Now that makes more sense. People can hardly express their awe for us properly, if we're busy doing it already.Alternative answer: You'd be happy to grab a pretentious title given to you by someone else, but making up your own is just poor taste.
Now that makes more sense. People can hardly express their awe for us properly, if we're busy doing it already.Alternative answer: You'd be happy to grab a pretentious title given to you by someone else, but making up your own is just poor taste.
so next objective is to build Mechanicsburg?If you can get a large enough audience, isolate them from artificial structures, and force them into the right mindset, you'll be perfectly capable of staging a repeat.
I can see why it has the "artillery" tag now. I'm not sure why, but I was expecting smallish rifts, maybe big enough to ride a horse through. This is... something else entirely.After that, a single swipe with Skybreaker opens up a massive, shrieking wound in the skies high above. It doesn't take more than a few seconds for it to devour the cloud it formed inside, leaving only a jagged white tear in the world. The skies surrounding it even seem to be dimmer than they should be.
I guess Inspired have a bigger say in the Consensus.(A smirk dominates your features when the first of the rifles explodes into stream, flaming coal, and hot shrapnel. Only one other rifleman actually tries to attack you before everyone else dismisses it as a bad idea.)
Near-crit.Stubborn & Redundant Tier Bonus: 1d100/16 = Bonus Tiers. Total: 98/16=6 (Rounded)
I guess this is a measure of how much belief you'd need behind you to build something that could out-bullshit Skybreaker's durability, rather than direct test of opposed belief-power?An audience of tens of thousands with the vast majority expecting and actively thinking about its destruction may be necessary. A sufficiently advanced weapon created before a similarly-sized group may also suffice. You don't think anything else would.
How big is Skybreaker? Would it object to being used as a melee weapon in extremis? Would it bite people that we hit with it?Skybreaker will painfully "bite" anyone who tries to hold it without your deliberate permission. You may retract said permission at any time. As its method of discouragement may lead to involuntary hand clenching, this may be fatal. You may deactivate or reactivate the self-defense features with a single verbal command.
Hum, interesting. So it's... lower-level, for lack of a better word? Belief isn't coherent or detailed enough to directly produce artifacts, and artifacts once constructed play by the rules that they were built with, but belief can bend reality enough for an Inspired to will more subtle effects into reality? A particular material to be more durable than it should be, pieces fit together in ways they really shouldn't, similar effects?As an aside, the creations of Inspired do not operate off belief. A stick will remain a stick even if untold thousands of people believe it's a magic wand. You can, however, play with physical traits. For Skybreaker, this was primarily used for durability/containment and to create a fuel source that (as far as you know) breaks the guideline of conservation of energy.
How big is Skybreaker? Would it object to being used as a melee weapon in extremis? Would it bite people that we hit with it?
Depending on what you mean by this, possibly not. You could have high explosives detonate in the barrel as a weapon. Normally a dumb idea, perfectly fine if the barrel is adjusted. Glass tubes that would normally shatter in open flame can travel right through it. That sort of thing.
You know, I wonder if an isolated Inspired could over time could push the boundaries of what works in their area?You just need enough of them thinking about the possibility of them changing. When fighting against a stubborn Inspired armed with the thoughts of hundreds of humans and supported by a cooperative gift, reality needs to bring more than casual indifference. You couldn't do this in a city, for instance; artificial structures and expectations would work against you. Reality would have a predefined set of rules and you'd have an exceptionally difficult time fighting them.
How awesome is Skybreaker? Like, how does it compare to the stuff our parents have laying around? Or just general awesome stuff.
Sweet, we have a bitchin' wizard's staff, complete with awesome nobody-expects-the-wizard-to-have-full-BAB skull-bashing action.About as tall as you are. No objections. Yes, but without sustained contact, it wouldn't do that much extra damage to most humans.
Tests.@Alivaril Do we understand more or less everything there is to understand about Skybreaker, or would we have to do some tests? Like, would we know how much pull a 1 km sized void rift would have?
