Thank you!
I'm not sure how much I agree with this ruling, as it would imply that the maintenance costs for all our equipment is much, much, much lower than the industry standard, since we'd naturally use low-maintenance arc reactors (and for that matter any other super-low-maintenance tech, like hyper-modularity) everywhere in favor of higher-cost power delivery that everyone else uses.
Well hypermodularity just became a thing so non-factor right now. It's relevance and net effect are some thing I'm open to thoughts on on the building level. On one hand it makes maintenance and repairs easier, on the other it makes parts cost more. For factories I imagine that parts need to be replaced often and the issue is buying the new parts not the difficulty of replacing them esp as replacement would be made easier as replacements need to be done often. "People" Buildings I don't really see it as a major contributor. Other stuff? IDK. Like I said I'm not sure.
As for arc-reactors? Power is already cheap. Modern prices are ~5-20 cents per kWh in US land. Industrial cost tend toward 6.67 cents or says the US's EIA. Fusion should have vastly devalued that. Consider that your looking at a technological jump of possibly centuries. (Though considering the state of fusion tech development it may take a century or two to get the stuff working
You can debate if you will the use percentage of the power plant arc-reactor and thus the credits per kWh price. Frankly I'm not 100% sure about that myself.
The thing is, we seem to have standardized all our buildings and equipment on 20% of the build cost per year in maintenance, which is kind of high but reasonable if you assume wages are much higher than the lowest-common-denominator prices we've been seeing lately.
I didn't pick the number! On the other hand I've been considering switching to 20% per year for high use/wear buildings (factories, labs) and 10% for lower use.
That can't possibly square with the idea that most industries pay a lot more than we do on maintenance; either we're paying too much for our own maintenance, or our tech products have to have higher maintenance costs.
Actually you pay more then most industries on maintenance on a per building basis as far as I can tell you run generalist factories and have magic labs. Maintenance on other stuff IDK.
If you think about it for a second, even if our Arc Reactors don't cost that much to maintain, we'd have to charge a similar amount for a maintenance contract just to keep the corporate buyers happy. Middle and upper managers can't trust and don't place value on things that they get for free: they need a maintenance contract so they'll have a clear chain of command (and a 24/7 support line to call, with different tiers of response) in case there's a problem that needs an immediate response. PI invented the Arc Reactor, and PI built the Arc Reactor; a large corporation is going to require PI be the one to maintain the Arc Reactor, and require PI to take responsibility for and fix any problems that arise, because having anyone else take the maintenance contract will just mean that there's three different entities responsible for that Arc Reactor, and anyone with any experience in management knows that if three people are responsible for something, then nobody is.
This is a reasonable point. Though I would point out that PI certified maintenance personnel would work too. Basically as long as PI will still respect the warranty/care/maintenance deal. I'm not sure about the need to charge a similar amount. Similar to what fusion core costs?* As long a PI offers a guarantee that the management can trust that PI will honor they'll be happy. The trust bit is the big deal, I'm not really sure how that balances out. You have the military basically standing behind you giving a massive thumbs up and all. I can see not trusting a it's good forever guarantee, but It needs work every five years and regular spot inspections to refresh the warranty? that seems trustworthy esp if the military is going for it. But what do I know.
*And isn't that a mess. How much would that be? Similar based on what size? initial cost? And then even in space future I can't imagine to may groups own their own powerplants. Not worth the effort. They probably buy power from a large company that does. The Arc Reactor makes owning a powerplant for each company far more reasonable and thus likely. What are they going to compare these costs to?
If PI says that the reactor needs to be inspected every... say year for mechanical issues (here's the check list*, we can have a PI inspector come by if you wish) and that the core needs to be exchanged every five years or when the core quality meter reads lest then 10% or whatever (Here's the procedure**, PI technicians are available to preform core replacements). And PI also says to maintain warranty PI certified technicians need to preform work and warranty is good for 5 year past last core replacement. Then the maintenance contract is more or less the cost of paying for the inspectors/technicians+palladium cores. Which should not really run all that much really (I think). Suggestions on how to handle this are welcome.
*
**
Arc-reactors are already BS enough as it is here have a object you can fit in you hand that provides enough power to vaporize it self several times over every second here we'll prove it! From the majority outside perspective arc-reactors are space magic. If PI says that it work in way X as far as everyone is concerned it works in way X. Anyone claiming otherwise better have some good hard data.
(Edit): Oh, and it just occurred to me: we know, OoC, that the long-term maintenance costs will be relatively low, but in-universe the tech is only ~3 years old, and nobody really knows what the long-term costs will be. What that means is that no reputable company is going to be trying to low-bid a PI Arc Reactor maintenance contract for many years, similar to how even after five years you still need to pay super-car rates for insurance on a Tesla Model S, despite the fact that it's priced as a mid-range luxury car, because for most companies the tech is so new.
I was thinking more like mechanics not insurance.