Am I to take this as "Nothing in these two actions:That's flanderization.
Guns are guns. Especially ones acquired from a registered and recognized supplier.
[] Visit the old Psykana section of the Sapphire Keep:
[] Psykana and firearms:
is going to require any additional shenanigans we need to unfuck in order to use, presuming at least marginal success?"
And can we presume that if a source is either sanctioned or has no particular outstanding issues, we can expect similar later?
Because if that's not what you're saying, then you'd be the second person to misread what I'm writing and attribute my concerns to Kel, instead of random psyker lore that may or may not be trustworthy which I'm actually criticizing.
If that is what you're saying, great! Glad to hear it, I'll tone it down a bit.
Also, while I'm here, can we get a ruling about whether or not we need to spend a Turn Action studying whether or not it's safe to allow psykers to use autoguns and such? Because that's something else that was brought up.
Last edited: