Subs are monsters. Archerfish was more "Japan's DC is awful so archerfish got a cheap kill" but the Falklands was "subs rise"

For the light carriers just give them some harriers or F-35Bs, problem solved. Now we have jets that can launch from the small carriers.
 
Subs are monsters. Archerfish was more "Japan's DC is awful so archerfish got a cheap kill" but the Falklands was "subs rise"

For the light carriers just give them some harriers or F-35Bs, problem solved. Now we have jets that can launch from the small carriers.

Archerfish was more "What kind of idiot sends an incomplete aircraft carrier into waters crawling with hostile submarines?"
 
As a surface guy, battleships are the worst of all worlds. They have the tiny crews of destroyers and cruisers with the steam systems of a carrier, combined with the idiot marines of amphibs combined with the nightmare of maintaining a 1930s system.

We killed them for a reason, do not say untrue things.

@theJMPer bbs lack the organic anti sub suite of most destroyers and cruisers which makes them kilo/akula food, which in a litoral scenario is not idea.

Where are you getting "tiny crews"? An Iowa class has a complement of 2,700, compared to a Burke's 300ish.

And regardless, we've established that Battleships are little more than very expensive food in a modern naval battle. But this isn't a modern naval battle. This war is being fought using WWII rules. (WWI, actually, if you consider the lack of carriers.) The Abyssals haven't sortied any nuclear-powered hunter-killers, their sub forces consist entirely of diesel-electric boats from the 40's. Their "subs" are basically glorified torpedo boats that can old their breath long enough to dive every once in a while.

The sub threat isn't anything like it would be today. Even though Abyssals are hard to detect, they're still slow. Arizona has enough speed to run rings around a Gato, and she's slow as shit.

The biggest threat in this war is Abyssal surface vessels. That is exactly the kind of fight a battleship was built for.
 
their sub forces consist entirely of diesel-electric boats from the 40's. Their "subs" are basically glorified torpedo boats that can old their breath long enough to dive every once in a while.
No Elektro boats? No minelayers? No Sen-toku Special Types? Man, you must enjoy sinking my dreams.:p
The sub threat isn't anything like it would be today. Even though Abyssals are hard to detect, they're still slow.
Which is why those submersibles ran on the surface whenever they could.
 
@theJMPer you inadvertently made the argument for P3/P8s since they are made for the coastal defense/long range escort mission against slow and large targets.


(But this isn't nfo gaiden, because it would be a P-3 vectoring Jersey onto targets and providing anti sub defense for the girl... Wait this is a great idea, give her a p-3 or a P-8 )
 
I think part of the awesomeness of battleships is just the engrained history of naval warfare. Since the very dawn of war at sea up until the early 1940's, seabattles were won or lost by surface ships crashing into and beating the stuffing out of one another. Battleships are the very perfection of that ideal. Battleships beat the shit out of other ships while laughing at their puny attempts to stop the Train Of Pain.

The idea of standoff carrier warfare, as efficient as it may be, is just so new it doesn't have quite the same mental impact.

This is a rather skewed perspective. It's worth remembering that dominant strategies for naval engagements generally break into one of the following:
  • Board the enemy and take their ship (this was Rome's big thing)
  • Ignite the enemy and laugh as the burn to death (this was Byzantium's big thing)
  • Standoff advantage (this is what carriers have dominated for nearly 80 years)
If we're going to talk about pre-modern sea battles, then we should recognize that more time was spent with greek fire (and similar forms of napalm) and fire ships then ships designed for the line of battle. It might also be worth noting that the earliest battleships can trace their history is to the all steel designs of the mid 1800s, and that's only if you count designs like Monitor.

To put this another way, the true historically dominate ship you should be focusing on would be:
 
P-3s and P-8s rely on their sensors to do their job though. Remember, nothing beyond an actual eyeball actually looking at the target is garunteed to make an Abyssal show up in the right place (or at all.) Modern sensors are severly nerfed.
 
P-3s and P-8s rely on their sensors to do their job though. Remember, nothing beyond an actual eyeball actually looking at the target is garunteed to make an Abyssal show up in the right place (or at all.) Modern sensors are severly nerfed.

The levelling affect (AKA: "Abyssal/Shipgirl Magic Bullshit").
 
This is a rather skewed perspective. It's worth remembering that dominant strategies for naval engagements generally break into one of the following:
  • Board the enemy and take their ship (this was Rome's big thing)
  • Ignite the enemy and laugh as the burn to death (this was Byzantium's big thing)
  • Standoff advantage (this is what carriers have dominated for nearly 80 years)
If we're going to talk about pre-modern sea battles, then we should recognize that more time was spent with greek fire (and similar forms of napalm) and fire ships then ships designed for the line of battle. It might also be worth noting that the earliest battleships can trace their history is to the all steel designs of the mid 1800s, and that's only if you count designs like Monitor.

To put this another way, the true historically dominate ship you should be focusing on would be:
It's more of the standoff thing I was thinking about. Carriers are the only capital ships I can think of that can't take hits. Battleships, Ironclads, the great tall ships of Nelson, etc were all "in the thick of it" and would be expected to laugh off enemy fire while prosecuting said enemy. It's not a perfect correlation, but Battleships are a lot closer than carriers to the historical ideal.

And, at least for me, carriers just don't have the same 'cool' factor. It's like comparing a '69 Mustang against a modern Nissan GTR. Yeah, the Nissan is a marvel of technical eneingeering, but it just doesn't have the soul of a Big American V8.
Well! This thread has had a sudden attack of the buzzkillers!

Did someone find out people were having fun and decide to do something about it or what?
Well, they're right. The carrier is utterly dominant in its time.

But this isn't the carrier's time. The Abyssal War is the Age of the Big Gun.
 
P-3s and P-8s rely on their sensors to do their job though. Remember, nothing beyond an actual eyeball actually looking at the target is garunteed to make an Abyssal show up in the right place (or at all.) Modern sensors are severly nerfed.
So? Just because those aircraft aren't useful here doesn't mean that the role they play hans't been eliminated. You know what forced the U-boats into the Mid-Atlantic Gap: land-based patrol aircraft. What put the final nail in the U-boat's coffin? Escort carriers in convoys and sub-hunter task groups. The WWII submersible's biggest threat was not from the waves, but from the sky. Jersey can, mostly, pick up Abyssals on her radar, so it and other old-fashioned WWII technology/tactics like HF/DF, Sonar, Magnetic Anomaly Detection, and so on should still be available to shipgirls, right?
Exactly. This is not carrier time, so why come here to beat the drum of the portable runway?
Because WWI/II was more complicated than that. I should know, my parents are shelling out their money for me to learn this stuff. :p Jutland-scale BB duels are fine, but a carrier has many more uses than just sinking surface vessels. Especially when two battleships are about to face a giant Aircraft Carrier, and kind of need a bunch of other carriers to not horribly die.
 
Last edited:
Eh Enterprise is armored and designed to take hits from cannons and my boat has sci fi shit they will install psa to make us handle hits , it's just we would rather not (though they made Bush and I want to say Truman armored for experiments and it cost too much).


See, I am all about the big electric gun, or AGS, if I wasn't stuck on carriers I would love to be on that thing. Upgrade jersey with some rail guns for tier 4 tech.

(Also I might be angry at you for implying the GTR lacks soul, if anything the shitty early 1960s v-8s were awful and the 70s had the true mustang, damn oil crisis killing our big blocks)

This post sponsored by Lockheed Martin- because Kai Ni is just Japanese for big business
 
Because WWI/II was more complicated than that. I should know, my parents are shelling out their money for me to learn this stuff. :p Jutland-scale BB duels is fine, but a carrier has many more uses than just sinking surface vessels.

What. Is. Your. Point? This isn't a 'fic about WWII. It's a 'fic about the Abyssal War as rendered by @theJMPer.
(Also I might be angry at you for implying the GTR lacks soul, if anything the shitty early 1960s v-8s were awful and the 70s had the true mustang, damn oil crisis killing our big blocks)

No matter what the year or car, there is no substitute for cubic inches when you want the satisfaction of an awesome ride.
 
I know that feel, it's why I miss my crown Vic, last American huge v-8 (the neo mustang and charger are not the same, challenger is like a modern ( in a good way)relic with modern saftey standards, ugh stop making me want a fun and impractical car)
 
It's just the difference between Information-age warfare and Industrial-age warfare. Nowdays, there's so many variables to consider when building a warship, standoff ability, missiles, ECM, ECCM, low-observability, counter-missile-missiles, more electronics, radars, fancier radars, radars of average intelligence...

