Tenno Drifter
IT WAS ALREADY ON FIRE WHEN I GOT HERE
Yep same... WeirdYeah this came up in my alerts as OP and was threadmarked as "threadmarks" instead of "staff post" in the thread.
Yep same... WeirdYeah this came up in my alerts as OP and was threadmarked as "threadmarks" instead of "staff post" in the thread.
Yeah this came up in my alerts as OP and was threadmarked as "threadmarks" instead of "staff post" in the thread.
Doppelgangers are weird.As far as Hannah could tell, the intent of the duo was for Jessy to build equipment for Joyce to then go out and be the one using.
FOOF doesn't react instantly with fluoridated metals. It will absolutely destroy mere oxides though; that's what it's used for, industrially.FOOF is nasty, but we can actually work with it well enough to know how it acts beyond exploding on contact with nearly everything ever.(I think it doesn't care about wax or oxidized aluminum?)
It's not the doppelgänger devices per se doing that; it's the form shifting – it's designed to partially isolate the other form from the core personality, effectively giving it it's own set of memories. I assume this was originally meant to aid infiltration by creating "legends" that literally couldn't give themselves away but that's just my cynical take. The devices are just tapping that and letting them run 24/7, accelerating their development.Doppelgangers are weird.
They act a lot like independent entities in my opinion.
The first ones that come to mind would be Synthetic element's.So, jumping to another topic...
What sort of theoretical or just stupidly dangerous molecules do you think are going to be petitioned to be produced, through simulation first and then in an empty system, so their characteristics and behaviors can finally be documented? FOOF is nasty, but we can actually work with it well enough to know how it acts beyond exploding on contact with nearly everything ever.(I think it doesn't care about wax or oxidized aluminum?)
I know there are FAR more energetic molecules that we can't actually look at, as that will trigger them.
Or are they materials? Molecule doesn't sound right.
Memes.
Similar to how the memes of gun safety make it socially inappropriate to look down the barrel of your own gun, regardless of foreknowledge or actual safety.
When the swab comes out clean, it's been cleared of all residue. As a rule, looking through the barrel is done to check the rifling itself for damage, and is done from the chambering end of the barrel rather than the firing end, when you have disassembled the firearm and it cannot fire.After you made a weapon safe, removed all ammo and pulled the trigger a few times to absolutely make sure it cannot fire, there's no reason to not look down the barrel. I mean, you kinda have to when cleaning your gun. Sure, usually that's done after disassembling the gun but not every model lets you remove the barrel. How else do you check if the rifling inside has been cleared of all residue?
Some firearms cannot be inspected in this way and must be inspected from the firing end. However, once the firearm has been sufficiently disassembled it hardly matters.done from the chambering end of the barrel rather than the firing end
When the swab comes out clean, it's been cleared of all residue. As a rule, looking through the barrel is done to check the rifling itself for damage, and is done from the chambering end of the barrel rather than the firing end, when you have disassembled the firearm and it cannot fire.
I'm not aware of a single firearm that you can't remove the barrel of. Are you talking about black powder weapons?Tell that to my drill instructor who checked all barrels that way to make sure they were cleaned perfectly. And as I mentioned before, that's not an option for many guns.
Many revolvers, for one. Unless they're the break-open ones, you physically can't look into the breech far enough to see the other end of the barrel without some sort of optical offset device.I'm not aware of a single firearm that you can't remove the barrel of. Are you talking about black powder weapons?
While I'm not familiar with the hammer-less revolvers, I can disassemble the trigger and hammer of our S&W .357 Magnum and look through the frame down the barrel.Many revolvers, for one. Unless they're the break-open ones, you physically can't look into the breech far enough to see the other end of the barrel without some sort of optical offset device.
Sunday morning was mildly amusing while looking over news reports. Taylor found that those in the Bureau's area were reacting similarly to those on PHO to the footage of the attempted invasion. Namely, everyone thought that those responsible had been complete idiots. There were some cultural differences in the reactions though, PHO being clueless about the 'hand over kids to be raised by the enemy as theoretical incentive for both sides to not fight later' tradition. The intent was to have the losers not willing to try again for fear of killing their own kids, the kids to be raised properly and not want to go to war with their birth planet, and with any luck a generation of peace between the two.
...which failed miserably nine times out of ten in the historical references because the kids frequently died fighting someone else instead. The kingdom was going to do better than that, even if Robin had taken the girl in directly instead of passing her along.
Because unlike with N2 or N3, which have stable double or triple bonds, the supermolecule here would be full of unstable, high energy single bonds.So why was this supermolecule such a scary event (aside from being completely impossible outside of magic)?
Taylor snorted. "They barely caused any injuries. Treated the whole thing as a 'use as little force as possible' exercise the entire way through, and the comments from the various law enforcement groups was that they'd like someone a little more violent next time."
I don't understand, why would law enforcement ask for them to be more violent?Despite it going against their normal operating procedures in the Bureau, Hayate was being significantly more violent today than she had been the day before. There were multiple reasons for this though, and being asked to was honestly a very small part of things. Concern over the Wolkenritter being worked on today was a much larger factor, but the largest contributor was probably what kind of assholes she was helping with today.
Because unlike with N2 or N3, which have stable double or triple bonds, the supermolecule here would be full of unstable, high energy single bonds.
N2 is one of the most stable compounds in existence. Any molecule with more then three nitrogen atoms in sequence will do it's best to reorganize to form into as much N2 as possible. It does this energetically. The more nitrogen involved, the more energetic the reaction, and the lower the enthalpy needed to initiate it.
Molecules with more then 8 nitrogen atoms in sequence tend to go off for any or even no discernable reason. Many thousands of mols of nitrogen? That should do a fair approximation of a strategic nuclear bomb going off. As in, forget kilotons, the blast should have been well into the high double digit megatons. (Note this is in terms of energy released, not energy density. Compared to an asteroid, even the czar bomba is tiny.)
Earth Bet is fucked up.I don't understand, why would law enforcement ask for them to be more violent?
Well, it wouldn't be surprising if an asteroid-sized nitrogen molecule decomposing was energetic enough to initiate fusion events within itself.That sounds impressive but in stellar terms seems like a non-issue. Also, with pure nitrogen I can't really imagine what the energy release would look like. Do atoms get split? Fused? Or merely distributed kinetically across the vacuum? Is there any radiation?
I don't understand, why would law enforcement ask for them to be more violent?
This sort of political hostage exchange was common in much of the world for a very long time for basically the exact reasons described in the chapter and worked quite well in a wide variety of cultures. Its not done today not because it wouldnt work but because it is not necessary.I think the main reason it would fail miserably is that it would only work if war consists of houses of nobles fighting each other for no more reason than wanting some more land or power and not caring about the peasants.
Having an exchange of children between the USA and ISIS wouldn't go well. And if ISIS wanted hostages, they don't need the children of American nobles anyway, ordinary people would serve fine as hostages.