Green Flame Rising (Exalted vs Dresden Files)

I have an idea that might be a bit too honest, but I'd like feedback
[] "You read the Council's Big Book of Yomi Wan? Well, imagine something like a metaphysical nuclear reactor, except instead of uranium it runs on Yomi Wan juice cleared out of most hell-ness and you'll have a nice approximation of what I'm plugged into and what I want to drop on anything that breaths wrong at humanity"

For now:
[X] Before you can reply, Clippy's speaker chimes in with the opening lyrics of a rather well known song, "Please allow me to introduce myself..."
-[X] "I'm Molly," you answer with a chuckle. "I brought cookies."
Yeah, mentioning you wrote the book on (a kind of) hell is a bit much for an icebreaker.
You are right, think I missed the diff reduction dice. One moment.

Edit: Edits done, make that 25 successes.
What was the scale again?

5 - Legendary
10 - Heroic
15 - Exalted Showboating
20 - Cementing A Reputation
25 - Why Are You Even Here

Or something to that effect? :V
 
Why? The main benefits of signing the Accords are that Mab won't resent you from not joining her pet project, access to diplomatic contacts and procedures, and stability. We are already cool with Mab (pun intended), we have plenty of contacts built on mutual benefit and interests (and have shown that we have enough to offer that we can easily make new ones), and stability is a two-edged sword for somebody as powerful as us that wants to change the status quo.

Because there might be a clause for just outright declaring a war of conquest on another member of Accords, but in canon we know that even the Red Court strongly preferred to seize a convenient casus belli first. Which we would need to manufacture.

Red Court is a signatory, so is technically Black Court, Drakul, Denarians as group (except for Nicodemus). So say goodbye to element of surprise, when we would at the very least need to formally declare war before attacking any of them (and we are planning an ambush on Denarians already). And any human thralls or slaves they have? Unless we are formally at war, then it would be violation of Accords to rescue them, because you would be "stealing" from another faction, which is an act of aggression. Remember our attack on Duchess Arianna? It wouldn't have been possible like that, had we been signatories.

Our enemies will manipulate our morals into violating the Accords and that will hurt our relationship with Mab more than not just joining in the first place. We could try to play the duel and wergild games to mitigate violations, but why?

There's a damn good reason why The Knights and The Church aren't members.
That's not quite accurate. The Accords are basically the closest thing to the UN and the Geneva Conventions that the supernatural world has. It doesn't actually work the same as either of those, but it has elements of both.

The difference between being a signatory and not is the difference between being a rogue state a legitimate one. From a practical perspective you can still do a lot of state things as long as you've got the juice, but you and your citizens don't have the same sort of rights and respect.

The Accords don't stop conflict; see the vampire war. What they do is set terms for negotiation and backing for mutual agreements. If you want to shatter another Signatory Power and drag their innocent citizens' souls to your personal spirit realm to be tortured for power until the end of time you're free to try. It's just that if you assault a legitimately appointed diplomat during a meeting then the rest of the members will kick your ass. Similarly, if you have a neutral party witness a peace agreement and then break it you also get the hammer.

The reason that the Knights aren't members is because they basically exist in a state of total war with the Denarians. They cannot enter any agreements with them by default and allowing them to force scenarios where the knights can't touch particular hosts violates their duty.

Edit:

Here's the requirements of the Accords as Molly understands them:

Even before you get the chance to ask Bob about Queen Mab the list of reasons to dislike her grows a little longer. Who insists on writing things on parchment these days? Does she have a grudge against cows as well as your free time, trying to decipher all this flowery verbiage? It's not like this stuff is old either, the current version of the Unseelie Accords is only as old as the Milwaukee Incursion, which is to say less than twelve years old, having been signed on the Winter Solstice when the power of Winter was strongest. That you soon learn is a big hint as to its purpose. Due to the power of oaths over most of those who deal in magic, even such alien and uncanny beings as the vampires of the Black Court, the various factions have a... trust in the letter of their agreements that would make mortal diplomats whistle in envy, but up until relatively recently there had been no need to create a unitary framework for interacting with each other under the veil of secrecy. There are no mortal signatories of the Accords, that much you know form glancing down at the list and yet the presence of mortal humanity looms over every word here written as the moon does above the ebb and flow of the tides.

The first chapter deals with the sacrosanct nature of messengers and the precise conditions one must meet to serve as a messenger you suspect because everything else is pointless if the two sides cannot converse and coordinate. It also covers penalties for third parties meddling with messages, including fax, telephone, radio and computer networks... all still written out on the darn parchment. Crucially the guarantee for this is enforced by Winter itself, allowing the unseelie court to act directly at the command of a march-lord, the least of the lords of Winter to ensure that harm to a messenger is punished and the message reaches its intended destination in a timely manner.

