Bad Blood (Mafia)

Slow day, huh? I guess we really don't have anything to talk about?
 
Slow day, huh? I guess we really don't have anything to talk about?
Not really. I'm still somewhat suspicious of AlphaDelta, but I'm more suspicious of Dirk, and there's not anything I can think of to say on those topics that I haven't already.
 
I know it's been explained, but I'm not really feeling the Dirk train. It makes sense that you're lynching him but I feel like Alpha is the bigger threat.
 
Right, had to take a break: lack of sleep and need to work do not a sane and sensible Phoenixian make.
...And now that I'm rereading (rushed a bit this morning), I see Phoenixian already stated as such.

Maybe next theatrics next time?
...In retrospect, I was probably a bit loopy and unfortunately deffered the important bit for the conspiracy theorist bits, yes. (I'm only grateful I held myself back from going full TehChron. Thank god.)

But as long as I made that mess, I might as well see if I can dredge something out of it. (sorry about inciting the mess with Mortifer, Lost Deviljho)

--------------

So what actually happened last post is that NSMS pinged my suspicions. This isn't some highly analyzed process, just a matter of intuition. So as a result I decided I'd craft an argument and see what came of it. Connecting NSMS and Dirk is half for the sake of me being pinged and testing to see if something's there, but mostly because I was just plain having a good time.

What can I say, I enjoy making convoluted theories... and... gunning for a dozen possibilities at once... Yeah... that post was kinda seeping pure unchecked Id. :oops:

Actually tracing my thoughts back however, the suspicions of NSMS appear to come a little bit from NSMS's propensity for moving hither and yon on the votes a lot during day one (Which could easily be nothing, I was... more than a little rusty) and a bit from the latter log analysis. Anything tying NSMS to Dirk, is basically based off of that one, singular, post guessing at a possible scum!Nanimani and its proximity to Dirk93. Their explanation of "I'm trying to examine things from multiple angles" fits the facts much better.

The "crafting a narrative together" bit was, in retrospect, silly. ( Dammit loopy-tired me :/ )

But that that whole mess aside, there is a bit of analysis here that might be useful. Interesting at least.

The reason I brought up the possibility of werewolf watchers is because they can be a thing, and because as a general rule I feel hyperfocusing on one possibility is a bad idea; I like to consider things from multiple angles rather than just assuming that the most obvious possibility is correct. As for defending Ellf... do note that I voted for him straight off, and my first post on the topic (which is what I assume you're referring to) was this:
Not quite. There's timestamps to consider: Azrael, myself, Khawy, and Pawn Lelouch all voted for Ellf either just after Nanimani dropped the bomb or within an hour of Ellf's roleclaim. In fact, of that group, only Pawn voted after the claim. NSMS's own post, and all those immediately following him, (Atk50, Dirk93, and Joebobjoe, for reference) didn't start chiming in until nine hours later. That's more than enough time for Ellf to coordinate with his team, realize he messed up fatally, and say "Yo, guys, throw me under the bus pronto."

As for why Ellf would do that, there is in fact a very suspicious thing that Ellf had reason to know at the time, but messed up in his claim: The town isn't green, it's brown(ish). Nevertheless, he claimed that his investigations got green for town and red for scum. (A pretty simple explanation there is that he prepared it earlier, copy-pasted it, and then fixed the name color, but missed the text. Preparation beforehand also fits when him saying "well, maybe I'm the investigator" when first accused.)

And, to be fair, Ellf was right about the latter color. As we all saw when we lynched him.

There's no guarantee that scenario actually happened, but I think it's pretty likely that investigation color was an error on Ellf's part, and it's likewise plausible that he realized his mistake and warned his teammates about said mistake. The author of a work is often the one most sensitive to its contents and implications after all. So there's both the motive and time for Ellf to get his allies to turn on him.

