Arch-Demon's Eternal Game: Aeon Edition, The Turtle Chronicles

I totally get tunnelling on somebody, and I really like the analysis you put together @Wiadi . It makes me feel a lot less worried about you.

@Tykan I do need to do more scumhunting. This set up makes it sort of difficult, though, because the scum are actually scumhunting, not just trying to sabotage investigations. That makes a lot of scum tells much easier to hide.

@QTesseract welcome aboard! Thanks for filling in on short notice.

[X] Null
 
Hm, okay, so. Reviewing with some more distance, what it looks like to me is that meso & I got caught up in a playstyle argument that got messier than it had to because both of us were disinclined to extend the presumption of good faith. What was bugging me about his defense, I think, is the extent to which it seems to be coming from a starting position of viewing me as Scum; this felt like Scum trying to build a narrative, but I can also see how I at least got kinda caught up in things, so I'd not be shocked if Town!meso did similar and was just locked into reading my posts from the perspective that I was Scum.

So that puts me at more or less null on meso, since he hasn't had much other content to judge off of. Nictis, on the other hand, I'm side-eyeing a bit more because - under this new context - it seems a bit like he was stirring shit up to keep the discussion continuing & escalating. Curious if it looks that way from other perspectives - in particular @mesonoxian what's your take on Nictis's involvement in that dispute?
 
Hm, okay, so. Reviewing with some more distance, what it looks like to me is that meso & I got caught up in a playstyle argument that got messier than it had to because both of us were disinclined to extend the presumption of good faith. What was bugging me about his defense, I think, is the extent to which it seems to be coming from a starting position of viewing me as Scum; this felt like Scum trying to build a narrative, but I can also see how I at least got kinda caught up in things, so I'd not be shocked if Town!meso did similar and was just locked into reading my posts from the perspective that I was Scum.

So that puts me at more or less null on meso, since he hasn't had much other content to judge off of. Nictis, on the other hand, I'm side-eyeing a bit more because - under this new context - it seems a bit like he was stirring shit up to keep the discussion continuing & escalating. Curious if it looks that way from other perspectives - in particular @mesonoxian what's your take on Nictis's involvement in that dispute?
The later comments don't strike me as malicious. I think Nictis and I agree on the level of risk involved in mechanical speculation being pretty low and he was expressing the same points I was, so they seem pretty genuine to me.

The very first comment where he expressed suspicion about your jumping to vote me does feel more antagonistic, but not necessarily in a scummy way. He didn't jump to an actual vote, and making people defend their choices is a pretty effective means of scum hunting.

So yeah, I think it was intended to rattle your cage a bit, but that is perfectly compatible with town!Nictis.

I tend to gut read Nictis as scum every game, so I am trying not to let that color my perceptions of events. Some of the earlier stuff (like implying he could help determine item order) seemed really off to me, but Nictis' play style is so unpredictable whether town or scum that I really don't see that as being out of character regardless of the his faction.
 
I recognize that was a lot of words for a shrug, but that's what I've got right now.
 
I think Nictis is fine (for now) because he's making people incredibly paranoid rather than just annoyed.
 
I think Nictis is fine (for now) because he's making people incredibly paranoid rather than just annoyed.
Not that I find Nictis particularly sus right now, but what does this even mean?

Nictis is town because he is making people question his motives instead of making people angry? Pretty sure he does both as either alignment. How did you come to A) this conclusion and B) this read from this conclusion.
 
Not that I find Nictis particularly sus right now, but what does this even mean?

Nictis is town because he is making people question his motives instead of making people angry? Pretty sure he does both as either alignment. How did you come to A) this conclusion and B) this read from this conclusion.

The latter causes a lot more chaos than the former and leads to more people tunneling on him for much less gain.
 
@Wiadi, can you show me which posts of Ori read especially towny to you? I reread him and don't really find him that productive.

Those reads were mostly based on overall impression; I can do a deeper dive on Ori & see how that one holds up, though it may be a bit.
 
I'm okay with an inactive lynch, I think a No Lynch should at least be considered as well, there are more than enough night actions that some information will be generated regardless and it might be worth the padding if KP starts flying around that losing a townie to a wild guess of a lynch might be sub-optimal, the only thing is it denies us some voting pattern info.