The second chapter is all about places like Mac's Pub, the fines for impinging upon them, which range from weregild to the execution of the offending individual to loss of territory. You briefly wonder what Mac would even do with territory in faerie or villages filled with unfortunate vampire thralls, but that is not the important part here. Neutral places extend beyond their physical boundaries to a certain degree so you cannot just siege someone inside the pub say. An agreement to meet someone in such a place is also an agreement to allow them to leave in peace, with both those words described in painfully precise detail. The implication of course is that other meetings are not thus protected between signatories. There is also a clause about not attacking mortals within or around Accorded Neutral Ground in such a way as would compromise it, referring not just to physical space but their capacity to function within mortal society. It's a good thing Mac runs such a clean ship because anyone who tried to call the food inspectors on him would get smote, you think amused.

Alas the smile does not last long as you get to the list of reasons someone might be forced to leave neutral ground without the lingering protection to 'go in peace'. These include insults to the legitimacy of the opposing power, showing up with property you stole off the opposing side... including thralls, serfs and slaves because of course it does.

"There are many powers mistress which cannot bear such an insult and to whom the presentation of stolen treasure would be tantamount to a compulsion to attack," Usum points out, like you didn't know.

"Still horrid," you sigh.

The third chapter is interesting, but not that relevant to you, being that it is about the use and abuse of mortal authorities to get what you want out of a situation. The gist of it is you can but any such mortals are defined as the retainers of whichever co-signatory of the Accords is making use of them so long as they are acting knowingly. Here follow six pages describing various levels of awareness . Beneath a certain level which can be summarized as 'that's not Bigfoot it's just a bear' mortals are not treated as retainers but more as a kind of battlefield hazard, no different from getting someone to fall in a pit of spikes. There are of course contingencies about the mortals being aware of more than their handlers thought. The party in question must then clean up their mess to the satisfaction of a neutral emissary if they do not wish the higher standard to apply. Murphy has definitely been acting as Harry's agent for years and more recently yours. Is the Library of Congress a member? Ah not important now...

Finally the fourth chapter has to do with settling disputes by blood or by weregild, from battlefield truces to duels. These always involve a neutral mediator when the Accords are Invoked who ensures the sides are not cheating, whether it be using magic in a duel which has been decided as a test of will between the parties or giving up... lives that have already been hollowed out or souls which have already been dedicated to another power. God, no wonder the Church isn't party to the Accords.

Being as fair as you can the document does not force anyone to take part in the soul trade, it just provides rules for doing so, the same way it provides rules for trading labor, works of artistry and craft, precious metals and even cash, but still there are situations in which Winter might call upon other signatories to provide limited assistance in resolving a breach of the Accords, including a breach of weregild payment
 
Last edited:
What was the scale again?

5 - Legendary
10 - Heroic
15 - Exalted Showboating
20 - Cementing A Reputation
25 - Why Are You Even Here

Or something to that effect? :V
5 Successes I would expect them to be certain that these are the best cookies that they have ever had.
25 successes I don't even know some sort of dramatic revelation about the nature of the universe? But that can likely happen at 15 successes.
At the very least in the future if we ever want a favor for any of them they will likely do for some cookies.

The roll says cookies of the gods, but gods would likely fight for these cookies.
 
Last edited:
I am fairly sure that the precedent is that we start to spontaneously generate least gods at 25+ successes.
That was before we had a proper Exalted crafting charm. So I guess that these cookies count as Prodigies?
We actually beat our direct roll from that by 7 successes, and are only 3 shy of the ritual's total value counting our willpower expense here:
We're off by one Pauline.
 
"Just so you know, I made these cookies with roughly the same amount of focus and dedication as that time I made a minor god."
And I have far more skill then I had back then. Since we have the charm now these cookies are Prodigies. It would not be unreasonable for them to have a 2 dice bonus to all rolls today as well as being able to shake off mental afflictions in the future just be remembering just how great these cookies were.

So in the future they look at a skinwalker using the sight and are overwhelmed with evil, but then they shake it off when they remember these cookies which prove that there is still good in the world.
 
Last edited:
Wizards get a point in the Cooking sphere. What do you mean that's not a sphere? It is now! :V
we can't do it with cookies, but it occurs to me that there are some funny and completely accidental parallels between Molly/FCF and Mage's speculation on the tenth sphere:

The following attack of the Technocratic Union has led the Traditions into disarray, but they see the harbinger of the Tenth Sphere brightly in the night sky - the Red Star.

