[X] Knock Harry out, he cannot call Mab if he's unconscious and she cannot even blame him for planning it if you do it now
We're years away from the events that lead to Harry taking on the Mantle of Winter Knight, and the chances of us not butterflying that out of the timeline are very slim.If nothing else, we should plan to either give the mantle to someone else or to give Mab the means to do so. Leaving the mantle unclaimed would seem to be something that would continue to cause issues for the future.
Wait.
Oh no.
Would the mantle of Winter Knight be mutually exclusive with this mantle?
I hope that Harry doesn't decide to do anything so rash…
So what, as long as they kill some monsters it doesn't matter what else they do? If they run about killing monsters, but do it so they can establish their own empires or settle grudges that leave ruin in their wake they aren't an improvement just because they're human.Classical heroes were still heroes. Larger than life, but not just larger than life. Doing heroic deeds.
Heracles was a hero. He killed his family, raped a lot of women, but he also, and primarily, slew monsters and did heroic deeds, in the sense of doing something worth remembering and being inspired by.
Also remember, exalts are selected from those who have being touched by a supernatural world and are aware of it in at least some sense. That would play a role in their motivations.
he didn't really rape any women thats more a dc comics thing he did sack some cities though. at least not in most versions of his tales that I can remember you know greeks and their seven other telling of the same story and all.Classical heroes were still heroes. Larger than life, but not just larger than life. Doing heroic deeds.
Heracles was a hero. He killed his family, raped a lot of women, but he also, and primarily, slew monsters and did heroic deeds, in the sense of doing something worth remembering and being inspired by.
Also remember, exalts are selected from those who have being touched by a supernatural world and are aware of it in at least some sense. That would play a role in their motivations.
Plus the killing his family was (at least in the versions I'm familiar with) while under a curse of madness from Hera, so not his fault.he didn't really rape any women thats more a dc comics thing he did sack some cities though. at least not in most versions of his tales that I can remember you know greeks and their seven other telling of the same story and all.
1)No he was not under any form of duress. This was explicitly established by Bob.That is actually arguable. He was clearly under long term duress when giving his oaths.
We don't know that and, from what I understand, that's not how mantles normally work. Otherwise Molly wouldn't be a winter lady in canon.
No, it's very much selling yourself into slavery. Like being a janissary.
She does regular "mental reconditioning through prolonged torture", however. See Leanansidhe. And yes, extenuating circumstances, but point is, Mab is absolutely capable of brainwashing people through various means, like extended psychological and physical torture, gaslighting, threats, inducing Stockholm syndrome, etc. One also has to remember that the mantle themselves have mind-affecting effects on their users, and Lydia is a teenager. And Mab is explicitely interested in "molding her to her whims".
Look, I understand that you think Mab is necessary, and that she's a hard woman making hard decisions in a hard situation, and that ultimately she's on the side of good. I can even agree to some of it. But from everything we were told IC and OOC, Mab is very much interested in making Lydia's life miserable at least for a long time, if not forever, and the condition for stopping the misery is "being Mab's perfectly loyal servant forever". That's slavery. Mab has reasons extending well beyond Arawn and Lydia to want to make Lydia her loyal slave after publicly and visibly making her suffer. But she's still going to make her suffer.
As I said, I disagree. Solar exaltations go to heroes, yes. Heroes who might have tempers, who might become tyrants, but heroes who are slayers of monsters. Who will push back against the darkness, who will slay monsters and do heroic deeds. Solars are inherently human, and they are on their own side. So, yes, they are, at least in part, on humanity's side.
Also, not a hundred random people. A hundred best and brightest random people.
Also, it's notable that canon ExvsWod solar literally had "find others, save the world" told to him by the long-past spirit of Sol Invictus as he exalted, and is following that motivation. Together with his Sidereal guide to boot.
Also worth noting that he led the lesser Ankou to swear that oath. And THEN he abandoned them.In addition to this, I think it's worth being more worried about Arawn's whole deal.
And if, on average, the best and brightest of humanity were also the least moral of humanity, I would agree, probably. But they are not. On average, humans have to be good, otherwise society couldn't exist.So what, as long as they kill some monsters it doesn't matter what else they do? If they run about killing monsters, but do it so they can establish their own empires or settle grudges that leave ruin in their wake they aren't an improvement just because they're human.
You're not wrong about the touch of the supernatural, but we're still talking about people here. They're not going to universally lose all interest in their prior affiliation. Which means an instant does of high grade supernatural power into the human world with no prep.
