Why Logistics Win
-War Load: 60 shells on ammunition cart in two-shell boxes, up to four shell carts per gun organically.
You know, it never really sunk in for me why so fucking many people were in supply columns, or in artillery units, until I actually started looking over numbers like these while researching a project. Even an hour's barrage from a unit goes through some fucklarious weight per artillery battalion.

Fire two shells a minute for an hour, at ~20kg a shell, plus a couple kg for the shell-boxes, and that's a quarter-ton per gun, and a ton per battery. Early wave Wehrmacht used 3 battalions of 12x10.5cm leichte Feldhaubitze, so 36 guns is nine whole tons of ammunition gone in an hour, without even considering the 15cm battalion they also had, or the weight of mortars used down the chain. So that's about four trucks loaded with ammo that need to arrive on the hour every hour to keep that division in supply just for the 10.5s, assuming everyone is conveniently located. Keep that firing up for a day of heavy combat and you're going to need a train load to replenish that unit by itself.

...

Sorry, that was a bit of a sidetrack. Lingering research/maths trauma, you see. >.>
 
Annendum to Previous
You know, it never really sunk in for me why so fucking many people were in supply columns, or in artillery units, until I actually started looking over numbers like these while researching a project. Even an hour's barrage from a unit goes through some fucklarious weight per artillery battalion.

Fire two shells a minute for an hour, at ~20kg a shell, plus a couple kg for the shell-boxes, and that's a quarter-ton per gun, and a ton per battery. Early wave Wehrmacht used 3 battalions of 12x10.5cm leichte Feldhaubitze, so 36 guns is nine whole tons of ammunition gone in an hour, without even considering the 15cm battalion they also had, or the weight of mortars used down the chain. So that's about four trucks loaded with ammo that need to arrive on the hour every hour to keep that division in supply just for the 10.5s, assuming everyone is conveniently located. Keep that firing up for a day of heavy combat and you're going to need a train load to replenish that unit by itself.

...

Sorry, that was a bit of a sidetrack. Lingering research/maths trauma, you see. >.>
Not a bad calculation, but I think you're off by around an order of magnitude. One gun firing 120 20kg rounds yields 120*20=2400kg fired, or around 2.5 tons. 36 guns would use 86.4 tons of shells themselves, not to mention propellant, casings, shell boxes, and the rest, which probably at least doubles the required mass flow. more than 170 tons per hour is an absolutely enormous quantity, and you're probably talking about several train-loads per day, if not hourly depending on the size of the train. Forget trucks for anything other than individual gun supply at this point.
 
Contest 8: Opening Ideas
After assembling your Board, you got to talking with everyone.

Janzen, as a pilot, was quite conflicted on the topic of flak. In the War, it hadn't been a major issue unless you were going after something like divisional command with bombs or an artillery spotting balloon. Most flak, to him, had been based around the enemy's machine guns, and generally surrounded the balloon in three to four positions. When he was attacking a balloon, the two times he succeeded (attempt number three nearly taking off a wing of his) his technique was to make sure he was always flying tangentially to the guns, as if he was flying straight at them he'd get shredded. By his estimation, it took ten light and heavy machine guns to really put up a hard and fast no fly zone, and anything less than that was only discouragement. You could press an attack through flak, mostly if you had speed and altitude, but the early war eindekers didn't really enjoy either if you didn't baby them.

Kaptain Adler, meanwhile, thought Janzen was a bloody idiot and backwards fighter jock till the day he died. In terms of flak, the importance wasn't on the number of guns pumping lead, but rather on the ability to aim them. On the Carragian Front, there were several incidents where only three guns beat off four or five fighters, but the planes were all coming in from specific angles and the gunner had low closing rates- meanwhile, the Balhks tended to fill the sky with lead and shell shrapnel to little effect because they had no trigger discipline. If you went for a shell firing gun as the solution, Adler thought, you'd need to make sure you had an accurate firing solution on either a barrage point for transverse shots, or you had a solid bead on the plane with no more than fifteen degrees of closing angle, ten if the gun had a hand traverse. Anything with limited traverse, less than ninety degrees or so, needed to be immediately axed too. A light machine-gun based solution needed a certain amount of armor so a suppressive burst of the plane's synchronized gun didn't panic the crew. There'd only need to be one or two guns for the lighter pieces, but the catch was that they'd need to be both highly reliable, and more importantly be able to fire a lot of rounds. Once the gunner had a target, he was going to hold down the trigger, track the bogey, and pray he hit until the plane was out of his sights or he was out of bullets.

