Hereafter [Worm x Fate/Grand Order]

Emiya and Illya ARE NOT Heroic Spirits, they do not have a Legend that requires Mystery and Belief to ascend to the Throne of Heroes.

"Servant" and "Heroic Spirit" are not interchangeable terms.

A Servant is a container, like a jar, that has a limited capacity and comes with a number of variations that fit different things. A Heroic Spirit is one of the variety of things you can put into a Servant Container, but you can only put so much of one in a given Servant because a Heroic Spirit in its entirety is MUCH BIGGER than a Servant Container. This is why Servants of the same Heroic Spirit are frequently very different between classes, like Saber and Lancer Arturia, because different facets of the complete Heroic Spirit were what was placed into the container.

Voyager is an explicitly mysterious existence even within the ALTERNATE UNIVERSE he originates from, and we don't fully know what his deal canonically is yet. It is a canon aspect of the Nasuverse that different Alternate Universes frequently have different underlying metaphysics.

For example, "The 12 Dead Apostle Ancestors" and "Heroic Spirits" explicitly CANNOT NATURALLY EXIST in the same universe as they rely on an opposite state of the same underlying metaphysics.
Honestly, this is just more fodder for Magi, and specifically Olga in this chap, never knowing wtf they're talking about despite vehemently insisting on the 'rules'.

Even if she was right and Davy Jones being fictional means his legend isn't expressive enough for him to be a Heroic Spirit, that doesn't even begin to mean he couldn't be summoned as a Servant. In that case he'd probably be a Wraith, which, as seen with Kojiro, is pretty much a Heroic Spirit, but, like, weaker or something. Hell, there's tons of Servants nowadays that are just three Wraiths in a trenchcoat, IE: the amalgamation of ghost ship stories people have sugested.
The Meme about the Nasuverse having no rules is actually...just a meme. Most of the things people claim are "Rules that were Broken" were never presented as actual Rules of the setting.

A significant portion are the "Rules" of the "Fuyuki Holy Grail War Ritual" which are not actually setting rules so much parameters of that specific competition and that specific Holy Grail... Rules that were explicitly put in practice by three different mage families who were planning to then compete in that same Ritual for a way to the Root. To absolutely NO ONE'S surprise, especially not the people themselves, everyone involved added in loopholes and abusable conditions in order to stack the deck in their favor.

Those "rules" were explicitly designed to be broken IN-UNIVERSE.

Another portion are Rin Tohsaka explaining the metaphysics of the World to Shirou Emiya. Rin being a genius and prodigy is generally taken as a valid source of information.... Except she isn't. Rin is a 16 year old girl from the magical equivalent of the sticks who was trained by a sadistic priest that actively messes with her for his own amusement, does not care for magic as a field of study or culture in the slightest, and barely meets the bare minimum qualifications to be called a magus at all, never mind a teacher. And maybe some books she has to figure out on her own.

She literally Doesn't Actually KNOW What She's Talking About.

And finally a lot of these cases are people on the internet deciding to only remember part of a "rule" and ignoring all the stuff after that gives context to how that's less a "rule" and more an "assumption" based on a characters limited context. That is to say: Characters who also don't REALLY know what they're talking about.

The rare few times someone who DOES, assuredly, actually know what they're talking about regarding the Rules of the World says "this thing is a hard rule of the universe" it actually IS.

Far from "There are no Rules, Chaos is the TRUE ORDER" it's generally more a case of "Are you sure about that? Are you sure that's a fact?"
Hard disagree. Yeah, Rin doesn't know wth she's talking about, but she's far, far from the only one. Just a friendly reminder that a lot of the exposition we get on the quote-unquote rules of the verse(tm) we get on FGO comes from either Da Vinci (aka the smartest, most knowledgable person ever) and Romani aka mister 'King of Magicraft' himself. If there's anyone in the setting that should know anything about how anything works, it's those two. And well, it's pretty much a meme at this point how much of Romani's dialogue is him going 'nani!?' at every little thing. And that's not even getting into Sherlock.

