fair enough.Removing rebels (by means of diplomacy and/or conquest of the Great Labyrinth) is one of the intended options of the build.
fair enough.Removing rebels (by means of diplomacy and/or conquest of the Great Labyrinth) is one of the intended options of the build.
Sorry, at the end i had to use something to get one more point, or drop Lord of the Land or some other feature. And I firmly oppose overpoulation.
They aren't rebellious; the prison tribes basically want Molly to prove she's actually all that by coming inside to fight them instead of bowing to her whims by default.Why not drop loyalty down to neutral to gain the point we loose by not taking rebellion?
I'd prefer everyone involved just being sorta ok with the situation than having to navigate having a rebellion in our soul-world thingy.
---
Sorta like... "yeah, we have a god. She's ok I suppose. Trades some really spiffy tech stuff with us, and that's cool."
Well, if that's the case then I'd be ok with that being in the plan then, because I was thinking 'basement partisans who just really have beef with Molly'. what with this description:They aren't rebellious; the prison tribes basically want Molly to prove she's actually all that by coming inside to fight them instead of bowing to her whims by default.
Not quite the same as having a basement full of partisans looking to storm the capitol or something.
For my peace of mind, can you point me to where it's confirmed that we will be dealing with... not fervent hate and resentment?Resistance Movement (Cost: None; gain 1 point): A minority of the Realm's inhabitants fervently hate and resent you, and seek your overthrow or demise. You may only select this option if your Hell is Loyal, Committed, or Fanatical.
I thought we had some go ahead on it from when Yog originally wrote out the concept, but I don't have a quote.Well, if that's the case then I'd be ok with that being in the plan then, because I was thinking 'basement partisans who just really have beef with Molly'. what with this description:
For my peace of mind, can you point me to where it's confirmed that we will be dealing with... not fervent hate and resentment?
Well, if that's the case then I'd be ok with that being in the plan then, because I was thinking 'basement partisans who just really have beef with Molly'. what with this description:
For my peace of mind, can you point me to where it's confirmed that we will be dealing with... not fervent hate and resentment?
I thought we had some go ahead on it from when Yog originally wrote out the concept, but I don't have a quote.
To be clear, my understanding of the idea is that they are similarly invested in their position, but are basically interested in either Molly living up to their standards or dying in the attempt if she tries to enter the prison rather than say staging a coup.
Just to make sure I'm not spouting bullshit:
@Yog and @DragonParadox is that roughly correct and are we actually allowed to do that?
I think the resistance movement night actually have the potential to be a good idea - a spirited opposition could help keep us honest and accountable, both in our actions within the Kingdom and those in the outside world - at very least some push back to our ideas, plans and rule might help reveal flaws and improvements we might be able to make in our actions and designs, or at least allow a more accurate weighing of the pros and cons of our decisions. Of course, this very much depends on the exact nature of the resistance - especially whether and to what extent it's peaceful opposition in a quasi-democratic opposition fashion or a violent insurgency or terrorist cell which could bring perpetual violence, sufferimg and instability, potentially to the innocent. I'd guess it'd probably be a mix of both extremes the exact composition in flux over time.
Also, a question @DragonParadox - is there any way to change any aspect of the Kingdom after its founding, for instance increasing its size or scale, or alter an aspect of its environment or gaining control or power over/within through the investment of sufficient power/xp/something else? I'd guess if additional changes are possible, sapients could only be added or increased, not removed both for ethical reasons and such sapient or entities now existing having the capability to resist.
At the risk of Exalted background overtaking everything, depending on the worldbuilding we are not aware of yet, the situation can differ, by a lot. We don't actually know what White God is, how they relate to Primordials, and what inherent right Primordials have left. Creation has clearly been rebuilt (likely several times), but at least some parts of underlying structure remain, even if in degraded / warped form, such as Ancient Sorcery, which is basically admin console of reality. How we, as a possible heir of said Primordials figure into it is a question (we should probably look Mandate of Heavens at some point).We're in a very unique not touching you position with the world and the white god right now.