I'm inclined to be distrustful of this perspective, since I'm under the impression it's widely accepted that lynching day one is good for town. Is this setup really sufficiently different enough that a no lynch makes sense? Since I'm new I'd like to hear others thoughts on this, and also how this effects your view of @OriginalName.

Also, @Byzantine, could you explain your null read on Nictis and your interactions with them? I don't really understand getting off of a null read like you did without having a better read, because we want some wagons going if only to exert pressure.

I don't really like most of @Nictis contributions right now. Trying to get some of the less actives to actually participate seems pro-town but also low effor to me, and a lot of their earlier stuff just felt chaotic, which I don't think helps us. I'm going to wait on Nictis actually explaining what they got out of the four items question to switch, because I think if that discussion was actually doing good work that would effect my read quite a bit right now.
 
I'm inclined to be distrustful of this perspective, since I'm under the impression it's widely accepted that lynching day one is good for town. Is this setup really sufficiently different enough that a no lynch makes sense? Since I'm new I'd like to hear others thoughts on this, and also how this effects your view of @OriginalName.

Also, @Byzantine, could you explain your null read on Nictis and your interactions with them? I don't really understand getting off of a null read like you did without having a better read, because we want some wagons going if only to exert pressure.

I don't really like most of @Nictis contributions right now. Trying to get some of the less actives to actually participate seems pro-town but also low effor to me, and a lot of their earlier stuff just felt chaotic, which I don't think helps us. I'm going to wait on Nictis actually explaining what they got out of the four items question to switch, because I think if that discussion was actually doing good work that would effect my read quite a bit right now.

There was 7 kills n1 last Arch-fiend game, I think there is a real concern about being deliberate with regards to numbers.
 
Okay, so, OriginalName:

It was a really flippant post and also to me says "I didn't read the thread and just posted to get it out of the way".

Agrees with BB's dislike of swarmingu's first post.
I think it's kinda rough to get D1 reads based on 3P speculation when basically every faction would probably prefer that the 3Ps actions benefit them in some way or another, it's like the one thing everyone can agree on and really doesn't reveal alignment at all.

This appears to be in reference to the Deep Dweller discussion. As the person who instigated said discussion, I'm inclined to agree - my goal there was legitimately to gain a better grasp of the role rather than trying to get alignment info on anyone.
Statistics are incredibly lame and boring even if they are useful, but people reacting to statistics is very cool and good for reads, so lets get a twofer!
I'm curious what Hailcapital thinks of the people who are speculating on his math!

Attempts to pivot from mech talk into talk about mech talk, the latter of which is probably more useful D1, so points for productive conversation direction albeit without any personal contribution.
You're going to have to explain precisely how to mechanically solve d1 when theres literally no information other than statistical speculation to solve based on.

We have no evidence to even correlate if people are lying even if they did willingly give up information.

Its literally just text walls.

Pretty reasonable, though NAI, reaction to swarmingu's excessive mech focus.
[X]Vote Swarmingu

I feel like hes trying to squirm is way out of a slip in not quite seeing. Theres the vibe of 'keep speculating while i know more than you'. I also find his point of mechanics being overlooked d2 being very patronizing.

If I get satisfying answers then cool but I think this deserves formal pressure.

NGL I don't entirely follow this one but it broadly follows from earlier suspicion on swarmingu.
Battle Wands are risky in a setup with already bonkers KP levels but useful in the sense that they CAN be town KP.

Exchanges are cool because theyre essentially a 1 shot delayed roleblock but they can backfire hard if the next person in the chain grabs something inconvenient.

Telehat is like a last resort cop pick because the amount of possessed people is super rng, albeit I guess its useful to clear people as not possessed as well.

Eagle Mask seems like a very safe middle pick in this setup there was a bunch of them in the bag but they arent as interesting as say a ferrymans coin. Watchers being imo one of the strongest investigatives especially in a game with this many visitors should rate it higher than usual.