Vizewachtmeister Lang in large part agreed with Adler, and the two promptly blocked together to avoid some of the other unwise ideas floating around. Experiance with shell-firing guns in the War revealed they needed specialized mounts, and there was an old 8,8cm long gun concept they'd pulled out in a couple of regiments to serve as a flak cannon. The main issue was training the gun, since a wooden carriage trained about as fast as the ass hauling it. For lighter guns, he thought four guns under competent aims could bag a plane every time, and preffered ensuring there was both density of fire, and more importantly that a gunner could actually keep a lead on a target that was conducting a terminal attack near his position, which meant an increasing angle difference. Most planes were shot down on terminal attack runs, many after releasing their ordinance. The most important thing that Lang was concerned with, though, was good sights and good training. A gun crew had to be up at a moment's notice, and light flak units had to be able to keep their weapons in a ready state, even with the engines off.

Volkkstrupppe wasn't much help, but explained your smallest time fuse would result in a twenty to thirty percent dud rate in a 5,5cm gun, and you'd probably need a long barrel and wide bore to get good performance. Likewise, you'd need to drop spades and possibly even use a packing mount for a dedicated flak gun that fired shells. Anything smaller than the 3,5cm guns wasn't his problem, though.

Mittlewesk, meanwhile, was chomping at the bit to go if you needed a new gun. The old 8,8cm guns were a Royal Armory exclusive, but he'd be able to go around and get you a new option in roughly the same caliber if you needed a shell-firing gun. A machine gun would be notably harder to build since they were more mechanically complex, but he had high hopes on the "Embiggening Project" the team had been working on, and with long recoil weapons for vehicle mountings.

At this point, Hauptman zie Himmel Janzen reminded you that you still needed an idea on how to test firing at a moving target, and one moving in three dimensions, no less. God, you were going to be in deep on this one.


Votes

(Plan Vote)

[] Work on the Test Apparatus
-[] Write-in ideas
[] Work on the Weapons Specifications
-[] Write-in ideas
[] Work on the Chassis Specifications
-[] Write-in ideas

(Ok, since this is easily two or three times as complicated as your other projects, I'm breaking it up some. Before you write the RFQ and kick off testing, you need to decide some general ideas for this thing, and more importantly find a way to see if it works without shooting down friendlies. That last bit is bad.)
 
ESL blog plug
So, since we're talking about the chassis again, I figure I would shill my writing on how to avoid conflicting missions in AFVs. Which is incredibly generic, but still something you should pay attention to.

Well, I call it my writing, but it's the stuff @7734 and I yell at people on my server, summarized into a nice, easy to read (thanks to him, not me) post without any "Nyet"s or "rifle is fine".

----​

Personally, I think big-gun AA with MT shells is not our concern - they are pretty shit on the field, though they are good for protecting more static assets, so we might want to do something. Our main task I see in the 30mm+ autocannon range. They offer a good rate of fire so that they can actually hit a moving target (opposed to MT fuzed big guns, which are only really useful against level bombing without radar). Opposed to the 20-30 range, they offer a lot more range and a lot more damage per hit. The range is the important part here, there are limits to how many of these we can buy even if we put them on the truck and not a tracked chassis. A higher range means that they can cover more area, or can stay a bit further behind the front lines.

Thus, I'm going to cast the first vote, namely:
[X] Work on the Weapons Specifications
-[X]A Shell firing gun of at least 30mm caliber with a muzzle velocity of 850m/s. Ammunition should be fed through a belt or an uninterrupted clip feed, not through magazines or other things that halt the firing. The gun should be able to fire at least 70 rounds in the first minute, using up to 2 loaders, spare ammunition lying next to them.​
 
Contest 8: Guns
After issuing your weapon specifications, you got down to the Very Serious business of bumming around the college looking for bright young sparks to throw at managing the eternal contractor horde that was running a project.