Quoting the claim for easy reference:
Burden of proof. What sort of proof are you looking for? My role name? Nikola Rechin. I'm the town deputy. I'm looking into the killings for the town. Once per night, I may investigate someone to look for proof of any wrongdoing. I will get a result of either "Innocent" or "Guilty" in green and red text specifically.

GatS came up Innocent, by the way. Not that it matters. He died.

Wrote a lot of this before going to bed. Hope it's not too long and spaghetti-ish.
 
Not quite. There's timestamps to consider: Azrael, myself, Khawy, and Pawn Lelouch all voted for Ellf either just after Nanimani dropped the bomb or within an hour of Ellf's roleclaim. In fact, of that group, only Pawn voted after the claim. NSMS's own post, and all those immediately following him, (Atk50, Dirk93, and Joebobjoe, for reference) didn't start chiming in until nine hours later. That's more than enough time for Ellf to coordinate with his team, realize he messed up fatally, and say "Yo, guys, throw me under the bus pronto."
Timezones, work (though not in this case), and general real life business are a thing; if you look at my posts, I don't have any in any thread for about 12 hours before making the post where I voted for Ellf. See here:
You can check my posting history myself if you don't believe me/think I might have doctored that pic (which to clarify, is taken from my overall posting history, not just a search of my posts in this thread).

And personally, I don't think a lack of posts between just after midnight Sunday morning and just after midday Sunday afternoon is anything odd in terms of delay.
 
good, good

i'd have felt awkward if people were crowding in on my schtict, thank you

*Clears throat*

andrew jackson diomedes andrew jackson diomedes andrew jackson diomedes andrew jackson diomedes dont talk to me about percy jackson diomedes diomedes diomdes old hickory lol smartass comment lol gets banned


Am I crowding on your schtick enough yet TehChron? :V
 
Timezones, work (though not in this case), and general real life business are a thing; if you look at my posts, I don't have any in any thread for about 12 hours before making the post where I voted for Ellf. See here:
You can check my posting history myself if you don't believe me/think I might have doctored that pic (which to clarify, is taken from my overall posting history, not just a search of my posts in this thread).

And personally, I don't think a lack of posts between just after midnight Sunday morning and just after midday Sunday afternoon is anything odd in terms of delay.
Perhaps I should have been clearer. I wasn't talking about you delaying here. I was talking about Ellf's actions.

This isn't a point that you didn't post the moment you got up. This is a point that 1: There was a discrepancy in Ellf's roleclaim and 2: Ellf Had a chance to realize the discrepancy in his roleclaim and post in private to warn his allies. All his allies would have to do is read his message, and could do so even while they were still reading the thread in the American continental morning. (Hell, even Pawn Lelouch could be in that group, if death hadn't vindicated his innocence.)

So uh, congratulations Khawy, your alibi here is the strongest among us.
 
Right, had to take a break: lack of sleep and need to work do not a sane and sensible Phoenixian make.

...In retrospect, I was probably a bit loopy and unfortunately deffered the important bit for the conspiracy theorist bits, yes. (I'm only grateful I held myself back from going full TehChron. Thank god.)

But as long as I made that mess, I might as well see if I can dredge something out of it. (sorry about inciting the mess with Mortifer, Lost Deviljho)

--------------

So what actually happened last post is that NSMS pinged my suspicions. This isn't some highly analyzed process, just a matter of intuition. So as a result I decided I'd craft an argument and see what came of it. Connecting NSMS and Dirk is half for the sake of me being pinged and testing to see if something's there, but mostly because I was just plain having a good time.

What can I say, I enjoy making convoluted theories... and... gunning for a dozen possibilities at once... Yeah... that post was kinda seeping pure unchecked Id. :oops:

Actually tracing my thoughts back however, the suspicions of NSMS appear to come a little bit from NSMS's propensity for moving hither and yon on the votes a lot during day one (Which could easily be nothing, I was... more than a little rusty) and a bit from the latter log analysis. Anything tying NSMS to Dirk, is basically based off of that one, singular, post guessing at a possible scum!Nanimani and its proximity to Dirk93. Their explanation of "I'm trying to examine things from multiple angles" fits the facts much better.