Item evaluation in response to Nictis's question; I don't think I see anything AI in this (part of why I'm not a huge fan of that question).
I don't think the uniqueness of the reasoning mattered so much as the strength of it, and the hole just kept getting dug deeper from my point of view. I think a single attempt to move the subject onwards or like actually answer the primary question (what have you done to contribute being the operative one here) rather than being evasive or hostile would've been enough for me.

Justifying suspicion on swarmingu.
I'm just kinda wondering right now how town v town this really is though, the nature of having two opposing scum teams leads me to wonder if there is some scum v scum going on here. I actually don't like people posting about town v town stuff because they're glossing over that point a lot. I'm not sure how tight of a thing that people chasing tails is compared to normal.




Nictis is probably fishing for probabilities/how people would of used the later picks. It's a set of less 'interesting' items that probably are glossed over by the early picks in favor of the more big ticket flashy and powerful items.

I'm kind of uncomfortable disclosing more of my thoughts on this line as it gets very close to more uncomfortable amounts of info leaking - at least this much can be obfusciated and the trend in picks is fairly easy to reason out assuming you aren't in approximately the first 3-4 picks.

Skepticism of Byzantine's "Town v. Town" theory, plus an explanation of why Nictis's question might have been structured the way it was.
I actually mostly agree, if anyone info leaked picking those items to discuss it would've been Nictis or Myself who leaked at all anyways, and I would say both of us conciously chose that and if anything me pointing it out was probably more likely to cause the problem than Nictis asking.

This is in agreement with Nictis that my concerns about his question being leak-bait are probably overblown.
Kinda but not really.

No I'm not trying to be difficult intentionally.

In response to "are you new." No meaningful content.
What is the line you'd pick to vote somebody, because honestly I think with anything less than like 4-6 hours left the bar is pretty low on D1 for what I'd consider voting, like honestly I think I find this kinda wishy-washy which I don't think is like super scummy (yet) but that was awfully quick to back off and be defensive instead of say holding your ground and trying to dig for something.

In regard to meso being somewhat non-committal about his vote on me.
I'm gonna practice what a I preach

[X]Vote Happery

I think the interesting things in the last 24 odd hours are the Nictis post which you replied to, and Meso and Wiadi - do you think these things are interesting and if you do can you give some reasoning?

Trying to prompt activity again with directed questioning.
I'm kinda lurking in thread while chilling alone at the office, I'm keeping my vote right where it is for now for the same reason as BB.

I'm okay with an inactive lynch, I think a No Lynch should at least be considered as well, there are more than enough night actions that some information will be generated regardless and it might be worth the padding if KP starts flying around that losing a townie to a wild guess of a lynch might be sub-optimal, the only thing is it denies us some voting pattern info.

If forced to pick between Wiadi and Ondine I think I'd pick Ondine but I'm hesitant on both. Albeit Ondine's play kinda reminds me of Aetherial, I actually largely agree that her posts were to a degree twisted up and I certainly think getting heated was real but I wonder how much of the initial responses might've been played up a touch.

Wiadi's usually pretty clever though, which alone is enough that I really want to think hard over what's gone on so far, on one hand I'm usually not super hot on list reads but the point about Tykan might be worth looking into either way to see if it's got some substance or a deflection.

This one postdates my reads list & makes me somewhat more suspicious, given that inactivity votes and no-kill votes both provide Scum with cover and are normally not a great move D1 (when generating information is paramount), but OTOH this is a weird game so it's not as immediate of a red flag as it otherwise would be.
I think Nictis is fine (for now) because he's making people incredibly paranoid rather than just annoyed.
The latter causes a lot more chaos than the former and leads to more people tunneling on him for much less gain.

Two-parter effectively, arguing that Nictis provoking suspicion rather than massive fights is better for Town (and means Nictis isn't actually sus?).

Long story short, while nothing outstanding, there seems to be a decent mix of provoking and participating in useful discussions. Think I'm downgrading my overall read to null though, 'cause there's nothing that stands out as super-Towny and that recent "inactive or nobody" post isn't a great look.

@Tykan ping since you requested this.
 
