Would you Distort or manifest EGO?


  • Total voters
    142
[X] Plan: This is the ideal.
-[X] …is someone dedicated to their work.
-[X] …would be a peer or conversation partner.
-[X] …is deeply compassionate.
-[X] …has a very strong moral compass.


Besides Adam, I genuinely do wonder if anyone checks all of these boxes

...For some reason my mind jumped to Don Quixote in some weird mockery of logic.
 
[X] Plan: This is the ideal.
-[X] …is someone dedicated to their work.
-[X] …would be a peer or conversation partner.
-[X] …is deeply compassionate.
-[X] …has a very strong moral compass.


Besides Adam, I genuinely do wonder if anyone checks all of these boxes

...For some reason my mind jumped to Don Quixote in some weird mockery of logic.
Are not at all of these correct!? Are thee an evildoer! All know that Don Quixote De La Mancha is a paragon! A wondrous knight, virtuous, kind, stalwart, dedicated!
 
Are not at all of these correct!? Are thee an evildoer! All know that Don Quixote De La Mancha is a paragon! A wondrous knight, virtuous, kind, stalwart, dedicated!

The worse part is that I can see all of them being checked out with the exception of the conversation partner one, but even then you can be technical and say: "Yeah...you can have a conversation with them."
 
Frankly speaking I don't believe in the ideal plan. Feels a bit too much.

[X] …is deeply compassionate.

The worse part is that I can see all of them being checked out with the exception of the conversation partner one, but even then you can be technical and say: "Yeah...you can have a conversation with them."
Don Quixote is someone who is deeply immersed in her interests. For the LCB Sinner, it's Fixers. For W-Corp Don Quixote, it's trains (she probably collects train model kits much like the base version collects figurines, I dare say), and for N-Corp Don Quixote it's the obsession with the scriptures. I'd even say Shi Director might have a massive sword collection back home.

If you're into autistic girl swag and can accept talking with someone for 10 hours on the Red Mist's feats, on the engineering of WARP trains, the history of wakizashi or the teachings of the One Who Grips, she's a great conversation partner.
 
Last edited:
I can't really see X getting together with anyone because of the whole terminally not a person thing but if I had to pick one partner for X it would be Chesed. I don't even have a good reason for the pairing, I just think it would be funny.
 
X getting a significant other is it's own adventure. Whoever they are will have to be good with kids though...

INB4: the entire thread starts searching the multiverse for a contestants in a special episode of "The Bachelorette" :V
 
Come with me on a journey.

This basically got some attention from me. It's a topic that hasn't really come up at all this quest, and maybe something different has happened.

Now I'm full on interested! Someone she doesn't know very well? That could be anyone! She's been running into all sorts new people lately! Is it one of the girls she was stuck with inside Nothing There? Someone from the Library? Did she just run into a random guy or girl on the street? Who knows! I wanna see the kind of person that gets the attention of someone like Kyoko, after everything she's been through and what she's become. That sounds down right fascinating.

Then it's- its Sayaka. It's Sayaka.

It's Sayaka.

You know, I like Sayaka. I like her a lot. As a character, and as someone who might be fun to hangout with if she was like, five years older. She's fun, determined, and here, actually believes in something. Good people.

But man, I felt something inside me break. An infinite world of possibilities brought about by all sorts of changes, and it's fucking Sayaka and Kyoko again.

Would you prefer she be crushing on Argalia?
 
One problem with them is that both Adam and the Doctor are hella shitty conversation partners. Adam is less so than the Doctor but not by that much.

Ah, but the thing is, the option says nothing about *great conversation partner* it says *would be a peer or conversation partner*, and Adam does work for both, he is a peer without a doubt, and he definitely can have debates with X, so conversation partner.

See, truly the ideal man.

Edit:

In fact, let me add, the text of the option doesn't precise anything but *conversation partner*, as such, the only researched criteria is *can have a conversation*, no precision on if these needs to be good, interesting, two-sided, or anything, you can talk and answer, you're good.

As such, a good candidate if you only choose this criteria is Tommerry, they do know a lot about L.O.V.E so I'm sure they would be a great partner!


:V
 
Last edited:
[X] Plan: This is the ture ideal.
-[X] …is someone dedicated to their work.
-[X] …would be a peer or conversation partner.
-[X] …is deeply compassionate.
-[X] …has a very strong moral compass.
-[X] ...is not a religious madman.
 
: What in the name of this hell on earth are the two of you talking about. have you finally came to the conclusion that it will be better for you two to become nothing but a member of City's madness? in which case, leave you childrens out of your mad talk, its annoying.
 
Last edited:
Let's just bury the shipping talk for now before we enter weirdo territory even further.

*Cough* Ayin and Carmen are good candidates too btw *Cough*
 
All this discussion and I'm surprised only one Abnormality has been brought up. I'm not sure if this is better or worse than that.
 
[X] Plan: This is the ture ideal.
-[X] …is someone dedicated to their work.
-[X] …would be a peer or conversation partner.
-[X] …is deeply compassionate.
-[X] …has a very strong moral compass.
-[X] ...is not a religious madman.
Changing my vote. This is too good. Plus, our Agents still qualify!

...Is that bad?

That's probably bad.

On the plus side, I find the idea of X asking Angela if she remembers what company policy on that sort of thing was, and getting a look of deep concern in response amusing. That's also probably bad. There's also a bit of a power dynamic there that has some bad implications, but at least now it's 'merely' a little higher on the totem pole rather than "My girlfriend is the God Queen of my workplace" bad. Still probably shouldn't. But then I'm a person on the internet and therefore have never been in a relationship so I don't actually know.
 
Back
Top