This is late.
My apologies.
Sorry about that, I forget that this isn't actually common public knowledge sometimes. Anyway, nuclear regulatory commissions don't know how to classify, certify, or regulate nuclear fusion, because it's not nuclear fission, which is what they are geared for. Yet, the need to regulate is recognized. So, how is this resolved? By negotiation. Take, for example, tritium which is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen weighing 3 atomic mass units. The limitations went from 100 grams of tritium in the device, to 300, to 700 with a further 300 grams error margin baked in. That was over the course of about a decade (it was "finalized" in ~ 2009). The changes were made as ITER was developed and we understood better how much we would actually get. There is actually a number of such things, with regulations being very fluid and subject to adjustment.
So, what ITER is basically saying is that it will follow the laws it wrote and negotiated for itself.
No, fire regulations don't work like that. You are looking at high voltage regulations, but the fire hazard regulations would be for flammable gases. Plasma itself, at least non-atmospheric plasma (i.e. stuff that's not atmospheric arc discharges) is not considered as a conventional fire hazard. It's important to understand, a typical working pressure of a tokamak is ~ 10^-7 of atmospheric pressure. And the heat that you are quoting is at the core plasma, not the whole volume.
Magnetic safety is a thing, but that's basically OSHA.
I dont have the knowledgebase to confirm or dispute this either way.
So I'll have to take your word for it.
Frontend vs. backend is the analogy I would suggest. You don't go for flashy world-changing stuff first. You establish yourself as the backbone of the industry first, but one that's outside of public view. Advanced alloys, energy capacitors, etc.
I'm not sure why you expect this to make a difference.
GMO organisms remain incredibly controversial across large sections of the world despite being pretty backend innovations. RNA vaccines attracted remarkable opposition in the middle of a global pandemic.
This is also an assumption on your part. While yes, our world, being our world-soul and not a part of Creation is likely to have different underlying physics, it also can have humans in it, which, I assume, wouldn't keel over dead after leaving. So, physics are the same on at least some level of abstraction. This means that at least some technologies, meaning ways to influence the world, would be the same, because form follows function.
For your encryption-decryption example, I would expect even a happy crime-free society with the government that enjoys a genuine 100% approval rating and that has somehow overcame the individual desire for privacy to have more advanced archival and data transfer algorithms than we have. And that ties directly to encryption-decryption. Almost certainly far better machine learning, machine vision, text recognition, text-to-speech and speech-to-text systems than were available in 2006. Unless literally everyone's OS is a cyberdevil, but that means a way to mass-produce cyberdevils loyal to their owners on a truly industrial scale.
1)No it's not.
Technology is not uniform, and is driven by need and resource availability. There were New World civilizations with vastly better city sanitation and planning systems and still used obsidian weaponry while the contemporary Europeans who were horrible at sanitation still had metal weapons. There is plenty of evidence to support the idea that parallel societies won't necessarily come up with the same solutions.
Especially if magic is in play, because it allows shortcuts.
Like I pointed out earlier, the Fomorians demonstrate genetic engineering, human bioware and energy weapons in this setting. But they have no aircraft, which meant they got fucked by National Guard helicopers while in retreat in canon after their other munitions were depleted.
2)Your second statement isnt true either.
It relies on a model of physics that is straight up canonically and textually demonstrated to be untrue.
Its outright stated that there are sections of the NeverNever where a lot of mundane physics does not work, even though sapient creatures and humans can fight there without difficulty. Where even combustion might not work.
Which is why human wizards dont rely on firearms there.
3) See 1.
Yes. You start with material science, because we already have background there with Chicago Synthetics, and expand from there, offloading stuff to patsies. If need be, you use the Crown to find good patsies.
Chicago Synthetics is not a reference. It's a cover business that is designed to give us a (thin) veneer of legal protection for our initial moneymaking schemes. It isnt designed to be any sort of resume buffer or represent experience in the formal field of material science. In fact its lack of any bona fides makes it an an active liability on the resume of anyone hoping to be taken seriously.
Not really. While 3D printers might be stalled, material science things won't. Nor would batteries and stuff like that.
I am confident in saying this is not true.
We've been aware of fullerenes and graphene for decades, have made them in the lab, and have long theorized uses for them. Actually making them safely and economically is a very different matter. John B Goodenough's work on lithium ion batteries date back to 1980. It took decades to commercialize.
This is your preference. Mine is different. Autochton was very much a part of Exalted setting, and my favorite at that. Technocracy was a part of WoD. Your preference is perfectly valid, so is mine. But appealing to "this setting works on different themes" is wrong, because two of the three settings we are talking about have the themes in question.
From my understanding, and correct me if I am wrong, what you want as a result of Molly's actions is essentially the same world, but safer. Doylistically, a story of adventure and fighting with maybe some politicking, where the setting is the background and essentially actually stays pretty much unchanged, or at least not relevant, where our impact is significant cosmologically, but wouldn't actually be noticed by an average person on the street. What I am interested at least in part, is to see a positive change happening. Not just the same, but safer, but different and better.
I was a participant on Alchemical Quest for several years on this board and SB. I like Autobot just fine, and I'm quite familiar with his WoD version as well.
And both versions are characterized by stasis. The societies may have advanced in the past, but they have all stalled out by the times the games are set in.
Neither WoD nor Exalted has any themes of technological uplift as an ongoing element in the setting; M20 in particular is explicitly post-apocalyptic in the wake of the Avatar Storm.
So is Exalted, for that matter.
The Technocracy explicitly considers its advanced technology to be magick anyway.
===
This is an urban fantasy set on DF Earth.
Dresdenverse Earth is essentially a duplicate of RL Earth in the early 21st century. And uplift is not a primarily technological process, its a political and economic one. 2006 Earth had the resources and tech to solve almost all its problems; it just lacked the political will to do so. People werent starving in North Korea or Yemen because there was a worldwide shortage of food. We had the tech to push fission and renewables much earlier to reduce fossil fuel dependence. We could have stopped exploiting developing countries.
We didnt because politics.
That isnt something changed by waving shiny new tech around when, for example, a bunch of US states benefit from fossil fuel mining and have the political votes in the US Senate to attempt to keep it viable in the face of solar and wind. That isnt going to prevent the Chinese government from expanding a surveillance state, or US political parties from using computing advancements attempting to restrict access to voting rights by gerrymandering better.
And I doubt anyone here is qualified to negotiate the....fraught political and social arguments of real world Earth. From racism and neocolonialist economics to things like the Israeli-Palestinean Problem. Or, if we're just sticking in the US, the decaying towns and cities of the Rust Belt, systemic racism and its economic impacts on entire populations(Look up tours of Jackson, Mississippi on Youtube. I dare you.)
Nevermind the optics of the 18 year old blonde American girl telling the billion plus people of subsaharan Africa, or the 3 billion of Asia their business.
These are inflammatory topics, and too close to RL situations to be handled with any detachment.
I dont want that.I didnt start participating here to play that.I may be reaching, but I doubt many other players, or the QM, do either. Id rather keep your technological uplift ambitions, and all the fraught political and economic implications thereof, out of my urban fantasy and concentrate on the notLovecraftian outer gods and supernatural creatures of the setting.
They are a much more relaxing topic to deal with.
Yes, and, frankly, probably better than you, no insult intended.
No offense taken.