- Location
- MS, USA
...Yeah, that would do it.
...Yeah, that would do it.
turns out disney is a megacorp and when it does things things happen.How the heck did we go from "hey, let's do a fun running Disney quest" to "seriously debating the ethical implications of stopping the Challenger launch?"
YES!!!! So much this. Strike the top, strike the bottom, strike the strike, contact the people who actually know jack and shit about this.I think making a speech to the nation is a bad idea. We have no expertise on space craft and have no influence at NASA. Making a speech based off of this one letter is going to put us at odds with NASA and might not change anything. They need to take the first step in order to change the agency.
I believe we should write back to him and say they should organize a protest. If a significant portion of the engineers are against the schedule, the work cannot be done on time. Give him the suggestion that he should "do what you believe is right." We can come out in support of their protest once it is made public, but we should not start it ourselves. We can also suggest that engineers that value safety will always be in demand. Even if they get fired from NASA, they can find other work. Even if working on the space shuttle is their dream job, they can start a private space company if they get the funding.
Another idea would be to contact the president. This seems like a good PR opportunity if it is handled correctly. Preventing the next Hindenburg disaster should be a good reason to change things at NASA.
No matter what we do, we should speak with an imagineer about the letter. They are some of the best engineers in the nation, so they can relate to the people at NASA. Getting their perspective should help us assess difference options.
Plus, we would most likely end up in conflict with Roy and his drive to mantain Walt's legacy.Yup.
At this point in time, and even for a long period after, the Space Shuttle is the symbol of futuristic space exploration. Nasa is pushing it as the one and only solution for everything you want to launch into space. It is supposed to become cheap, regular transportation to space, and every other space program or dream is build upon it. Space Station Freedom is designed for the shuttle. The Hubble Space Telescope was made for the shuttle. The Shuttle has a lot riding on it, and it simply can not fulfill that promise.
It's going to be very hard to maintain an image of a compagny of the future, while simultaneously trying to kill the symbol of the future of spaceflight.
Does that mean that if we don't do anything, or take too long, someone else will do it for us?You will also have the option of leaking an anonymous report to the press if you choose to deal with the problem next turn, as a middle ground choice. Of course, given who's currently popping around the Disney campus (who might have more than a passing interest in NASA), that chance may get taken out of your hands...
fortuitous, there is an impetus to pull the meeting through and us being the source of his problems means there's things he wants from us.Friendly reminder that the current president is Ronald Reagan, who you have only interacted with negatively, and who is currently trying to figure out how to fix the economy that it seems like you broke.
He's also the guy who just announced Space Station Freedom, in the 1984 State of the Union address.Friendly reminder that the current president is Ronald Reagan, who you have only interacted with negatively, and who is currently trying to figure out how to fix the economy that it seems like you broke.
That's good, yes.
The person will only have a chance of getting involved if they overhear a meeting about the subject ongoing, which will have a chance of happening if you take the option next turn. Otherwise, expect no changes or a worsening situation at NASA.Does that mean that if we don't do anything, or take too long, someone else will do it for us?
Because if so, that doesn't sound too bad.
Friendly reminder that the current president is Ronald Reagan, who you have only interacted with negatively, and who is currently trying to figure out how to fix the economy that it seems like you broke.
Exxon collapsed.
This is an even better way to get it to him than doing it just by ourselves though if possible I'd hope to get some engineers willing to burn for this(which is entirely necessary to get them to do this) to join them.Regarding our choices on NASA. Why don't we call up Carl Sagan and Christa McAuliffe (who all of America's kids just saw get launched into space) and get a group privately, and then spring both of them on Reagan. As a result we stay out of it, and are merely just the facilitator of the connections to get things going
Because we made them look bad.
You knocked down the first domino, essentially. History books will say "this recession started when Exxon withdrew from a partnership with Disney, which was enjoying record setting popularity at the time, over a new interest in solar power."
