Indeed. Points where things fall apart in the future:Speaking of plausibility a more general piece of advice for you guys, you can bowl over the average mortal, hell you can bowl over even most strong willed mortals, what you cannot do is talk your way around systems. So if you sell someone a bridge in Brooklyn and they later investigate and discover there is no such thing the jig is up. What you most need is not a story that can stand up to immediate scrutiny, Molly has a particular set of skills to handle that (bullshitting, the skill is bullshitting), what she most needs is a story that corroborates once the mortals in question are no longer in her presence and which can no longer be persuaded that the sky is actually pink.
The reasons to move out could be:Honestly why move out. They only thing worth moving out for would be a several block sized warded palace. We are not getting that anytime soon, even if we had a charm to make the morals work faster. Only way we are getting that early is spending a Mab favor on it.
That's an important point to consider. I think my approach satisfies that though; it doesn't claim anything unusual from anywhere that we can't trivially fabricate the evidence. The only external party to validate with is Chicago Synthetics, and any call there is going to go to Clippy.Speaking of plausibility a more general piece of advice for you guys, you can bowl over the average mortal, hell you can bowl over even most strong willed mortals, what you cannot do is talk your way around systems. So if you sell someone a bridge in Brooklyn and they later investigate and discover there is no such thing the jig is up. What you most need is not a story that can stand up to immediate scrutiny, Molly has a particular set of skills to handle that (bullshitting, the skill is bullshitting), what she most needs is a story that corroborates once the mortals in question are no longer in her presence and which can no longer be persuaded that the sky is actually pink.
This doesn't do anything about the many issues of breaking that particular barrier with them.Which is why I'm in favor of telling them about magic.
In the moment we can convince them to go with that, and afterwards it's basically impossible for them to find out anything we kept secret, because the other wolrd is kinda tight-lipped around muggles snooping around.
Dad the defence-contractor or whatever might be able to look into Chicago Synthetics, but he certainly can't find out much about Exalted Molly besides her being kinda scary to the average being in the know in Chicago.
We are really hiding it though. Thomas is running the show because Molly can't legally own a company, especially this kind of company, at 17. That's why his loyalty was so important, our name isn't on any paperwork and our agreement with him is an entirely verbal one backed by Molly's personal power.Well, that basically says that Yog's plan is the one that works to best then, Uju's has the problem of us not having the inheritance he claims, and Bronzetongue's, while truer, will create questions when (not if, when, we are not really hiding it) it is discovered we are the one who created Chicago Synthetics.
Thankfully you're good at producing scientific-sounding jargon. It is just a pity you could not be there to see him deliver it, but in the end it just made more sensenot to associate Molly Carpenter with the company at this point. As the only person able to make the whole thing work you are going to have to get involved eventually, but it would be best to do so under an alias, one that is not seventeen.
One of the few requirements for a CEO is that they be at least eighteen and while an underage employee would not be wholly out of the question it would raise eyebrows.Sso while Thomas handled the regulatory details you had gone looking around the neighborhood for a source of scrap.
I think its safe to assume that Molly wouldnt arrange a talk with her best friend's mother without letting her friend know beforehand.Also, I just noticed I neglected to actually include Rosie in the decision making process, which isn't ideal. Adding that now, and I think anyone with a plan in the pool should stick something to the front about getting a go/no-go from her privately beforehand instead of just making decisions.
You're right, I conflated it with part of BronzeTongue's.This is straight up not true. I do not commit to any timeline for moving out, and provide an alternative in buying her an apartment.
I dont think it should be. We're not lying, just not being totally frank.Wouldn't this be Subterfuge? Since Molly is definitely shading the truth here.
IIRC Etiquette was mostly for other people in Molly's power class.
Part of the reason we havent actually gone for the Lotto yet is that Molly just turned 18 this November.I'm a bit confused on this point between you and Yog, because it feels like you are both ignoring the lotto win thing with regards to how it influences the argument. Is it actually still on the table with Chicago Synthetics? Because nothing will draw more scrutiny into Molly's finances than the lotto win, so if that's an issue it should be won ASAP before her finances get even more hinky.