That's when the Kaiser, having turned eighty nine last month, decided it was a good time to kick the bucket and send the whole country into a massive succession crisis. Louise Victoria was the elder heir of the Kaiser's first marriage, while Wilhelm Viktor was the oldest male heir. There had been no designated Imperial Succession, which was a problem and a half, but the country would keep running. There were provisions for this. Of course, your office would be closed down for a week, but that wasn't a problem so much as the politics. Everything in the country was gearing up to pick sides while you got down to business.

After requesting an automatic cannon that could sustain fire in over thirty millimeter, you quickly discovered that, suprise suprise, the only person who'd actually worked on a project to that (domestically) affect was the Potsdam Armory, with their automatic thirty five millimeter cannon. Using a pull-and-push system to feed, it fired from an open bolt and had around a four hundred round a minute fire rate. The gun was apparently designed for the Luftwaffe as a truck and armored car breaking weapon to be mounted on the new prototype Heinkel 74 ground attack aircraft in a pair of gun pods under the wings. Belts were two hundred rounds and the system had a new metallic disintegrating belt to help reduce weight of the system, although the gun was completely reverse-compatible with a standard metallic belt.

Interestingly, there was a non-domestic entrant from the Baal Company, who had found themselves on the wrong side of a coup in the Balhk capitol and were fleeing for their lives. The test prototype used the trademark heavy-duty Baal Long Recoil system to eject a case at extreme velocity, then via a top-mounted rammer system would reload the gun as it came back up into the battery position, with the breech slamming closed, firing, and then flying backwards. It operated from an open bolt, and the only real issue you had with it was the caliber- 46x400mm. It was an absolutely titantic piece, nominally designed as a fast tank destroying gun, and also as a bunker suppression system. Examples existed back in Balhkchivian if you adopted it, but the fact it had a top feed and could take a three round stripper clip with continual feed made it very attractive to you.

Finally there was the latest Torpedo Boat Gun from the Reichsmarine. Chambered in 40x360mm rimmed, it used an eight round spindle that could be topped off by a hopper and was gas operated with a rotating locking bolt. The spindle could nominally be replaced, but for all practical purposes it was fed loose shells or by a loose feed box that held nine rounds over the gun. The Reichsmarine was unhappy to part with it, and notified you it sometimes had issues at elevations over twenty degrees with the extraction system.
Naturally, there were several lighter entrants to the competition as well.

The most interesting, to you, was actually a colonial design by the gentlemen at Furrer & Mukami Arms, a Nyasalander munitions company that had recently earned a colonial patent and contract for a self-loading service rifle. Their weapon was an utterly massive toggle-locked variant of the Mg.51, upscaled piece for piece and then brutally stripped down in an effort to reduce weight and increase tolerances for the machining. The gun could fire either 28x165mm Short Thunder, which was chambered on modern Propellant Mix F (you said modern with your tongue in your cheek- they were technically up to Mix I or so, but nobody used it yet except the Luftwaffe) or with a surprisingly minimal series of modifications to the tune of a different barrel and toggle arms, fire the 28x210 Long Thunder Straight chambered on Propellant Mix B, an antique powder still shot in the old single shot Nyasaland service rifles. Naturally you'd only order in the Short Thunder variants if you got any.

Then there was the Armor Branch's own brain-child, an Slk.69 with a belt feed. Apparently some old fart said the magic word "commonality" and wanted it tested. Honestly, it probably wouldn't be worth fighting some old Oberstgeneral on this, so yay. More guns.

Lastly there was the civil-designed and civil-market Lightning Knife program, built around doing pest control and area defense in the deep Ostafrika jungles or on the wilderness preserves slash untenable hellholes like Tanzia and Skull Island. Based around a six barrel rotary system feeding from a loose tray(thus dodging just about all the laws against automatic weapons) it used an open bolt system that charged, armed, discharged, and extracted each barrel individually. Legally, it was 'only' six guns working together with an assistive device, but considering it managed to fire 19x110mm rounds as fast as the operator or electric motor could crank, generally in the range of six hundred a minute over the length of ten seconds to blow through the standard feed tray. The developers, Kalmund und Herman, however, assured you that feed trays could be made as large or as small as needed.

