So, and sorry to keep bothering you about this, but doesn't Karrin's connection to Dresden, LoS and just the position of head of SI count? Or did you mean Murphy as Karrin Murphy? It gets a bit confusing, sorry.All you get is Murphy's story like a lonely silver bell, a relief all on its own.
Denarians don't make their hosts do things, they tempt them into it. He may have resisted, but she quite literally fell into temptation and was persuaded to try to seduce her brother. Even having the desire that could be nurtured to the degree that she could be encouraged to act on it is shameful for her and her family. And the implication is that she had that desire before the Denarians ever got to her:
Given what she tried later, that's rather suggestive about why he went to seminary and then off to the Americas.
I'm going to be honest here:
My reaction to her having a crush on her brother that could be manipulated by the very best manipulative denarian out of all of them is to shrug and say: *And?*
She could have one daydream once and Lasciel could've made her end that way, that's how good she is at that.
*Tempting* isn't that different from mind control when the tempter lives in your head and has millennia of experience, so, for all intent and purposes, the sister is not responsible for her actions past the point where she took the coin (and probably some time before if she had the shadow whispering in her ear).
Blaming her is blaming one of the victims here.
Edit:
A quote of a little sister, that is deathly sick, crying for a month when her big brother leaves to a foreign country because she doesn't think she will see him again is not really a good indicator of her *desiring him that way before she took the coin*.
All it says is that she liked him and was afraid she would never see him, which, given that she could've died at any moment, is pretty understandable.
It's not whether you understand that matters, it's whether the people who will learn of this because Molly tells them that will understand.
Ask yourself this. Would Kate Murphy have preferred that this secret died with her? I think she almost certainly would, and as there's no benefit whatsoever to sharing it, then we shouldn't. It's just prurient gossip at this point.
So, and sorry to keep bothering you about this, but doesn't Karrin's connection to Dresden, LoS and just the position of head of SI count? Or did you mean Murphy as Karrin Murphy? It gets a bit confusing, sorry.
Doesn't matter much in this instance, but why are we rolling for the crown in this situation?
Doesn't matter much in this instance, but why are we rolling for the crown in this situation?
I get why it's necessary when someone else has super stealth to oppose it, but the RaW is that it just works. It's not like NWS where there's a scale of understanding based on success baked in.
Especially because I think that not even a perfect defense, which takes precedence over everything, would have any effect because it is a question asked directly to the narrator, something nothing inside the story should have the power to affect. Have different information based on different question wording? Of course. But hiding the content of a response? Never.Doesn't matter much in this instance, but why are we rolling for the crown in this situation?
I get why it's necessary when someone else has super stealth to oppose it, but the RaW is that it just works. It's not like NWS where there's a scale of understanding based on success baked in.
Are there even any Sidereal charms that would allow for hiding from the crown of eyes? I never spotted any and Sidereal have more direct interactions with the storyteller then any other Exalted.Especially because I think that not even a perfect defense, which takes precedence over everything, would have any effect because it is a question asked directly to the narrator, something nothing inside the story should have the power to affect. Have different information based on different question wording? Of course. But hiding the content of a response? Never.
Shouldn't that be the domain of the question asked? In this one Molly asked for the plot that the guy was a target of, so the crown's answer should describe that.To see if Molly could put things together if given the pieces, just because you have the information does not mean Molly understands it (what was with that stone?/Gee that does not looks like any shore I recognize etc...)
Shouldn't that be the domain of the question asked? In this one Molly asked for the plot that the guy was a target of, so the crown's answer should describe that.
Tom killed Larry in the basement with a lead pipe because he wanted the insurance money. As opposed to a snapshot of Tom braining Larry and later purchasing a sports car.