You don't think it inherently destroys anything it takes. You just won't be getting anything back from it.Do we know if Skybreaker would survive being poked into the Void, being near indestructible?
Also, a non-skybreaker-specific question. If we poke something partially into the Void, and pull it out, is it cleanly cut off at wherever it stopped going in?
I was under the impression that itty bitty rifts were safe enough. Rifts small enough that we physically CAN'T go through it, even if they were sucky-enough. We considered using it to keep the area around us free of mosquitoes.If you poke part of something into a void rift, you can generally assume you're not getting the rest of it back either. In fact, if you're that close, you'd often be in danger.
Not "no chance". We've been able to discern possibilities. But the acronyms can make it harder on us.I believe that that's the point, yes. Alivaril has a habit of rolling dice in public so the rolls are easy to find and we can't claim he's cheating, but in such volume and with such cryptic tags that there's no chance of anyone figuring out anything unduly important.
...There are SO MANY inappropriate jokes I could make right now. You're damn lucky I'm too lazy to look up the lyrics to Terry Pratchett's "A Wizard's Staff has a Knob on the End". Or at least, what few lines we got.
...Are we channeling the power of Chaos, by any chance?
Now that you mention it, it does sound like a wonderful idea. That said, apparently buildings would screw with the effect. What we need is an army. One that we can use to bolster our control over reality.
Certainly explains why eating your Inspiration gives you superpowers. I wonder if that's just another type of symbiosis, or if, by consuming the light, it becomes a more exploitative relationship, with the host in control.Ooh, I was right - Inspiration absolutely is a symbiotic infomorph that self-hosts by exploiting consensus reality. This is really cool.
I mean, technically, bronze does form a crystalline lattice structure, or at least can. So it's not entirely out of the question to make a crystal from a type of copper-alloy (the definitions of bronze and brass being a touch...elastic, that's often the term used in archeology).You know, I wonder if an isolated Inspired could over time could push the boundaries of what works in their area?
like, if reality expects the properties of things to change when they're being worked on, and Inspiration is just bluffing reality into accepting way more than it should. Out here in the middle of nowhere, we have very few example of what bronze can turn into, so Inspiration says "Crystal. Trust me on this.". Reality does a quick survey, and we've got several hundred minds going "eh. Seems legit." and no prior cases of bronze not turning into crystal, so it's allowed. In a city, bronze is worked often enough that saying "crystal" has lots of past history of that never happening, and thousands of minds going "That doesn't seem right."
But here in this place, we now have an established example of bronze turning into crystal. Can we do it again? Maybe, maybe not. But if we do do it again and again, reality now has loads of prior cases of it happening, and no counter arguments. So, bronze into crystal becomes a normal thing here, like water into steam.
YeahDo we not have the option of taking on an assumed name? Are we too Stubborn for that?
You're free to give a false name, such as Jane Smith, but not such a title.
Now that you mention it, it does sound like a wonderful idea. That said, apparently buildings would screw with the effect. What we need is an army. One that we can use to bolster our control over reality.
Maybe, maybe not. The effect buildings have may still have an impact. Also, armies are much lower investment, in terms of time. Also, we'll likely want one anyway in order to be able to hold anything we conquer. So the captive audience is just the icing on the cake, really.but that's the thing the buildings aren't the thing that screws with the effect it's more that you have so many people who just don't believe all the BS you can pull off hence why if we can make something like mechanicsburg we could pull it off. It's a town filled with people who already know you can pull all kinds of BS off so therefore you can
Not what I was talking about. Mechanicsburg is the result of centuries of semi-accidental selective breeding and culture-building. It's people are near-perfect minions, and term incredibly helpful to any effort Heterodyne decides to make. It's got serious history. It's too high a bar to hit within any rational timeframe. And it would take way too much time, and probably require building a cult centering on ourselves.@Nixeu
You're right it does say that artificial structures would affect it.
As for investment? I would think that the army is a lower initial investment but a high upkeep cost for the logistics vs the castle/city that has a high initial investment but would, hopefully, make money. Granted you could use an army to make money by attacking places but that would get you enemies until you scare everyone off.