If scrutiny really isn't an issue, (and it's arguable with Molly's social charms and supernatural edges it truly isn't), we can certainly wait for the bigger win. But if it is a concern, and we want to avoid scrutiny but still want the lotto win, we should have Molly blow a hundred dollars she got as a 'birthday present' on lotto tickets or something to give an interesting story for the newsies right away and take a lesser pot. It's the kind of income Rosie's parents would accept Molly 'wasting' on Rosie more easily because it's unearned.
In comparison to that level of scrutiny, how we handle Rosie's parents is more of a 'what is Molly's moral code' thing than a scrutiny of the mundanes thing.
Yeah. Tell no tales that can be independently disproved.Speaking of plausibility a more general piece of advice for you guys, you can bowl over the average mortal, hell you can bowl over even most strong willed mortals, what you cannot do is talk your way around systems. So if you sell someone a bridge in Brooklyn and they later investigate and discover there is no such thing the jig is up. What you most need is not a story that can stand up to immediate scrutiny, Molly has a particular set of skills to handle that (bullshitting, the skill is bullshitting), what she most needs is a story that corroborates once the mortals in question are no longer in her presence and which can no longer be persuaded that the sky is actually pink.
They arent treating her like shit.Why are we even paying for Rosie's care ourselves? We're a social-focused exalt; can't we convince her parents to step up and stop treating her like shit?
It won't be anything close to that expensive, even if we have to pay all of her expenses and those of the baby, not unless we're planning to put her up by herself in an upscale Chicago neighborhood.We are essentially committing to around a hundred, a hundred and fifty thousand dollars in expenses every year for five to six years until Rosie finishes university, and thats not including the costs of an apartment or living money if she moves out.
Or one-time costs like a car.
We literally make 3 times that a month. Money is not an issue. Not to mention we should have VEE long before then.We are essentially committing to around a hundred, a hundred and fifty thousand dollars in expenses every year for five to six years until Rosie finishes university, and thats not including the costs of an apartment or living money if she moves out.
Or one-time costs like a car.
I mean, to enumerate some of the costs we're looking at:It won't be anything close to that expensive, even if we have to pay all of her expenses and those of the baby, not unless we're planning to put her up by herself in an upscale Chicago neighborhood.
Even in a city like Chicago, her total annual expenses should be well under 100k in 2006.
Im not saying we cant afford it; we paid roughly that much to hire a bunch of Einherjar for six hours.We do get a certain amount of bulk discounts from our undertown work and I am sure some of our minions is will be willing to babysit. Also once we get our kingdom it all becomes trivial.
This is pre-Obamacare in the US. What do you think?I'm getting between 800 and 3000 dollars per year For Formula alone.
Also, are we counting insurance for the baby as part of Rosie's health insurance, or are the insurers going to be dicks about it and make us pay for baby's insurance separately?
Are there any restrictions on them, say, changing the coverage or costs without informing us, or otherwise screwing us over in a way where we cannot do anything until after the fact, when they can present what has been done as a fait accompli?This is pre-Obamacare in the US. What do you think?
Expect them to be in the high-risk pool as well, with high-risk prices, because his/her/their(they may be twins or triplets) mother may have used heroin in the very early stages of the pregnancy.
Seriously, even today the average yearly costs for family health insurance seems to be around 20k.
No.Are there any restrictions on them, say, changing the coverage or costs without informing us?
Source:Opiate abuse said:Illicit opiate use has been steadily increasing in the past decade and a large part of this increase is in the 18–25 age bracket, which includes women of reproductive age (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2013). The probability of preeclampsia, premature labor and rupture of membranes, placental insufficiency, abruptio placentae, intrauterine growth retardation, and intrauterine death increases greatly with illicit opiate use during pregnancy (Bashore et al, 1981; Hulse et al, 1998; Kaltenbach et al, 1998). Even with a successful labor and delivery, neonates often have low birthweight and smaller head circumference as well as experience symptoms of opiate withdrawal (Binder and Vavrinkova, 2008; Hunt et al, 2008; Kandall et al, 1976). Some clinical studies have also suggested an increased prevalence of heart defects, autonomic dysregulation (Paul et al, 2014), nystagmus (Gupta et al, 2012), and strabismus (Gill et al, 2003) in children exposed prenatally to opiates. At the pre- and elementary school ages, these children show motor and cognitive impairments (Bunikowski et al, 1998; Guo et al, 1994; Hunt et al, 2008), inattention (Hickey et al, 1995; Ornoy et al, 1996), hyperactivity (Ornoy et al, 1996), and an increase in ADHD when exposed prenatally to heroin (Ornoy et al, 2001). The damage of prenatal opiate exposure is debilitating and long lasting, and physicians must continue to track cohorts of exposed children to further understand the impact into adulthood.