Whoops, and missed the latest while constructing that. More justification for the post I found most suspicious, though @OriginalName bear in mind that a bunch of those deaths were Scum (and are likely to be in any early mass-death scenario, between deliberate and accidental crossfire with 2+ Scum factions in the mix). Still not loving it considering the value of making people commit to real reads D1.
 
Also, @Byzantine, could you explain your null read on Nictis and your interactions with them? I don't really understand getting off of a null read like you did without having a better read, because we want some wagons going if only to exert pressure.
We have enough history I know casual pressure that was literally "eh... sure." isn't something Nictis is going to take seriously in any way, so there didn't seem to be any downside to getting off while I tried to sort out everything going on.

It's much like how trying to inactivity Lynch QT is unlikely to draw more than an anemic response - they just don't take it seriously.
 
Whoops, and missed the latest while constructing that. More justification for the post I found most suspicious, though @OriginalName bear in mind that a bunch of those deaths were Scum (and are likely to be in any early mass-death scenario, between deliberate and accidental crossfire with 2+ Scum factions in the mix). Still not loving it considering the value of making people commit to real reads D1.

I think it's a fair point - and I'll note I just thought it should be DISCUSSED and wasn't necessarily something to commit to - the fact is that mass death scenarios are more likely than normal and is something that should be accounted for.
 
Thanks @Wiadi for the ping and the effort. So it wasn't just me.

Honestly I don't really like any of the current lynches but I don't have the time to look for another one.
Happerry is kinda an inactivity push, I don't follow the ondine case and Nictis is playing his usual self. Although it feels a bit more chaotic and less productive than usual. So today I'm going with that case.
No Lynch isn't really an option when there are people who are already absent and have voted if I understand that correctly.

[X] vote Nictis

@Nictis, you got another vote.

Next day I want to see more from several people. For example @Hutchmang, only a single post per day gets you voted really quick. Twisted Mind is probably out tonight.
 
What I'm getting right now is essentially everyone reads everyone else as null except me and the zero poster. The zero poster because obvious reasons and me because I don't have a consistent view on mech across two very different games and also that I got annoyed when I was being scum read for this crime?

I just want to be clear on this for when you misvote me in a few hours because ohhh no no one else has done annnnything at all. That ondine should go.

I'm going to put my vote on Wiadi for two reasons. First, the post I tagged before. It felt like a slip. Second , this iso of Ori is .. well first off he went in saying Ori was towny but can't seem to point out a single towny thing. Mostly he just describes the posts. What little color commentary there is is very wishy washy except for not liking a recent post and it all comes out to a big nothing. Which I suppose happens. But he's also somehow null on meso after arguing with him for an entire day? And he's side eyeing Nictis a little so he asks meso who he was just arguing with for his view on Nictis and that's also a big fat... Null.

Opinions are good for town. Making people make choices is good for town. This wishy washy I have no reads on anyone even after you do a full ISO of someone or argue with them for two days seems just wild to me. It seems fake. And here's why: scum want to keep themselves alive and fuck everyone else right? So they're willing to kill anyone that isn't their team and it's a lot easier to leave their options open and not commit to any reads they have to backtrack on because then they have to come up with a reasoning that makes sense and it's oh now my scum team needs that person dead. So letting people coast by on this oh all my reads are null or mm I guess a tiny scum read on Nictis who everyone always scum reads and who hasn't actually been scummy this game.. is bull and a very bad game strategy.

Gth I scum lean on Wiadi, Ori, Meso, Rosen, hail, Scia.

Town lean on BB, Nictis, Shadell, Byz. I go back and forth on Tykan. --These people are the ones who seem to be doing something and not just spinning their wheels. They're trying.

Haven't seen enough of Cyri, Happ, et al others

This isnt perfect. And I don't have a huge lean on anyone, but we must start somewhere. And I'm between Ori and Wiadi. And I think Wiadi is worse.

[X] vote Wiadi.
 