Doing bad things to bad people isn't an inherent good.
Edit:
To emphasize my point: to become a Solar 'all ' you need to do is score an interesting win in a caste appropriate category. There's no moral judgment attached; hell, the night caste explicitly considers being an assassin a viable cause for exaltation.
You can be a hero to your community and be horribly exploiting someone else's. You can become a war hero fighting an unjust war.
Now unleash hundreds of these things to pick out the shiniest examples of humanity they can find with no regard to why they're shining.
"The world is screwed, but it's okay because our guys are doing it" isn't a constructive position.
Not a DC comics thinghe didn't really rape any women thats more a dc comics thing he did sack some cities though. at least not in most versions of his tales that I can remember you know greeks and their seven other telling of the same story and all.
well yeah he isn't personally noted to rape anyone though others did the raping. Just cause he sacked a city didn't mean he raped a bunch of women during it.Not a DC comics thing
And you didnt sack cities in antiquity without the sexual assault and kidnap of women and children.
No Geneva Convention back then.
Current Tally:
[X] Knock Harry out, he cannot call Mab if he's unconscious and she cannot even blame him for planning it if you do it now
[X] Focus on finishing off that sub
[X] Write in
- [X] Use the Crown of Eyes to learn the Capricorpus' mortal name, and whatever else it can tell you besides.
- [X] Then Knock Harry out, he cannot call Mab if he's unconscious and she cannot even blame him for planning it if you do it now
[X] Knock Harry out, he cannot call Mab if he's unconscious and she cannot even blame him for planning it if you do it now
-[X][Stunt] With speed you knew not you had you sprint across the ruins of the display cases, glass cracking under your feet.
-[X][Stunt] "And so he found the Ankou and will call the Cold Queen as soon as he is able," your voice calls out coldly standing over his battered body, "fulfilling the letters of his bargain."
[X] Rather than actually knocking (which could be dangerous), forcefully shut his mouth so he could not suumon Mab
[X] Focus on finishing off that sub
-[X] Afterwards, call Michael. If Mab wants to try and make a deal with Lydia, we can't stop her forever, but I'll be damned before I let her go into this alone.
Taking Lydia is very, very explicitly stated to be a way to get revenge against her father. Her continued service to Mab is intended to bring pain to her father. That has been stated in the text. Her situation is not that of her father at the time he gave his oaths and sold himself to Mab for protection (which, yes, was duress).5)Thats not true either.
Mab does not do brainwashing of people she recruits. Its literally counterproductive to her needs; when she goes recruiting outside Winter, she needs autonomous motivated agents who she doesnt have to babysit while she does the rest of her job.
If brainwashing was a thing, Arawn would not have been able to rebel.
She would not have so much trouble with Maeve, or the scheming members of her Court.
Harry would have come out of the several months of physical therapy as a Mab zealot. Ditto Molly.
I mean, I dont want Lydia to be railroaded into a deal against her will.
But that does not mean charging headlong into an avoidable fight with the Queen of Air and Darkness, or disabling an ally on a dangerous battlefield.
And "molding her to her whims" means fuckall.
Mab has two daughters she's raised herself for more than two hundred years that are nothing like she'd have preferred them to be.
Lydia is sixteen, not six. She actually gets a call on how she develop as a person, even in the worstcase scenario.
The proposal is that Mab raises Lydia's father, not Lydia using her new power:2)We do know that because thats what is being proposed right now; he dies and his successor revives him.
And if Mab was proposing it, we know it will work.
We also know that Mab's predecessor gave up the Mantle and moved on; we dont know the details.
It wouldn't be up to Lydia, even with a mantle, if her father comes back. It would be up to Mab.Death does not lightly bind those who know so much of it. Odds are he would die, but not permanently and bringing him back would be up to Mab and thus the price she would extract from Lydia.
Auge. Deianeira (in some version of the myth at least). That's me doing a rush job.well yeah he isn't personally noted to rape anyone though others did the raping. Just cause he sacked a city didn't mean he raped a bunch of women during it.
Both of those in multiple versions weren't raped. Not to even mention their stories aren't nearly that prevalent. Heracles in most versions isn't a rapist hes done bad shit the rape isn't one.Taking Lydia is very, very explicitly stated to be a way to get revenge against her father. Her continued service to Mab is intended to bring pain to her father. That has been stated in the text. Her situation is not that of her father at the time he gave his oaths and sold himself to Mab for protection (which, yes, was duress).
Mab doesn't do it routinely, I could agree with this, with a note that mantles themselves do long-term brainwashing.
