Do you? Did you actually look at the ship in question?
The Des Plaines class was a wooden paddle steamer. A 170 feet, 420 ton paddle steamer.

We were building paddle steamers at the start of the 19th century, before the American Civil War broke out.
The US built the first such warship at the end of the War of 1812.
Building a steam power plant for a 420 ton wooden vessel is not heavy industry.

And its not because they didnt know how to do better; coal-powered propeller ships date back to 1838 with the SS Archimedes.
We have homebuilt aircraft.
But they had to worry about the availability of fuel, and about drawing Vic attention.
Sorry, minor correction, if we're treating the fanart of the Des Plaines Class as canon, then the Des Plaines class is definitely not a paddle steamer. There are screws at the stern.

As for what it's made of, Poptart seems to be leaning towards metal.
"Looking at the linked image, sure appears to be metal."
discord.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

But hey, maybe they just painted the ships grey. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
So are we going to see the timescale speed up after beating Victoria? Because from what the OP is saying we are a garbage pile of nation that's going to need a few decades to anything besides piss off Japan.
 
Firstly, Map for reference:
Man, thanks for reminding me of the Farmer Federation of Dakota. I love that masterpiece I wrote up when we were filling out the map. Admittedly, it's also a complete horror show which should be either currently in the process of fracturing or actively at war with themselves, but hey! Who says you can't love something where this:
Broad Objectives: Fix the everything that is the horror of mistakes that is their nation. Join the CFC as they look to be a true inheritor of the USA. Ensure that the USA never rises again. Stay independent. Ensure that their 'nation' dissolves. Anything else that more than eleven Clan Heads can agree on.
Is what the goals of the nation officially are! And a reminder that the mention of 'Anything else more than eleven Clan Heads can agree on'? Is 11 out of 312.
 
Last edited:
I hope we can get extra clay with canadians and mexicans

USA 2.0

Bigger and better

Given the choices we made during the Revivalist Conference, I'd be amazed if we aren't aiming for the end goal of a single continental power.

In universe, there might be something to the idea that, after breaking Victoria's nose and then kicking them in the kidney's multiple times, the culture in the CFC political class might be a wee bit over confident in their goals for the short term.
 
So regarding Victoria, I think we should aim for a series of wars of attrition wherein we constantly deny them any victories and steadily deplete their resources and labor pool.
 
Progress Update from the Discord!
PoptartProdigy said:
All right. Progress today:
  • Well over 50% complete with the update.
  • Opening interlude complete.
  • Build Rail action written.
  • The Works action written.
At this point I only need to write up Long Tail, Trouble In Minnesota, Retraining Campaigns, and the School Survey.
Plus the conclusion.
 
Last edited:
So regarding Victoria, I think we should aim for a series of wars of attrition wherein we constantly deny them any victories and steadily deplete their resources and labor pool.

Ideally I think we aught to aim for this war to be the knock out blow for Victoria, even if it's not the last one period. That's an ideal world though.

If it comes down that we simply aren't in a position to completely knock out or take annex Victoria, I figure we have two major goals beyond making the Victorians "not a problem anymore"


The first would be linking up with FCNY and taking the pressure off of them by pushing the Victorian border away from the city. They'll be much better allies once they don't have the Sword of Damocles over their heads.

The Second would be taking control of the St. Lawrence. As was mentioned in the discord, we could attract plenty of foreign investment in the long term due to our competitive wages and strong trade position in the interior. The major problem of course being that everyone knows there will be another war, and the moment (and maybe even before) it pops off, we will once again be completely cut off from the global market.
The Mississippi gives some wiggle room on the St. Lawrence, but I still reckon the lake route is more reliable once we have it locked off from Victoria.
 
Ideally I think we aught to aim for this war to be the knock out blow for Victoria, even if it's not the last one period. That's an ideal world though.

If it comes down that we simply aren't in a position to completely knock out or take annex Victoria, I figure we have two major goals beyond making the Victorians "not a problem anymore"


The first would be linking up with FCNY and taking the pressure off of them by pushing the Victorian border away from the city. They'll be much better allies once they don't have the Sword of Damocles over their heads.

The Second would be taking control of the St. Lawrence. As was mentioned in the discord, we could attract plenty of foreign investment in the long term due to our competitive wages and strong trade position in the interior. The major problem of course being that everyone knows there will be another war, and the moment (and maybe even before) it pops off, we will once again be completely cut off from the global market.
The Mississippi gives some wiggle room on the St. Lawrence, but I still reckon the lake route is more reliable once we have it locked off from Victoria.
While A big decisive war would be all well and good, I'd rather dig in for the long term, and soften them up first.
 