Seriously, there's denial and then there's thinking the Nasuverse has rules that matter.
 
Hard disagree. Yeah, Rin doesn't know wth she's talking about, but she's far, far from the only one. Just a friendly reminder that a lot of the exposition we get on the quote-unquote rules of the verse(tm) we get on FGO comes from either Da Vinci (aka the smartest, most knowledgable person ever) and Romani aka mister 'King of Magicraft' himself. If there's anyone in the setting that should know anything about how anything works, it's those two. And well, it's pretty much a meme at this point how much of Romani's dialogue is him going 'nani!?' at every little thing. And that's not even getting into Sherlock.
...Have you ever even SEEN Romani? The guy who was "God's Sock Puppet" to the point he didn't even know his own likes and dislikes is the guy who "definitely knows things"? Absolutely nothing about his characterization or actual history implies he has any goddamn clue what he's doing about anything that isn't medicine... That's kind of his whole deal in the story. He's woefully out of his depth but is trying his best.

Da Vinci is the SMARTEST person in the room, but being Smart does not mean you automatically KNOW everything. Provided with the pieces she can figure out A LOT of stuff through experimentation and observation with her intellect that most others couldn't. But she is still "Human" and by default has the limited perspective of a Human. She isn't some 3/4ths God King with the explicit magical ability to pull true knowledge out of her ass. She wasn't there to see the Alien Nanomachine Transformers become God Ghosts after getting slapped around by a glowing woman from space or whatever the hell. She comes probably the closest to Knowing what she's talking about. But she doesn't Actually Know in the way there are existences in the setting who definitively for a fact KNOW how they're universe works.

She, and Holmes, are both Human and have to at some point just guess and hope Zuesimus Prime doesn't roll up and prove them wrong.

When a smart character like Rin, or Olga, or Da Vinci say something about how the universe works, pay attention because they'll give you the general consensus that the mages have come to. But accept that that doesn't mean it's the actual Universal Truth, they are all entirely capable of being wrong. Because that's just a "general agreed upon assumption" rather than a real Truth.

For that you have to look to the goddamn aliens and/or Gilgamesh and those bastards almost never say anything flat out. But when they do it's Actually True.

The Quantum Time Locks and pruning of alternate Timelines are True, and have held true since they were established by the alien supercomputer on the moon three or four games ago. The Decline of Mystery is True and has held true since its introduction. etc, etc.
 
she's not detecting any shrimp? krill? no isopods or bugs on the ship? i am fairly sure she should feel something, especially with sea weed having bugs on them pretty often. mainly just wondering if this is yet another example of singularity 3 wierdness and those just legit don't exist, or whether taylor just didn't feel them worth mentioning or something, though with the 'i was back to my normal, human senses' line i am not too inclined to think it's option 2.
That did strike me as odd. Even if there weren't any isopods floating around beneath them or preexisting bugs on board, her standard procedure would have her bring at least a small swarm from the island just so she could keep an eye out for piratical scheming.
 
Um, even that rule has an exception. Both exist in the Fate/strange fake timeline. Nobody understands how that is possible in-universe either.
I haven't actually read or kept up with Strange Fake to say for sure, though as an alternate universe it's just as capable of having divergent metaphysics as any other Nasuverse universe.
 
The Quantum Time Locks and pruning of alternate Timelines are True, and have held true since they were established by the alien supercomputer on the moon three or four games ago. The Decline of Mystery is True and has held true since its introduction. etc, etc.
Honestly, the Decline of Mystery isn't really 'rules' in the sense we're debating imo. Like, it isn't a limit or anything like that, just a general trend/theme of the setting. And even it has exceptions. (Like, there's stuff that has more Mystery than other stuff that came before it, IE: Camelot , etc)

As for the Quantum Time Locks, well those aren't really understood very well atm, and stuff like the Servant Universe seems to indicate they're a lot less absolute than they sound. So yeah.

Basically, the argument is that the Nasuverse has no actual *hard* rules, despite everything about it's presentation trying desperately to convince the reader that it has.