The "crafting a narrative together" bit was, in retrospect, silly. ( Dammit loopy-tired me :/ )

But that that whole mess aside, there is a bit of analysis here that might be useful. Interesting at least.


Not quite. There's timestamps to consider: Azrael, myself, Khawy, and Pawn Lelouch all voted for Ellf either just after Nanimani dropped the bomb or within an hour of Ellf's roleclaim. In fact, of that group, only Pawn voted after the claim. NSMS's own post, and all those immediately following him, (Atk50, Dirk93, and Joebobjoe, for reference) didn't start chiming in until nine hours later. That's more than enough time for Ellf to coordinate with his team, realize he messed up fatally, and say "Yo, guys, throw me under the bus pronto."

As for why Ellf would do that, there is in fact a very suspicious thing that Ellf had reason to know at the time, but messed up in his claim: The town isn't green, it's brown(ish). Nevertheless, he claimed that his investigations got green for town and red for scum. (A pretty simple explanation there is that he prepared it earlier, copy-pasted it, and then fixed the name color, but missed the text. Preparation beforehand also fits when him saying "well, maybe I'm the investigator" when first accused.)

And, to be fair, Ellf was right about the latter color. As we all saw when we lynched him.

There's no guarantee that scenario actually happened, but I think it's pretty likely that investigation color was an error on Ellf's part, and it's likewise plausible that he realized his mistake and warned his teammates about said mistake. The author of a work is often the one most sensitive to its contents and implications after all. So there's both the motive and time for Ellf to get his allies to turn on him.
To be fair they were claiming it was solely a matter of Inno/Guilty, so it wouldn't be surprising for it to use a slightly different scheme from faction colors for the precise reason it wasn't technically seeing faction. Still suspicious in retrospect but not an immediate red flag. I just took awhile to actually get to thread and vote myself.
 
*Clears throat*

andrew jackson diomedes andrew jackson diomedes andrew jackson diomedes andrew jackson diomedes dont talk to me about percy jackson diomedes diomedes diomdes old hickory lol smartass comment lol gets banned


Am I crowding on your schtick enough yet TehChron? :V
not enough IT WAS ME, DIO

And I SWEAR I'LL WORK ON STANDING PROUD AGAIN SOMEDAY :V
 
Not quite. There's timestamps to consider: Azrael, myself, Khawy, and Pawn Lelouch all voted for Ellf either just after Nanimani dropped the bomb or within an hour of Ellf's roleclaim. In fact, of that group, only Pawn voted after the claim. NSMS's own post, and all those immediately following him, (Atk50, Dirk93, and Joebobjoe, for reference) didn't start chiming in until nine hours later. That's more than enough time for Ellf to coordinate with his team, realize he messed up fatally, and say "Yo, guys, throw me under the bus pronto."
While this is... interesting, I don't really think we can lay suspicion on a group for voting scum.

I like the updating sign, I wonder how that got set up?
 
While this is... interesting, I don't really think we can lay suspicion on a group for voting scum.

I like the updating sign, I wonder how that got set up?
How about voting scum in a suspicious way while doing other things that make you think they're scum?

For starting a runaway bandwagon on me,

[x] Hang @NSMS

:/

 
Perhaps I should have been clearer. I wasn't talking about you delaying here. I was talking about Ellf's actions.

This isn't a point that you didn't post the moment you got up. This is a point that 1: There was a discrepancy in Ellf's roleclaim and 2: Ellf Had a chance to realize the discrepancy in his roleclaim and post in private to warn his allies. All his allies would have to do is read his message, and could do so even while they were still reading the thread in the American continental morning. (Hell, even Pawn Lelouch could be in that group, if death hadn't vindicated his innocence.)

So uh, congratulations Khawy, your alibi here is the strongest among us.
No offense, but that's an incredibly weak argument. By that logic, ANY vote made for Ellf after Nani outed him is suspicious, which makes it borderline worthless as a way of finding scum.
How about voting scum in a suspicious way while doing other things that make you think they're scum?
Do you honestly find a clearly joke vote for you suspicious? I mean, just look at the reasoning I gave for voting for you:
Boooo, that's a boring answer. You're fired!

[] Null Khawy
[] Hang Bailey Matutine
Does that look like I was taking that at all seriously, or actually voting for you as anything other than day one randomness?
 
I've got to admit that I'm a little fuzzy on what's being argued about -someone's innocence? Trying to explain a posting pattern? It's too early on Saturday morning for me to parse all of this.
 
No offense, but that's an incredibly weak argument. By that logic, ANY vote made for Ellf after Nani outed him is suspicious, which makes it borderline worthless as a way of finding scum.
Do you honestly find a clearly joke vote for you suspicious? I mean, just look at the reasoning I gave for voting for you:
Does that look like I was taking that at all seriously, or actually voting for you as anything other than day one randomness?
Voting somebody for being too serious day one, after which Bahn, now confirmed as scum joined your vote, and Ellf, also confirmed as scum encouraged people (successfully in the case of MrEgret) to join your vote without doing so himself?

Yeah, sure, not suspicious in the least.
 
Voting somebody for being too serious day one, after which Bahn, now confirmed as scum joined your vote, and Ellf, also confirmed as scum encouraged people (successfully in the case of MrEgret) to join your vote without doing so himself?

Yeah, sure, not suspicious in the least.
'For being too serious'... does the concept of a joke honestly elude you? I mean, look at my first vote that day and tell me that I was taking who I was voting for seriously in any way.

As for the Bahn and Ellf thing, (a) they're from different factions, so according to your logic them both going after the same person as me would mean I'm a member of both factions :)rolleyes:), (b) starting a bandwagon on day one is not in the best interests of werewolves, as it's too obvious and open a position to take, so latching onto other existing votes is very common, and (c) do you honestly think that werewolves would bother colluding on random votes day one?
 
'For being too serious'... does the concept of a joke honestly elude you? I mean, look at my first vote that day and tell me that I was taking who I was voting for seriously in any way.
To clarify: I was voting pretty much as whims and jokes took me. Your answer as too why people weren't posting much was common sense and straight forward, and therefore appealed to those whims, so I voted for you.
 
people said:
Oops?

I'm not sure if I should claim or not. On one hand, target. On the other, not-verifiable claim... so far. I can set up verification, but a nice, clear target would be nice.

people switching to Dirk said:

Okay. I guess I won't be lynched?

[X] Null

I don't know anybody else to point the suspicion to and my role also doesn't lend itself to getting info, so I will probably be lynched.
TehChron?

Me? :V

Slow day, huh? I guess we really don't have anything to talk about?

Tired oh-god-why O'Clock thoughts: Color and Flavor.

So far, we've seen three colors (Orange, Blue, and Red) and four flavors (Slaughtered, Savaged, Bludgeoned, and Poisoned).

Red appears to be a hostile faction. I mean, red. He also tried to bolt, so there's that too. Thus, red is probably the anti-town faction. Given the enhanced strength, I'd guess that he's a maf bulletproof or strongman, or both. Alternatively, Ellf was a werewolf. That would also fit the extra strength. I'm not sure if there's a werewolf faction, however. The lack of a Savaged kill lends credence to this... but if there is another werewolf, cultist, or vampire, we may have to deal with a third, if they have a conversion ability. This is worrying. I'll need to take a look at Ellf's interactions to narrow down possibilities.

