- Location
- Australia
I would prefer it Year 1. The sooner the Eldar get the information, the more likely they are to be able to stop Vect's deal. Fighting Chaos is not something you compromise on for convenience's sake.
I would prefer it Year 1. The sooner the Eldar get the information, the more likely they are to be able to stop Vect's deal. Fighting Chaos is not something you compromise on for convenience's sake.
You do realise that they almost certainly know, Vect is like one of their most hated enemies and they have a God Transcendent Seer. And given Vect's defences even if we told probably worth jack shit, unless of course you want one of the three best powers who are trying to stop the galaxy dying to waste all their time and vast amounts of resources on an fruitless attempt to kill someone who can just finish his deal earlier resulting in a better result for Slaanesh.I would prefer it Year 1. The sooner the Eldar get the information, the more likely they are to be able to stop Vect's deal. Fighting Chaos is not something you compromise on for convenience's sake.
This isn't something we should make any assumptions about nor take any potential risks because of mere politics, especially when our motives are as clear cut and pure as "we don't want Chaos to get a massive power up". Please stop arguing against fighting Chaos just because it'll be inconvenient and possibly redundant. That is a very bad attitude to take when it comes to Chaos.You do realise that they almost certainly know, Vect is like one of their most hated enemies and they have a God Transcendent Seer. And given Vect's defences even if we told probably worth jack shit.
So yeah, not worth it if it looses us influence to be spent in the actual meeting.
No in this case I will argue against it, barring a full scale assault on him there seems to be no way to interrupt the contract which would simply make him give Slaanesh a better deal so its actively detrimental, and I refuse to believe the faction with the best Seers in the galaxy, with a God supporting their seeing and a Transcendent Seer Daemon thing don't already know about the biggest thing their mortal enemy is doing.This isn't something we should make any assumptions about nor take any potential risks because of mere politics, especially when our motives are as clear cut and pure as "we don't want Chaos to get a massive power up". Please stop arguing against fighting Chaos just because it'll be inconvenient and possibly redundant. That is a very bad attitude to take when it comes to Chaos.
1. Yes[X] Compromise Plan
You do realise that they almost certainly know, Vect is like one of their most hated enemies and they have a God Transcendent Seer. And given Vect's defences even if we told probably worth jack shit, unless of course you want one of the three best powers who are trying to stop the galaxy dying to waste all their time and vast amounts of resources on an fruitless attempt to kill someone who can just finish his deal earlier resulting in a better result for Slaanesh.
So yeah, not worth it if it looses us influence to be spent in the actual meeting.
@Durin
1. Is the high council less likely to be pissed if we just tell the Eldar about Vect and the Destroyer rather than initiate any proper talks?
1. YesHm, on the one hand, Chaos can go jump off a cliff, on the other hand, we're kind of already seen as the guy who will do anything to accomplish our goals, and this feeds into that perception. Then again, that would mitigate the rep hit. I'm conflicted.
@Durin
1. Would it be a major rep hit to do the Eldar action without asking the Council first?
Right never mind then @ilbar123 get that Eldar contact back to year 1 ASAP
Why!? Your reason for not fighting Chaos is that we'll take a rep hit! Why do you want us to take a rep hit with the Eldar now for something that does not involve fighting Chaos!? Eldar webway stuff should only happen after we ask the High Council first.Right never mind then @ilbar123 get that Eldar contact back to year 1 ASAP
Never mind, I miss read it sorry.Why!? Your reason for not fighting Chaos is that we'll take a rep hit! Why do you want us to take a rep hit with the Eldar now for something that does not involve fighting Chaos!? Eldar webway stuff should only happen after we ask the High Council first.
-Y1: Sound Out (Eldar Diplomacy - talk with the Eldar through Ridcully, ask what they might want in exchange for limited webway access so we can talk with and possibly trade with other major human polities in the galaxy)
Its a sound out not a do the action.Didnt notice this before, removed my vote, dead set against pissing off the council for no reason, we can do this action after getting permission at the council meeting
[X] Compromise Plan
Despite prices being lowered I can see the trust using up more EM and AM so my concern is that supply available will be lowered as well. Holding off on expanding the Helguard until after we can properly asses how much EM we can actually trade for is key.
@Durin, can you confirm that EM and AM prices are still going to be lowered, and that we should be able to fund the Helguard upkeep with what we can trade for?
18 years is a long time. During that time it would be possible to spend 8 years each on the gunships, bombers, and shuttles if we use multiple slots, all of which would be useful in war.Also, I'm going to remind people that Turoq are going to try to attack us in some way. That means another war at some point in the future. You know what's useful for that? MORE HELGAURD. The expansion takes eighteen years. Delaying it may mean that those elite troops aren't fully available for the next war.