- Location
- Pacific Rim
While I'm with Zephyr on this mostly, I often end up using Hanlon's Razor "Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity." I think that fits Neelix pretty damn well.
Hanlon's Razor is bunk... except when it comes to actual well-meaning idiots like Neelix.While I'm with Zephyr on this mostly, I often end up using Hanlon's Razor "Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity." I think that fits Neelix pretty damn well.
Hanlon's Razor is bunk... except when it comes to actual well-meaning idiots like Neelix.
I still get dirty looks from the family when I point out that me and crazy Uncle Randy might have to pack in the tin foil soon because we're running out of conspiracy theories that haven't been proven true recently.I think it is totally fair to point out that incompetence is highly prevalent but I usually have Hanlon thrown at me when I'm talking to people about anti government conspiracy stuff where we have hundreds of years of evidence that it is, in fact, deeply malevolent.
please, please take this conversation somewhere else. This is not the appropriate thread for… whatever this is.
Zephyr has a decent read on Neelix, but I think he's slightly misattributing his tendency to get things… wrong. The issue isn't that neelix is intentionally lying or as Zephyr thinks blustering - it's that he genuinely thinks he knows more than he does, and thanks to Voyager's main-character luck everything he doesn't know is always going to come out of the woodwork and cause problems, making him look bad when anyone else not at the center of The Plot would never see that shit happen.
Sisko proved that even with his powers, he's just as vulnerable as a human when he's in human form. Zephyr tail-slapping him into a wall probably can't kill him, but he will feel it.I'd like to see Q running from a very pissed off dragon demanding explanations, but that'd require Q be vulnerable to him to be actually funny.
It's probably just Neelix's waifu Leola Root.I'll eat a hat if they aren't a biological threat that grows exponentially and very very quickly. Plant monster of the week, anyone?
My guess is going to be Neelix's ship has some passive characteristic that makes it very easy for the Kazon to pick up on their sensors.Neelix… traitor or not? I had no evidence for that. No direct evidence anyway… and I admittedly was biased against him because of the fact that I couldn't be in the same room without gagging.
Is Neelix's ship even going outside Voyager these days?My guess is going to be Neelix's ship has some passive characteristic that makes it very easy for the Kazon to pick up on their sensors.
Even in canon it was mostly kept in a shuttle bay as I recall
It is an unfortunate fact that Hanlon's Razor falls into the category of "common excuses people whip out when their primary concern is avoiding inconveniencing themselves", whatever merits it might independently have.I think it is totally fair to point out that incompetence is highly prevalent but I usually have Hanlon thrown at me when I'm talking to people about anti government conspiracy stuff where we have hundreds of years of evidence that it is, in fact, deeply malevolent.
...but that's a domain-specific supporting argument to Hanlon's Razor, unless you believe bureaucratic organizations actually are controlled by cabals of their enemies.It is an unfortunate fact that Hanlon's Razor falls into the category of "common excuses people whip out when their primary concern is avoiding inconveniencing themselves", whatever merits it might independently have.
Or, as I like to counter-battery fire, "The best way to interpret the resulting behavior of any bureaucratic organization is to assume it is being heavily influenced, if not outright controlled, by a cabal of its enemies."
Espionage and subversion have literally been an integral part of bureaucracy for as long as buraucracy has existed, and history is in a large part decided by when and how such groups, national mercantile and otherwise, are destroyed by subversion. If your reaction to serious bureaucratic fuck-ups does not include some variant of sweeping for such activities......but that's a domain-specific supporting argument to Hanlon's Razor, unless you believe bureaucratic organizations actually are controlled by cabals of their enemies.
Sir, madam, or otherwise, this is a Wendy's.Espionage and subversion have literally been an integral part of bureaucracy for as long as buraucracy has existed, and history is in a large part decided by when and how such groups, national mercantile and otherwise, are destroyed by subversion. If your reaction to serious bureaucratic fuck-ups does not include some variant of sweeping for such activities...
Hanlon's Razor demands that your response to fuck-ups be restraint imposed on your part. My counterpart demands there be restraint imposed on their part.
Or, to put it another way, Hanlon's Razor demands you make a distinction between the two and treat them differently. My counterpart demands there is no functional difference between the two, and that you don't even consider a difference in treatment until after the issue has been contained.
Unnecessarily harsh, you say? I don't agree, and even if I did I would point out my proposed treatment is the human default as far as bureaucracy is concerned. If you want something different, you had better start coming up with really motherfucking good reasons as to why.
Harsh but... true?
Critical hit; Ego punctured and deflating rapidly."You're a coward, Paris," I told him, "What's worse, you don't even admit to it because that would mean standing for something. And that's going to get people killed."
He stared at me for several long moments before he turned and walked away without a word.