For a WWII ship, it's just good American Steel. And stupid amounts of AA guns. And then some more AA guns just to be safe.
 
What. Is. Your. Point?
Firstly, no need to get worked up. Secondly, my point is that there's plenty for aircraft carriers/aircraft to do, and even be essential for, even within the author's limitations of Battleships being the main focus for the story.
This isn't a 'fic about WWII. It's a 'fic about the Abyssal War as rendered by @theJMPer.
... which involves WWII ships being summoned as shipgirls to fight pseudo-WWII Naval engagements against a pseudo-WWII enemy. You can't just throw WWII out the window, it's an integral part of Kantai Collection.* If the story wasn't about World War Two, answer me this: Why are all the characters involved ships from that time period? Why are the Abyssals using WWII-derived weapons/ships?
*Even in stories of spaceship kanmusu, there are WWII shipgirls.
For a WWII ship, it's just good American Steel. And stupid amounts of AA guns. And then some more AA guns just to be safe.
Way to over simplify... and all those AA guns were still not sufficient for the job given. You literally cannot have enough dakka, the/a bomber will always get through.
 
And mechanical computers, and of course freedom, don't forget the freedom @theJMPer . If you are ever in Virginia I owe you (many) beers, and I will see if I can drag you through my boat.

Also did I summon the spirit of Curtis le may, because I felt like I invoked his unholy name, Nimitz please banish this spirit to Cheyenne Mountain, in the name of the United States and the Montanas
 
I know that feel, it's why I miss my crown Vic, last American huge v-8 (the neo mustang and charger are not the same, challenger is like a modern ( in a good way)relic with modern saftey standards, ugh stop making me want a fun and impractical car)

The answer of course, is to get to a point in your life where you can have whatever practical scrubmobile for the everyday shit and get a real car made out of real metal for fun.
 
Firstly, no need to get worked up. Secondly, my point is that there's plenty for aircraft carriers/aircraft to do, and even be essential for, even within the author's limitations of Battleships being the main focus for the story.
I never said I wasn't going to bring carriers out (or if I did, that wasn't what I meant to imply.) Carriers are a crucial part of naval warfare. They might not have the same prominence as they did in real life, but they're still Capital Ships. The fact that all the main characters of this fic are surface warships means that the carriers jobs might happen mostly off-screen, but it doesn't mean I'm just gonna leave the CV's hanging.

I did say that I wasn't bringing E out because she'd overshadow literally everyone else.
... which involves WWII ships being summoned as shipgirls to fight pseudo-WWII Naval engagements against a pseudo-WWII enemy. You can't just throw WWII out the window, it's an integral part of Kantai Collection.* If the story wasn't about World War Two, answer me this: Why are all the characters involved ships from that time period? Why are the Abyssals using WWII-derived weapons/ships?
*Even in stories of spaceship kanmusu, there are WWII shipgirls.
WWII was the last great naval war. Nothing since has had even close to the same massive battles erupting over the waves. A shipgirl gets her soul from her crews, and valorous acts in battle is the surest way give her soul a solid imprint. There's also other reasons that haven't been revealed yet, but I'm not saying because spoilers. (Also because it's quite late and I'm sleepy.)
Way to over simplify... and all those AA guns were still not sufficient for the job given. You literally cannot have enough dakka, the/a bomber will always get through.
They did a better job than just about anyone else, and American ships tended to have stupidly large AA suites, especially when compared to their Japanese counterparts.
And mechanical computers, and of course freedom, don't forget the freedom @theJMPer .
Jersey: You misspelled "FREEDOM!"
And what is this boat of which you speak?
 
It's just the difference between Information-age warfare and Industrial-age warfare. Nowdays, there's so many variables to consider when building a warship, standoff ability, missiles, ECM, ECCM, low-observability, counter-missile-missiles, more electronics, radars, fancier radars, radars of average intelligence...

For a WWII ship, it's just good American Steel. And stupid amounts of AA guns. And then some more AA guns just to be safe.
Wrong. There's a whole lot of science behind all that good american steel that made it so effective. Not to mention that it isn't pile a shit load of guns onto a hull to provide a flak screen. Gun placement and good design are also a science.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top