If Mom wasn't here there might be a slight chance. She is so there isn't. Hunter is an antipersonnel fighter. Jade requires anti-ship levels of damage to hurt. Also I think the highest damage weapons in XCOM are plasma which Jade is immune to.
Uh...not necessarily. The Chosen may very well have been buffed. The Hunter wasn't using lasers in the original games, but magnetic weaponry. So assuming he's still restricted to antipersonnel combat seems like a bit of a reach.
Unless XCOM has been secretly feeding entire universes to Cthulhu in exchange for assistance against the Ethereals, there's no possible comparison between them. Is it about the torture and dissection? Because the Ethereals do worse on a nigh-continuous basis. Is it the use of violence? The Ethereals butcher entire civilizations and convert the civilians into expendable drones.
Vivisection is a bigger issue than dissection. Also, it should be noted that Vahlen was never actively malicious, but rather trying to understand the best method of extracting information from the aliens, disregarding any pain they experienced. The Skulljack was similar in that respect: practical, not an attempt at payback or torture in the normal sense. I think the mentality behind the actions is rather important, because it's indicative of how easily that person might reintegrate into a civilized society.
I'll also note that the Skirmishers, the ones who have actually been controlled by the aliens, but found a way out, see killing their enslaved former comrades as a mercy. Just saying.
XCOM... does not commit evil that is smaller than ADVENT's evil as much as it has less power. XCOM gleefully tortures and murders whatever it can get its hands on just like the ethereals do. Its prisoners are just as guaranteed to die and they die just as hideously. Given the power to do so, XCOM would gleefully do to the Ethereals and their clients everything that the Ethereals did. XCOM is smaller and that is the sole reason it gets even slightly different treatment, the same way we dealt with that drunk idiot on Chara differently than we dealt with Calypso. Ultimately, though, XCOM needs to burn just as much as ADVENT does.
Citation f*cking needed. Mostly for the "gleeful" part. Where in the world are you getting this from? Oh, wait, Jade's indecision on who to support. Mate, Jade is not the best judge of this sort of thing, nor is she omniscient. Let's actually make our judgements once we meet XCOM and see what they're doing, shall we?
I don't think being tortured gives anyone the right to tortured their abusers, that's basally an eye for an eye we're all horrible people. Besides, didn't the original XCOM do the whole torture and extermination on prisoners thing before ADVENT was a thing
Yes, because the prisoners didn't speak any human languages. They were space aliens. To get any information out of them, they needed a method to get information directly from their brains. This was before they had access to psionics. The head of their science division came up with a method to do so, with no regard for the subject's pain. No malice, no joy in torturing them, just practicality and dispassion. It involved practices one might call torture, but pain wasn't really the purpose, efficient extraction of information was. That makes Vahlen and XCOM amoral. That doesn't necessarily mean they're a menace to society at large, which is the only reason I can personally support to want to "burn them to the ground".
Now, whether or not this stilll holds true, I don't know. We'll have to see. That said, I very strongly disagree with the idea that anyone who has ever been a party to any sort of wrongdoing, including torture or war crimes, is by default evil, or incapable of setting such practices aside when they are no longer in a life-or-death or wartime situation. Because it's just plain
wrong, based on historical precedent. Whether or not XCOM are irredeemable monsters is a judgement to make after actually meeting the people involved and learning their reasons and how frequently these means are resorted to, and how they feel about "having" to use them. Just seeing their actions doesn't tell you jack-sh*t about their mind-set.