Emotions are not a psychological status effect.Gamer's Mind includes immunity to psychological status effects.
But PTSD is.
Who decides?
Right, sorry, didn't quite catch the context of your post. Quoting what you're responding to helps avoid that.
Sure, but "Angry" (which is the emotion associated with rage) isn't.
In the Gamer, you are calm. You can "feel" anger, but it won't cloud your mind.Sure, but "Angry" (which is the emotion associated with rage) isn't.
... Or at least I've never heard of it being one.
Sure, but "Angry" (which is the emotion associated with rage) isn't.
... Or at least I've never heard of it being one.
That, punishing not attacking the taunter, and just flat-out forcing them to attack the taunter are a few I've seen.
Except the reassurance is: "We have her word and thus, by extension, the word of her family", and so long no one important tries to force matters, it's all reassurance that it merits. The insult comes essentially by the implication that Louise's words are not good enough to take on their own and they need to actually check for proof. Even if only to reassure a third party, it's still an insult, if one by proxy, and even so, unless the source of the insult was strong enough to twist the Academy's arm into such action, the staff wouldn't escape any of the blame for the insult either.Not true. The way such an attack would work is you'd have a bunch of different students (and possibly staff) "report rumors" and ask for assurances that this is impossible, assurances the school would be unable to provide because they hadn't actually tested Louise which would feed the rumors and if nothing was done the Rumors would become damaging in their own right, and made worse by the fact that the school did not test Louise. The damage done then is something the Valleires could blame the school for.
Checking and publicly stateing the rumors are groundless cuts short that attack and providing an explanation prevents any similar attacks so the Valleires have no basis to take offense at the school's actions.
True, how is that relevant to the discussion?
PTSD is having the natural symptoms to stress and trauma not go away, if Gamer's Mind doesn't eliminate those reactions it doesn't do anything.Who decides?
It may be that it includes immunity to whatever psychological elements the user feels are wrong.
Problem with this is:Except the reassurance is: "We have her word and thus, by extension, the word of her family",
It was an response to this line of discussion:
Can someone with Gamer's mind even have Night Terrors and PSTD?
Nnot sure about night terrors, but isn't PTSD a status effect, and thus would get cured by a night's sleep?
Oh, missed that. Thanks.
I would be surprised if it doesn't negate those.PTSD is having the natural symptoms to stress and trauma not go away, if Gamer's Mind doesn't eliminate those reactions it doesn't do anything.
They actually do, if implicitly so. To claim that she's currently not able to use magic is to essentially accuse her of intentionally and dishonestly perpetuating a falsehood. Childish ill natured rumors of this nature wouldn't garner much attention, specially so long they don't go much farther than the academy itself and no one starts invoking their families, but that's only so long nothing official is done and it can be ignored as, at the very most, kids being kids (aka, immature and stupid). Official action on the part of the academy on the other hand is not something that can be ignored at all, and even just tolerating it without recompense would be risking appearing somewhat weak. Although, as I comment on the next point, proper phrasing can help somewhat with it.
Kinda, but not really so long it's well phrased. They wouldn't be questioning, interrogating or demanding her to give her account her in any way, but just asking if she would mind telling her story (while making it clear that her story obviously is true, it's so they can know it) as to stop any misunderstandings. And if someone accuses her of lying afterwards, well, no way for it not be clearly interpreted as an attack on her and her family honor, and be dealt as such.2)If they go as far as asking but don't do anything else they open both themselves and the Valleires to other attacks.
The thing is, as far as politics go, specially with how Louise is so incredibly disciplined as to just about never first escalate into throwing her family name around, "Louise the Zero" is a completely different person than "Louise le Blanc de La Valliere". And while the first can be mocked, teased, bullied and have rumors spread about with little to no consequence, the second is the one who is relevant when it comes to any actual official action that is not routine and/or strictly SOP given the situation.3)The suggestion was that Louise was damaged by something, given her reputation as "Louise the Zero" no one would accept she knows enough to give an accurate assessment (not even her own family).
The thing is, as far as politics go, specially with how Louise is so incredibly disciplined as to just about never first escalate into throwing her family name around, "Louise the Zero" is a completely different person than "Louise le Blanc de La Valliere". And while the first can be mocked, teased, bullied and have rumors spread about with little to no consequence, the second is the one who is relevant when it comes to any actual official action that is not routine and/or strictly SOP given the situation.
The thing is, as far as politics go, specially with how Louise is so incredibly disciplined as to just about never first escalate into throwing her family name around, "Louise the Zero" is a completely different person than "Louise le Blanc de La Valliere". And while the first can be mocked, teased, bullied and have rumors spread about with little to no consequence, the second is the one who is relevant when it comes to any actual official action that is not routine and/or strictly SOP given the situation.
Medeival and Early Modern culture had no difficulty with having several different identities each with different rights and privileges in the same person. If Louise had been throwing around her family's authority and name dropping she'd have made it difficult to separate "Louise the Zero, academy student with a poor record" from "Louise le Blanc de La Valliere, youngest daughter of the second most powerful noble in the land and the Princess' best friend" and made it possible for people to attack the later (and be extension her family and possibly even the royal family) while pretending it's just a bit of scoolyard taunting of the former.I think you are saying that due to Louise never throwing her family's weight around that while Louise the Zero is a target for small time jabs and rumor mongering, the moment actual authority comes into view, she is a lot harder to actually damage her reputation?
If so I don't quite understand why. Could you explain it to me?
So, because Louise always kept her family out of the school yard, all attacks against her were against her, and the use of her family name draws her family into it?
Ok then when you can cast any actual spell in an element you are a dot, I didn't mean that someone who can't cast that element is a dot mage.I agree with this. It can't be simple linear progression, since 2 mages of an lower rank don't equal the power of a mage in the next rank. A square mage can take down a large force/army single handedly and multiples of triangle mages.
Louise has been referred to as a subdot mage before, So I'm sure you don't have to start at dot. When you start, no one is a Dot level mage.
There are equivilants in the modern world.Medeival and Early Modern culture had no difficulty with having several different identities each with different rights and privileges in the same person. If Louise had been throwing around her family's authority and name dropping she'd have made it difficult to separate "Louise the Zero, academy student with a poor record" from "Louise le Blanc de La Valliere, youngest daughter of the second most powerful noble in the land and the Princess' best friend" and made it possible for people to attack the later (and be extension her family and possibly even the royal family) while pretending it's just a bit of scoolyard taunting of the former.
Since Louise has kept a clear separation between her various identities there's no confusion an attacker can hide behind.