While your Board got to scratching and butting heads over what they thought were good ideas for a carrying vehicle, it was time for you to make sure your, and by extension your family's, political orientation was nice and nailed down for the inevitable questions and issues. Why was it always politics, again?


VOTE
(This is a one item no write-in vote and anyone being a schmuck will get their vote banished to North Carolina)

[] Declare for the Death's Head and Hussars; Prinzessin Louise Victoria Hohenzollern
[] Declare for the Long and Short Hands of Travel and Governance; Prinz Wilhelm Viktor Hohenzollern
 
Contest 8 Guns
Also I'm bored, have a table

Design Cartridge Action RoF Feed
Baal 46x400 Long-recoil, Verticall Sliding Breech Block (Bofors)   Three-round clips in uninterrupted top feed
Potsdam Armory 35x280 Open bolt, probably gas actuated in some form 400 Pull-push-belt
Torpedo Boat Gun 40x360 Gas-operated locking bolt   Eight-round spindle, topped of with single rounds
Furrer & Mukame 28x165 or 28x210 Toggle-lock, short recoil   Belt
Armor Branch 20x82 Gas-op rolling bolt   Belt
Lightning Knife 19x110 Externally driven Gatling Gravity feed probably will have issues exceeding 1000 Gravity tray
So, while we can not test guns yet, that's what we got. A Bofors in a middle ground between the two calibers they made OTL, a not really great gun firing 40mm Bofors. A generic 35mm autocannon which we probably should test.

After that, we got toggle-lock memes, a sensible conversion of what we have that has no harm in testing it and the first gatling. Firing what should be close to 20x110 USN, the round of the Oerlikon. I want to test it to get a foot into Gatling development, even if it doesn't turn out great yet.

So, in short, drop the torpedo boat gun for being bad for sustained fire, drop the toggle lock for being a toggle-lock that's not a Maxim.
 
Last edited:
The Heirs
But which would be more competent?

That's a matter of opinion. Most of your co-workers are for Louise Victoria because she's the one who's actually got experience doing field-y things. Before this whole 'modern schooling' thing came around, she was a foster child of Oberst Franz von Moltke IV, alias the Old Man of the Cavalry Branch's first son, now one of the moderates of High Command and one of the people who was fully up for the Cavalry Motorization Project. Her nickname comes from von Moltke IV's regimental standard, since his regiment at the time was the Lunesburg Second Imperial Cavalry Regiment, the Death's Head and Hands and she was nominally the standardbearer (an old administrative position to get people who needed to have TIG some TIG while not being in a position to fuck shit up) so things tended to follow from there. She's fairly level-headed, but academically doesn't tend to do well in class settings or with a lot of her peers in the Collegium.

By counterpoint, Wilhelm Viktor was very much a scholar and a 'gentleman' throughout his life. He's much less active than Louise Victoria, but the circle's he's active in are many. He's mostly made a game attempt at collegiate ambitions for the last three years, and due to his birth defect leaving his left arm a good eighteen centimeters shorter than his right and stricken with Erb's Palsy he's patently unfit for actual military service. He did however share his father's love for flying and travel, and took every chance he could to get out of the country that looked at him like a cripple. He's been all over, from Balkhchivian to Carragia on formal events, and more than a few controversial trips to Taelexi. He's even nominally a pilot recently, even if he needed a prosthetic hook for his short arm to actually reliably use it. While normally kind, Wilhelm is possessed of a mercurial temper and violent streak his classmates have shrugged off as an eccentricity befitting his otherwise-sharp mind.
 
Contest 8: Board Recommendations
After getting through the political nonsense, you got to work postehaste on querying your Board on ideas for a vehicle to move the guns around, and maybe for whether to settle for a towed carriage or an integral mounting.

