It seems fairly likely that much of the technology will be useless to us for the foreseeable future without STUs, and without tiberium, our STU supply becomes negligible. Do we have time, knowing the Visitors and Reeapers are out there, to replicate Bentusari technology without the advantages tiberium gives?It would be better to sacrifice tiberium than the tech trade. In fact, I think that's an entirely fair position.
Well golly, guess which vote is doing that:praying no warlord makes a poor choice in the face of the erosion of their legitimacy and power base
The thing is, you're modeling him as a machine who just endlessly seeks destruction without cause, rather than as a person motivated by incentives.Blow up the world, conquer the world, turn everyone into weird aliens, have us subjugated by other aliens… because he has repeatedly tried to do these things and never shown any attempts or intentions to do anything else.
At the very least this ends with Kane in a position of power and us saying "why did we let him do that".
The knowledge of Kane's origin isn't meta. It's in-character. We know he's an alien and what his background is.I am excluding my OOC knowledge of Kane's real origin and history and meta knowledge-of-the-future of the TCN
"High minded rhetoric" Okay, dude.I'm struggling to imagine how Kane endorsing unification ends with a messier and more problematic unification than just crossing our fingers and praying no warlord makes a poor choice in the face of the erosion of their legitimacy and power base.
Theres a reason major NOD figures are described as Warlords. Their political authority is rooted in their ability to mobilize a capable military. How challenged is that authority going to be by peace? As channels of diplomacy, communication, and trade open that a warlord is increasingly going to struggle to monopolize and distribute to those in his favor as a way of building loyalty? You have got to give NOD an off-ramp out of warlordism if you want peace, because otherwise we are gambling on people in power on the basis of their military, who are predisposed to think in terms of military, to solve problems with military solutions, willingly decoupling their regime's policy from military matters and abstaining from using their military to achieve their aims.
This high minded rhetoric is nice, but it's meaningless. It doesn't acknowledge the issues everybody needs to resolve in order to achieve peace in favor of just assuming it'll happen. Peace is *hard*, it's something that needs to be worked at and fought for, we need to give NOD a means of fighting for a peace they can live with besides military means. Assuming peace will just miraculously assume is just reckless.
This is not imperialism, this is not naked subjugation. It's demanding some kind of Reconstruction so the issues can be fought on a campaign trail rather than with military campaigns.
Squid said on discord that we can vote for as many as we want, it's just that the top 3 will get pickedIf we're allowed approval-votes I'd add "subordination" because I could take it as a substitute for technology exchange and not feel cheated
If someone's already stabbed you three times you don't hand him a knife while saying "I trust that, as a rational actor, you will recognise that it is not in your long-term self-interest to stab me." He clearly thinks stabbing you is an effective way to advance his interests, and maybe he knows something you don't. You can't model everything he might know and might be planning, but you can recognise patterns.The thing is, you're modeling him as a machine who just endlessly seeks destruction without cause, rather than as a person motivated by incentives.