If you have them, yes.
... Arguably they're CAS focused aerospace vehicles... which... don't really have a good name yet. (technically that'd make them Bombers, though that's clearly wrong too.)
Ground attack vehicles.
... Arguably they're CAS focused aerospace vehicles... which... don't really have a good name yet. (technically that'd make them Bombers, though that's clearly wrong too.)
Well, we could always try this.The main problem i have with our current heavy relience on drones is when it comes down to it they are RC units. They can and will be hacked at some point and cause devistation in our 'lines'. With a little bit of research we could probably fit Guardian tech on smaller things (Take a Mech for example) and the drones become a near moot point when the Guardian fire is mixed with whatever weapon the unit is holding. Unless the numbers are just stupid...like it's our home base kind of situation. Yea for basic Defence and small ambushes drones are nice. But in larger scale extended and/or sudden combat anywere that's not one of our bases they become a little obsolete......were was i going with this?
Hacking does not work like that at all. Pretty much the only way to take over someone elses competentley designed miltary stuff in a combat enviroment is to have sabotaged it in advance, which is completely conventional covert ops (like in nBSG).The main problem i have with our current heavy relience on drones is when it comes down to it they are RC units. They can and will be hacked at some point and cause devistation in our 'lines'.
Don't forget that ME has canonical magic hacking beams that can be fired from omni-tools, though before you take this to mean ME is soft sci-fi I should note that reading electronics from a distance has been possible since the 1970s, and writing should mostly be a matter of creating a sufficiently dense array of EM field emitters.Hacking does not work like that at all. Pretty much the only way to take over someone elses competentley designed miltary stuff in a combat enviroment is to have sabotaged it in advance, which is completely conventional covert ops (like in nBSG).
We've scienced the shit out of mass-effect physics, we ought to be able to handwave some explanation for the hacking abilities of your average combat technician.Don't forget that ME has canonical magic hacking beams that can be fired from omni-tools, though before you take this to mean ME is soft sci-fi I should note that reading electronics from a distance has been possible since the 1970s, and writing should mostly be a matter of creating a sufficiently dense array of EM field emitters.
Use one-time encryption with petabyte-size randomized keys. That should suffice if the drones just need general directions and not micromanaging.One of the only ways i can think of to make the drones 80% safe from hackers is to have an off site server with Q.I. nodes linked to each drone and a single node linked to the 'drone commander guy' or V/AI. This massively limits the number of 'safe' drones we can use at a time and the price to build them would probably skyrocket but i guess safety from ze hakz beats cost.
Since we may get to fight with AI enemies (Reapers, Geth or both) that can process ludicrous amounts of data in an instant, I have my doubts if any amounts of encryption could work.Use one-time encryption with petabyte-size randomized keys. That should suffice if the drones just need general directions and not micromanaging.
Which is how we're underestimating them.If we knew just how fucked up they were beneath the pleasant-seeming surface... well, let's just say we'd have a drastically different opinion of them.
GM's Notes: Here have an update. It's shorter then I would have liked, but covers the key points without turning into a massive document. Will read through backlog and post second update a soon as I finish reading and see if anyone changes my mind about what in it .
One-time pads are literally unbreakable. Not just 'effectively' unbreakable, not just impractical to break, but literally, mathematically unbreakable. If you intercept a one-time encrypted message, and somebody claims to know what it says, you cannot even tell if they are right, because, for every possible message of the right length, there is a key that such that encrypting it results in the message you received.Since we may get to fight with AI enemies (Reapers, Geth or both) that can process ludicrous amounts of data in an instant, I have my doubts if any amounts of encryption could work.
So I assume that a mech like yours would be perfect in urban warfare?On mecha:
The most we might want to seriously consider is a mini-mecha design as a sort of 'heavy power armour' option. See, one of the limitations on power armour is size - you simply cannot make them more more than a certain amount larger than the man inside them. This is because of the joints; your armour's arm must bend at the same places as the human arm inside them, which means that no matter how thick the arm, the length is constrained to the same as a human. (Which in turn constrains the thickness, since you need to leave enough room around the joins to bend them.)
- Can we build mecha?
- Yes, absolutely. People have built small ones in real life (treaded rather than bipedal, but we're still working on that whole 'walking without falling down' thing).
- Can we make mecha combat-effective?
- Almost certainly. Revy is a genius, and there's more than enough super-materials and tech around already to overcome the known issues with building a combat mecha.
- Can we make combat mecha a viable warfare platform?
- No. Not outside a few very specialized fields. The problem is that basically any tech that makes them viable provides as much or more benefit if applied to a conventional platform of the same purpose (i.e. tanks for heavy ground combat, fighters for air and space combat, powered armour for light ground combat).
So, if you want to give your powered armour dudes some sort of heavy support unit that's almost as manoeuvrable as them, but capable of carrying heavier weapons and armour, one option is to take the basic powered armour design and scale it up just enough so the pilot's entire body fits into the chest, thus freeing the limbs to be scaled however you like. The result is effectively a mini-mecha - emphasis on 'mini'; one of the challenges here will be to scale it down as much as possible to avoid running into the issues that plague full-sized mecha. We have an advantage there, since the mind-machine interface tech means we don't need to leave enough room in the cockpit for the pilot to move their real limbs to control the unit by motion-capture.
One-time pads are literally unbreakable. Not just 'effectively' unbreakable, not just impractical to break, but literally, mathematically unbreakable. If you intercept a one-time encrypted message, and somebody claims to know what it says, you cannot even tell if they are right, because, for every possible message of the right length, there is a key that such that encrypting it results in the message you received.