There's a reason those omniscient types never say anything outright, it's because any definite statement would be disproven eventually lol.



Honestly the Nasuverse set the tone for this at the very start so it has nothing to blame but itself, just look at how FSN begins: the very first fight between Servants has an Archer (established as the class of bowman) engaging in meelee combat, then right afterwards, you have Lancer introducing the rules for how his NP works -- once the spear is thrust, the foe's heart has already been pierced / it always hits the heart -- then, he uses it against Saber... and it misses. So yeah, from the very start, any and all rules are only there to be broken.
Hell, if you think about it, the same thing aplies to Tsukihime too. I mean, the protag has the Mystic Eyes of Death Perception, something that causes death at a conceptual level, an absolute power that can kill ANYTHING, even imortals, inanimate objects, or abstract things like space and time... and the first time Shiki actually uses it on someone, the target survives, and doesn't even take permanent damage, not really.

You can argue all day every day about how justified those exceptions were and how the people who established those rules were unreliable narrators or whatever, but you can't argue that it sets a tone. And the rest of verse keeps going like that.
 
Honestly, the Decline of Mystery isn't really 'rules' in the sense we're debating imo. Like, it isn't a limit or anything like that, just a general trend/theme of the setting. And even it has exceptions. (Like, there's stuff that has more Mystery than other stuff that came before it, IE: Camelot , etc)

As for the Quantum Time Locks, well those aren't really understood very well atm, and stuff like the Servant Universe seems to indicate they're a lot less absolute than they sound. So yeah.

Basically, the argument is that the Nasuverse has no actual *hard* rules, despite everything about it's presentation trying desperately to convince the reader that it has.

There's a reason those omniscient types never say anything outright, it's because any definite statement would be disproven eventually lol.



Honestly the Nasuverse set the tone for this at the very start so it has nothing to blame but itself, just look at how FSN begins: the very first fight between Servants has an Archer (established as the class of bowman) engaging in meelee combat, then right afterwards, you have Lancer introducing the rules for how his NP works -- once the spear is thrust, the foe's heart has already been pierced / it always hits the heart -- then, he uses it against Saber... and it misses. So yeah, from the very start, any and all rules are only there to be broken.
Hell, if you think about it, the same thing aplies to Tsukihime too. I mean, the protag has the Mystic Eyes of Death Perception, something that causes death at a conceptual level, an absolute power that can kill ANYTHING, even imortals, inanimate objects, or abstract things like space and time... and the first time Shiki actually uses it on someone, the target survives, and doesn't even take permanent damage, not really.

You can argue all day every day about how justified those exceptions were and how the people who established those rules were unreliable narrators or whatever, but you can't argue that it sets a tone. And the rest of verse keeps going like that.
I suppose it's somewhat of a difference of perspective.

I'll fully agree that the setting primes you to expect anything a character states as fact about some magical thing to be either proven wrong or expanded on with caveats in relatively short order. I don't really consider things an "unreliable narrator" says like that to really be Rules of the Setting so much as assumptions of that character though. And from there, a bunch of characters rapid-firing assumptions out that get proven wrong almost instantly doesn't seem like an issue at all, so much as things working narratively exactly as intended.

Assumptions stated in universe exist to be proven right or wrong. They were just wrong, and that's fine.

Lancer for example doesn't come across as him "stating a rule" so much as explaining a power, and other characters exposing counters and flaws he didn't state himself for obvious reasons is just the usual anime battle back and forth. iirc Emiya also mentions at some point it has a range limit for that effect, making a possible counter simply backing off quickly enough when he goes to use it.

Those "general theme things" like "there is magic, but it has to stay secret because if not the Mystery that fuels it will decline further and eventually cause it to disappear" or "all myths are true, but not necessarily in the way they are remembered." are the Actual Rules from my perspective and those stay consistent and unbroken. Unless we're in an alternate universe where they're explicitly different. We may not know a lot of them, but we do know some, and those generally stay true.
 
I suppose it's somewhat of a difference of perspective.

