- Location
- Philippines
[X] Contact the major galactic powers only - No diplomatic issues, prevents negotiations with the Hutts or slaver bands
[X] Be true neutral - No diplomatic changes
[X] Be true neutral - No diplomatic changes
While she wasn't the best it also had to do with the fact she was following Tarkin's tactical plans and book. And the people she was facing were mostly all very used to that and knew how to fight those tactics effectively.even Daala would be quite the catch, with 4 ISD 1s and the tech of Maw Installation along with her. (I'd suggest reserving her for ground campaigns, since she was a genuinely talented ground commander but incredibly lackluster as a space tactician.)
No as in three turns total from the start and we have already gone through 2 of those turns. It is not blocked in any sense of the word.Exactly my point. Our ability to grow our fleet with home-grown construction is almost nil for the near future, and will only slowly ramp up as time goes on.
No as in three turns total from the start and we have already gone through 2 of those turns. It is not blocked in any sense of the word.
I think you need to try and look at it from Thrawn's perspective. The dude very much does not like how a lot of Imperial Navy members carry themselves, and also just isn't a fan of the big doomsday weapon projects.Even then we shouldn't stop recruiting other Imperials completely, because no matter how you look at it free Star Destroyers are free Star Destroyers.
I think you need to try and look at it from Thrawn's perspective. The dude very much does not like how a lot of Imperial Navy members carry themselves, and also just isn't a fan of the big doomsday weapon projects.
do we have this? or can ours be turned into this?
Imperial Remnant Arquitens Cruiser
Like I said before, I don't think it's an all-or-nothing deal. If we prove ourselves to be powerful then Imperial factions will join us on their own, and if they do then they need to be willing to do things our way. We just fired hundreds of officers in our own navy because they opposed the more practical design and doctrine philosophy that we are trying to implement, what kind of message does that send if we do not have the same qualms with warlords who want to join up? It means that as long as you've got some decent naval power we'll compromise our standards to have you onboard.And? We work with what we've got, and what we've got is a hell of a lot of Imperial fleet and army assets that could be persuaded to join us. It doesn't matter if he likes how they do things, since we're changing that anyway and can do the same for new arrivals over time. And who said anything about doomsday weapons? I'm talking purely conventional warships.
Though frankly, I think Thrawn's main issue with superweapons is their cost inefficiency and the stupid uses the Empire has put them to. It costs far more to produce a Death Star than it's worth when you look at the actual combat capability you get out of the station. But I bet if a pre-constructed Death Star fell into Thrawn's lap, he'd gladly take it and use it (though I doubt he'd blow up too many planets; it works better in the long run as a fleet-killer and siege-breaker anyway). He'd never build such a boondoggle himself, but if one was already available to him, I don't see him having too many qualms about using it in the most efficient manner he can think of.
This is what I think you guys aren't getting: The "perfect" is the mortal enemy of the "good enough." Right now, "good enough" would be a huge step up from where we currently stand, and it is easily obtained and does nothing to prevent transitioning to "perfect" in the future. But you guys are stuck in this "it's gotta be perfect" mindset that would see us pass up some incredibly valuable opportunities for the sake of what looks to me like some kind of OCD tick that just demands fleet symmetry for its own sake.
Look at it this way: every Destroyer we coopt is one less in our rivals' fleets. Every Destroyer we turn our nose up at because we don't like it's design philosophy or its crew's training is one more in our rivals' fleets. On one hand, we gain military might in an imperfect form (which can be perfected later). On the other, we gain nothing, and our enemies are stronger. Which do you prefer?
Threat Analysis: Imperial Core and Splinter Factions, Other Threats
As a side question, has Betl Oxtroe's plot to try reforming the Empire into a constitutional monarchy with Palpatine's 11-year old grand-niece as Empress fallen through yet? If not, would it be possible to leverage that somehow, either by supporting Oxtroe's plan, or by snatching the Princess to use as a figurehead to bolster our own legitimacy?
I can think of any number of canon commanders, admirals and captains who would be a godsend to our military. Dorja, Brandei, Veers, Lara Notsil, Baron Fel (whom Isard canonically sent Thrawn's way in 5 ABY), Teren Rogriss, Sair Yonka, Ait Convarion, Ivan Cronus...heck, even Daala would be quite the catch, with 4 ISD 1s and the tech of Maw Installation along with her. (I'd suggest reserving her for ground campaigns, since she was a genuinely talented ground commander but incredibly lackluster as a space tactician.)
Long-term victory will come as a result of absorbing as much tech and manpower as we can and integrating them into our own military. The good ones will follow orders; the bad ones may yet find new careers as refresher scrubbers.
Her loss is our gain. In more ways than one, in this instance.I will say that Isaard is going to be sending more than in canon at the advice of her intrigue head.