Similar to human clinical studies, rodents exposed to heroin or morphine have a lower birthweight (Eriksson and Ronnback, 1989; Lu et al, 2012; Zagon and McLaughlin, 1977b, 1977c) and impaired learning and memory (Steingart et al, 2000a; Wang and Han, 2009). Numerous structural and functional alterations have been found that could underlie the effects of prenatal opiates on cognition, including perturbations in dendritic length, synaptic plasticity, neuronal proliferation, and cholinergic function. Prenatal heroin or morphine exposure decreases dendritic branch length in layer II/III pyramidal neurons in somatosensory cortex, which is thought to be specific to opiate receptor activation, as it can be blocked by co-administration of an opiate receptor antagonist (Lu et al, 2012; Ricalde and Hammer, 1990). Long-term potentiation, long-term depression, and proteins associated with synaptic transmission are all attenuated with perinatal morphine exposure (Villarreal et al, 2008; Yang et al, 2006). Decreased proliferation in the developing striatum (Harlan and Song, 1994) and increased apoptosis in dopaminergic cell cultures and the hippocampus have been observed with perinatal heroin or morphine exposure (Oliveira et al, 2003; Oliveira et al, 2002; Svensson et al, 2008; Wang and Han, 2009).
The Yanai lab has provided substantial evidence to suggest that the deficits in spatial learning and memory may be tied to hippocampal cholinergic alterations. They found increased hippocampal levels of a cholinergic receptor (muscarinic M1 receptor) and the choline transporter with perinatal heroin (Steingart et al, 2000a; Steingart et al, 2000b). In addition, they observed altered levels and activity of protein kinase C—a signaling protein downstream of the M1 receptor- and enhanced inositol phosphate induction by cholinergic agonists (Steingart et al, 2000a; Steingart et al, 2000b; Yaniv et al, 2004). Whether a cholinergic deficit is found in cohorts of opiate-exposed children is unknown.
Perinatal heroin and morphine exposure also disrupt maturation of the opiate receptor system. Postnatal morphine exposure decreases mu opioid receptor binding in the striatum, NAc, amygdala, hypothalamus, and spinal cord (Hammer et al, 1991; Kirby, 1983; Tempel, 1991). Perinatal morphine exposure also induces morphine tolerance (Chiang et al, 2010; Eriksson and Ronnback, 1989; Hovious and Peters, 1984), although an increased sensitivity to morphine analgesia has been reported in female offspring (Arjune and Bodnar, 1989). Aroyewun and Barr (1982) proposed that postnatal morphine also accelerates the maturation of some aspects of opiate-dependent behaviors, such as opiate antagonist-induced anorexia, that normally only occurs after P14. Postnatal morphine exposure accelerated the appearance of this behavior to P10 and 12 (Aroyewun and Barr, 1983), but the observed hypophagia could also have been induced by the precipitation of opiate withdrawal. In addition, perinatal morphine or heroin has also been shown to alter sexual behavior (Vathy and Katay, 1992), NE turnover and release (De Vries et al, 1991), neuroendocrine function (Litto et al, 1983), and several other important structures and processes that this review cannot cover (for a comprehensive review of the developmental effects of illicit opiates see Slamberova (2012)).
Ultimately the material costs aren't an issue, but I'm not sure the kingdom actually factors into it.We do get a certain amount of bulk discounts from our undertown work and I am sure some of our minions is will be willing to babysit. Also once we get our kingdom it all becomes trivial.
Yes. We're talking about the insurance industry, if you told me they were their own distinct vampire court in WoD I'd believe it.
I did the math. I know how much it is.Again Molly has resource 4, Molly was making 400k a month. She can literally pay for 4 years off 1 months income. Money is not an issue.
There's really no need to insult the vampire courts like that. They're bad, but not insurance company bad.Yes. We're talking about the insurance industry, if you told me they were their own distinct vampire court in WoD I'd believe it.