- Location
- The internet
[X] Plan Sorry Carter
It has grants, I vote for it.
It has grants, I vote for it.
Yeah but forgotten conference is coming up soon and next plan as well so I want to keep PS high so we have some to spend on options.
Yeah but forgotten conference is coming up soon and next plan as well so I want to keep PS high so we have some to spend on options.
Sorry. I didn't understand that LT in your first post meant Liquid Tiberium. Brain fart on my part.
Which will be any point between now untill 5 ingame years from now.General plan is to focus our PS on getting Seo into the best position possible. Then Seo, with his more wholeheartedly leftist political agenda can push for more effective Union legislation than Granger can.
We need the bureaucracy reviewed before we do Unions. Right the fuck now. It got 11 turns without. We do not want Nod doing governmental sabotage here.Which will be any point between now untill 5 ingame years from now.
I am taking this oppertunity to make the relevant undefined elements of this general plan clear.
Because I very much dislike the thought of anyone accepting your stated reasoning for not doing it now is operating under the assumption that Seo becoming treasury head is in any way assured to happen "soon".
---
I for one see the possilibilty of calcification and opportunities missed because of it.
Which will be any point between now untill 5 ingame years from now.
I am taking this oppertunity to make the relevant undefined elements of this general plan clear.
Because I very much dislike the thought of anyone accepting your stated reasoning for not doing it now is operating under the assumption that Seo becoming treasury head is in any way assured to happen "soon".
---
I for one see the possilibilty of calcification and opportunities missed because of it.
It was not "without issue". See the Q2 2050 update where Director Granger called us in on the carpet.
It's not unnecessary spending. One of the primary goals is the welfare of the people under GDI's governance - and they *are* requesting more diversity in Consumer Goods. Your premise is incorrect.I don't have any major preferences for how Military dice is spent, and am more concerned about unnecessary spending on Grants, especially when the Treasury doesn't even have enough resources for it's current list of options, and when reallocation is nearing in a few turns to slash funding levels again.
The economy should be the means and tools which GDI can use to accomplish it's goals, and not a goal in of itself to pursue. Whichever means suits it's needs the best to maintain itself as a viable polity, continue it's efforts to reclaim Earth from Tiberium, and fight against Nod, should be the way chosen.
Thus, so long as centralized economy is working effectively and efficiently as a well-oiled machine, I don't want to push for political and economic changes to disrupt and slow down the Treasury's capabilities to continue supporting GDI's goals. Grants should be done when the Treasury has more resources than it can spend, and no sooner, unless directly dictated by a plan and/or the parliament as a requirement to do.
The problem is that it does matter how the Military dice is spent--and while we want Shell Plants and ablative plates, we need at least ULRS 1 before the Air Force situation begins to degenerate in earnest because we have no answer to the Balghest.I don't have any major preferences for how Military dice is spent, and am more concerned about unnecessary spending on Grants, especially when the Treasury doesn't even have enough resources for it's current list of options, and when reallocation is nearing in a few turns to slash funding levels again.
The economy should be the means and tools which GDI can use to accomplish it's goals, and not a goal in of itself to pursue. Whichever means suits it's needs the best to maintain itself as a viable polity, continue it's efforts to reclaim Earth from Tiberium, and fight against Nod, should be the way chosen.
Thus, so long as centralized economy is working effectively and efficiently as a well-oiled machine, I don't want to push for political and economic changes to disrupt and slow down the Treasury's capabilities to continue supporting GDI's goals. Grants should be done when the Treasury has more resources than it can spend, and no sooner, unless directly dictated by a plan and/or the parliament as a requirement to do.
Grants aren't capitalists taking over the industry, what they are are capitalists taking over things that are too small scale for us to probably ever get to funding; such as building cell phones, some entertainment technology, and luxury goods. that, and according to Ithillid Grants will inevitably return more resources to us than they cost per turn; that, and it's comparing 15 resources per turn to the hundreds that we are investing elsewhere ourselves, and that there is nowhere near capitalism taking over.I'm happy to do unions, go nuts. Grants are a no, not only for the hidden costs that will come out of them but also because we've been told that there are coops gathering capital to begin manufacturing. Let it happen, we don't need to help them nor should we. We are doing perfectly fine on our own.