"Sandy base"? Letmebefree is somebody that is an absolute wild card at best, and has used PRs incredibly suboptimally in the past, and I believe freely admits to this. I'm inclined to just lynch them straight out, but at the very least that fact warrants an early wagon and is better than any of the earlier candidates.
Even if you don't believe me or don't think this is a solid base for a wagon, an early wagon is a good way to give the game some momentum and overall get reactions. It's a nulltell at absolute best.
I'm confused as to why you didn't change your vote to Riki after you realized he started the wagon, and I don't even get why the wagon is suspicious to begin with. The only arguments you've provided is that it's weak on evidence (We're on Page 4. The game started a page ago. I'm not sure what you want?). In terms of Riki starting the wagon on letmebefree with zero reasoning, not only has LMBF not posted yet, but Riki's post was the 4th post since the game start. What evidence was there to analyze? Terra and I random voted. That is totally it.
Also I find it odd that you vote, out of the three of us, the player that actually provided reasoning for their vote, when your argument is about the lack of reasoning. That's just kind of weird.
Honestly I'm fine with Nictis at the moment, though I want to see more from him later, but I'm looking really askance at you right now, because this feels a lot like defending letmebefree from a wagon (and attempting to derail it) with incredibly strained reasoning, and I'm very unclear of exactly what the motivation is there.
What's the motivation?
Discussion and a lack of sleep.
Lack of sleep is an excuse however and an excuse shows a weak argument.
So discussion
Maybe I was unclear in my words (scrap that I was definitely unclear)
But I wanted, above all, more discussion.
Why did I not change to Riki?
No deep reason, just did not cross my mind.
This is, again, a weak argument from me.
...ergh? I mostly vote on someone based on what they say. Your right the fact they said nothing is weird to me but NollteBoy just attracted more attention to me.
I did not think about the use of bandwagoning, my vault there.
As Riki has said, I had no clue that LMBF has been a loose cannon in the past.
I don't know the past of most players, to be honest. This is my second mafia game on a forum.
Ehh, I think Lizard Knight is just wanting to go straight to arguing as much as possible which is useful just in case someone slips up. Not being aware of LMBF being a loose cannon is fine, and questioning wagons and stuff is fairly towny, or neutral. Also, if one has to defend a lynch vote then that can be used for later reasoning.
A good thing about this set up, is that I don't think there is gonna be a cult. Unless it's waluigi versus luigi or something
(and don't say That's What A Cult Would Say!)
No clue what a cult is, would you (or someone else) kindly inform me?
I am mostly asking questions. I think discussion is important, it gives us more info.
We are on page 4 but more discussion is more information.
Maybe it is my inexperience but I do not see how bandwagoning gives us more information.
...but your right it does get the ball rolling and this is page 4.
But let's try to discuss more now the ball is rolling, as it is off more use in the long run.
That is my logic atleast, but it might be flawed.
Although I am curious Riki, why Lynch LMBF? Their wild card history or?