While A big decisive war would be all well and good, I'd rather dig in for the long term, and soften them up first.
Arguably time favors the Victorians, they're better positioned to receive foreign aid from their Russian masters and the more time they have the more they can implement army reforms better suited to countering the CFC. A grinding war would also give them combat experience against their primary foe.

All in all drawing it out does not seem like a great idea.
 
Arguably time favors the Victorians, they're better positioned to receive foreign aid from their Russian masters and the more time they have the more they can implement army reforms better suited to countering the CFC. A grinding war would also give them combat experience against their primary foe.

All in all drawing it out does not seem like a great idea.
there's a chance the russians might give up on Victoria if the costs are high enough for too little gain. They're likely to have other conflicts to worry about, after all.

In the end both us and Victoria will rely a LOT on external help, in particular for high tech equipment we can't produce on our own. So it will depend a lot on basically how much support we can find for ourselves, and if we can keep it for longer than Victoria.
 
there's a chance the russians might give up on Victoria if the costs are high enough for too little gain. They're likely to have other conflicts to worry about, after all.

In the end both us and Victoria will rely a LOT on external help, in particular for high tech equipment we can't produce on our own. So it will depend a lot on basically how much support we can find for ourselves, and if we can keep it for longer than Victoria.
Potentially but it's not exactly something we can count on. The current Emperor is, from little we know, a highly aggressive egoist who seeks to prove himself. Additionally on the day of his coronation he stated Russia's commitment to it's foreign allies and to remind the world that it is the foremost power on the planet.
When asked about his immediate objectives, Tsar Nikolai said, "Russia is strong, but beset by enemies. Under my leadership, we will reassert ourselves as the foremost power in all the world. We will re-commit to our allies abroad. We will strengthen our position on the world stage. We will lead the world forward as first among nations."
While he can back down and cut Victoria off doing so would be a major loss of face to both him and his government. We have to assume he's gonna commit. At least longer than we'd prefer him to do so.
 
Last edited:
One thing I have to give to @Ikacprzak is that, while the equipment, doctrine and training of the Victorian army will have improved compared to the Erie war, and we can't take for granted that Russian assistance won't get more dangerous as time goes on, one thing that will almost certainly be worse for the Vickies is manpower.

They bled hard on the outskirts of Detroit. Then they got hit with the triple threat of a significant famine, a pretty brutal civil war, and the fact that a not insignificant portion of their population now lives in the CFC. Given that the average Vicky is a subsistence farmer and they simply won't have as many young men to throw at us next time.

Meanwhile we have so many people flocking to our borders that it can be a legitimate problem at times. Their population is almost certainly smaller than it was before the war, yet the population we can draw from has only grown. Simply having a wider pool of bodies to draw from when the drums of war start up is a legitimate advantage that will only grow with time. We can either afford to be pickier with our recruits, or just enjoy the numerical advantage (assuming we can pay for it).
 
Last edited:
So regarding this, the way I see it, a series of futile wars forces Russia to expend resources propping up Victoria or risk losing control of the U.S.. People also forget Victoria is an ethnostate where only white men are allowed to amount to anything, this means while we have a steady stream of refugess we can make the most of, enough war would force Victoria to make hard decisions about how to replace their losses if it means opening up jobs to woman and POC, and risk societal instability.
 
One thing I have to give to @Ikacprzak is that, while the equipment, doctrine and training of the Victorian army will have improved compared to the Erie war, and we can't take for granted that Russian assistance won't get more dangerous as time goes on, one thing that will almost certainly be worse for the Vickies is manpower.

They bled hard on the outskirts of Detroit. Then they got hit with the triple threat of a significant famine, a pretty brutal civil war, and the fact that a not insignificant portion of their population now lives in the CFC. Given that the average Vicky is a subsistence farmer and they simply won't have as many young men to throw at us next time.

Meanwhile we have so many people flocking to our borders that it can be a legitimate problem at times. Their population is almost certainly smaller than it was before the war, yet the population we can draw from has only grown. Simply having a wider pool of bodies to draw from when the drums of war start up is a legitimate advantage that will only grow with time. We can either afford to be pickier with our recruits, or just enjoy the numerical advantage (assuming we can pay for it).
Might be good to make a few divisions or whatever size that are equipped manly for defensive battles then if we have so many people?
 
