@Doomed Wombat good luck on your A levels!
1. You think so but are not sure@Durin
- Are the Orks close to going down a level in their Waaagh based on the losses they've sustained so far?
- If so, is it impossible, improbable, probable, or certain for that to happen if we achieve significant success in breaking the current sieges?
Sigh
This sword maiden thing seems incredibly forced.
The reasoning doesn't amount to much at all, a vague idea that they may provide a small amount of help in a number of field that we already have organizations working on in a dedicated manner.
Also hope for some reason is thrown in there <shrug>.
There seems to be no actual reason for them just a bunch of attempted excuses for shoehorning in gender segregation.
You are pretty much exactly right in your calculations.I think we should go high of harrassment. We need to buy two days. Headcrusher can travel 20 kilometers a day. We need to get as good or better roll than before. We have less mines and if we put the psykers on air defense we need to make that modifier too.
We currently suffer 1:1 K/D ratio. High harassment would mean even 2:1 ratio. Losing one fifth to their one tenth.Your harassment forces killed a tenth of Headcrusha's Horde and delayed its advance by several days, though at the cost of almost a tenth of their own number.
68 for us, 34 for them, in two rolls.Harassment roll d100=53+10(home ground)+50(terrain)+15(scouting)+25(mines)+214(Martial)+5(psykers)=372
Ork Defence Roll d100=87+25(Orks)+50(numbers)-50(martial)=112
Harassment re-roll d100=68+10(home ground)+50(terrain)+15(scouting)+25(mines)+214(Martial)+5(psykers)+15(paragon Diviner)=402 Selected
Ork Defence re-Roll d100=34+25(Orks)+50(numbers)-50(martial)=59 Selected
Ork Speed reduced by 34%
I feel it necessary to deflate the rhetoric a little here. We inflicted 20:1 K/D ratio, it's just there were 20x as many of them.We currently suffer 1:1 K/D ratio. High harassment would mean even 2:1 ratio. Losing one fifth to their one tenth.
Those are serious casualties.
Is there a difference in the composition of their hordes? Cause they could be down to mostly their elites which reduces the casualties.I don't get why the hordes of Facesnapper and Scalpchoppa took only 434 and 334 divisions of casualties respectively. I expected that their casualties would get worse as they lost their numerical advantage. It's not like they've ground down the defenders all that much.
Another oddity is that we didn't get any AA damage to their aircraft roll this turn. Whereas in the previous turn we had that in addition to our air force killing their aircraft.
On the toughest in the army no less.I feel it necessary to deflate the rhetoric a little here. We inflicted 20:1 K/D ratio, it's just there were 20x as many of them.
The harrasment is literally the same in both plans, the only difference is my plan uses psykers to directly attack the ork fightas to help our air protect our harrasment forces.You guys do know we have to buy 2 more days with Harrassment and need to make up the modifier we lost?
Wait what no Harrassment is on High on the other plan that is the only difference. Everything else is the same.The harrasment is literally the same in both plans, the only difference is my plan uses psykers to directly attack the ork fightas to help our air protect our harrasment forces.