Please, have mercy on the QM.
... Yeah, I realize that this is too much.Um. Uh.
Please, have mercy on the QM.
At least cut down questions that aren't directly relevant. Like, Kennedy's murder?
--[X] Question: "Where can I find the largest currently undiscovered and unclaimed collection of writing in the same language?" Focus: the photo of the ritual circle in which [Perfected Principle of Consumtpion] was invoked.
Maybe it might be better to ask "what is the sequence of words that make a list all of the locations (coordinates, with a 50m radius about the point) with writings in the languages depiced in this photo, sorted by number of words in each location?"
That way we can have clippy find out what is at each location (museum? private collection? (or unknown, so maybe a nercomancer's lab)), and then they can look into who might own those places.
I don't think we should burn our photo of these words on an 'unclaimed' when we might be able to get leads on the libarys of bad guys.
----
Although I'd be wary that it might be too broad - when it come to getting the most bang-for-our-buck I keep feeling like I am trying to rules-lawyer the QM, as I am intentionally pushing up to the edges of the scope of what we can ask, so:
@DragonParadox, would the above be ok or is it too wide? (I'm espically leery about the "what is the sequnce of words that..." aspect, as that easily builds into multipart questions; here I'm trying to use it for 'all locations (corrodinates)' + 'sort function'.
---
(I wonder if the top of the list would be a computer server storing a museum's (innocent) digital archive )
I... Don't think so? I mean, we used Mister the cat as a focus to find Mab's plans. We didn't burn out the topic of Mab's plans. We burned out Mister as the focus. We burn (I think) the foci, not the topics themselves.Also, a little bit of a nitpick but I think the questions need to be formed in terms of the focus to actually count. That is, asking "what's prophecies feature my family" while looking at a photo burns Molly's family as a topic because that's the cornerstone of the question. Asking "what if any prophecies feature the people in this photo" would just burn the picture.
In principle true, but then, those could be obscure / not in English / not digitized, and cyberdevils lack the ability to choose the best. I just hope our exaltation has it. And the textbooks as foci aren't expensive, I feel, in terms of what we lose.I think a few of these are wasteful. Textbook shopping for mundane stuff can easily be done by having tireless cyber devils gun them down for us.
I think that's a bit too "gamey". I deliberately didn't apply any optimization tricks to the questions. It felt more honest to me.Maybe it might be better to ask "what is the sequence of words that make a list all of the locations (coordinates, with a 50m radius about the point) with writings in the languages depiced in this photo, sorted by number of words in each location?"
Broad question burns a big topic. That seems fair. Would Yog's original question burn only the photo/the instance of the language being used in the ritual or would it burn the entire language called 'Old Realm'?Yes that is a valid question since you have the writing samples. That said the subject here is Old Realm itself, you ask this and this is the only question you can ask about the language.
In regards to my list, are the foci "correct"? In the sense that we would be burning the foci themselves, not the whole global topics, like "Old Realm", "physics", "carpenter family", etc?Yes that is a valid question since you have the writing samples. That said the subject here is Old Realm itself, you ask this and this is the only question you can ask about the language.
DP is fine with it, so if your orignal question would also burn the languge 'Old Realm', I'll be voting for my idea. If your question only burns that photo/that instance of us using it in a ritual then I'll stick with your write in.I think that's a bit too "gamey". I deliberately didn't apply any optimization tricks to the questions. It felt more honest to me.
The unclaimed and undiscovered part was used under the assumption that we'll burn the phito and not the topic. We could then find the collection of writing without alerting anyone, and use it as a focus for further research.DP is fine with it, so if your orignal question would also burn the languge 'Old Realm', I'll be voting for my idea. If your question only burns that photo/the imstance of us using it in a ritual then I'll stick with your write in.
It's the "unclaimed" bit that I have issue with tbh.
That's a really good plan.The unclaimed and undiscovered part was used under the assumption that we'll burn the phito and not the topic. We could then find the collection of writing without alerting anyone, and use it as a focus for further research.
Yeah, but my point is that we framed that question in terms of mister the cat, which is why he was the thing that got burned.I... Don't think so? I mean, we used Mister the cat as a focus to find Mab's plans. We didn't burn out the topic of Mab's plans. We burned out Mister as the focus. We burn (I think) the foci, not the topics themselves.
In regards to my list, are the foci "correct"? In the sense that we would be burning the foci themselves, not the whole global topics, like "Old Realm", "physics", "carpenter family", etc?
Would it burn the Blackest Name-action? IIRC the name there is part of the Old Realm of that picture.Your question would burn the instance of Old Realm you have, so you would have to find another instance of it out in the wild to ask more.
This is more than fair. And I'll admit that at least 51% reason for the question is because I think it would be cool to know. The ratiozalization is as follows:That's a really good plan.
If DP says your question will only burn the photo then I'm 100% in favour of your idea.
---
You might not have noticed my edit, but unless aliens (from Molly's material universe, from other star systems are already in Dresdenverse, I really don't think we should add them to the quest's narrative), so I'll be voting for a variant that does not have that in it.