Work was tiring, marshmallow oreos are surprisingly good, and I need to get cleaned up. Gonna catch up on the thread and then go do that.
I don't really like most of @Nictis contributions right now. Trying to get some of the less actives to actually participate seems pro-town but also low effor to me, and a lot of their earlier stuff just felt chaotic, which I don't think helps us. I'm going to wait on Nictis actually explaining what they got out of the four items question to switch, because I think if that discussion was actually doing good work that would effect my read quite a bit right now.
To make sure I'm understanding this, the stuff you recognize and consider pro-town is suspicious because it's low effort (Meanwhile we have a variety of people who aren't making the effort to post at all) and the stuff you don't understand but recognize as more effort you don't like unless if I explain it now? I can explain it, just wanted to get confirmation that I'm reading that right.
Happerry is kinda an inactivity push, I don't follow the ondine case and Nictis is playing his usual self. Although it feels a bit more chaotic and less productive than usual. So today I'm going with that case.
Oh? How so?
Gth I scum lean on Wiadi, Ori, Meso, Rosen, hail, Scia.
Sorry, I don't get the term. Gth?

Gonna go get cleaned up now, will take my drink when I get back.
 
Sorry, I don't get the term. Gth?

Gonna go get cleaned up now, will take my drink when I get back.
Gun to my head. Aka if I have to choose. MU language is creeping into my phraseology

Also marshmallow Oreos sound amazing.
 
Oh, right. One other thing that I'd like to know.

@ComiTurtle Is it okay to ask who the other person getting replaced is?
 
Second , this iso of Ori is .. well first off he went in saying Ori was towny but can't seem to point out a single towny thing. Mostly he just describes the posts. What little color commentary there is is very wishy washy except for not liking a recent post and it all comes out to a big nothing. Which I suppose happens. But he's also somehow null on meso after arguing with him for an entire day? And he's side eyeing Nictis a little so he asks meso who he was just arguing with for his view on Nictis and that's also a big fat... Null.

I take exception to a number of things about this post but starting with some simple factual clarifications as my time is limited ATM.

Re: Ori, towny things I did specifically point out include several attempts to drive discussion in productive directions, e.g. asking hail to chime in on the mech discussion discussion (not a typo). Asking specific people to give views on specific subjects is, in my experience, a good way to provoke conversation. The problem is that there's also kinda scummy stuff (mostly that one post) so on net the read is pretty null. I don't know how else you want me to characterize "this person has done both scummy and towny stuff, but nothing conclusive either way."

Re: null on meso, the issue is that I'm increasingly convinced that said prolonged argument was basically just both of us unproductively tunneling in on each other; I specifically asked for his view on Nictis because I was concerned that said tunneling might have been deliberately exacerbated, so the perspective of the other individual involved would be relevant. I also don't see how meso's subsequent null read on Nictis is my responsibility.

Re: general having of reads, while I do admittedly have a bunch of nulls, I also have several Town leans and a couple Scum leans - note, e.g., my present vote on Tykan. I'm not sure why you're presenting my suspicion of Nictis as my only Scum read when it isn't even my strongest.
 
To make sure I'm understanding this, the stuff you recognize and consider pro-town is suspicious because it's low effort (Meanwhile we have a variety of people who aren't making the effort to post at all) and the stuff you don't understand but recognize as more effort you don't like unless if I explain it now? I can explain it, just wanted to get confirmation that I'm reading that right.

No. I recognize getting inactives to participate as pro-town, I'm saying I think it's weakly pro-town and it doesn't balance out the rest of your behavior, which is looking anti-town to me, since it's chaotic and I don't think chaos helps town. I am not saying all of your behavior is suspicious, just that on the net your behavior seems more scummy than towny.

The four items question I don't recognize as more effort right now. Right now it looks to me like you could have just picked four of the lower value items at random and then used them to try to start unproductive discussion and waste our time. It's just also plausible to me though that this question was tailored in more detail than that, and that other people's answers gave you some information on them. I'm asking you so that if you are town you can help me see what that question did for you and town.
 
A question to the veterans , how do the two opposite scum teams shape turn game compared to mafia ? Lol is after all lower here but we also have much more nightkills happening.
So how likely is it that fiends try to kill demons via lynching (as the demons it seems are more likely to do more kills at night by my reading of the powerset with the strong arms)
And how does the scum on scum int3raction influences the metric about lynching there?
 
Back
Top