I'll fully agree that the setting primes you to expect anything a character states as fact about some magical thing to be either proven wrong or expanded on with caveats in relatively short order. I don't really consider things an "unreliable narrator" says like that to really be Rules of the Setting so much as assumptions of that character though. And from there, a bunch of characters rapid-firing assumptions out that get proven wrong almost instantly doesn't seem like an issue at all, so much as things working narratively exactly as intended.

Assumptions stated in universe exist to be proven right or wrong. They were just wrong, and that's fine.

Lancer for example doesn't come across as him "stating a rule" so much as explaining a power, and other characters exposing counters and flaws he didn't state himself for obvious reasons is just the usual anime battle back and forth. iirc Emiya also mentions at some point it has a range limit for that effect, making a possible counter simply backing off quickly enough when he goes to use it.

Those "general theme things" like "there is magic, but it has to stay secret because if not the Mystery that fuels it will decline further and eventually cause it to disappear" or "all myths are true, but not necessarily in the way they are remembered." are the Actual Rules from my perspective and those stay consistent and unbroken. Unless we're in an alternate universe where they're explicitly different. We may not know a lot of them, but we do know some, and those generally stay true.
Yeah, those "general theme things" aren't the things I mean when I say 'rules'. Rules as I'm debating them are things like the limitations on a hard magic system or just the general workings of things. (Incidently, not all myths are true in Fate, since there are myths that explicitly aren't true from all the way back to F/SN -- IE: Sasaki Kojiro never existed and is an entirely fictional character in-universe, but eh)

And the thing about Lancer, 'his spear always hits the heart' is how his power is supposed to work, it's what makes it interesting -- it's a condition his opponents that should work around in a fight. It'd be fine, if what happened was, like, Archer staying out of range, or his opponent not giving Lancer a chance to activate Gae Bolg, or his oppenent actually being able to survive their hearts being pierced (hell the Fifth Grail War has at least three people who could ), or any number of other interesting interactions, but nah, Saber just straight up dodges it. The one thing that's explicitly against how the power's supposed to work, which was just stated moments beforehand. So yeah.
It's basically insulting at that point.

Seriously, when you have to resort to calling the smartest/most knowledgable human being in history an unrealiable narrator that knows nothing about how anything works in the slightest... When no one who's not literaly omniscient can tell you anything about what can and can't happen in regards to anything without being dead wrong, and even then it's not a guarantee... It's because there's no limits in the first place.
 
Yeah, those "general theme things" aren't the things I mean when I say 'rules'. Rules as I'm debating them are things like the limitations on a hard magic system or just the general workings of things. (Incidently, not all myths are true in Fate, since there are myths that explicitly aren't true from all the way back to F/SN -- IE: Sasaki Kojiro never existed and is an entirely fictional character in-universe, but eh)

And the thing about Lancer, 'his spear always hits the heart' is how his power is supposed to work, it's what makes it interesting -- it's a condition his opponents that should work around in a fight. It'd be fine, if what happened was, like, Archer staying out of range, or his opponent not giving Lancer a chance to activate Gae Bolg, or his oppenent actually being able to survive their hearts being pierced (hell the Fifth Grail War has at least three people who could ), or any number of other interesting interactions, but nah, Saber just straight up dodges it. The one thing that's explicitly against how the power's supposed to work, which was just stated moments beforehand. So yeah.
It's basically insulting at that point.

Seriously, when you have to resort to calling the smartest/most knowledgable human being in history an unrealiable narrator that knows nothing about how anything works in the slightest... When no one who's not literaly omniscient can tell you anything about what can and can't happen in regards to anything without being dead wrong, and even then it's not a guarantee... It's because there's no limits in the first place.
From that perspective, Saber dodging IS one of the rules of Gae Bolg. Because Gae Bolg's effect is an imposition of fate. Which is what the, incredibly poorly named, Luck stat is all about defying. Archer couldn't do that. Neither could Medusa. Because they lack the means to do so. That isn't a "broken rule" so much as a rule you didn't get from Lancer himself.