Like I said before, I don't think it's an all-or-nothing deal. If we prove ourselves to be powerful then Imperial factions will join us on their own, and if they do then they need to be willing to do things our way. We just fired hundreds of officers in our own navy because they opposed the more practical design and doctrine philosophy that we are trying to implement, what kind of message does that send if we do not have the same qualms with warlords who want to join up? It means that as long as you've got some decent naval power we'll compromise our standards to have you onboard.
What I think is that we should let any prospective subordinates come to us, and apply all existing standards for current personnel onto new members. Will this turn some people away? Yeah, it will. However if they're unwilling to get with the program and we allow them into the fold anyway that's going to undermine our own position, because it isn't simply a matter of liking or disliking what fleets they have, it's a matter of what kind of people and what kind of activities we permit. Someone like Isard for instance who would use bioweapons on Coruscant as a means of disrupting human-alien relations for the New Republic. Or Zsinj and his absurd brainwashing schemes. Kaine had precisely this problem with Jerec, who had his own goals that did not align with the greater government that was set up.
It might also give us a lead as to what Tyber Zann is up to. His Consortium is a potential threat, and he actually battled Thrawn in 3 ABY over a Sith holocron. Thrawn escaped with it, but the fleet left behind was destroyed - one of Thrawn's few pyrrhic victories. I don't think Thrawn will have forgotten that anytime soon, nor the fact that Zann stole the holocron from Coruscant later that year. I imagine he's wondering just what was so important about it (it contained coordinates to a Sith army frozen in carbonite).Since we're not opening up relations to the Hutts, this seems like a good time to consider expanding our network into the underworld. This could possibly allow us to start chipping away at Hutt Space until we're powerful enough to take them head on.
I think this is where the finer points of our views diverge. I think we should let them know what we will expect from them to begin with. We won't require them to change before we accept them but they will have to show a willingness to do so first. Maybe this is what you meant anyway but from how I'm reading this you want them to join first and then we deal with getting them up to speed and removing and changing the fleets and personnel as needed while I want to make our terms and conditions clear from the very start, even if it may cost us some would-be subordinates. I believe that if we used your method we may create too many dissatisfied or disloyal officials within our own empire who may be able to cause problems for us down the line.My point is that we should wait to do that until we have the ships and war materiel that they bring to the table already in our custody, and them and their crews already sworn to our service. Then, just like what we did with our own forces, we weed out the bad apples, promote the good ones, and reorganize to our heart's content. It makes no sense to apply our very different standards to them at the door. Instead, we welcome them in, then we make our standards clear and give them a chance to conform.
I think it's understood, it's just that this is turn 2, so we will have plenty of time to integrate before hitting Thrawn's EU campaigning schedule. Plus it'll help sell our position as being different from the old if we stick to True Neutral.Honestly people don't seem to understand that the best trained army in the world can't do shit if outnumbered 500 to 1. Ideally we integrate as much of the old Empire as we build out our New Way.
[X] Contact the major galactic powers only - No diplomatic issues, prevents negotiations with the Hutts or slaver bands
[X] Slightly favor Galactic Empire factions - Minor relationship boost with Empire factions. Minor relationship drop with the New Republic.
The funny thing is, had the surviving Grand Admirals worked together, they might've been able to turn the tide back against the Rebellion even after Endor.An excellent summary here of the breakdown in order following the death of the Emperor, from an equally excellent fanfic:
'The Empire had begun to crumble the day Palpatine died. For twenty-five years it had staffed its upper echelons with the most ruthless, power-hungry generals and admirals and moffs, all loyal to nothing but their own ambition. Grant knew that better than anyone; he was one of them and had been for as long as there'd been an Empire. Without Palpatine to hold them together they were falling on them-selves like rabid gundarks. Even now, his fellow Grand Admirals Pitta and Grunger, the famous white-uniformed elite of the Imperial Navy, were desperately trying to murder each other over Tralus.'
- Star Wars: Hour of Judgment
Funnily enough the imps did… after Thrawns death and successfully managed to retake most of the galaxy before Palps shattered their unity (caused infighting from loyalists) in the lead up to operation shadow handThe funny thing is, had the surviving Grand Admirals worked together, they might've been able to turn the tide back against the Rebellion even after Endor.
But of course, considering what kind of People most of them were, that was NEVER gonna happen.
Gilad Pellaeon is just plain awesome, not just for his talent in naval warfare but also for his good political sense. If I remember correctly, he was the one that wanted the remaining Imperial factions and the New Republic to broker a peace deal as he knew further fighting would be purely attritional and not in a good way for his side.Still I'm surprised with the imps as they were that Gilad was able to get 300 other captains to follow him under Crimson Command after all this, before joining up with the Teradoc's. I know a lot were trying to save their skins (Gilad being the only person in the navy with Thrawns death being remotely competent as a commander, despite staying a captain), but still