With the way our upkeep is ticking up every turn, I think we need to fit in admin reorganization 5, we've already put it off too long.
Personally, I think it's more important and urgent than making plans for sapper regiments.
Agreed with dragon on the admin reorg 5. Might as well get the thing over with.
Well... I did consider it as a Personal Attention...
The problem was getting the Y5 Expedite. Which is hard to do without using Personal Attention for it. And as a 5 year action the Admin Reorg would preclude that as a Personal Attention.
The Sappers is just because I needed a 1 year action as a spacer to get the Expedite in Y5 on the Shipyards. So you can't trade the Sappers for Admin Reorg. We'd have to trade in the Pilot Armor, and the Sappers, and Expediting a 2nd set of Shipyards in Y5.
I'm also trying to keep the AM on the things we expedite as low as possible (which makes the Shipyards very attractive to Expedite).
I suppose I could do the Admin Reorg in Y2 instead of Upgrading Defenses, and use a Double Down there... however that means forgoing the +15 from our Palace bonus.
I kind of want as many bonuses as possible of the Admin Reorg, which is why I was thinking next turn as a Personal Attention would work the best...
Which do you think is better?
~50% chance this turn, or ~60% chance of success next turn? We of course can try again assuming we don't fail too badly.
It should be noted, Siege Infantry Brigades are already sappers. Combat Engineer, Urban Defense and Offense, and anti-fortification work is literally their job description. There may or may not be value in elite versions of sappers with grav weapons and other exotic kit, but sapper units already exist.
Then that only makes the planning of sapper units even less urgent and important compared to other options.
Well of course. Sappers are not a priority for me at all. I'm looking for a 1 year action to space things so we can use the Y5 Expedite. Do you have an alternative 1 year action to propose?
Hmm... Maybe I could move Furthering Syr's education up into that slot...
Also I felt we could do the graveyard move as a personal attention.
Why? What is the benefit of doing it as a Personal Attention over a Void action?
I mean, I'm sure we can, but if we use our Personal Attention on a different Void action and use our Void action slot on Moving the Graveyard then the same stuff gets done right? And by using Personal Attention on the different Void actions we can schedule things so we can use an Expedite on a second set of shipyards.
For shipyards we do have one void action a year ahead of the other two which is where I would expedite the first shipyard and then expedite again the following year.
No, we don't want to do that, because one of those slots is our Construction slot and we want to use that for a Construct action (repairing ships). Also, I am already expediting both of those Void actions (the Y2 is a Shipyard, and the Y3 is the Construct action to repair ships). Furthermore Moving the Graveyard can not be expedited, so it makes sense to schedule it the same time as we are expediting a different Void action.
Also I was more trying to get my general opinion out on the choices since we have an 18 hr wait until voting. I have to double check the pdf action to see how much the AM upkeep is as that is one of my big worries.
No problem, that's what I am doing to, which is why I appreciate all the discussion.
Theological Studies Seminaries
I believe we should replace 'Those in the shadows' with the above. Ultimately, Deltas, Gammas and even Betas failing to pass doesn't endanger our future prospects all that much, as much as I would like to dispute that statement (Mostly because Avernus produces prodigious amounts of Major Psykers). Reducing Chaos cultists and abominations is significant more important than improving their odds.
Absolutely disagree with this. Cultists just dropped precipitously last turn (go read the Arbites section). There is no cultist crisis, so I think that having more psykers survive is much more important.
On the military, personally I think we should start the gradual reform then maybe speed up specific parts of it, though of course we might end up needing a military ASAP some time down the road..
Umm... you know that the Gradual Refit is for wargear, which we are already doing for everyone but the militia, and the Refit for weapons is a different subject from the wargear, right?