Might be good to make a few divisions or whatever size that are equipped manly for defensive battles then if we have so many people?


Its a good idea, specializing our units could be a way to stretch the arms budget a bit farther than we otherwise could. A unit dedicated to holding down the home front probably doesn't need a large armored force. Just don't know how that would work mechanically or how Poptart is gonna handle re-armament.

Hell, having something like a light infantry division with organic riverine transport as a rapid response force for any problems on the Mississippi might go a long way towards securing our interests in that direction. Of course that would also mean spending money on something not meant to fight Victoria, so there is that drawback.


So regarding this, the way I see it, a series of futile wars forces Russia to expend resources propping up Victoria or risk losing control of the U.S.. People also forget Victoria is an ethnostate where only white men are allowed to amount to anything, this means while we have a steady stream of refugess we can make the most of, enough war would force Victoria to make hard decisions about how to replace their losses if it means opening up jobs to woman and POC, and risk societal instability.

I guess I'm not seeing the benefit of this over going for the knockout blow. Do you expect a finishing blow during the next war to be impossible? I suppose if that's the case fighting an attritional conflict does make a lot of sense. The benefits of draining Russian resources would be nice, but it would be a heavy cost to us. However, that's a pretty grim aim to have when, at least IMO, we have a good chance at making this one decisive.

Guess we'll see how the preparations fall out, it's not like our war plan is set in stone yet.
 
Its a good idea, specializing our units could be a way to stretch the arms budget a bit farther than we otherwise could. A unit dedicated to holding down the home front probably doesn't need a large armored force. Just don't know how that would work mechanically or how Poptart is gonna handle re-armament.

Hell, having something like a light infantry division with organic riverine transport as a rapid response force for any problems on the Mississippi might go a long way towards securing our interests in that direction. Of course that would also mean spending money on something not meant to fight Victoria, so there is that drawback.
Given how vital the Mississippi corridor will be for us, it's kind of necessary to have a significant ability to project power up and down the river and its main tributaries.

I would caution against overspecializing "defensive" units. Many of the things a modern army needs to defend and to attack are quite similar. And while the obvious thing to sacrifice is mobility, in practice it can be a bad idea to make that trade. For instance, towed artillery is cheaper than self-propelled artillery and one might imagine that a 'defensive' force doesn't need to be able to relocate its big guns that fast... but on a modern battlefield towed artillery is a sitting duck for enemy counterbattery fire.
 
Sorry, minor correction, if we're treating the fanart of the Des Plaines Class as canon, then the Des Plaines class is definitely not a paddle steamer. There are screws at the stern.

As for what it's made of, Poptart seems to be leaning towards metal.
"Looking at the linked image, sure appears to be metal."
discord.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

But hey, maybe they just painted the ships grey. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Sorry this is late.

Anyway, its been a while since 2019.
But my distinct recollection was that the Des Plaines was supposed to be both wood-hulled and with paddle steamer propulsion. Cant recall the exact quote though.


So regarding Victoria, I think we should aim for a series of wars of attrition wherein we constantly deny them any victories and steadily deplete their resources and labor pool.
That was kinda the plan before the hiatus. We were never going to be able to collapse them in a short victorious war, so manageable bites are going to be necessary, which is how they took over that space.
We are looking at two more wars. Possibly three more wars.


Ideally I think we aught to aim for this war to be the knock out blow for Victoria, even if it's not the last one period. That's an ideal world though. If it comes down that we simply aren't in a position to completely knock out or take annex Victoria, I figure we have two major goals beyond making the Victorians "not a problem anymore"
Not gonna happen. And thats a good thing.

Look at the map. Victoria occupies the space of the former US states of MA, CT, RI, VT,NH and the Canadian provinces of New Brunswick, Labrador, Nova Scotia, King Edwards Island, Newfoundland and Nova Scotia.And thats in addition to most of New York and most of lower coastal Quebec.

It has what looks like, eyeballing it, more than a million square kilometers of surface area, even if most of it is relatively concentrated, and some of us estimated between 20 and 30 million people before the civil war.
Maybe even 40 million at the high end. Lotta territory, potentially a ton of people.

For comparison, 2003 Iraq was 27 million people.

We do not currently have the military capacity to occupy a nation the size of Victoria. We certainly dont have the economic muscle to do so. That was in part why we turned back after Buffalo. Give us a decade, some friends and an accelerated diet of refugees and other successor states and we can begin to make it happen. But we are not there yet.