The most common theory of the Tenth Sphere is Unity, a concept shared by the Ahl-i-Batinsince their inception[1], the Solificati who studied the middle eastern mystics and belief that the final Unity will be the Philosopher's Stone that will help humanity to see the limitless potential of the world[2]; the Celestial Chorus, who see it as a return to the One[3]; and the Order of Hermes, who espouses the Ars Unitatis as a means of returning to man's original divinity[4].

What exactly encompasses the Sphere of Unity is up to debate. The Batini, who are in general credited for the conception of the Sphere, believe that by bringing everything within the Tellurian in touch with each other, all will be one again and every false barrier will fall, enabling the Ascension of the world as well as of mankind[1].
Information is the Sphere Alan Turingdiscovered when he found the Digital Web. Control, however, refused to acknowledge Information as a valid sphere of its own right, especially since adages like "Information wants to be free" went against their own aims for humanity. The Virtual Adepts left the Union and throw their lot with the traditions, who let them research the Web.

In many aspects, Information is similar to the concept of Unity, a connection only strengthened when it was discovered that the Web was actually the ruin of Mount Qaf, the Correspondence Point of the old Ahl-i-Batin. Information seeks to connect people with each other and the world and eventually transcends its limits, like Unity does[6].

A star themed harbinger of a new era hmm? A new fundamental property getting added to the fabric of creation as only happened in the days of the primordial you say?

A principle touching on Unity and Information, connecting people in ways the sages of the old world could never have predicted and to a depth that this modern age has yet to truly grasp? Maybe a splash of "returning to divinity" by way of some sort of relationship with spirits too?

But that couldn't be little old Molly - they got the color wrong. :V

Seriously though, @DragonParadox and @Yog was this on purpose?

Edit: error
 
Last edited:
Not on my part. I'll be honest - I wasn't able to force myself to read through Mage book completely yet.
It's oddly appropriate. A new primordial should have something fundamental to add to the substrate of creation, but one borne of an infernal going heretic would by necessity have inherited a lot of their mythos from it. A "new" meta-principle is the easiest way to square that circle in the hypothetical that Molly gets that far.

Some extension of how things relate to each other grown from the basis of what's already there.

Assuming any of this is right I don't imagine it'd happen anytime soon, probably not until part quest really, but it would be cool if one day wizards studying the fundamentals of FCF sorcery broke into the beginnings of a new sphere.
 
The Accords don't stop conflict; see the vampire war.

I never said they did, I just assumed that you might need to formally declare war and be expected to have a casus belli. But since there is nothing about that in the quoted chapters summary, I concede that it might not be a concern.

But looking at the quoted chapters:

1) 2) We don't really have much of a need of protection for messengers and neutral territory. Because I would guess that when interacting with hostile factions, we go ourselves, not risk somebody else. In fact, we might want to mess with enemy information network in the future.

3) We have no use for outside oversight in how we deal with mundanes. If the Accords don't stop a war, then we also have no use in having them recognized as our retainers. It will only make them even bigger and more legitimate military targets.

4) We can solve our own disputes with those we want and don't want to be restrained by mediation or dueling rules with those who we don't want. Who could there even be that we might piss off but still want to make up with, where we would actually need the benefit of the Accords? Dragons, maybe? But the same situation as the Knights also applies to us. That we aren't in total war with Denarians is only a matter of time.

Also, I don't think "rogue state" is entirely accurate. Not being a signatory does not make us somehow seem less trustworthy to the White Council and Odin as the Red Court, who is a signatory, for example. The collection of signatories is so divided it makes the Cold War look like a love story and not some united front of "civilized world" vs rogue regimes.

Jade Court isn't a signatory, The Forrest People weren't for a long time. It's entirely possible to function as a supernatural nation state without being one.
 
Last edited:
[X] Before you can reply, Clippy's speaker chimes in with the opening lyrics of a rather well known song, "Please allow me to introduce myself..."
-[X] "I'm Molly," you answer with a chuckle. "I brought cookies."
 
Adhoc vote count started by Anaja on Aug 13, 2024 at 6:39 PM, finished with 55 posts and 13 votes.

  • [X] Before you can reply, Clippy's speaker chimes in with the opening lyrics of a rather well known song, "Please allow me to introduce myself..."
    -[X] "I'm Molly," you answer with a chuckle. "I brought cookies."
    [X] I'm a friend of the Council, a new one. You'll get to shoot guns I supplied at some point.
    [x] tilts head to peer at the wizardlings for half a moment before slipping into a soft smile. "I am Molly Carpenter, Sovereign of the Five Fold Courts, Circlemate to Lydia, daughter of Arwan, Lash, Lady of Light and Flesh, and Olivia, Night Hunter of Chicago. Be welcome among my people."
    -[x] claps hands together as her mouth stretches into a mischievous grin. "Now, who's ready for fresh cookies~?"
    [x] I'm a friend of the Council, odder than most maybe, definitely newer
    -[x]"As for what I am anything that I say is likely to give you the wrong idea because I am a very unique existence in this world."
 