Janzen was firmly in favor of a light, fast, organic truck type mounting so that you could mount the maximum amount of 'dakka' (his words) on the maximum amount of tactical maneuverability so that it could keep up with the second line support units with ease and maybe range ahead some so that it could intercept planes before they got to their attack runs. His perferered weapon for this system was the Lightning Knife rotary barrel system, based on the logic that a lot of bullet was more terrifying than an exploding shell since if you saw the shell explode then it hadn't hit you. If the truck could get in position and drop spades (Janzen hated that step and hoped a truck system didn't need spades) then it could blow through it's feed of however many bullets, hopefully splash a plane, and then take however long it needed to reload since it probably killed or scared off the plane and there wouldn't be another wave for another twenty or thirty minutes.

Mittleswesk couldn't give a flying fish for the carriage, he was just interested about the guns. His personal favorite was the Baal long recoil system, but he thought the rolling breech was too fast and that the gun really didn't need that high of a fire rate as long as it was tossing shells with reasonable precision. Based on that, he wanted a fairly exxtensive trailer mount to be plopped down around semi-fixed positions like an artillery park or HQ and equipped with a stereoscopic rangefinder and a fuze setter so it could use FG-T rounds, with possibly taking one of the Reichsmarine's experimental Gun Battery Coordination Systems and tying it to the entire network of guns. This would, theoretically, create a sort of aerial beaten zone which a plane couldn't reliably enter or press an attack through.

Lang's opinion was that Mittlewesk was a blithering moron who needed to stop sniffing glue and Janzen was a bloody pilot and his opinion was wrong by default. Air attacks would hit any place over the line, and pilots were normally savvy enough to avoid any specifically fortified points on the line and go for weaker secondary targets. Thus, Lang posited, the best solution would be a threefold method of air defense- first, in a integral lightweight system designed to closely follow the press of the armor or cavalry, probably truck mounted and kept to be as integral to one vehicle as possible. Next would be a towed system with greater range that would ideally take hints from the front end shooters to put up fire towards the enemy and beat them off the softer back-line targets. The heavier system would probably be shell-firing, had to be able to operate as lone guns, and probably would need two Kettenkrads to serve as operational tow and hauling vehicles with a third for supply. Finally, there needed to be a nominally mobile unit who would be ladled down with fancy crap like the GBCS and would protect the railroads from getting blasted into pieces. That was Very Important, keeping the light rail from getting taken out.

Volkstuppe wanted an integrally mounted heavy caliber anti-air artillery piece, but was smart enough to admit he probably wasn't going to get something like a 10,5/55 anti-air gun hooked up to a rangefinder and coffee maker on a tracked chassis though. In lieu of that, though, he bowed to Lang's expertise, and suggested using the 3,5cm autocannon on a towed modified artillery carriage as a good point-defense AA piece. One Kettenkrad could tow it, another could keep it fed, and with a good training gear it could probably move around fast enough to blast most aircraft clean out of the sky.

Adler was honestly quite neutral on the topic, but he did have several warnings about what anti-air artillery was liable to face in terms of airborne attack. There were three major Irromic projects underway, plus data about one Carragian project they'd managed to hear through a technology sharing program at Vogt-Lubeck Aircraft Corporation.
The first Irromic project was Project Erschweren, a bomb kit designed for the venerable fifty kilogram general purpose bomb. By using a drogue chute tied to six slat flaps on the back of the bomb, this would sufficiently retard the falling speed of the bomb to allow pilots to make bombing attacks as slow as their stall speeds at at altitudes of less than thirty meters- well below what your potential AA systems could likely track and engage due to the increases in angular speed from being so much closer. With this, a supression flight could come in on the nap of the earth and fast, nail a known flak site, and then pull off and escape while the flak site was doing damage control.

The second Irromic project was Project Kondensstreifen, an eight centimeter spin stabilized rocket with a twenty five kilo warhead with an impact fuze and explosive-shrapnel warhead. Here the idea was to spot the flak nest, launch rockets, and have the suppression flight fall back and gain altitude as the rockets disrupted the flak nest long enough to let the bomber pilots fly in, release weapons, and begin to fly out. Several people were pushing for incindiary warheads as an option, but that wasn't being seriously considered yet due to the low power of the proposed incendiary mixes compared to the ideal throw weight of the twenty five kilo warhead.