And if it happened now, we wouldnt have the capacity to prevent shenanigans going on.
Especially with other Russian bases in North America in the Arctic and Alaska.


Arguably time favors the Victorians, they're better positioned to receive foreign aid from their Russian masters and the more time they have the more they can implement army reforms better suited to countering the CFC. A grinding war would also give them combat experience against their primary foe.

All in all drawing it out does not seem like a great idea.
No it doesnt.
Victoria is currently at its best position relative to the rest of the continent, believe it or not. Things are likely to worsen strategically over the next decade. Especially with regards to relative return for investment.

Its fought a vicious civil war, and suffered hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of casualties, at least one major crop failure + famine, refugee exodus, significant infrastructure damage and essentially doesnt have a professional military anymore.
And its still run by an administration of fascist true believers and cynical satraps all beholden to Imperial Russia.

But all that does not detract from its current strengths.


It has a nationwide road, rail, air and telecomms network. It has local power generation capacity in excess of 40 gigawatts from Quebec Hydro, Niagara Hydro, Fundy Bay Tidal and Russian nuke stations. It has access to reliable levels of refined fuel for vehicles. Its population received a reliable level of basic education, and it has significant numbers of doctors and nurses.

It has sufficient light industry to build and maintain notCessnas locally, in addition to light armaments and pharmaceuticals.
It had enough domestic heavy industry to build and maintain steam trains and WW2-era tanks. It has sea ports and airports capable of accessing and handling foreign trade, and it actually earns foreign exchange.

Its significantly ahead of everywhere else on the continent not named FCNY, NCR or the Arctic Conservatiate.


But both FCNY and NCR started far enough ahead economically and demographically that once Victoria was distracted for a couple years, they'd both surge out of sight. And Victoria has to retrench and try to readjust to the civil war and the new normal.

By the time Victoria comes out of their repair and rearm cycle, both nations are going to have consolidated their positions enough that trying to dig them out is going to be...difficult at the best of times.
Meantime, Victoria would have to fight its way through Chicago to even get to Sister Cali.


Chicago plus the rest of North America are starting at so low a base that even marginal investments will result in major jumps in effectiveness. Chicagoland has likely been in double digit economic growth since we ended the famine, and Im reasonably sure Detroitland has been the same way since the war ended.

Thats turbocharged by the nationwide power network that was installed by the green power people into the Commonwealth a couple turns ago, and is likely to get further fevered once we hook up Lifeline of the West or the Mississippi and enable reliable foreign shipping with longterm expectations.

Together, they are going to drag the rest of the Midwest with them, and reshape the econonomy of the Great Lakes around them in a way that ignores Victoria, decreasing their economic and political clout and bulking the Commonwealth.
Victoria is going to improve, but it will find its neighbors a lot closer to it in capabilities than it was accustomed to.


Plus, most of the rest of North America, and especially the Commonwealth, does not share most of Victoria's ideological hangups about things like the official role of women in the workforce, or the proper relationship of the races.
So they are going to be suffering self-inflicted maluses to recovery and development.

Which they will need that Russian aid to help with, at a time that Imperial Russia has to prioritize between threats.
And there are much closer threats to the borders of the Motherland.
 
Last edited:
Given how vital the Mississippi corridor will be for us, it's kind of necessary to have a significant ability to project power up and down the river and its main tributaries.

I would caution against overspecializing "defensive" units. Many of the things a modern army needs to defend and to attack are quite similar. And while the obvious thing to sacrifice is mobility, in practice it can be a bad idea to make that trade. For instance, towed artillery is cheaper than self-propelled artillery and one might imagine that a 'defensive' force doesn't need to be able to relocate its big guns that fast... but on a modern battlefield towed artillery is a sitting duck for enemy counterbattery fire.
Shouldn't cut out there ability to move yes but necessary need everything a full offensive army needs, hell could use this as the chance to remake the national guard?
 
Shouldn't cut out there ability to move yes but necessary need everything a full offensive army needs, hell could use this as the chance to remake the national guard?
Again, the trouble is figuring out which capabilities an "offensive army" needs and a "defensive army" doesn't. Remember, modern warfare often involves a lot of mobility and counterattack, even on the defensive. Holding a purely static line without attempts to push the enemy back and throw them off balance often results in casualties.
 
Back
Top