Bahn was Slaughtered in the street near his home. This suggests a serial killer or mafia. I doubt that a vigilante/hunter would have the slaughtered flavor, especially in conjunction with the shotgun flavor, so I think that this was the action of a standard a cult. Thus, there's probably

Slaughtered makes me think of a ritual kill, or a hunter. Whoever's doing the slaughtering apparently hates heads, as Bahn was both shot and beheaded, and DexTraxWex had his skull split. And given that the slaughterer apparently has a gun, beheading Bahn seems extraneous. Thus, I think it's probable that a cult exists.

As for the Bahn and Ellf thing, (a) they're from different factions, so according to your logic them both going after the same person as me would mean I'm a member of both factions :)rolleyes:), (b) starting a bandwagon on day one is not in the best interests of werewolves, as it's too obvious and open a position to take, so latching onto other existing votes is very common, and (c) do you honestly think that werewolves would bother colluding on random votes day one?
But how do you know that they're werewolves?

And @Bailey, how do you know that Bahn is a cult member?

The three people painting accusations are all from the voting bloc that I identified earlier. A quick search for "Bahn" shows that since the start of D3, NSMS, Khawy, and Bailey are the only people that have been accusing Bahn.

Screw it. I probably won't be able to make any more posts before the day ends, but take this.

[X] NSMS
 
Oops?

I'm not sure if I should claim or not. On one hand, target. On the other, not-verifiable claim... so far. I can set up verification, but a nice, clear target would be nice.



Okay. I guess I won't be lynched?

[X] Null


TehChron?

Me? :V



Tired oh-god-why O'Clock thoughts: Color and Flavor.

So far, we've seen three colors (Orange, Blue, and Red) and four flavors (Slaughtered, Savaged, Bludgeoned, and Poisoned).

Red appears to be a hostile faction. I mean, red. He also tried to bolt, so there's that too. Thus, red is probably the anti-town faction. Given the enhanced strength, I'd guess that he's a maf bulletproof or strongman, or both. Alternatively, Ellf was a werewolf. That would also fit the extra strength. I'm not sure if there's a werewolf faction, however. The lack of a Savaged kill lends credence to this... but if there is another werewolf, cultist, or vampire, we may have to deal with a third, if they have a conversion ability. This is worrying. I'll need to take a look at Ellf's interactions to narrow down possibilities.

Bahn was Slaughtered in the street near his home. This suggests a serial killer or mafia. I doubt that a vigilante/hunter would have the slaughtered flavor, especially in conjunction with the shotgun flavor, so I think that this was the action of a standard a cult. Thus, there's probably

Slaughtered makes me think of a ritual kill, or a hunter. Whoever's doing the slaughtering apparently hates heads, as Bahn was both shot and beheaded, and DexTraxWex had his skull split. And given that the slaughterer apparently has a gun, beheading Bahn seems extraneous. Thus, I think it's probable that a cult exists.


But how do you know that they're werewolves?

And @Bailey, how do you know that Bahn is a cult member?

The three people painting accusations are all from the voting bloc that I identified earlier. A quick search for "Bahn" shows that since the start of D3, NSMS, Khawy, and Bailey are the only people that have been accusing Bahn.

Screw it. I probably won't be able to make any more posts before the day ends, but take this.

[] NSMS
I use werewolves as a shorthand for 'evil, wants to kill town', the same way others use scum or mafia, since I was first introduced to the game concept via it being called (and featuring) Werewolf.
 
I use werewolves as a shorthand for 'evil, wants to kill town', the same way others use scum or mafia, since I was first introduced to the game concept via it being called (and featuring) Werewolf.
Oh, and as I side note: my posts should show that I actually at first assumed Bahn was a Mason. It's only after someone else someone brought up the possibility of him being evil that I considered it. My first post after that night:
So, we have two non-town-colour deaths so far. Ellf from last night, who from the description and colour come across as some sort of monster rather than town, and now (I believe) Bahn, who I'd guess from the colour and name was a monk? So maybe a mason analogue?
 
Not much to contribute from me, but masons are likely the same orange as us, seeing how our quiet bartender was the same shade as me, and I happen to not be a mason.
 
Back
Top