Damn, that is some good branding.You knocked down the first domino, essentially. History books will say "this recession started when Exxon withdrew from a partnership with Disney, which was enjoying record setting popularity at the time, over a new interest in solar power."
The person will only have a chance of getting involved if they overhear a meeting about the subject ongoing, which will have a chance of happening if you take the option next turn. Otherwise, expect no changes or a worsening situation at NASA.
I like this plan. So, we should try and make sure that if we want to do something about it, we are never mentioned then.Regarding our choices on NASA. Why don't we call up Carl Sagan and Christa McAuliffe (who all of America's kids just saw get launched into space) and get a group privately, and then spring both of them on Reagan. As a result we stay out of it, and are merely just the facilitator of the connections to get things going
Nah, if it goes right we wanna headline. We just wanna keep it so that if it goes wrong we can avoid mention.I like this plan. So, we should try and make sure that if we want to do something about it, we are never mentioned then.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | |
Q1 1986 | Hotel 1 | Hotel AA | Imagineers | Nintendo | Lille Park | 2055 | Studios Park | FutureW1 | FutureW2 | |||||||
Q1 ACTUAL | Hotel 1 | Hotel AA | Imagineers | Nintendo | Lille | 2055 | Hollywood Studios | Living Seas | Sponsors | Hydrophobia | Oscars | Bluth | K/B | W/K | Focus | |
Q2 1986 | Hotel 1 | Hotel 2 | Cleaner Cars | NASA | Lille Park | Hotel AA Opening | Studios Park | Living Seas | FutureW2 | Disney Store | Focus Groups | Focus | ||||
Q3 1986 | Hotel 1 | Hotel 2 | Hotel 3 | Disney Store | Lille Park | Studios Park | FutureW1 | FutureW2 | ||||||||
Q4 1986 | Hotel 1 | Hotel 2 | Hotel 3 | Hotel ? | Lille Park | Vacation | Studios Park |
Now you're thinking like a businessman!Nah, if it goes right we wanna headline. We just wanna keep it so that if it goes wrong we can avoid mention.
Like, we want to avoid a headline that says "dumbass disney duck dicks around above his aygrade in NASA business" but nothing is better than "DISNEY SAVES SPACE: A MAGICAL TALE" accompanying a front page story about how the WDC in all it's goodness and hope just had to save lives and bring us into the future as they had before.
Like, it's an insulating layer against bad PR but a connection that if it works out we can use for good PR.
We have a Free action for Fantasyland for the next two turns as well, what can we do there?So... next turn we have to take Cleaner Cars, and we have to take NASA... Ok I need the table to help keep track
let me dig this up, and edit in what we did
Looks like we are quite on target to hit our board goals. We need to work on the second ride at Future World (Wonders of Life), we might want to consider starting work on Hotel 3 too next quarter, just so we can get all 3 to groundbreaking and a bit beyond. Remember We need about 1000 more rooms, so two mediums or a large and a small. We should have actions for other things. We should really consider doing some Disney Channel stuff too or other media acquistions
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Q1 1986 Hotel 1 Hotel AA Imagineers Nintendo Lille Park 2055 Studios Park FutureW1 FutureW2 Q1 ACTUAL Hotel 1 Hotel AA Imagineers Nintendo Lille 2055 Hollywood Studios Living Seas Sponsors Hydrophobia Oscars Bluth K/B W/K Focus Q2 1986 Hotel 1 Hotel 2 Cleaner Cars NASA Lille Park Hotel AA Opening Studios Park Living Seas FutureW2 Disney Store Focus Groups Focus Q3 1986 Hotel 1 Hotel 2 Hotel 3 Disney Store Lille Park Studios Park FutureW1 FutureW2 Q4 1986 Hotel 1 Hotel 2 Hotel 3 Hotel ? Lille Park Vacation Studios Park
Black Cauldron ride, update skyway, integrate LoZ, more as I think of them.We have a Free action for Fantasyland for the next two turns as well, what can we do there?
We have a Free action for Fantasyland for the next two turns as well, what can we do there?