The final project was the weirdest, and was called Project Voller Bomben. This plan, much like Erschweren, was designed explicitly around a low and fast attack- however, this plan instead of delaying one large bomb, used one kilo bomblettes as the attack mechanism, each with a time delay fuse of five seconds with a ribbon tail to ensure a mostly straight fall. The impact of the large number of bombs would already be reasonably traumatic, and more importantly the timed fuses would make sure that if the gun crews didn't evacuate for bomb shelters they'd shortly all be killed.

The Carragian project, meanwhile, was a plan for a large, airborne bomber to carry a bomb bay full of nine centimeter rockets on time delay launches. Once dropped, the rockets would have a special slat back with an airscrew-timed fuse that would launch the rocket once it was falling at a forty five degree angle, creating a large, shotgun-like barrage of rockets down on a target area, with each rocket's large warhead being equally effective at destroying bunkers and open infantry or armor.

Now you were up to the hard part: write your RFQ now, or work on a testing aparatus?


Votes
(PLAN VOTE)

[] Work on RFQ
-[] Write-in

[] Work on Testing Apparatus?
-[] Write-in
 
Last edited:
Some Luftwaffe Planes
Voller Bomben Carragian Project smells like an impractical vunderwaffen.

Not really. It's a pretty sound system, and is based around the idea that a unitary warhead and shrapnel blast isn't going to get everything really destroyed since a smart enemy is going to dig readabouts on anything holding still longer than six hours, so by sprinkling the explosives over it you make sure the entire position is pretty soundly bombarded. The big bomb, meanwhile, isn't an anti-flak weapon so much as a precision level flight bomb- there's a lot of times flying high and wide for a dive bombing run is a bad plan, so you need to go in low and tight and slam the bomb down their throats as tightly as possible. The current Luftwaffe runs about two dozen types of aircraft, and of them most of the old planes can't be used to do dive bombing and as they add Air Regiments they need to make sure these old planes are still useful.



Take this guy, a Farrier-Wolfgang 56. It can haul a bomb, but if you try to dive in it the wing will rip right off if you're not very careful. It's not much good as a fighter anymore either, since it can only haul one 13.2mm gun over the nose. Load it up with a retarded bomb, however, and it'll make very solid attack runs every time because, as a high-wing plane, it can and will work at altitudes other planes won't fly at because they can't see the ground. Then there's this guy.



He's one of your other fighters, and holds a whopping one 13.2mm and one 6.5mm gun, both synchronized throught the prop. He can haul a whopping two bombs, but there's a catch- when he's hauling two bombs, he handles like a bloody sow and can rip the mountings loose without too much effort. Load him up with Vollerbomben, though, and you can move the weight around much easier so that you don't slam the throttle forward and the stick back to rip the mountings out as an emergency bomb release.



Then there's this guy, a new design from Juniper, a brand new fast bomber. It's built to tank up with five thousand kilos of munitions, but it's only got so much room on the wings and it can't use the bomb bays and the wing mounts together without needing a runway longer than God to take off with. If they can make a low drag munition to hang on the wings, though, then they can start getting up past three thousand kilos of onboard ordy without listening to the madmen in the back asking if it's ok to strap a rocket to the back end to help the poor bird up.

You're not the only proccurement officer who's staying busy!
 
Contest 8: Gun Testing
After about a week of deliberation and paper shuffling, you came to the critical realization that you could do guns as a testing aparati totally separately from everything else, and probably weed out a lot of the dumb vehicles that would get mailed in to you by the manufacturers who seemed to be popping up like weeds these days. After making plans to do some tests, you went out to Ulm the next Monday and got ready for a show.

First was muzzle velocity, which would be measured by means of a Loomis chronograph, taken at a range of one hundred meters. Three shots would be taken, and then averaged.

Starting things was the Baal Arms entrant, which clocked in at 745 meters per second, and had no issues during test firing, delivering the entire clip of ammunition easily.