Compromise?

[] Before you can reply, Clippy's speaker chimes in with the opening lyrics of a rather well known song, "Please allow me to introduce myself..."
-[] "I'm Molly," you answer with a chuckle. "I brought cookies for you, and supply magic guns for the Council"
 
[x] tilts head to peer at the wizardlings for half a moment before slipping into a soft smile. "I am Molly Carpenter, Sovereign of the Five Fold Courts, Circlemate to Lydia, daughter of Arwan, Lash, Lady of Light and Flesh, and Olivia, Night Hunter of Chicago. Be welcome among my people."
-[x] claps hands together as her mouth stretches into a mischievous grin. "Now, who's ready for fresh cookies~?"
 
[X] I'm a friend of the Council, a new one. You'll get to shoot guns I supplied at some point.
 
I never said they did, I just assumed that you might need to formally declare war and be expected to have a casus belli. But since there is nothing about that in the quoted chapters summary, I concede that it might not be a concern.

But looking at the quoted chapters:

1) 2) We don't really have much of a need of protection for messengers and neutral territory. Because I would guess that when interacting with hostile factions, we go ourselves, not risk somebody else. In fact, we might want to mess with enemy information network in the future.

3) We have no use for outside oversight in how we deal with mundanes. If the Accords don't stop a war, then we also have no use in having them recognized as our retainers. It will only make them even bigger and more legitimate military targets.

4) We can solve our own disputes with those we want and don't want to be restrained by mediation or dueling rules with those who we don't want. Who could there even be that we might piss off but still want to make up with, where we would actually need the benefit of the Accords? Dragons, maybe? But the same situation as the Knights also applies to us. That we aren't in total war with Denarians is only a matter of time.

Also, I don't think "rogue state" is entirely accurate. Not being a signatory does not make us somehow seem less trustworthy to the White Council and Odin as the Red Court, who is a signatory, for example. The collection of signatories is so divided it makes the Cold War look like a love story and not some united front of "civilized world" vs rogue regimes.

Jade Court isn't a signatory, The Forrest People weren't for a long time. It's entirely possible to function as a supernatural nation state without being one.
1) We do need neutral territory. We've even made use of it in the quest with Mab and the Council. Arthur would probably not have been as willing to meet us without the infrastructure the Accords provide.

It's likely we'll need it in the future too. Either because we're required to meet with people who won't talk to us off of it or because we don't want to walk into a trap. Arrogance kills exalts all the time.

We also can't necessarily send every message ourselves, and people may not be comfortable sending us messengers if they don't know we'll respect them. We can muscle through without them for the most part, but not without making things harder on ourselves.

3) The outside oversight in this instance is in determining how culpable we are for their actions. The default is whatever our opposition at the time finds most convenient, this is legal protection for mortals who work for us. We can enforce this at the point of a sword, but more people are going to die while so we can make examples of their killers than if we made use of the system to warn people off.

4) You're not required to take binding arbitration with another party. You can just keep killing each other as long as you can keep it up. The benefit is that if you do take it you don't have to do all the enforcement yourself and that some people might have an easier time of it than you.

It is divided, but people signed it because it made negotiations among powers abroad in the world much easier and safer. Not every power is really interested in doing that.

It's worth noting that in DF canon we only know two things about the Jade Court other than that they haven't signed the Accords. That they have a mysterious ancestor like Drakul is for the black court, and that they almost never leave a specific valley in Asia.

The quest's Jades are pretty different, but the canon situation for them gives a decent explanation for why they might not sign on. They're extreme isolationists.

There's a definite difference in the weight given to powers who sign and those who don't among the subset you can have actual diplomatic relations with.

This whole thing is sort of like that guy who spent 6 months and $1500 making a chicken sandwich from the ground up. Literally growing/raising all the ingredients and doing all the processing.

It was tedious, expensive, and tasted like shit.

Turning up our noses at the Accords is turning up our noses at society. We'll spend more effort on basic stuff and then need to turn around and mooch to get things done half the time anyway.
 
[X] I'm a friend of the Council, a new one. You'll get to shoot guns I supplied at some point.

[X] "I'm Molly," you answer with a chuckle. "I brought cookies."

The song's a nice enough song, but I don't want us using it to introduce ourselves here.
 
[X] Yog

The full titles thing reads really weird to me. Despite actually having all those titles it still somehow manages to present them in an embarrassingly chuuni way. We don't have to try so hard to tell people how cool we are; they'll get the point when we start doing stuff.

Sympathy for the devil is better, but might put them a little on edge.
 
Back
Top