Knightfall
Nui lover and Slaaneshi
- Location
- New York, New York
Dude cool it.Are you trying to troll me? Because at this point I think you're trying to troll me and I'm about done with it.
Dude cool it.Are you trying to troll me? Because at this point I think you're trying to troll me and I'm about done with it.
You are vastly overestimating how much anyone cares about investigating a new piece of random quack medicine. No one will ever notice the suspiciously high success rate unless we start letting people do actual trials. Sell it on the internet to make it difficult to find us and we will never have an issue.It still falls under the scrutiny issue. No matter how innocuously we heal people, people will notice a trend. Inspecting the pills might lead to nothing being amiss, but if people are being cured of aches and pains with sugar pills(being the only unifying factor) with way more regularity than the placebo effect can account for, somebody is going to call bullshit eventually.
That and with the religion issue there is something called Faith healing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.You are vastly overestimating how much anyone cares about investigating a new piece of random quack medicine. No one will ever notice the suspiciously high success rate unless we start letting people do actual trials. Sell it on the internet to make it difficult to find us and we will never have an issue.
I've heard of it, but it's a bad idea to actively draw attention to ourselves that way. No one cares about a new brand of homeopathic pills on the internet, but they might notice what is basically a piece of performance art, especially if we start literally making cripples walk etc.That and with the religion issue there is something called Faith healing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
I agree completely. Which is why I am proposing that the pills should have a minor effect which is not beyond people's ability to comprehend. Plenty of people believe that taking natural herbal supplements will make them healthier and feel better. And even in real life, taking such pills does make people feel better if for no other reason than the placebo effect (which can be surprisingly strong). Adding magic to the mix, so that the pills actually do make you a bit healthier and taken by people who expect the pills to make them feel better, will not raise any eyebrows. We could screw it up, of course, but if we do it right then people will feel no need to investigate.It's the act of providing the service that causes the scrutiny. Because a service is provided, and it's effectiveness is far and away beyond most people's ability to comprehend, they will attempt to disassemble and understand it. When it cannot be understood, it will produce an extremely wide and dangerous array of responses, from cries of magic and miracles to conspiracy. Either way, it will make people look at us very closely, which will bring Kyubey back into the mix, and he'll demand another exorbitant fee of 30+ GCU to make it go away.
So we put herbs into the pills and then enhance the effects with magic.I agree completely. Which is why I am proposing that the pills should have a minor effect which is not beyond people's ability to comprehend. Plenty of people believe that taking natural herbal supplements will make them healthier and feel better. And even in real life, taking such pills does make people feel better if for no other reason than the placebo effect (which can be surprisingly strong). Adding magic to the mix, so that the pills actually do make you a bit healthier, taken by people who expect the pills to make them feel better, will not raise any eyebrows. We could screw it up, of course, but if we do it right then people will feel no need to investigate.
A man claims that the cream he sells makes your skin tighter, smoother, and appear at least ten years younger. It has reportedly high success rates. He declines to explain the process by which he produces it. What do you think the response to that will be? If something that, after examination, shouldn't do what it does and invites scrutiny, then something like that where the manufacturer outright refuses examination will invite at least twice that amount, and if you think a bunch of teenage girls can cover their internet tracks better than a hobby-hacker can trace them, you're daydreaming.You are vastly overestimating how much anyone cares about investigating a new piece of random quack medicine. No one will ever notice the suspiciously high success rate unless we start letting people do actual trials. Sell it on the internet to make it difficult to find us and we will never have an issue.
The problem arises when said pills do way more than they should be capable of. If a person takes these pills and suddenly their arthritis is basically gone, it's going to become a thing that anyone with arthritis will want. If, say, these peoples' doctors start to realize that their patients have been symptom and pain free since taking these herbal remedies, they're going to take virtually any length to have us reproduce the results for official testing and use. They'll want to know what the miracle chemical is, and when it doesn't work as advertised except when produced by a bunch of teenage girls, somebody's going to investigate.I agree completely. Which is why I am proposing that the pills should have a minor effect which is not beyond people's ability to comprehend. Plenty of people believe that taking natural herbal supplements will make them healthier and feel better. And even in real life, taking the pills does make people feel better due to the placebo effect (which can be surprisingly strong). Adding magic to the mix, so that the pills actually do make you a bit healthier, taken by people who expect the pills to make them feel better, will not raise any eyebrows. We could screw it up, of course, but if we do it right then people will feel no need to investigate.
This is why I'm advocating putting only a small amount of healing magic in the pills. Not enough to outright heal the arthritis, but enough to reduce the pain somewhat, for instance. If a patient tells their doctor that they've been taking these herbal remedies lately and they still have pain but it's more manageable now, the doctor is going to smile and nod and dismiss it as the placebo effect. Just like the hundreds of other similar stories he's heard over the years. But that patient will still be getting slightly better and they'll be paying us money. Enchanting the pills so that they do have a benefit, but that the benefit is small enough to be dismissed might be a delicate balance, but it should be possible.The problem arises when said pills do way more than they should be capable of. If a person takes these pills and suddenly their arthritis is basically gone, it's going to become a thing that anyone with arthritis will want. If, say, these peoples' doctors start to realize that their patients have been symptom and pain free since taking these herbal remedies, they're going to take virtually any length to have us reproduce the results for official testing and use. They'll want to know what the miracle chemical is, and when it doesn't work as advertised except when produced by a bunch of teenage girls, somebody's going to investigate.
Pretty much this.This is why I'm advocating putting only a small amount of healing magic in the pills. Not enough to outright heal the arthritis, but enough to reduce the pain somewhat, for instance. If a patient tells their doctor that they've been taking these herbal remedies lately and they still have pain but it's more manageable now, the doctor is going to smile and nod and dismiss it as the placebo effect. Just like the hundreds of other similar stories he's heard over the years. But that patient will still be getting slightly better and they'll be paying us money. Enchanting the pills so that they do have a benefit, but that the benefit is small enough to be dismissed might be a delicate balance, but it should be possible.