The Potsdam Armory gun, meanwhile, clocked in at 720 meters per second, and during testing proved disturbingly ornery with afixed metallic belts used.
The Kriegsmarine Schnellboot Program gun performed admirably well, shooting at 865 meters per second with no issues in the gun.

The Furrer and Mukame gun, firing the short cartridge, tested in at 870 meters per second with no issues of the gun or feed mechanism, despite a small number of rounds landing over the target due to a poor fit on the testing bench.

The standard Armor Branch 2cm autocannon performed in a rather lackluster fashion, clocking in at 684 meters per second. No issues were had with the gun or the feed strip loading.

The Lighting Knife, after some exciting issues with the fire control and the fact that one could not spool the gun "full", proceded to test fairly normally, with rounds hitting in around 853 meters per second.

Next up came the sustained fire testing. Shooting would start, and continue for thirty minutes, with the rounds per minute being calculated via division of rounds fired in the test over time. Fire would take place at zero degrees of elevation, and time would not be stopped for stopages that did not require an armorer to repair.

Again, the Baal Arms entrant went up, and continued belting out fire without any care in the world. With three stoppages due to shell non ignition (two due to primer failure, one due to a faulty firing pin strike) the gun kept up a cyclic eighty one rounds per minute, getting as high as ninety-five rounds per minute at one point before a stoppage. The gun handling crew liked the ease of the top loading arrangement, but disliked the gun's loud report and massive dust clouds it could kick up. It was requested also the gun be fitted with a flash hider or other muzzle device to help with these issues. It was noted, however, that due to the automatic loading system, there were two run-on fires in testing, neither of which were easily controlled.

The Potsdam Armory gun had issues, as testing crews quickly determined it would need two tests. The first test, with metallic continuous feed belts, was riddled with jams, extractor failures, shell lift failures, and failure to feed. Stopages were had nearly every three minutes, and the gun had the tendency to overheat massively on at least two occasions. After the numbers rolled in, the consensus was the gun averaged roughly two hundred and twenty rounds per minute, with a frankly disastrous number of jams and two one-minute periods spent cooling the gun after it had started suffering runoffs. Once cool to the touch and equipped with separating metallic belts, however, the majority of the issues disappeared, and were instead replaced by rampant overheating issues as the gun regularly suffered runoffs, each requiring a minute of cooling. Despite this, the gun was much more reliable, which lead to an average of four hundred and sixty one rounds per minute on the second test.

The Torpedo Boat Gun was next, and performed in an amazingly mediocre fashion. With only six stoppages due to overheating, the gun fired amazingly well as long as there was a steady supply of ammunition in the hopper. The only major complaint the testing crew had was the weight of the mainspring when manually recharging the gun, and the fact the bolt had to be locked open in order to rotate the loading spindle- although the fact the bolt had a lock-open position was appreciated. The only major suggestion was for a muzzle device for the same reason as the Baal- reducing dust and noise. In cyclic fire, the gun maintained about sixty five rounds a minute, and crews felt the spindle loading system was fairly reasonable, especially with the new "backup loader" gravity chute on the opposite side of the spool's drum that held an additional ten rounds in case the main load chute emptied out or something made it skip a cylinder.

Fuerer and Mukame were after the Torpedo Boat Gun, and promptly started demonstrating why nobody seriously liked toggle locks anymore. With a whopping ten stoppages, in large part to the gun over-recoiling and then 'bouncing' as it hit the chamber thus bringing it out of battery. Other than that, it had a very pleasant feel to it, and felt familiar to anyone who'd used a butterfly trigger Mg.51 for any length of time. Thanks to the ability to link the Nylassander-pattern canvas belts together into an infinite feed, much like a modern metallic non-disintegrating belt, the gun otherwise kept up a very good stream of fire, until it ran its water jacket dry and needed a refilling. In sum, with five hundred and twenty rounds a minute nearly constantly, the testers quite liked the gun and couldn't hear a word you said otherwise.