The proposal is that Mab raises Lydia's father, not Lydia using her new power:
It wouldn't be up to Lydia, even with a mantle, if her father comes back. It would be up to Mab.
Auge. Deianeira (in some version of the myth at least). That's me doing a rush job.
I will repeat that the sack of cities and settlements in antiquity was inevitably associated with mass sexual assault and kidnapping.well yeah he isn't personally noted to rape anyone though others did the raping. Just cause he sacked a city didn't mean he raped a bunch of women during it.
The one woman he raped in myths was also said in other versions to be willing heracles is not noted often for his rape. Hes noted for his rage hes killed people hes cared for, those teaching him, sacking a city that didn't pay him, etc etc. Not saying he didn't do bad shit he just didn't really rape anyone notably other heroes did notably rape people as parts of their myths.
For Mab its a bonus, not the aim.Taking Lydia is very, very explicitly stated to be a way to get revenge against her father. Her continued service to Mab is intended to bring pain to her father. That has been stated in the text. Her situation is not that of her father at the time he gave his oaths and sold himself to Mab for protection (which, yes, was duress).
Mab doesn't do it routinely, I could agree with this, with a note that mantles themselves do long-term brainwashing.
The proposal is that Mab raises Lydia's father, not Lydia using her new power:
1)Mab keeps her word. Always.wouldn't be up to Lydia, even with a mantle, if her father comes back. It would be up to Mab.
Again, I've been worrying about our Essence levels for a reason.What do you do next?
[] Talk to Gard, see if she is interested in a mid-ritual promotion
[] Call Mab, cards on the table, ask her to provide a host for the new Ankou and you will try to get Arwan to transfer his power
[] Write in
This is where we have the primary disagreement. I consider that for Mab getting Lydia as a servant is a bonus, and the aim is the revenge. If it wasn't so, Mab would have reclaimed Ankou's mantle much earlier - she knew where it was, she knew about Lydia being born, how old she was, etc. This means that she could have gotten Ankou for a long time. She didn't. Revenge is at least as motivating to her in this case as getting an old agent back.For Mab its a bonus, not the aim.
And its something we've had implied that she'd give up.
Long term conditioning is a thing. Yes, it can be resisted, but so can be almost everything else.Mantles do urges, not brainwashing, and we know explicitly by word of both Uriel and Mother Summer they cannot compel you.
The Mantle in question predates the Ankou pledging to Winter.
Any urges it brings are its own.
How are you connecting these two things? Yes, Mab keeps her word. Her plan was to raise Lydia's father in exchange for Lydia's magically compelled perpetual service and obedience.1)Mab keeps her word. Always.
2)Its also explicitly said that negotiating with Mab is an option:
okay yes not everyone in said sacking raped though like in any period and both of said women in multiple myths are also listed as willing.I will repeat that the sack of cities and settlements in antiquity was inevitably associated with mass sexual assault and kidnapping.
The Israelites in the Bible and their various enemies certainly did it.
Heracles myths mentions at least two women of note, and that doesnt include any other women who werent important enough to make the stories of storytellers.
For Mab its a bonus, not the aim.
And its something we've had implied that she'd give up.
Mantles do urges, not brainwashing, and we know explicitly by word of both Uriel and Mother Summer they cannot compel you.
The Mantle in question predates the Ankou pledging to Winter.
Any urges it brings are its own.
1)Mab keeps her word. Always.
2)Its also explicitly said that negotiating with Mab is an option:
Again, I've been worrying about our Essence levels for a reason.
Because we'll need social Excellencies.
mab by word of jim is a creature of logic revenge is secondary the revenge aspect is clearly about image not just for revenge.This is where we have the primary disagreement. I consider that for Mab getting Lydia as a servant is a bonus, and the aim is the revenge. If it wasn't so, Mab would have reclaimed Ankou's mantle much earlier - she knew where it was, she knew about Lydia being born, how old she was, etc. This means that she could have gotten Ankou for a long time. She didn't. Revenge is at least as motivating to her in this case as getting an old agent back.
Long term conditioning is a thing. Yes, it can be resisted, but so can be almost everything else.
How are you connecting these two things? Yes, Mab keeps her word. Her plan was to raise Lydia's father in exchange for Lydia's magically compelled perpetual service and obedience.
And yes, we could negotiate with her. It's not guaranteed that we would have succeeded. But we could try. Mab is pragmatic, if we offered her enough, like "a service for a year and a day" or something like that, she would likely take the deal.
