AA's job isn't traditionally to destroy aircraft, though its a close second, primarily it is supposed to deny the enemy of the ability to attack freely with planes.
For spaa i think we should look into making 2 types a light and cheap one for protecting our logistics convoys and a more armored one for front line use.
Ideally for the cheap one we should try to mount the aa on what ever truck we are using for logistics.
No proximity yet, and I doubt that we can get an adjustable time fuze on a gun under 75mm.
Ideally we would want a mix of 40, 20 and .50 cals. 40s to provide an aa umbrella over our forces and act as area denial and shooting any planes that pass over. the 20 and .50 cals are for close in defense, shooting down attacking planes and hopefully seeing a hail of bullets fly their way will un-nerve pilots to either abort or release their bombs early reducing accuracy of their bombing run.
the reason why i am including .50 cals is simply because we can put them on every vehicle for self defense and quad .50s while short range can still kill any plane that get into their range.
Sounds like a good pintle mount and belt box for the Mg.97 that can be welded onto any vehicle sturdy enough would be a good start. Plenty of tracer in the belt for intimidation.
Mostly because, with the fact that one of the most advanced tank options we might have had is now about to go open source, we need a tank killer and fast. If we can, I'd hope for it to be something like the StuG III, or the Jagdpanzer IV, or a new turreted vehicle with enough armor to resist the gun that the W-41 is intended to carry and, ideally, a gun with enough firepower to pierce the armor hull that's been left at Wanderer's factory. At this point, I'd say that Wanderer's company might as well just get nationalized, which could also allow the W-5's to be delivered.
Is it probable that Wanderer's new tank being open-source will render our own new tank obsolete?
So it's definitely competitive, but not fantastic - it'll keep everyone else's tanks good, but we don't need to replace anything - other than the W-1 through W-5, which are thoroughly obsolescent most likely.The W-41 was very advanced, yes, but preliminary examination still shows you got the better vehicle in terms of sophistication. You've got more sloped armor, a nominally better suspension, possibly a better engine, and most importantly your gun isn't an experimental piece of equipment that's not in production. The W-41 is more of a teamwork-oriented animal, having a five-man crew with a dedicated radio operator rather than your commander pulling double duty, but they apparently didn't have a turret basket. The other thing to note is that four centimeters of armor isn't all that protective- the tank you currently adopted has a front glacis of five and a half centimeters sloped fifty degrees. The devil is in the sides, which are four centimeters on the W-41 versus the two centimeters at thirty five degrees on your new tank.
Besides, there was mention of other design boards, so i'm assuming there's another guy in our position who would have to pick up the SPAA contract.
By the way, do Irmionics have paratroopers?
And if they do, when they are going to make noises about wanting airdroppable or at least air-transportable vehicle?
Hey, if worst comes to worst, we can just upgun the Wander tanks. Or convert them to SPAA or SPAT.
7734, sorry if this has been stated before, but have other countries demonstrated the ability to deliver tactical air support or does the Luftwaffe have a monopoly on that kinda thing?