The bog standard 2cm Slk.69 was on the blocks after that, and to the suprise of nobody was a complete bore to watch. Rattle off a belt, stop, clear the action, thread a new belt in, drop the bolt out of the safety notch, repeat. It had two extractor failures, somehow, and one overheating that required a minute to cool the gun. All in all, it had a good five hundred round a minute pace, which was rather nice.

Last, but certainly not least, was the Lightning Knife platform, which caused some test concernation. Once the two thousand round chute was loaded, the testing team started the generator, threw the switch, and watched it go. Aside from one stopage when a test assistant accidentally loaded a box into the hopper backwards and several nominal pauses in firing where the feed was empty and the motor was still running, the gun operated continuously without issue through the entire test. After, however, there were some issues discovered, including one barrel with the bolt edifice nearly fused shut, one barrel with the firing pin punched straight through the back of a cartridge, and one barrel which had snapped a firing pin. This last barrel, most interestingly, had attempted to fire every cartridge put through it, and then ejected the still-unfired projectile without noting the issue. That could be a plus or a minus, you weren't sure yet. What was nice was the fact it was belting out an (estimated; those lost barrels probably futzed the math) eight hundred ninety rounds a minute.

You wanted to test mounts, but there was the slight issue none of the guns had AA mounts, and more importantly wouldn't work with the standard double 13.2mm gun mount. A minor oversight, but educational, since currently all your tests were being done on the old wooden W.45 and .48 artillery carriages with varying amounts of modification.
While you planned to do balloon tests, the voice of wisdom you had (and your chief of staff) told you it might be a good idea to start out with fuse tests. As the Fuerer & Mukame design, Slk.69, and Lightning Knife all fired solid shot, they would be excluded from this round of testing. The targets were all going to be some dozens of condemned planes the Luftwaffe had provided, explaining they had basically flown the wings off and structural damage had made them terminally unsafe. Fire was going to be put on the planes at one, two, and five hundred meters.

The Baal was up first, and quickly ran into the issue it's shells wouldn't fuse on the canvass at the close range targets, only the five hundred meter target. They would, however, fuze on just about any other hit to the plane at any range- gas tank, engine, cockpit armor, wings, radiator, frame, and even one memorable shot where the shell fuzed on the canvas after tumbling through the wing, through the fuselage, and then on the other side.

The Potsdam Armory gun, meanwhile, had shells that exploded on every hit regardless of strike location or range. While you weren't convinced the rather sorry-looking holes they punched into the planes were going to do anything, Janzen informed you that all of these planes had been terminally damaged, and any one hit would take them out of the sky.

The Torpedo Boat Gun wasn't as bad as the Baal when it came to fuse failures, since it would sometimes fuse on the two hundred meter target's canvass, but it still prefered a solid hit. Also like the Baal design, what it hit was most certainly not operational. In one rather memorable shot, a radiator hit (under the forward fuselage) was enough to destroy the wing spars, and therefore take off the lower right wing.

Balloon tests were postponed, as the only balloon-certified working unit, the Erika battalion of Ninth Air Regiment, were currently helping work up the Eleventh Air Regiment, tentatively scheduled to be a Naval Attack Squadron based out of Edelweiss Air Base on Edelweiss Island.

Towed glider tests, meanwhile, would procede when you actually had mountings for these guns lined up. Considering the number of horses you'd swapped to get five Krammer racing coups from GBA, those tests were happing hell or high water- unless they managed to totally fuck it up, you'd almost have to drag whatever they sent you through the first round of testing.

Which, speaking of mounts, got you a message back from High Command that was a bit of an issue. Apparently, the anti-aircraft corps of the artillery branch had decided to standardise on a two-level flak project, and recommended that therefore the correct response was for you to adopt a two-level flak system- a short-range point defense gun, and a longer range gun that might be able to make crossing intercepts. More importantly, however, was the fact your vehicles were totally absolved from any strategic defense imperative, due to the creation of Flakcorps regiments responsible for protecting strategic assets like rail lines. Said Flakcorps might look into buying some of your tanks, though, so please please look into working quickly because they couldn't actually start a procurement program right now.


Votes

(You have guns, you have a testing plan. Time to write a Request For Quotes.)
 
Back
Top