Revenge in this case is a completely logical political move. Mab had a servant / vassal try to escape. Mab has to demonstrate that not only such an escape is impossible, but that the consequences of trying far outweigh the possible benefits. Moreover, she has to make it about not just the Ankou, but also his children, to prevent those who are ready to sacrifice themselves but get their (future) children away from Winter's grasp, from trying to do so.mab by word of jim is a creature of logic revenge is secondary the revenge aspect is clearly about image not just for revenge.
yes you said for revenge though I doubt its an emotional response its a political one.Revenge in this case is a completely logical political move. Mab had a servant / vassal try to escape. Mab has to demonstrate that not only such an escape is impossible, but that the consequences of trying far outweigh the possible benefits. Moreover, she has to make it about not just the Ankou, but also his children, to prevent those who are ready to sacrifice themselves but get their (future) children away from Winter's grasp, from trying to do so.
Revenge here is PR. It is politics, aimed at her other subjects. "Don't even think about leaving your duty. Not even death would stop me from claiming you back".
Nope.This is where we have the primary disagreement. I consider that for Mab getting Lydia as a servant is a bonus, and the aim is the revenge. If it wasn't so, Mab would have reclaimed Ankou's mantle much earlier - she knew where it was, she knew about Lydia being born, how old she was, etc. This means that she could have gotten Ankou for a long time. She didn't. Revenge is at least as motivating to her in this case as getting an old agent back.
The revenge is not a priority, else the plan would not be death, it would be hanging on a tree besides Slate.Cold Days said:Titania nodded. She said, "You are unlike the other monsters she has shaped for herself over the centuries."
"Uh. Thank you?"
She shook her head. "I have done nothing for you, Harry Dresden." She pursed her lips. "In many ways, she and I are alike. In many more ways, we are entirely different. Do you know what my sister believes in?"
"Flashy entrances," I said.
Titania's lips actually twitched. "In reason."
"Reason?"
"Reason. Logic. Calculation. The cold numbers. The supremacy of the mind." Titania's eyes became distant. "It is another place where we differ. I prefer to follow the wisdom of the heart."
"Meaning what?" I asked.
Titania lifted her hand and spoke a single word, and the air rang with power. The ground buckled, ripping my circle apart and flinging me from my feet onto my back.
If this was of any reliable import, Arawn would not have been able to go rogue.Long term conditioning is a thing. Yes, it can be resisted, but so can be almost everything else.
1) Because Mab came to Dresden with this instead of sending an assassin.How are you connecting these two things? Yes, Mab keeps her word. Her plan was to raise Lydia's father in exchange for Lydia's magically compelled perpetual service and obedience.
And yes, we could negotiate with her. It's not guaranteed that we would have succeeded. But we could try. Mab is pragmatic, if we offered her enough, like "a service for a year and a day" or something like that, she would likely take the deal.
This strongly, very strongly, depends on Ankou's priorities. For him it's entirely possible that living free while his daughter is stuck in Winter's service is a harsher punishment and worse torture than hanging on a tree. We don't have enough information to tell.The revenge is not a priority, else the plan would not be death, it would be hanging on a tree besides Slate.
Instead of being a bargaining chip for recruiting his daughter.
Mab's primary agents (Lea, current Winter knight, her daughter) are all unable to act at the moment. The situation is very time sensitive and politically sensitive. It's entirely possible that Mab didn't have much choice. Her opponents included the Thule society, and those have members that avoided Odin for a long time. They had a voice in the whole situation.1) Because Mab came to Dresden with this.
Her Winter Knight candidate. The guy who set off the Vampire War on a matter of principle. Who killed the Summer Lady in her name. Who invaded Arctis Tor to rescue Molly maybe four or five weeks ago.
She KNOWS his hot buttons.
If she was unwilling to give this up, she wouldnt have let him anywhere near this case.
Please note that I am voting to deal with the submarine. I figure we'd have at least a few minutes between "fight ends" and "Harry has to call Mab or be considered an oathbreaker". We could speedtalk Matthews and Ankou into a mantle transfer.We could hit Dresden and he'd die.
He could fall unconscious and be possessed by Corpsetaker and used to blast the whole room. EvilBob could set off the submarines magically filled magazines or fuel tanks and murder everybody in the hundred yard radius in the explosion.
But talking to Mab is the only option that actually solves this, instead of postponing it fot a couple days or weeks or months as Arawn goes back on the run. And we actually need a properly supported necromancer hunter out there, because the White Council that would take up the slack is at war.