Why I didn't quote everything: cuz I was tired and the point I didn't quote for was the least important. I should not have included that, my bad, however, he fact that you focused solely on one part and ignored the other parts of my post, for which I did quote your reasoning makes me feel like you purposefully evaded the other accusations and then also thereafter withdrew....seriously? I would really appreciate that when people try to build a case against me, they also quote my reasoning for such. The first half of that post I explained why d1 and you've only quoted the parts that construct it in a worse light. The stuff from today is fair, but still. Why do people keep doing this?
I did such twice in fact! Both directly quoting one of your messages. Please stop ignoring me and my answers, I'm getting really annoyed that this seems to be a common technique in these games. I've seen it with both Comi and Wiadi before in games where they were scum. So going with my gut here now but...
[X] Vote Wies
From experience whenever I start getting this feeling that people are purposefully ignoring my explanations, I'm usually right on this.
Anyhow, that's me for the day, should really be getting some sleep but this really ticked me off.
@Draxy What do you think of the gamestate so far? D1 You said you didn't have scum reads. Indeed, you didn't even vote at the end of D1. Is that still the case?
Left my vote where it was yesterday, because I didn't like any of the wagons at the time and knew I'd be gone before EOD, didn't want to be responsible for any sudden last minute wagons when I didn't have good reads. Right now, still not too sure, need to do a proper reread of things.
Well I suppose that's not the biggest surprise but Hunh.
Anyhow, I didn't find my targets last night so that's fun.
You.
Why I didn't quote everything: cuz I was tired and the point I didn't quote for was the least important. I should not have included that, my bad, however, he fact that you focused solely on one part and ignored the other parts of my post, for which I did quote your reasoning makes me feel like you purposefully evaded the other accusations and then also thereafter withdrew.
The heart of my case to you is your non-vote and your argumentation for that. It is a pity others didn't pick that up.
So, let's take it again up in this new day, shall we?
I repeat that this looks suspicious to me. First, you don't vote D1, then you explain with "I didn't want to be responsible for some sudden wagons" which is a logic of "I don't want to look bad" which is a more wolfish logic than townish, and then you vote for me based on your gut and you don't make any effort to convince others, which reads to me as only a little bit more participating in the voting than last Day.
[X] Draxy
But now that I've cool downed a bit and reviewed when I haven't been barely keeping myself awake, I realise that I've been misreading this and it is complete nonsense as well because I did vote D1. I placed my vote on Nic for lack of a better option start of d1, and then you were on my back about it all day as to my reasoning.
So? That is not what I am arguing now. You shifted your vote on Nick to Observer Chat. I call that not voting at D1. Like, if I have a vote for the most of the D2 on, like, Logos, but I conclude it with null, then other people are going to say I didn't vote that day and they are right.
...honestly forgot I did that. Didn't think that would null my vote besides, it was a non valid vote so don't think it would count?
Hrrrm.
So if not all three, which one(s) do you fellows think we're dealing with?
For me, I'd argue likely not the Serial Killer, but Arsonist and Cultist are options.
Particularly the cultist but…
Pretty sure we're dealing with a perfectly normal not at all strange Mafia