Ok, so, to be as clear as possible - it'll burn the example of Old Realm in the photo, not everything about Old Realm language in general. So, for example, we wouldn't be able to ask "who was [Perfected Principle of Consumtpion]" without finding some other recording of that name, but if we did find that name written somewhere else, like say the library we find using the question, we'd be able to ask additional questions?Your question would burn the instance of Old Realm you have, so you would have to find another instance of it out in the wild to ask more.
Do you have any suggestions for rephrasing the questions?Yeah, but my point is that we framed that question in terms of mister the cat, which is why he was the thing that got burned.
In order to be the focus for a question the subject has to the the focus of the question in a technical sense.
Or that's my understanding anyway. That's why all of my question suggestions in the past have gone out of their way to link together what we're looking at directly to how the question is phrased even when it reads awkwardly.
Would it burn the Blackest Name-action? IIRC the name there is part of the Old Realm of that picture.
This is more than fair. And I'll admit that at least 51% reason for the question is because I think it would be cool to know. The ratiozalization is as follows:
1) If there are aliens, then Uriel being capable of destroying galaxies is very impressive. if there aren't, than he'd be destroying base matter, which is very much conceptually simpler. I want to check if there's actually meaningful universe ourside of Earth, or if stars might as well be lightbulbs on a celestial sphere.
2) At least partially, I expect our exaltation to default to giving us locations of any surviving exalted era demons, i.e. primordial / yozi subsoul species, who would fit the description of being sapient non-terrestrial aliens
Ok, so, to be as clear as possible - it'll burn the example of Old Realm in the photo, not everything about Old Realm language in general. So, for example, we wouldn't be able to ask "who was [Perfected Principle of Consumtpion]" without finding some other recording of that name, but if we did find that name written somewhere else, like say the library we find using the question, we'd be able to ask additional questions?
Do you have any suggestions for rephrasing the questions?
Could we also include question about Atlantis via Plato's Critias?
While I am the one to suggest it in the first place, given how RVD seems to work, I'd rather find it using RVD, and use the crown and the Critias to check for traps. In any case, this is not urgent, as we are not likely to go exploring before talking to MabCould we also include question about Atlantis via Plato's Critias?
- first seems fine[X]Plan Yog's questions v.1.1
-[X] Actually concerning questions
--[X] Question: "Where can I find the largest currently undiscovered and unclaimed collection of writing in the same language?" Focus: the photo of the ritual circle in which [Perfected Principle of Consumtpion] was invoked.
--[X] Question: "what was the reason Lara Raith wanted to purchase Black Rider?". Focus: the recordings (such as the receipt we got for paying) from the police auction
--[X] Question: "What was the reason detective Green tried to harass Harry?". Focus: Detective's house
--[X] Question: "Who killed detective Green?". Focus: Detective's tombstone
--[X] Question: "What was the identity of the sniper who tried to shoot Harry?". Focus: The roof from which the shot was made
--[X] Question: "What are all the prophecies featuring the members of my family?" Focus: Carpenter family photo
--[X] Question: "What are the best, most comprehensive *subject* textbooks currently existing?"Focus: each of our school subject textbooks.
-[X] General curiosity questions
--[X] Question: "What's the closest location can I find actual living non-terrestrial sapient aliens?" Focus: SETI website
--[X] Question: "How did humans actually appear?" Focus: a copy of Darwin's "Origin of the Species"
--[X] Question: "Which of the USA universities are the most mired in the supernatural?" Focus: an online list of USA universities
Didn't we already get that from the phone? They knew who the car used to belong to and heard the car was possessed so they figured that they could interrogate it.--[X] Question: "what was the reason Lara Raith wanted to purchase Black Rider?". Focus: the recordings (such as the receipt we got for paying) from the police auction
I'm not sure. I honestly don't remember.Didn't we already get that from the phone? They knew who the car used to belong to and heard the car was possessed so they figured that they could interrogate it.
Thank you. I'll use most of those with few exceptions:- first seems fine
- "what was the reason Lara Raith wanted to purchase Black Rider?". Focus: the recordings (such as the receipt we got for paying) from the police auction —> "What motivated the competition for this purchase?" This one was also probably okay, so either way works.
- "What was the reason detective Green tried to harass Harry?". Focus: Detective's house —> " For what reason did the man who once lived here harass Harry?"
- "Who killed detective Green?" Focus: Detective's tombstone —> "Who killed the man buried beneath this tombstone?"
- "What was the identity of the sniper who tried to shoot Harry?". Focus: The roof from which the shot was made —> "Who attempted to shoot Harry from this place?"
- "What are all the prophecies featuring the members of my family?" Focus: Carpenter family photo —> "What prophecies feature the people in this photo?"
- "What are the best, most comprehensive *subject* textbooks currently existing?"Focus: each of our school subject textbooks. —> " What are the best sources covering the subject if this book?"
- "What's the closest location can I find actual living non-terrestrial sapient aliens?" Focus: SETI website pretty sure a wide variety of nevernever spirits count under this question. —> "where might I find what the organization behind this website seeks?"
- "How did humans actually appear?" Focus: a copy of Darwin's "Origin of the Species" I bet that the white god will nix this one, but we might as well try. —> "How different is the true origin of humanity from this mortal theory?" The crown isn't a monkey paw, we should get details on how it's different and not something like 'very different'.