Future phases of microgeneration will mainly harden your grid against attack. So if NOD destroys say one of your power plants, it will mean that your people's life support systems keep running, and the like. It will help some with your power plants, but at the same time, each of the nukeplants is pushing hundreds of megawatts minimum, while the microgeneration is pushing kilowatts.
Sounds like we really want to do this (and Yellow Zone generation) after we get our next stage of Blue Zone Energy generation online. The more Energy we're putting into all those Military factories, the more vulnerable to that kind of attack we're going to be.

Unless we want to push all our Free Dice into Heavy Industry next turn...
 
Last edited:
Shock Nuclear Power Plant construction when? People would not dare consider doing that over in VSNKh quest but perhaps we could do it here next turn.
The difference is that GDI has the knowledge base to field-assemble nuclear reactors to power military bases in a hurry. Because they do that in the games, more or less.

Also, due to the part where much of the world is a toxic hellscape and tiberium lets you manufacture almost anything you want in a hurry, we're operating under fewer constraints. By contrast, the USSR would be building prototype nuclear power plants with far less experience to go on.
 
The difference is that GDI has the knowledge base to field-assemble nuclear reactors to power military bases in a hurry. Because they do that in the games, more or less.
Mostly it is a matter of GDI and GDI's forerunners basically doing this for an actual century. The field assembly bit is relatively new, (inside the last 20 years) but still a whole lot of power plants in that time frame.
 
Shock Nuclear Power Plant construction when? People would not dare consider doing that over in VSNKh quest but perhaps we could do it here next turn.
Yeah, now that we completed the Leopard factory, the Blue Zone Power Grid project is getting all our Heavy Industry dice, and quite possibly several free dice as well. Because there are a *ton* of factories/shipyards and other projects that will eat Energy.
 
Well, when his department has more resources than the rest of the GDI combined, maybe that comes with some extra authority...
It just feels insanely unrealistic, are we the head of treasury or the Dictator? Its not like anyone else in the quest does anything other than the occasional Nod reference.
 
It just feels insanely unrealistic, are we the head of treasury or the Dictator? Its not like anyone else in the quest does anything other than the occasional Nod reference.

Presumably that'll start to change as time rolls on. Like we're going to submit a plan to parliament next turn so we'll interact with people who have authority over us that way soon.
 
Presumably that'll start to change as time rolls on. Like we're going to submit a plan to parliament next turn so we'll interact with people who have authority over us that way soon.
Honestly this whole privatization thing should be a thing the entirety of the government is deciding, since encouraging things like coops and such would require concrete policies and legislation, our MC is nowhere near politically influential enough to make judges and legislators to rule and vote that way.
 
It just feels insanely unrealistic, are we the head of treasury or the Dictator? Its not like anyone else in the quest does anything other than the occasional Nod reference.
You underestimate just how much pull people like the Chancellor of the Exchequer (Britain's finance minister) can actually have on government policy. They are the one that sets the budget, dolls out grants, assigns additional funds to different ministries as needed or as according to their instructions from on high. When you are the one in control of the purse strings people listen to what you have to say as you can very easily not fund their projects or decide that next time the budget is being set for the year they get less. Of course though, if you upset too many people you can be removed for ignoring too much or for hoarding resources to yourself.

The 2 things we do need to do are get the new shell plants finished and either build new ships for the Navy or start giving their battleships the CIWS refit.
 
You underestimate just how much pull people like the Chancellor of the Exchequer (Britain's finance minister) can actually have on government policy. They are the one that sets the budget, dolls out grants, assigns additional funds to different ministries as needed or as according to their instructions from on high. When you are the one in control of the purse strings people listen to what you have to say as you can very easily not fund their projects or decide that next time the budget is being set for the year they get less. Of course though, if you upset too many people you can be removed for ignoring too much or for hoarding resources to yourself.
Yes, but they don't unilaterally decide public policy as well as the laws alone. Our MC is described as enigmatic, but this is also meaning that our influence and allies are few beyond being in the party that controls the government currently. We are literally the only one that does anything, the only one that decides what the GDI is doing in totality, because there is no reference to GDI doing anything other than what this mysterious guy with no real political game says to do. We got mildly talked to even at our least popular and other than that we do whatever we want.
 
Yes, but they don't unilaterally decide public policy as well as the laws alone. Our MC is described as enigmatic, but this is also meaning that our influence and allies are few beyond being in the party that controls the government currently. We are literally the only one that does anything, the only one that decides what the GDI is doing in totality, because there is no reference to GDI doing anything other than what this mysterious guy with no real political game says to do. We got mildly talked to even at our least popular and other than that we do whatever we want.
We rarely hear any details about the forever war against NOD, or about the management and upkeep of all the industry supplying our spending, or about the internal diplomacy between GDI's various blue zones and politicians. Plus so far large parts of GDI have been unable to do more than keeping the lights on with their small budgets.

Coming next Plan we're going to see more actions of other government departments as they start up their own programs. (And many of these are going to put costs on our statistics, like costing us Logistics and such.)
 
We rarely hear any details about the forever war against NOD, or about the management and upkeep of all the industry supplying our spending, or about the internal diplomacy between GDI's various blue zones and politicians. Plus so far large parts of GDI have been unable to do more than keeping the lights on with their small budgets.

Coming next Plan we're going to see more actions of other government departments as they start up their own programs. (And many of these are going to put costs on our statistics, like costing us Logistics and such.)
That would be very helpful, because in most if not all the updates, all we see is what our character is doing, and to me it feels like the difference between the Head of Treasury and the absolute monarch of GDI is the title. :p.
 
Yes, but they don't unilaterally decide public policy as well as the laws alone. Our MC is described as enigmatic, but this is also meaning that our influence and allies are few beyond being in the party that controls the government currently. We are literally the only one that does anything, the only one that decides what the GDI is doing in totality, because there is no reference to GDI doing anything other than what this mysterious guy with no real political game says to do. We got mildly talked to even at our least popular and other than that we do whatever we want.
Dr. Granger is the #3 person in the world as far as power goes. (#1 being Kane, and #2 being Director Granger.) GDI total budget at Turn 1 was 500. We have come pretty close to doubling that. We have done far more than any other GDI higher-up towards damaging NOD's support in the Yellow Zones. Parliament could probably put pressure on to affect these decisions, but at the level of power we have, the question is what it costs to take an action, not whether he can do it or not.
 
Dr. Granger is the #3 person in the world as far as power goes. (#1 being Kane, and #2 being Director Granger.) GDI total budget at Turn 1 was 500. We have come pretty close to doubling that. We have done far more than any other GDI higher-up towards damaging NOD's support in the Yellow Zones. Parliament could probably put pressure on to affect these decisions, but at the level of power we have, the question is what it costs to take an action, not whether he can do it or not.
So your saying we ARE the dictator? Like its constantly referenced that noone really talks to the MC and he doesn't really get involved in politics, his influence is practically nil because of that. Not to mention that even if we have not dipped to the popularity we had before, we likely don't have the public popularity to do whatever. Like our government is a democracy right?
 
The idea that a business can't run if the workers have good pay and authority is a myth. A very threadbare one built on the back of anti-union rhetoric. Historically unionized workers, in cooperation with the board and CEO of various companies, have opted to take pay cuts to keep the business running in the black during slim times; its in the interests of the worker if the business succeeds and continues to employ them. In the aftermath, once the business/economy recovers, it's almost always the case that the business itself fails to uphold its side of the bargain and raise wages back to previous levels, rather than a failure to uphold their agreement on the worker side. Believe it or not, workers aren't morons, and it's not only the wealthy that have enlightened self-interest.

What doesn't happen when workers have good wages and authority is massive golden parachutes for the top 4 or 5 guys in a company. Most big American corporations have the CEO making 500-1000x the wages of their average worker. That's where all padding in the margin goes, because workers in the company have no idea what the books look like, what the margins are like, and no authority to stop that bullshit even if they did.
 
The idea that a business can't run if the workers have good pay and authority is a myth. A very threadbare one built on the back of anti-union rhetoric. Historically unionized workers, in cooperation with the board and CEO of various companies, have opted to take pay cuts to keep the business running in the black during slim times; its in the interests of the worker if the business succeeds and continues to employ them. In the aftermath, once the business/economy recovers, it's almost always the case that the business itself fails to uphold its side of the bargain and raise wages back to previous levels, rather than a failure to uphold their agreement on the worker side. Believe it or not, workers aren't morons, and it's not only the wealthy that have enlightened self-interest.

What doesn't happen when workers have good wages and authority is massive golden parachutes for the top 4 or 5 guys in a company. Most big American corporations have the CEO making 500-1000x the wages of their average worker. That's where all padding in the margin goes, because workers in the company have no idea what the books look like, what the margins are like, and no authority to stop that bullshit even if they did.

To add on to this, Co-ops also tend to be more resilient in the face of adverse external conditions, being less likely to fail early on, and even likelier to survive economic hardship in the long term.
 
Back
Top