That trait of a high Luck stat being a way to avoid Gae Bolgs curse has consistently remained true, to the point where in Fate Extra the only way to avoid being killed by it is by having a high enough Luck Stat or having a revive skill active.

Is it perhaps a lame rule to throw in? Sure. Are there ways to have depicted that rule in a more satisfying way? Again, sure. But that doesn't make it any less consistent.

And yeah. Intelligence has little direct link to the actual information you have to work with. It's entirely possible for someone to be rock stupid but know some obscure thing that the most educated person in the world doesn't have a clue about.

Da Vinci is SMART, but she isn't ALL KNOWING. Her role in the story isn't to go "Oh, that's just X. It works because Y. This is an absolute fact because Z. Trust me. I already know. That's the rule." It's to get posed with a problem that seems insurmountable and then figure out a solution. Sometimes that solution is pulling some new invention out of her ass that works because magical technobabble, but that's what she does. She "knows" a lot of stuff the player doesn't know about which she can explain, but all of that comes with a margin of error by default; She CAN be Wrong.

She takes a problem, runs it through what she DOES know, or "knows", and comes up with a solution based on that information. On occasion she has no solution until she receives new information.

If you want true, infallible rules, that absolutely can't be wrong ever or it's a plot hole. You need to turn to the omniscient uberbeings. And they're thin on the ground and don't say a lot because those things WOULD be hard shackles on the setting and you really don't wanna be throwing those around without really being sure what you're doing.
 
I recall someone saying that it was Rin that said it was either impossible for a modern age human to be a HS or just very very hard.

And remember, while a competent and talented magus, she was far from omniscient


You know, this talk about about modern portrayals in movies affecting Heroes' legends reminds me of a Campione fic I once read where Sif used her portrayals in the recent Thor movies as a female fighter to manifest as a Warrior deity, since that's the image people have of her nowadays.



It's not as if this sort of thing doesn't happen in Fate, despite what Magi say -- I mean, the 'King of Warrior' when summoned has his gear changed to reflect the modern conception of war; Voyager is wholly contemporary legend who got into the throne with no shenanigans, Blackbeard reflects the author's contemporary definition of scum, etc

So clearly, it's not as if the views of modern-day humans somehow don't affect the Throne.

Got a link to that fic? Any decent Campione stuff is rare

You've got a link to that campione fic?
 
Last edited:
I recall someone saying that it was Rin that said it was either impossible for a modern age human to be a HS or just very very hard.

And remember, while a competent and talented magus, she was far from omniscient
I'd just put it as narrative hyperbole. Impossible is often used in place of improbable for the sake of more potent prose even if its less accurate.

They're writing for entertainment, not precision
 
Are we finally at the point where Mr. Author reveals that all of this has been only a farce, that all these chapters been only a prologue for the real story, in which Taylor becomes the best shipgirl that ever sail on the seas, finally gives up leaf juice for bean soup, gets a big bust, gains uncountable amounts of guns and solves every problem while reacting to everything in totally OOC ways? Right?
 
From the top of my head, both Frankenstein and Sasaki Kojiro are fictional, with possibly others I can't remember.
Pretty sure no one ever thought Frankenstein's monster was fact, and she's still in the throne anyway.

In our world, yes, but I legitimately would not be surprised if there was an actual magus who inspired the Frankenstein novel in the Nasu universe. Remember vampires are actually real there (even if Vlad Tepes wasn't one) and there's lots of magical human experimentation happening in canon.
 
From the top of my head, both Frankenstein and Sasaki Kojiro are fictional, with possibly others I can't remember.
I don't think Fran was fictional? In Apocrypha, Fiore bought the actual blueprints of Dr Frankenstein's creation for Caules to use as a catalyst, and the supplementary material make it clear that, in Nasu Land, Victor was a real, historical person who built Fran, then freaked out and did his whole Very Bad Parenting routine.

