop in detection range, tops? Maybe less.
U-511 had a wolf pack along? Ouch. I just hope the static defenses and surviving escorts are enough that the Panama Canal isn't put out of commission...
It is cold to say it, but if we get out of this having lost Wisky but with both the oilfields and Panama canal having taken no (or almost no) damage, strategically it was worth it in face of what the Abyssals are throwing at us. That is the basic purpose of a combatant, to protect the non-combatants, in this case that meant Wisky taking the attack instead of the Canal. It is far from any sort of victory of course, but it wouldn't be a defeat either.
Thing is, the U-boats are still around, and
Wisconsin's ASW escorts are apparently in disarray. They're going to start shooting up ships near the Canal, and it's very unlikely we'll get them all.
Having
Wisconsin sunk by U-boats is a straight-up tactical defeat for Team Dontgeteatenbyabyssals. No other way around it. It increases the risk that Atomic Battlecruiser Princess will go on a rampage in the Gulf after defeating all comers, and it does nothing to reduce the threat posed by the Abyssal wolfpack.
I wonder how MSSB going to play this considering the B-1 has a service ceiling of over 20,000 feet beyond the maximum height of what a 5/38 can hit.
Leveling effect. The Abyssals' AA shells fly higher and faster than they have any right to, just as the B-52s that attacked Northern Princess encountered flak and fighter cover at altitudes that WWII guns and interceptors couldn't reach.
Texas only accounts for a little over half of the tonnage lost by Wisconsin.
No no no, we don't get shipgirls for losing
our tonnage, we get it for sinking
their tonnage.
Translation: if we sink Atomic Battlecruiser Princess and her escorts, we can probably get Wiskey back! GOOO!
Right, wait? What? *Insert dumbfounded face here* You have just succeeded in confusing me, then again, I SUCK at understanding jokes. Has to do with my Asperger's Syndrome. *Shakes head*
Oh, your problem is Asperger's? GREAT! Asperger's does not interfere with your ability to listen to facts. This is good news!
So here is a fact that you can take as 100% true and reliable and a good rule for all social interactions.
Never, ever explain a joke to someone, unless they ask a question about it and explicitly request the information.
If you follow this rule, people will like your jokes better. You will come closer to the desired result (amusing people with jokes), with
less work. There is no downside whatsoever.
It is literally that simple.