@Academia Nut: Did you ever give a reward for that, or was it too short?
@Academia Nut - what would networking all of our Archival Tools together actually do?
P.S. Can't the scientists record their knowledge down instead of teaching it to students so that it isn't lost even if they die?
@Academia Nut : is the biological material in the jars a genetic match for the host? Has it been modified? Is it even human? When we throw it in one of the cloning systems, exactly how many city blocks collapse into a spinning maw of screaming darkness?
The material in the extra brains was too badly decayed to make any sort of match. The body had clearly been dead for more than a few days and appears to have died from being set on fire.
The material in the extra brains was too badly decayed to make any sort of match. The body had clearly been dead for more than a few days and appears to have died from being set on fire.
So effectively they're the pure researchers who routinely work and think in more esoteric terms, who of course, aren't much good at teaching anybody who's not already as informed as they are, and going from a hyperlinked, indexed smart Wikipedia system that feeds data as needed to twenty incomplete, jumbled encyclopedias in as many languages with entire alphabet sections scorched out of existence?When someone enters something into their Archival Tool, it gets shared with every other Archival Tool in the network, with automatically generated citations and notes about contradictory information. As the shared database grows it will let you know more when you add something, and will also be able to bring up any issues (the information is of a dubious source or is known to be bad with citations from accepted sources). Further boosts to research will just be part of it. There are, of course, also social engineering possibilities.
Call it the Omnipedia. And yes, you can also read ominous into that.
Yes, the can and do, it is just that they are sort of having a melt down. They were so used to having all of this knowledge and experience at their fingertips, and now it is all dead words on a screen missing half the information and context. It used to be that they could fairly easily schedule things call up other experts and have a quick chat about damn near anything. Now they are desperately scrambling to make sure that all the stuff in their heads is passed on and not just written down.
They are, also, really bad teachers for the most part.
So we can conclude from the propagation pattern that the burns were thermal, rather than chemical or electrical, occurred before death, and actually did the killing instead of something like smoke inhalation?
Any other injuries?
So effectively they're the pure researchers who routinely work and think in more esoteric terms, who of course, aren't much good at teaching anybody who's not already as informed as they are, and going from a hyperlinked, indexed smart Wikipedia system that feeds data as needed to twenty incomplete, jumbled encyclopedias in as many languages with entire alphabet sections scorched out of existence?
The cause of death appears to extensive burns and inhalation of flame, although not from any sort of fuel sticking to the target. Possibly immersion in the flame of some sort of burning gas or exposure to a semi-diffuse hot plasma, although the latter is somewhat unlikely because of a lack of distinct burns that come from the ionization of the plasma creating differential patterns due to conductivity, particularly on such a cyberized individual.
When someone enters something into their Archival Tool, it gets shared with every other Archival Tool in the network, with automatically generated citations and notes about contradictory information. As the shared database grows it will let you know more when you add something, and will also be able to bring up any issues (the information is of a dubious source or is known to be bad with citations from accepted sources). Further boosts to research will just be part of it. There are, of course, also social engineering possibilities.
Call it the Omnipedia. And yes, you can also read ominous into that.
No radioactivity? Damage-to-depth pattern and burning in the lungs inconsistent with a laser or microwave weapon? We're certain that the decay occurred significantly after fiery death, rather than, say, in a dramatically accelerated fashion before or simultaneous with it? Did they have anything distinctive in their stomach or intestines?
I suggest that we put safeguards on any computer system that we create that could become self-aware or corrupted, we DON'T want another case like the men of iron on our hands do we? As for the Social engineering I have only one word to say, "Excellent"
You know, this is why I've asked for a map.The line you are on is roughly (out to the part I have actually mapped in my head):
Heartwood Hearth - Six Pillars - Librarian's Nook - Amethyst Gardens - Glenshade Manor - Greengraft - Shattersaw
With Librarian's Nook and Greengraft both being on spur lines. The Librarian's Nook one terminates there, while the Greengraft line continues on to end at a known pile tree grove.
Although, I suppose this is a good time to realize the extent of some confusion: I have dithered on getting a map because movement is all linear: you are either going towards Shattersaw or you are going away from it, and the two other rail lines branching off from Shattersaw are wholly controlled by the Dragonflies and 504s, so you can't just go poking around without their permission. Thus it has been "Well, do you want to go up the line or down the line?" and there has been little need in my head to draw that out.
Well, our Jaeger program and portable sap purification means that we have the ability to move through the forest and poke around, say, the Machine Heads, right?
If you want to make a several month long expedition, sure. Their nearest base is several hundred kilometres away through the forest.
I mean, we've gone on expeditions over there before, right? I mean, that's what the whole 'Fight forestry Mechs, lose SAW' thing was about.