FA Materials on Victor:
The creator, or perhaps parent, of Berserker of Black, Frankenstein. In the light novel, he appears as a real historical person. He was a scientist and alchemist. Like Caster of Black, he aimed to create Adam and Eve. He differs from Caster in that he didn't see the creation of Adam and Eve as the gateway to Eden, but rather simply wanted to create a being as close to God as possible.

FA V1 C3
As luck would have it, they quickly acquired the holy relics needed as a catalysts. Fiore was able to buy Frankenstein's blueprints off a freelance magus she was acquainted with.
[...]
Victor Frankenstein was a student of the science of nature. Obsessed with the delusion of creating the 'ideal human', he spent two years on a patchwork of lifeless flesh, and succeeded in giving life to it.

His ideal was to give birth to a wise and beautiful human being, perfect in every way. However, what he created was an repulsive monster. In terror, Frankenstein disassembled her again and left it all behind. But even in pieces, the monster still lived. Reconnecting and repairing itself, the monster doggedly pursued the escaping Frankenstein to Geneva, Switzerland - a great chase built on hatred and admiration.
 
Last edited:
In our world, yes, but I legitimately would not be surprised if there was an actual magus who inspired the Frankenstein novel in the Nasu universe. Remember vampires are actually real there (even if Vlad Tepes wasn't one) and there's lots of magical human experimentation happening in canon.
This happened by the way – Fran was the first and only of a unique Homunculus created in an attempt to replicate the first humans, Adam and Eve, by magus Victor Frankenstein and in Fate/Apocrypha she was summoned by the Yggdmillennia family using a catalyst in the form of Victor's blueprints, which, probably were also used to create homunculi farm of Yggdmillennia.

Edit: Hassan'd-o-Imp'd
 
Last edited:
Because it takes sincere, heartfelt, common belief for a Heroic Spirit to be changed. Most of them have been, as explained in-story, softened and made better by the modern shift of hero from "someone who accomplishes incredible deeds" to "a noble, inspiring figure who bravely faces terrible odds for a greater good." "To be accepted as fact" is part of the defining necessity to form a Heroic Spirit around.

This is also why, irrespective of what Nasu might have said before we actually got him in the story, I would have said that Sherlock Holmes was a Heroic Spirit, because people honestly and earnestly believed he was a real person who did a real thing. People wrote letters to 221B Baker Street addressed to Sherlock Holmes, that was how widely he was accepted as a person who existed.

But this is why modern fictional heroes can't really be Heroic Spirits — unless you make them heroes of alternate worlds instead — because society has a better defined relationship with reality than it did even just 100 years ago. Kids from the 90s might have dreamed of getting a Hogwarts letter delivered by owl on their eleventh birthday, but after the magic of childhood dissipates, those children grow up to recognize that it was just a fantasy and never real. That's why Harry Potter can't be a Heroic Spirit, why Cloud Strife or Vash the Stampede wouldn't qualify either, nor Superman or the Master Chief. We recognize them as inherently fictional, and so we can't believe in them to the degree where they become Heroic Spirits for real.

Relevant to this chapter, the mere fact that people recognize PotC as being fictional, a movie series that wasn't meant to be historically accurate, should thereby prevent a hypothetical Davy Jones from being a squid-faced, crab-armed monster who secreted away his heart into a treasure chest and buried it in a secret spot, who also happened to be estranged from his sea goddess lover, Calypso.
but you still have that hurdle of people accepting the fact of "this depiction isn't real" that comes with a movie franchise.
So two issues with this. The first is that many of the sources that are used for nasuverse servants were blatantly fictional when they were written with no allusions that was not the case, and not even in a "maybe this was real" way. People's conception of reality 100 years ago was different sure, but not in the ways you seem to think. This also ignores that lots of people in poorer countries totally still think magic is real to the point that doctors were having issues because people would assume their sickness was some sort of curse and go to some local "magic expert" and only go to actual doctors after it was too late.
The second comes around to the fact that you are unfortunately wrong that people don't watch blatantly fictional movies and come out of it assuming that things in them are real. I have relatives who while otherwise normal watched a movie and came out of it believing that something on the same level as potc davy jones was real. Sure they don't broadcast it given they are aware of how most people think, but the idea that people are reasonable and don't think things they see in movies are not real is just not true.


The recent Singularity with Pope Johanna tries to explain this phenomenon with something like this: a lot of heroes that we consider to be fictional used to be real people who performed most of the deeds attributed to them, but with the depletion of Mystery in the modern world, people believe less and less in their existence, until historical reality retroactively rearranges itself so that their existence isn't covered in the umbrella of Proper Human History.

Basically, just as people can believe in someone so hard they wish them into existence, they can also disbelieve in someone so hard they retcon them out of it.

For example, Artoria gets by because modern scholars consider King Arthur might have some historical basis, so people can reasonably believe that someone like Arthur did live.
I really hope they abandon this explanation, because even ignoring all of the plot holes that it opens up it also ignores the fact that the reason people did not think Johanna was real was because some medieval scholars dug up a bunch of evidence and found that it was blatantly impossible for her to exist. If she actually had existed, people would have kept on believing in her existence, which means the explanation just does work in this case.
 
This happened by the way – Fran was the first and only of a unique Homunculus created in an attempt to replicate the first humans, Adam and Eve, by magus Victor Frankenstein and in Fate/Apocrypha she was summoned by the Yggdmillennia family using a catalyst in the form of Victor's blueprints, which, probably were also used to create homunculi farm of Yggdmillennia.
Fairly sure Ygg's homonculi stuff was mostly Einzbern-sourced, and they had that running before Fiore got her hands on the blueprints- it was a fairly late purchase, with Caules being intended as a Fiore substitute up until he got his Seals (by which time Ygg should have been well established given how long Darnic had had to set things up).

But yeah, Fran and Victor were real in Nasu-Land.
 
I really hope they abandon this explanation, because even ignoring all of the plot holes that it opens up it also ignores the fact that the reason people did not think Johanna was real was because some medieval scholars dug up a bunch of evidence and found that it was blatantly impossible for her to exist. If she actually had existed, people would have kept on believing in her existence, which means the explanation just does work in this case.

I dunno what to tell you. Nasuverse never "abandons" anything, it just adds to existing content with even more ridiculous, over-the-top shit.

In-universe, you could maybe justify it as those scholars falsifying records and running a campaign to discredit the very idea on Church's orders, but that's veering into conspiracy theory territory.
 
Got a link to that fic? Any decent Campione stuff is rare

You've got a link to that campione fic?
IIRC it was this one: It sits in the family , over in fanfiction net
Da Vinci is SMART, but she isn't ALL KNOWING. Her role in the story isn't to go "Oh, that's just X. It works because Y. This is an absolute fact because Z. Trust me. I already know. That's the rule." It's to get posed with a problem that seems insurmountable and then figure out a solution. Sometimes that solution is pulling some new invention out of her ass that works because magical technobabble, but that's what she does. She "knows" a lot of stuff the player doesn't know about which she can explain, but all of that comes with a margin of error by default; She CAN be Wrong.

She takes a problem, runs it through what she DOES know, or "knows", and comes up with a solution based on that information. On occasion she has no solution until she receives new information.

If you want true, infallible rules, that absolutely can't be wrong ever or it's a plot hole. You need to turn to the omniscient uberbeings. And they're thin on the ground and don't say a lot because those things WOULD be hard shackles on the setting and you really don't wanna be throwing those around without really being sure what you're doing.
Da Vinci isn't just smart, she's pretty much the literal smartest person to have ever lived. She's also supposed to knowledgable.
And it's not that she's wrong about some things -- she's wrong about literally everything. Not a single deduction she ever makes on the limitations of anything is ever not disproven pretty much immediatelly.

That's really, really dumb.

As I said, when you have a setting where you're bombarded with exposition on the 'rules' every other exchange between characters, but where any character who's not literally omniscient is completely, 100% wrong about anything they ever say about then, and every character that is almost never says anything one way or the other... you start to realise there's no rules. You have to draw a line somewhere.

From that perspective, Saber dodging IS one of the rules of Gae Bolg. Because Gae Bolg's effect is an imposition of fate. Which is what the, incredibly poorly named, Luck stat is all about defying. Archer couldn't do that. Neither could Medusa. Because they lack the means to do so. That isn't a "broken rule" so much as a rule you didn't get from Lancer himself.

That trait of a high Luck stat being a way to avoid Gae Bolgs curse has consistently remained true, to the point where in Fate Extra the only way to avoid being killed by it is by having a high enough Luck Stat or having a revive skill active.

Is it perhaps a lame rule to throw in? Sure. Are there ways to have depicted that rule in a more satisfying way? Again, sure. But that doesn't make it any less consistent.
Several problems with that: 1) the Luck thing was never even hinted at before it happens 2) Saber just says 'I dodged it thanks to my luck' and never adequately explains 3) Luck is never really explained unless you dig deep into WoG and even then it's inconsistent as all hell 4) it's arbitrary af 5) it's a direct contradiction of everything we knew about Gae Bolg beforehand -- it's not 'the spear always pierces the heart, UNLESS...' 6) it's hard to call the trait of high Luck stat being a way to avoid Gae Bolgs curse consistently true when it only exists for the sake of that one asspull and comes up nowhere else 7) somehow that trait never comes up in the stated rules 8) the whole deal with Fate rules being BS is that every single rule has more exceptions than anything else... so saying that the workings of Gae Bolg have an exception isn't really a defense
I really hope they abandon this explanation, because even ignoring all of the plot holes that it opens up it also ignores the fact that the reason people did not think Johanna was real was because some medieval scholars dug up a bunch of evidence and found that it was blatantly impossible for her to exist. If she actually had existed, people would have kept on believing in her existence, which means the explanation just does work in this case.
Honestly, yeah.
The explanation is just dumb. Expecially since the Nasuverse already had a better explanation built into it -- the more blatantly supernatural something was, the more the evidence of its existence will fade with time thanks to the decay of Mystery.
I don't think Fran was fictional? In Apocrypha, Fiore bought the actual blueprints of Dr Frankenstein's creation for Caules to use as a catalyst, and the supplementary material make it clear that, in Nasu Land, Victor was a real, historical person who built Fran, then freaked out and did his whole Very Bad Parenting routine.
Huh. Did not remember that.
Still, the fact remains that there are Servants who are known to be 100% fictional in-universe, even if Fran isn't one.
 
Last edited:
Huh. Did not remember that.
Still, the fact remains that there are Servants who are known to be 100% fictional in-universe, even if Fran isn't one.

I believe the only truly fictional servants are Nursery Rhyme and Kojiro. Kojiro being the man that actually had the skills attributed to him rather than the man that was in the story, both of which were conflated together; and Nursery Rhyme being one possible invocation of the concept of children's books. Am I forgetting any others?
 
I believe the only truly fictional servants are Nursery Rhyme and Kojiro. Kojiro being the man that actually had the skills attributed to him rather than the man that was in the story, both of which were conflated together; and Nursery Rhyme being one possible invocation of the concept of children's books. Am I forgetting any others?
I know there are some, but I can't really be bothered to look through every Servant to remember which is which.

The ones I remember are Phantom of the Opera and (IIRC) Nemo, but I know there are others I'm not remembering rn.

Also there's WoG in Fate/Side Material that says 'Heroic Spirits are made up of those who truly existed, those only from legends, and those who were never observed at all.' In other words, there's no rules at all. An Heroic Spirit can be a real historical person that became legendary, a purely fictional legend, or someone without a legend. So yeah ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Last edited:
I know there are some, but I can't really be bothered to look through every Servant to remember which is which.

The ones I remember are Phantom of the Opera and (IIRC) Nemo, but I know there are others I'm not remembering rn.

Can't remember the Phantom, but Nemo was specifically grafted onto Triton's Saint Graph. He isn't eligible as a Heroic Spirit normally.
 
Back
Top