The idea of having an official embassy is appealing. Possibly not just for Heaven either. Winter and Summer might be allowed in my opinion. And yeah, it would be fun to have angels just being there, in their material "be not afraid" forms.This example probably wouldn't work, but to illustrate the idea I'm thinking something equivalent to giving "basing rights" or an embassy to Heaven for the nominal sake of local mortal souls without the jurisdictional expansion of Hell on the other side. Because they aren't and never were involved here.
Fairly sure we are the nukes, and Chicago is Cuba in this analogy.
You may be jumping to a conclusion there. I don't think that it's precisely that Amoraccius couldn't come inside, as that it couldn't come inside without impinging on Molly's free will as ordained by God, given the whole Hell is 'Molly', which obviously it refuses to do. There might be a way to game that diplomatically still, but I would assume it brings up the issue of Heaven and Hell's tit-for-tat interference policy.Independent of the particulars of the hell, it's interesting to note that Amoraccius couldn't come inside. We've talked about potential "diplomatic issues" and loopholes before, but I don't think we've touched on the possibility of any explicit arrangements yet.
We're in a very unique not touching you position with the world and the white god right now. That affords us the ability to do things like guess what the side of the angels would like to accomplish but can't without breaking the rules and simply do it, then tell the fallen to pound sand because god doesn't have to pay penalty points for people who don't work for him.
It would be very interesting to me if the Sword literally couldn't enter our Hell, not because of rules of conduct or etiquette, but as a simple fact of metaphysical existence. If the Sword is barred, then regular Angels are probably similarly affected, and if it extends to Angels then it probably extends to Denarian coins.Independent of the particulars of the hell, it's interesting to note that Amoraccius couldn't come inside. We've talked about potential "diplomatic issues" and loopholes before, but I don't think we've touched on the possibility of any explicit arrangements yet.
We're in a very unique not touching you position with the world and the white god right now. That affords us the ability to do things like guess what the side of the angels would like to accomplish but can't without breaking the rules and simply do it, then tell the fallen to pound sand because god doesn't have to pay penalty points for people who don't work for him.
Losing that dynamic would cost team good guys a significant potential advantage, but it's possible we could maintain it and make some unfair deals to bias the game if we're careful.
We need more exact answers to do anything without risking serious consequences for everyone, but really screwing over hell in a way they can't really do anything about would be amazing.
This example probably wouldn't work, but to illustrate the idea I'm thinking something equivalent to giving "basing rights" or an embassy to Heaven for the nominal sake of local mortal souls without the jurisdictional expansion of Hell on the other side. Because they aren't and never were involved here.
Ideally that would mean Heaven would have zero rules tying their hands on how they're allowed to keep Hell from fucking with our inhabitants coupled with an obligation to defend their free will from the Denarians.
Then, to maximize cheating, Heaven brews plots in our territory which we freely and independently choose to allow to interact with the real world. Molly would basically get to exploit dual citizenship + free will rules; the plots are off limits in her Hell until she does something to bring them to Creation proper where the rules apply to the consequences but not the initial conditions.
This particular idea assumes too many convenient conditions, but it's worth exploring what actually viable options might exist.
Just imagine what Uriel could accomplish if he could choose when his plots had to even pretend to be fair.
tldr: Cuban Missile Crisis Divine Edition when?
Heaven is overwhelmingly more powerful in that equation and primarily constrained by its own rules. Being able to physically block them was never the point, only that they're making the jurisdictional distinction. If it was just free will it wouldn't be a complicated explanation for the Sword. Defending that is literally Micheal's job.You may be jumping to a conclusion there. I don't think that it's precisely that Amoraccius couldn't come inside, as that it couldn't come inside without impinging on Molly's free will as ordained by God, given the whole Hell is 'Molly', which obviously it refuses to do. There might be a way to game that diplomatically still, but I would assume it brings up the issue of Heaven and Hell's tit-for-tat interference policy.