iAmJimmyHoffa
Servant of Morgoth
- Location
- New York
You realize that Madero's policies weren't that different from the Porfiriato, and only the Zapatistas promised true reform? It says on the Wikipedia page.
This is a very gross misunderstanding of the Revolution. Madero was a reformist and a moderate liberal who focused mostly on political change. He detested the authoritarianism of Diaz, and while he largely supported most of Diaz' modernization policies with respect to industrialization and infrastructure, he felt that too much power was being agglomerated by Diaz and his political allies by allowing American companies to invest in Mexico while simultaneously abiding by no kind of regulation whatsoever. His proposals largely appealed to the educated and the middle class, but that demographic making up only a small percentage of the country's population is the primary reason why he ultimately fell out of favor and failed as a leader. The Zapatistas and others appealed to uneducated and poverty-stricken Mexicans who wanted to seize land from the church and the wealthy and redistribute it to the poor -- a very drastic program, but ultimately that which proved most popular with the people.
I wouldn't call "land seizure" a type of reform. I *would* call the Zapatistas hardline revolutionaries. Clearly they were socialist. But I feel like describing Madero as Diaz' long-lost son does him and his supporters a bit of a disservice.
Last edited: