Chimeraguard
We do deserve to exist.
Also, I find the amount of people who even with a no grants plan that are still voting for Military and All Dice that leaves our Air Force hanging for another quarter minimum to be... alarming.
I think I was insuffuiently clear when I chose the phrase "see the possilibilty" - it was a personal perception of something being within the bounds of possibility, not a statament of "this is going to happen" or even "I think this is likely".I feel like this is just so disingenuous. We've picked all the left-wing political options almost as quickly as we could get them.
Grants idealogues, mayhaps.Also, I find the amount of people who even with a no grants plan that are still voting for Military and All Dice that leaves our Air Force hanging for another quarter minimum to be... alarming.
People what to buy nice if they can't get nice stuff they get angry and will vote for the parties that will say that they will get the nice stuff and that sounds like the racist party that wants us to become isolationist Will use that so basically you're giving them free stuff to get more people to vote for there racist policies?
1. I wasn't being specific or trying to strawman you it's just my impression of what the general anti-grant crowd believe since that does seem to be the line of thought that gets trotted out every time grants are brought upI'm sorry, but I'd appreciate a touch less strawmanning. My specific words were because some people were legitimately arguing for private water, rails, and electricity, as well as private military materiel production. Due to this, I have suddenly become rahter sure that those people will do their best to take grants way fucking further than I, or I think most of us want. Thus, I don't want to risk them gaining ground.
I don't think it even strengthens the FMP that much. Because the FMP is specifically the "Bring back the big corporations" party, and that got pretty badly gutted when we passed a max strength Co-op bill.yep,while grants do strength the FMP,it does strenght the Market socialist party
wich for all intents and porpuses is the main buffer against initiative first and FMP
appealing to their interests is a good idea
That already exists in Plan Sorry Carter without grants.If you care strongly, maybe make a non grants plan that has airforce in it?
You mean all the opposition to grants is ideological. There is no mechanical, game play argument that forbids ever taking grants. For a given turn, you can weigh the RpT loss against the virtual dice gain, and decide against grants though.Also, uh, a lot of opposition to grants is idealogical, not pure number crunching.
Sorry man. I shouldn't have quoted you. I'll edit it out. Disingenuous is a bad word choice, as it implies more about your intent than I could possibly have knowledge of. My b.I fucking dispise people who play dumb. It feels bad to be accused of such. Like. Genuinly hate them. Full blown rule 2 level shit. (Ok, not nearly rule 2, but def. 3/4 if I get going). Life teaches us all different lessons.
So um. Bug oof that my post made you think that about me![]()
"what are you talking about its not a mega-corp it's just my company of 400 people working with my other company of 400 people selling to my other company of 400 people, they're contractors not part of the company. Also on that note I really need grant money for this company that's not part of my existing company that I just started"- Totally not owner of mega-corp.FTFY.
Any company above 400 people becomes a COOP. We made it law two turns ago.
The problem with that is that we have letters from Parliament telling us "Look, the voters want good quality housing, so you should really get to work on that." And steady progress is what is more politically acceptable, because it shows people that the Treasury is putting in steady effort. People like that more than they like sudden Shock Labor. Plus the plan is to throw our Railroad dice into the BZ Arcology once the current (and last) phase of rail reconstruction ends.The 5 free resources are used to change the Blue Zone Arcologies to one more mecca dice as i dont want to do that project one dice at a time and force Ithlid to write 7 more updates about a flat being build real slowly.
The other change is one less dice on the cruiser yard, we have 3 already so it is not required that it completes this turn and that frees up a die for wartime factory refits to get more Firehawks to help counter the NOD airforce.
"what are you talking about its not a mega-corp it's just my company of 400 people working with my other company of 400 people selling to my other company of 400 people, they're contractors not part of the company. Also on that note I really need grant money for this company that's not part of my existing company that I just started"- Totally not owner of mega-corp.
Direct answer to your question:Can someone please explain to me why is everyone screaming at Grants, when we fucking made COOPs several turns ago which meant that no company can et bigger than 400 people without becoming a democratically controlled COOP!?!![]()
I— it wasn't one person though. They were. Fuck.It was one person, and he was shot down by the GM that such things wouldn't ever become options anyway.
This is why I am voting for grants. If people opposing it could give me a practical reason for why grants is bad like Housing Costing us Logistics or not being cost-effective in terms of Resource to stat gain or the grants would go to the megacorp and not small businesses, then I wouldn't oppose them. But it is all ideological about how grants is bad because the private economy is bad and how the government not controlling everything is bad so I see no reason not to oppose grants and I'm fed up these irrational ideology-based arguments shutting down any reasonable discussion about grants on the Discord that I am voting for grants because that arguments against it suck enough that they are actually a reason to do grants in my books.You mean all the opposition to grants is ideological. There is no mechanical, game play arguement that forbids ever taking grants. The only possible arguement against every taking any grants, is purely ideological.
We are doing Boston to get the capital goods needed for the wartime refits and we plan to complete them as soon as possible for the 1 to 2 military dice we get once the final phase is done.Also, we really can't afford to slow down Cruiser rollout. We've already had a major delay when we went to do other things, and the Navy's still at low confidence. And furthermore, it's not Firehawks that'll help most in the air, it's URLS and the QAAMs that come with it. The Air Force wants to move Firehawks to a greater focus on ground attack missions.
Housing can't make arcology