Wolfman217
Oh No! Oh No! Oh No!
- Location
- England
@Teen Spirit Just to be clear, if we pick Honourable Rhaenyra isn't going to start getting stress from doing things like courting her very pretty handmaiden instead of her lawfully wedded husband, right?
Because that would be a dealbreaker for my vote.
This.
There is no way you can justify cheating on your spouse as "honourable". ESPECIALLY in a society like Westeros.
AND this isn't modern days interpretation of "honourable" - this is WESTEROS'
You know, that land where women are considered property? And gay people are disliked at BEST and killed at worst?
That thing that our MC is both of?
So she wouldn't even get the rep bonuses of being "honorable" as she'd either have to undo basically everything she's done to be Westoros' idea of a "honourable" woman, or go on a different idea of "honourable", and NOT be "honourable" according to 99% of Westeros.
So Rhae would be stuck in a stress loop - she either cheats on her spouse and gets stress, or stays loyal and gets stress from the romantic trait of breaking up with and then staying away from the woman she loves.
Literally the worst option.
[X] [Trait] The Honor You have Been Given
After Ser Arnold's execution, we picked the Vale Knights' words to stick with us most. These were:
And, well, that says it all, doesn't it?
So why are you voting for it twice? If a previous vote already coded being honoruable then why vote for it again? It's just a waste of losing the opportunity to be diligent or ambitious.
I like Ambitious: Frankly, I think it's the most IC for our Rhaenyra. Many of our primary goals revolve around acquiring and maintaining power - the SC position and then the Iron Throne. And these are not goals we'd have been culturally encouraged in - yet we want power in spite of that. Like:
This is a little ambitious.
There's also our defiant nature - there's been talk in the thread about permanently changing the Targaryen succession to a equal inheritance model, and that's an ambitious goal. Our general stance has been that if something we want goes against customs and traditions, we will go against customs and traditions and they will break before we do. That both requires power and is itself ambitious.
Ambitious is the most culturally-evil coded (both IRL and In Universe). And I'm by no means arguing that we should be willing to do immoral things in pursuit of power. However, I think that the combination of our morality and ambition is some interesting texture. An honorable romantic knight is a bit of a tautology. A diligent romantic knight isn't, but isn't necessarily any more interesting than a romantic knight. An ambitious romantic knight is a bit spicy.
And honestly, words like "grasping" and "power hungry" and just words to describe ambition in someone the speaker thinks ought to know their place.
Also this.
Why is ambitious being coded as "evil" or "amoral" by so many people?
Wanting to cure cancer is pretty fucking ambitious. But who'd argue that's evil.
You can still be ambitious and NOT go off the deep end trying to reach it.
Ambitious includes aspects of diligent - because genuinely ambitious people WORK HARD - without the downside of being unable to abandon something or minimum effort something (not everything NEEDS maximum effort, it's called being efficient)
Plus it's just the best for the future of the quest in terms of plot/scope as the "goals" of the mc/quest would be higher.
And voters are already RP'ing honoruable a lot of the time, so just keep doing that - getting a honourable trait will just handicap the quest as it will cut of a ton of flexibility without incurring massive stress.
[X] [Trait] All That You Could Achieve
[X] [Trait] The Hard Work That Brought You Here
Literally only voting diligent to go against honoruable.
[X] [Celebrate] Visit Your Father
[X] [Celebrate] Celebrate Your Success with Ser Tarly
[X] [Celebrate] Speak to Rhaenys The Queen Who Never Was (GM Discretion)
Don't mind to much here - though we've spent a lot of time with Alicent already and the nature of the quest makes opportunity cost so important.
Last edited: