>> "You don't need to apologize for how you feel. In fact, I'm glad that the reminder seems to have been a pleasant one." <<
So, is the Therapist doing this remotely?
Why the >> << dialogue?
Also, I wonder how much of QA's message was heard (because she was usingthe > < system/channel) and what they'll think about it...
Cats being tiny eldritch entities? That checks out."
I don't think this fits?
After all, Epona is a Pegacorn, right?
Uhhh… here, Spirit, chew this while you trot around the table."
Epona would need to revise her biting routines
Why is Epona referred to as 'Spirit'?
>> "I know orders from my parents are absolute," << QA found herself saying on a human-secured channel,
Yeah, this is going to be a red flag...
And now QA is using the >> << messaging?
QA had observed permanent losses of information
I'd rephrase this, 'losses' doesn't quite flow. I feel it should be 'loss'
"Observed multiple instances of permanent information loss" - fe
[
1) QA belongs to a race that is able to extensively modify Valkyrie Cores and even create them outright ( now the question is whether they use Occam's razor and assume they are the original creators )
2) QA believes that her mother sees everything she's doing, always, even inside a bunker with space-warped walls and energy dampeners around it
3) QA refers to a larger Experiment, implying that Antagonists and Valkyries were created by the same entities who will observe the results of the conflagration and wipe out the survivors after a set period of time
While I can't find any issues with 2 & 3, you forgot the more reasonable conclusion that they'd make regarding 1.
They'll think this is confirmation that QA was a Valkyrie core, and that her parents are the creators.
However, it's not unreasonable that they connect the statement about 'this world' to that point. Valkyrie Cores are already acknowledged as somewhat Alien - the idea that they were made by Aliens isn't that far a jump.
Also, it would create a reasonable explaination for how/why Hell's Hand was never found before this point.
Their calculation are not near complete and are pretty basic, they calculate all the ways they can be beaten, remove them or adjust themselves to counter those while in transit, they know kind of how it will go, but precoging everything will run counter to the cycle, they do it to cheaply get data, precoging a cycle might get you all the data, but you already wasted all the energy and there is no point in doing said cycle now.
Also, no simulation is perfect - many of the so called perfect ones actually are the result of correcting things unnoticeably.
the whole point of the cycle is to find new power interactions.