I still reserve the right to point and say I told you so when it goes wrong. I wonder at the effect of ingested healing magic taken once per day, no matter how small the amount, and the stupidity of people being people and 'making up for lost time' by overdosing two or three pills at once.This is why I'm advocating putting only a small amount of healing magic in the pills. Not enough to outright heal the arthritis, but enough to reduce the pain somewhat, for instance. If a patient tells their doctor that they've been taking these herbal remedies lately and they still have pain but it's more manageable now, the doctor is going to smile and nod and dismiss it as the placebo effect. Just like the hundreds of other similar stories he's heard over the years. But that patient will still be getting slightly better and they'll be paying us money. Enchanting the pills so that they do have a benefit, but that the benefit is small enough to be dismissed might be a delicate balance, but it should be possible.
Nothing. There are literally dozens of companies doing exactly that right now (they tend to use pseudoscience instead of just refusing to explain, but we could do that too) for anti-aging cream alone and hundreds more for other things. No one does anything about it because everyone who matters knows it's bullshit without having to spend any resources on investigating. In this universe, they'd happen to be wrong, but they have no way of knowing that.A man claims that the cream he sells makes your skin tighter, smoother, and appear at least ten years younger. It has reportedly high success rates. He declines to explain the process by which he produces it. What do you think the response to that will be?
Examined by who? Investigating quack medicine is a waste of time. Who decided that doing this examination was worth their time? Who's funding this? Why are they examining us, instead of any of the other groups whose stuff is indistinguishable from ours before a detailed investigation?If something that, after examination, shouldn't do what it does and invites scrutiny
They rarely do anything that overt, but there are plenty of things we can to to make controlled trials harder (refuse to tell them who our customers are, don't sell to people in bulk) and we only have to be more inconvenient then something else to get skipped.then something like that where the manufacturer outright refuses examination will invite at least twice that amount
So? That takes effort. Why do they care?and if you think a bunch of teenage girls can cover their internet tracks better than a hobby-hacker can trace them, you're daydreaming.
Someone's salty over their arguments being debunked, and it isn't Skelm. Seriously dude, you're embarrassing yourself.Okay. Talk all you want about how brilliant your plan is, how stupid it is to examine the genius of the idea in a critical way. I have one last question for you.
There's a big difference between being willing to bet money on an issue and being willing to bet money you don't have, when the penalty for bankruptcy is death. It's just stupid to risk more than we have to on anything.Would you be willing to commit to it without having a surplus of GCU to pay Kyubey for a memory fix? Because if you aren't willing to do it, then all of your arguments against me ring kind of hollow, don't they? You deride every argument I make as needless worry, as wrong and excessive in my assessment, but unless you're willing to bet it all without having that safety net, well...
Someone has a poor understanding of the definition of the word 'debunk'.Someone's salty over their arguments being debunked, and it isn't Skelm. Seriously dude, you're embarrassing yourself.
How about letting Nagisa create cheese?Frankly, all y'all are nuts. We have like five other ways to make money that don't involve the lossy conversion of grief cubes into miraculously working quack medicine:
We can work on any of all of these once we get tandem casting trained up better, next month.
- Nagisa starts a pet whisperer business.
- Expand the courier business into Seto's area.
- Franchise agreement with the non-Serene
- Sell cubes directly to Nagoya
- Start another restaurant in Iwata (doable especially if specialties can be cross-trained)
Skelm's entire argument amounts to 'it's not that bad'. Forgive me for throwing my hands up and giving up the argument.Someone's salty over their arguments being debunked, and it isn't Skelm. Seriously dude, you're embarrassing yourself.
OK, on the issue of whether to uncap the rural harvest.
In order to keep the rural demon strength at 0 over time, any positive harvest must be balanced with a negative harvest. With our default 2.5 solo vets hunting there, the uncapped harvest would be 7.4 cubes instead of 7. However that would increase DS to 1.1. In order to reduce DS back to 0, the following month would need to harvest 6.6 cubes.
As you can see, over two months, 7.4 + 6.6 = 14, exactly the same as if we keep things capped: 7+7 = 14.
As long as we don't simply intend to allow DS to grow unbounded, this will always be the case, unless we apply rotating tactics to the area. Thus, outside of a change to rotating tactics, there is no reason to uncap the rural harvest value.
There isn't. If you believe there is a risk of attention that requires mass mindwipes such that you'd need the GCU reserve, then why are you arguing on the basis that no mass mindwipe can happen if we simply follow the details of your own plan? It weakens your position to say 'this is infallible and perfect' and yet when a man asks you to bet money on it you waffle and say it's risky to take such a bet.There's a big difference between being willing to bet money on an issue and being willing to bet money you don't have, when the penalty for bankruptcy is death. It's just stupid to risk more than we have to on anything.
Hmm. Valid proposition. Let me run some numbers.I agree with the above until the final conclusion.
There is a good reason, meguca costs will vary.
Due to the danger level of hunting with Solo Veterans in a rural area, we would have to alternate 1 turn of overhunting with 1 turn of underhunting and there would be a bit of inefficiency due to the DS falling below 0. Still, it would gain us (roughly) 0.5 meguca every other month at a loss of 0.7 GCU. Might be worth it.For example we could hunt with only 2 vets solo next turn, this would return 5.94 cubes, and save us a meguca 0.5 vet, to be spent elsewhere. DS would fall below 0, and then next turn we could overhunt again with 2.5 vets, followed by another overhunt, followed by an under hunt. We'd save 0.5 a meguca month every three months.